logo
Indiana Senate gives Medicaid bill final approval

Indiana Senate gives Medicaid bill final approval

Chicago Tribune18-04-2025
Indiana Gov. Mike Braun will receive the Senate Medicaid bill in the coming days as the Senate gave final approval to the bill Thursday.
The Senate voted 37-10, with all Republicans present voting in favor of the bill and all Democrats voting against it, Thursday on the Medicaid bill to affirm the amendments made by the House.
Senate Bill 2 — authored by Sen. Ryan Mishler, R-Mishawaka — places restrictions on Medicaid, including work requirements, with 11 exemptions, on an insurance program for Hoosiers with a medium income and between ages 19 to 64.
The bill requires the office to establish performance standards for hospitals that create eligibility requirements and action for when hospitals do not comply with standards.
The House Public Health Committee amended the bill to remove a 500,000 cap on the Medicaid program. The House Ways and Means Committee amended the bill further to allow an Indiana resident enrolled in or attending an accredited educational program full-time to be eligible for the plan.
The House Ways and Means Committee also amended the bill further to allow the secretary of Indiana's Family and Social Services office to advertise or market participation in the Medicaid program. The office can also reimburse medical providers at the appropriate Medicaid fee schedule rate for some medical claims prior to the beginning of benefits.
When the state first established the Healthy Indiana Plan, the Indiana Medicaid program, in 2006, there were 40,000 people on the program, Mishler said. Before COVID-19, there were around 390,000 people on HIP, and currently there are more than 700,000 people on the program, Mishler said.
Overall, Medicaid has grown by $5 billion in the last 4 years, Mishler said, and the rate of growth is greater than the state's revenue increase. In the upcoming 2-year budget the legislature is working on, Mishler said the majority of new revenue will cover Medicaid costs.
Sen. Shelli Yoder, D-Bloomington, said while she's pleased the program cap was removed from the bill, her 'continued concerns' were the increases in administrative costs as the bill calls for more eligibility checks and the work requirements.
The Kaiser Family Foundation found that 73.1% of people on Medicaid in Indiana have jobs, and the remaining 26.9% are either caregivers, in school, too medically frail to work, or have trouble finding a job, Yoder said.
Ultimately, Yoder said the bill makes Indiana's Medicaid program 'more complicated' which will result in people who qualify for coverage getting kicked off the program. Then, when they need healthcare, those individuals who were kicked off the program will go to emergency rooms for care, which increases the state's healthcare costs, she said.
'While the language has changed, the goals haven't wavered,' Yoder said. 'We don't want to punish people for being sick.'
Sen. Mike Bohacek, R-Michiana Shores, said he supported Senate Bill 2 because it will ensure 'that those folks that are on the program are eligible.'
'When the pandemic happened, we expanded Medicaid and we let a whole lot of folks on it. A lot of those folks, many of them, weren't qualified and weren't eligible but we did it anyway because it was the right thing to do because we had a health emergency. Those times are over, and now it's time to get back to where we were before,' Bohacek said.
Sen. Fady Qaddoura, D-Indianapolis, said the bill kills Medicaid expansion in Indiana because it will give state control over the program and limits elements of the Affordable Care Act.
While the bill was amended to remove the cap, Qaddoura said the program is still capped because it states that FSSA 'shall limit enrollment in the plan to the number of individuals that ensures that financial participation does not exceed the level of state appropriations or other funding for the plan.'
'The solution is not to reduce eligibility. The solution is not to reduce appropriations. The solution is not to withdraw from the Medicaid expansion, but rather the solution is to look at the population and find alternative policies,' Qaddoura said.
Sen. Chris Garten, R-Charlestown, said Medicaid is 23% of the state's budget. He said Indiana's Medicaid program 'exploded because of COVID,' when non-eligible people joined the program.
'Every dollar that goes to somebody that's not eligible is taking away a dollar from a poor, disabled Hoosier who otherwise should be getting that dollar and receiving benefits,' Garten said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kaul joins multistate suit claiming Trump has sought to deter care of transgender youths
Kaul joins multistate suit claiming Trump has sought to deter care of transgender youths

Yahoo

time44 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Kaul joins multistate suit claiming Trump has sought to deter care of transgender youths

Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul joined a multistate lawsuit Aug. 1 suing the Trump administration for "relentlessly, cruelly and unlawfully" targeting transgender people. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, comes six months after Kaul vowed to pursue legal actions should the federal government attempt to impede funding for gender-affirming health care. Recent federal actions have sought to deter health care providers from treating transgender patients under the age of 19, despite states like Wisconsin having laws in place that allow for medically appropriate procedures. President Donald Trump's Jan. 28 order oversteps its authority, the lawsuit states, by intimidating providers through threats of civil and criminal prosecution. The lawsuit emphasizes the order not only "has no basis in law" but is unconstitutional. Ultimately, the lawsuit is requesting the court to block the administration's actions and cease enforcing the order. 'The Trump administration shouldn't be interfering with the provision of health care,' Kaul said in a press release last week. 'The administration should be respecting individual liberty and equal rights, not shamefully targeting transgender people.' Trump's directive, signed early in his second term, aims to strip funds from medical institutions that provide gender-affirming care, and would require federal health programs like Medicaid and TRICARE (for military families) to exclude coverage of gender-affirming surgeries and hormone treatments for young people by 2026. Gender-affirming medical care supports people whose gender identity is out of sync with the sex they were assigned at birth. Health care may include the use of hormones to delay puberty in adolescents, behavioral health counseling to support and promote the gender identity with which a person aligns, and hormone replacement therapy. In very rare cases for young people, it may involve surgery. Access to gender-affirming services has been associated with lower suicide risks for transgender people. Research has also shown that people encountering anti-transgender bias and a denial of services had more than double the prevalence of suicide attempts than those who didn't have such experiences, according to the Williams Institute. The attorneys general warn the administration's tactics have had a chilling effect on states' ability to provide gender-affirming services. Despite protective laws being on the books, health care providers have already scaled back the services they offer to transgender youth. Other gender clinics have shuttered services completely in an attempt to avoid civil or criminal investigations and actions. Joining Kaul in filing this lawsuit are the attorneys general of California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawai'i, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island, and the District of Columbia, as well as the Governor of Pennsylvania. Natalie Eilbert covers mental health issues for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. She welcomes story tips and feedback. You can reach her at neilbert@ or view her X (Twitter) profile at @natalie_eilbert. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Wisconsin AG Kaul joins suit claiming Trump deters transgender care Solve the daily Crossword

