logo
Major update in Sydney Harbour Bridge protest battle as police reveal why they're so against pro-Palestine march

Major update in Sydney Harbour Bridge protest battle as police reveal why they're so against pro-Palestine march

Daily Mail​a day ago
NSW Police have challenged plans for a pro-Palestine march across Sydney Harbour Bridge, arguing in court the rally could cause crowd crush if it goes ahead.
Up to 100,000 protesters could descend on the bridge on Sunday as part of the 'March for Humanity', the court heard.
NSW Police lodged a prohibition order in the Supreme Court against the planned rally organised by Palestine Action Group.
Authorities argued the event posed a risk to public safety due to crowd crush and could even lead to clashes and hostility from competing protests.
A previously planned counter-protest in the harbour tunnel has already been cancelled.
Pro-Israel group Never Again is Now applied for permission to hold its protest at the same time as the Palestine Action Group's rally but has since withdrawn its application.
The group wanted permission to block the harbour tunnel in recognition of the hostages held by Hamas in Gaza.
NSW Police's barrister Lachlan Gyles, SC, said violent clashes and crowd crush were highly likely if both protests were to have gone ahead.
Mr Gyles argued police could not ensure the safety of up to 100,000 protesters crossing the bridge in such a short time frame.
'This is really unprecedented … in terms of scale, level of risk, lack of time to prepare, and of course location, which is one of the main arteries in one of the largest cities in the world,' Mr Gyles told the court.
Mr Gyles told Justice Belinda Rigg the court needed to be 'concerned about being seen to condone' the rally if there were violent scenes or if ambulances were blocked from reaching patients.
He added the prohibition order was 'necessary' otherwise police would not have the powers that they would normally have to control such a massive crowd.
Court proceedings were further stalled on Friday after 100 pro-Palestine supporters packed into the courtroom and sat on the floor.
Justice Rigg said she would reserve her decision until 10am on Saturday - just one day before the rally is set to take place.
The planned march would lead protesters across the Harbour Bridge from Lang Park near Wynyard towards the US consulate in North Sydney.
It has been scheduled to begin at 1pm.
If police succeed in barring this from happening, the protest would simply be rescheduled, activists have said.
Acting Assistant Police Commissioner Adam Johnson said his concerns would not rest even if the courts allowed the march to continue.
'Fifty thousand people at Lang Park, whether authorised or unauthorised, has significant public safety risk, crowd crush,' he said under cross-examination.
'I'm personally concerned about that.'
Palestine Action Group and protest organiser Joshua Lees told the court the march was 'unstoppable'.
Mr Lees argued the group did not seek 'confrontation with police' but rather, wanted to work with authorities to ensure the success of the protest.
'We want to work with them to make this a successful event,' Mr Lees told the court.
'What we don't want to see but is a real, real possibility, which is that if we lose in the case here today.'
'If [the protest] is unauthorised, that opens up the ability for the police to use extra powers to make arrests against peaceful protesters … an outcome we absolutely do not want to see.'
Mr Lees added the rushed planning of the event was necessary to produce a maximum effect while the Israel-Gaza war was still making global headlines.
Palestine Action Group had offered to postpone the protest until August 24 - an offer Mr Lees said was still on the table and which police have yet to accept.
Any prohibition order would not prevent the protest from going forward but would make it illegal for protesters to block roads.
Barrister Felicity Graham represented the group and told the court that people turning up to protest was a foregone conclusion
Instead of trying to frivolously prevent the march, police should instead focus on trying to make it safe, she said.
'It would create a very fluid, dangerous and unstable situation if the court grants this application,' Ms Graham said.
'It's unclear exactly what would unfold, but it's clear police wish to have powers to arrest people simply for being on a road.'
Five Labor MPs have already vowed to attend the rally despite Premier Chris Minns urging them not to.
Stephen Lawrence, Anthony D'Adam, Linda Voltz, Cameron Murphy and Sarah Kaine have said they will all march across the bridge.
Other politicians including Greens and independent crossbenchers have also confirmed their attendance.
Despite gaining momentum, Acting Deputy Commissioner Peter McKenna previously told 2GB the protest was still 'stoppable'.
He also accused its organisers of sending out mixed messages to the public which has created confusion about what exactly is happening.
Justice Belinda Rigg will reveal her judgment at 10am on Saturday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘I have never been an activist': Meet the pensioners risking prison to support Palestine Action
‘I have never been an activist': Meet the pensioners risking prison to support Palestine Action

The Independent

time5 hours ago

  • The Independent

‘I have never been an activist': Meet the pensioners risking prison to support Palestine Action

In an interrogation room just after 1am, 68-year-old grandmother-of-seven Marji Mansfield was sat across from counter terrorism officers after being arrested at a pro-Palestine protest in central London. She had suffered days of poor sleep in anticipation of this eventuality. Now, an 'aggressive' man was asking her repeatedly if she sympathised with a terrorist organisation, leading her through an extensive list of questions about her politics and who she knew in Gaza. A few hours earlier, on the afternoon of 5 July, half a dozen officers had handcuffed the pensioner and hauled her off the ground and into a police van, alongside her 73-year-old husband. The couple who once described themselves as small 'c' Conservatives had travelled to the capital up from near Chichester for the protest, declining to tell their children what they were about to do. It was only a day later that their son realised what had happened after he saw her in the news, suspended and flanked by the large group of officers. She had been following the conflict in the Middle East since the Israeli invasion of Gaza in 2014, but only became an active protester after former home secretary Suella Braverman branded peaceful protesters as 'hate marchers' in November 2023. 'I have never been political or an activist. I was just an ordinary, middle-England person,' she says. 'But then I became outraged.' She said she was 'shocked' by the events of 7 October, when Hamas militants broke into Israel and killed around 1,200 people, taking 251 more hostage. 'But the actions that subsequently followed, where entire families are being wiped out, I had to join those urging for a ceasefire now,' she adds. More than 60,000 Palestinians are believed to have been killed since Israel launched its retaliatory aerial and ground offensive in Gaza. Humanitarian organisations have warned that, with not nearly enough aid entering the enclave, the 2.3 million residents of Gaza are now being effectively starved. Sir Keir Starmer this week warned that Britain would recognise the Palestinian state if Israel did not end its 'appalling' war in Gaza. He urged Israel to work towards a ceasefire and a two-state solution. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused Sir Keir of 'rewarding Hamas's monstrous terrorism'. Ms Mansfield dismissed Sir Keir's move as 'performative rather than substantial'. Fighting her own battle for Gaza, the pensioner was arrested under Section 12 and 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000 for holding up a placard that said: 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action'. The charges carry a possible maximum sentence of 14 years in prison. The protest group Palestine Action had just been proscribed as a terrorist organisation, after they claimed responsibility for activists spraying red paint on fighter jets at RAF Brize Norton, making it illegal to support them. It put the group in the same legal ranks as Isis, Al-Qaeda and Hamas, leading critics to accuse the government of heavy-handedness. Ms Mansfield had known it was a possibility she would get arrested, but had no idea how the police would actually react when she and dozens of others held up placards in support of Palestine Action outside the Houses of Parliament. It was the first of what would be weekly protests, all of which resulted in arrests. As the police interview with an exhausted Ms Mansfield drew to a close around 2am, after more than 60 questions had been asked, the counter terrorism officer made one final remark. 'Look, even if you get hundreds of people, thousands of people, we're 30,000 strong,' Ms Mansfield recounts him saying. 'We'll put all our resources, and not just police forces, into arresting and interrogating you.' Then he let the 'traumatised' pensioner go free, hundreds of miles from home. She was not charged with a crime. A total of 385 MPs voted in favour of the unprecedented move to criminalise Palestine Action. Only 26 dissented. Announcing the vote, home secretary Yvette Cooper said that while the right to protest and to free speech form 'the cornerstone of our democracy', Palestine Action was guilty of 'violence and serious criminal damage' that does not constitute 'legitimate protest'. As a result, Palestine Action was proscribed alongside a white supremacist, neo-Nazi organisation called Maniacs Murder Cult and a pro-Kremlin ethno-nationalist organisation which seeks to create a new Russian Imperial State. Critics and human rights activists quickly accused the government of infringing upon people's right to protest after the proscription. In a letter to Ms Cooper, the Network for Police Monitoring said: 'Misusing terrorism legislation in this way against a protest group sets a dangerous precedent, threatens our democratic freedoms, and would be a terrifying blow to our civil liberties.' Several United Nations human rights experts, meanwhile, said criminal damage that does not endanger life was not 'sufficiently serious to qualify as terrorism'. On Wednesday, a judge ruled that Palestine Action would be allowed to challenge the Home Office in court over its proscription, but it could be months until a result. The outrage over the move has increased as more protesters are arrested. Private Eye editor Ian Hislop branded the arrest in Leeds on 19 July of 67-year-old Jon Farley, for holding up a printout of the magazine's front page that questioned the proscription, as 'mind-boggling'. Mr Farley has not been charged. The case was cited by Mr Justice Chamberlain on Wednesday as a reason to allow Palestine Action to fight the proscription. He said it was evidence of the 'chilling effect' the proscription was having 'on those wishing to express legitimate political views'. In total, more than 200 people have been detained since the ban. Not a single person in England and Wales has been charged. The large majority are over 60, according to Tim Crosland, a former government lawyer who now campaigns for Defend Our Juries, an organisation supporting many of the detainees. He says some of the protesters are 'well into their 80s'. The police are aware of these optics. Ms Mansfield claims her male counter terrorism interrogator even asked her at one stage: 'Was this a conspiracy to make the police look bad?' The reality, she says, is simpler: the seriousness of terrorism charges is a significant disincentive to younger protesters at the start of their careers; for pensioners determined to take a stance, it is the perfect opportunity to step up. Robert Lee, 61, another protester arrested on 5 July but not charged, who later went to support demonstrators in Bristol, says he remembers one 83-year-old woman gleefully telling him that police were too afraid to arrest her 'because they are terrified I might die in custody'. But the crowds of pensioner protesters are nonetheless peppered with younger demonstrators, a reality they say nods to the broad spectrum of opposition to the proscription of Palestine Action. For Zara Ali, 18, among the youngest people to have been arrested, her involvement felt especially high stakes. She was already on bail for conspiracy to cause public nuisance after blocking a road in March. She has not been charged. 'I was told to prepare myself for prison,' she says, admitting that she was very 'anxious' when she arrived in Parliament Square for her 19 July protest. 'But at the end of the day, I had it in my mind that this is not about me but about Palestine, and about every single political prisoner who is being held.' The Independent spoke to half a dozen protesters for this piece, all of whom mentioned their 'disgust' with Israel's war on Gaza as the primary motivation for their involvement. Claims that the proscription pointed to a 'dystopian' future in Britain were also commonly cited as key motivation.