FDA Chief Says He Wants Gene Therapy Head Prasad to Return
FDA Chief Says He Wants Gene Therapy Head Prasad to Return

Bloomberg

time2 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

FDA Chief Says He Wants Gene Therapy Head Prasad to Return

By and Skylar Woodhouse Save US Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary said he's trying to persuade Vinay Prasad, the agency's former head of gene therapy and vaccines, to return to the FDA after his abrupt departure last week. Makary told reporters Monday that media reports suggesting that Prasad was fired after intervention from the White House are 'simply untrue.' He 'didn't want to be a distraction,' Makary said.

New Hampshire becomes first Northeastern state to ban gender-affirming care for minors
New Hampshire becomes first Northeastern state to ban gender-affirming care for minors

The Hill

time3 hours ago

  • The Hill

New Hampshire becomes first Northeastern state to ban gender-affirming care for minors

New Hampshire is the first Northeastern state to ban gender-affirming health care for minors after its Republican governor gave final approval to bills that will ban the use of certain prescription medications and surgeries to treat gender dysphoria beginning next year. Gov. Kelly Ayotte, a former U.S. senator who won New Hampshire's gubernatorial election in November, signed two bills Friday restricting access to transition-related care in the state, which already prohibits rare genital surgeries for minors to transition. House Bill 377 prohibits doctors from administering puberty blockers and hormones to transgender youth starting Jan. 1. Like a handful of other, similar measures adopted by nearly all Republican-led states, New Hampshire's prohibition includes a 'grandfather clause' that allows minors already receiving care to continue doing so even after the law goes into effect. The second bill, House Bill 712, builds on New Hampshire's existing restrictions on gender-affirming surgery. The measure, which will also take effect in January, bars adolescents younger than 18 from undergoing certain procedures when they are used to treat gender dysphoria, including facial feminization or masculinization surgery and 'transgender chest surgery.' In a statement, Ayotte said, 'Medical decisions made at a young age can carry lifelong consequences, and these bills represent a balanced, bipartisan effort to protect children.' The New Hampshire House approved HB 377 in June, with two Democrats, state Reps. Dale Girard and Jonah Wheeler, voting with nearly all Republicans to advance the measure. Eleven Democrats were excused from voting. New Hampshire senators approved the bill in a 16-8 party-line vote. Wheeler joined House Republicans again in voting to pass HB 712, and 11 Democrats again were excused. The state Senate approved the measure in June in another vote along party lines. New Hampshire state Rep. Lisa Mazur, a Republican and the prime sponsor of both bills, celebrated their approval Friday in a post on X. 'My two bills that will protect NH kids from irreversible harm were just signed into law by Gov. Ayotte. We are now the 1st state in New England the whole Northeast to do so. Go NH!!' Mazur wrote. In June, while defending House Bill 377, Mazur pointed to a recent Supreme Court ruling that upheld Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors. 'It is now legal and constitutional for states to regulate and or ban the use of these harmful drugs in minors,' she said. LGBTQ rights groups immediately condemned Ayotte's signature on the bills, which they said ignore testimony from transgender youth who have benefited from gender-affirming care and statements from major medical organizations that such care for transgender adults and minors is medically necessary and can be lifesaving. 'It is heartbreaking to witness lawmakers inserting themselves into deeply personal, private conversations between families, their doctors, and their children,' Julia Hawthorne, a board member of the state LGBTQ rights group 603 Equality, wrote on Facebook. Linds Jakows, the organization's founder, said transgender young people in New Hampshire 'are not only tangibly losing access to life-saving healthcare — but also receiving a disturbing message of rejection from their state government.' 'To youth impacted by these bills, please know: You are loved, you are worthy of respect and dignity, and there is a community here in New Hampshire and beyond that is ready to support you,' they said. The Campaign for Southern Equality, an LGBTQ rights group that has since 2023 distributed more than $900,000 in grants to families of transgender children needing to travel out-of-state for gender-affirming care, announced on Friday that it would expand its Trans Youth Emergency Project into New Hampshire. 'Every day I speak with families of transgender youth who are worried about the future. Many are panicking, unsure of where or when they'll get the medicine that their child needs to continue leading a healthy, happy life,' said Van Bailey, a patient navigator for the program. 'These laws are cruelly thrusting families into impossible choices, and it is deeply unfair.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store