Palestinian statehood vote at Victorian Labor conference heaps more pressure on PM
Palestinian statehood vote at Victorian Labor conference heaps more pressure on PM

The Guardian

time11 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Palestinian statehood vote at Victorian Labor conference heaps more pressure on PM

Victorian Labor members have voted to immediately recognise Palestine, heaping further pressure on the Albanese government to join Canada, France and the UK in their push for a sovereign state. Rank and file members at Labor's state conference on Saturday also carried an urgent resolution to review the Aukus submarine deal. However, the wording of the motion was watered down before the vote. Labor Friends of Palestine's motion calling on the federal government to immediately recognise Palestine, extend existing sanctions on two Israeli ministers to all members of Benjamin Netanyahu's cabinet, and to end all direct and indirect military trade with Israel was carried. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The internal campaign group's Victorian convener, Oliver van Ingen, told the conference the measures were 'appropriate, effective steps that Australia can take to contribute to peace in the Middle East' and were backed by unions, Labor members and the wider community. 'The time has come for sanctions and an end to military trade – they are the only option to prevent further atrocities and work towards a long-term solution,' van Ingen said. The motion was seconded by Tony Piccolo, from the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union, who said: 'Apartheid is never right, no matter who the perpetrators are and the reasons they say it stands. 'The behaviours we walk past – whether they be in the world, in our community, on the job site, or anywhere else – [are] the behaviours that we accept, and, comrades, we can't accept what is going on in the name of self-defence,' Piccolo said. 'I won't, and I hope you won't either.' Attempts to amend the motion were put forward by Nick Dyrenfurth, from Labor Friends of Israel, and Dean Sherr, a former Albanese adviser and lobbyist, who is also a member of the Jewish community, but failed. Dyrenfurth told the conference it was 'impractical to recognise a Palestinian state at this juncture' and criticised 'one-sided extreme motions, which endlessly demonise just one party in this ongoing conflict'. Albanese has so far stopped short of matching his UK counterpart Keir Starmer's promise to recognise the state of Palestine in September unless Israel abides by a ceasefire and commits to a two-state solution. Two other resolutions by Friends of Palestine – to increase aid and for the protection of civil liberties, including the right to protest – were also carried. As was a motion urging a federal review of the Aukus submarine deal – but only after criticisms of the US president, Donald Trump, were removed, alongside a sentence calling for a 'withdrawal' from the partnership. 'Despite the best efforts of ministers' offices to have this vote killed off, we prevailed and the voice of the rank-and-file has been clearly heard,' the Labor Against War Victorian convener, Hamish McPherson, said. A committee report that called on the government to suspend funding during the proposed inquiry and for the Victorian branch to make a submission calling on withdrawal from the Aukus partnership, however, passed. While non-binding on state or federal Labor MPs, the motions represent one of the most effective ways for rank-and-file members and unions to influence party policy. With prime minister, Anthony Albanese, in the Northern Territory for the Garma Festival, deputy prime minister and defence minister, Richard Marles, was the most senior party figure at Moonee Valley Racecourse on Saturday. But he received a lukewarm reception, with some delegates refusing to stand as he arrived. During Marles' speech, a group of delegates held up their phones to display Palestine flags. Tim Ryder, said participated in the 'silent protest' to 'hold the federal government to account' over their lack of action on Palestine. He also criticised the conference for banning placards on the floor this year, saying branches were 'white hot' with 'rage' over the move. Pro-Palestinian protesters also gathered outside but were unable to make it into the racecourse as they had last year, due to tighter security. Marles said the recent federal election result – where the party won 27 of the 38 seats and 56% of the two-party preferred vote – 'enshrines Victoria as Australian Labor's home base'. He thanked volunteers for their 'countless hours' volunteering during the campaign and vowed to deliver on the 'entirety of the agenda that we took to this election'. The Victorian premier, Jacinta Allan, used her speech to announce a key policy commitment to enshrine in law the right to work remotely two days a week, setting stage for the 2026 state election, which she said 'won't be easy'. 'We've got a fight on our hands, a fight for what we've built, a fight for the people who rely on us, a fight for the future of this state,' she said. 'But let me tell you, it is a fight we will win because our cause is just, our record is strong, our vision for the future is clear and our movement is unstoppable when it remembers what it is fighting for.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store