Wisconsin court says 19th-century abortion ban cannot be enforced
The 4-3 decision by the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which affirms a lower court, leaves in place a 2015 state law that bans abortion after 20 weeks.
The majority agreed with Wisconsin's Democratic Attorney General, Josh Kaul, that while the 19th-century law has never been formally repealed, it was effectively nullified by more recent laws and regulations including the 20-week ban.
"That comprehensive legislation so thoroughly covers the entire subject of abortion that it was clearly meant as a substitute for the 19th century near-total ban on abortion," Justice Rebecca Dallet wrote for the court.
The decision stemmed from a lawsuit Kaul filed in 2022 against Joel Urmanski, the Republican District Attorney of Sheboygan County, Wisconsin, who had argued the 1849 law was back in effect and could be enforced shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, which had recognized a constitutional right to abortion.
The court separately on Wednesday said that as a result of its decision, it was dismissing a pending case brought by Planned Parenthood's Wisconsin chapter arguing that the 1849 law violated the state constitution.
At a press conference on Wednesday, Kaul said Wednesday's ruling was a major victory for reproductive rights and a first step toward addressing the "devastating impact" of the U.S. Supreme Court decision.
Michelle Velasquez, chief strategy officer of Planned Parenthood Wisconsin, said the group was disappointed the court had dismissed its separate case.
'At a time when politicians are doing everything in their power to strip away rights... our state courts must step up to protect fundamental freedoms,' Velasquez said at the press conference with Kaul.
Urmanski did not respond to requests for comment.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court flipped to a liberal majority in 2023 for the first time in 15 years following an election that focused largely on abortion. The court's 4-3 majority was maintained after an election in April in which the winning candidate, Susan Crawford, campaigned on her support for abortion rights.
The contest was the most expensive judicial election in U.S. history, widely seen as an early referendum on President Donald Trump. Billionaire Elon Musk, then a Trump adviser, and groups tied to him spent more than $20 million in an attempt to elect Crawford's conservative opponent.
Crawford will join the court next month, replacing Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, who was in the majority in Wednesday's decision.
'ZEBRA HUNTING'
The 1849 law makes it a felony to "intentionally destroy" a fetus except to save the mother's life, and violations are punishable by up to 15 years in prison. It was rendered unenforceable in 1973, when the U.S. Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade.
The Supreme Court overturned Roe in 2022, with the 6-3 conservative majority ruling it was flawed and that abortion should be left for states to regulate within their borders.
Currently, 13 states have near-total abortion bans and 28 others prohibit abortions after certain points during pregnancy, according to the Guttmacher Institute, an abortion rights advocacy group.
Providers across Wisconsin stopped performing abortions in 2022 over concerns they could be prosecuted under the 1849 state law. They resumed in 2023 after a state judge ruled in Kaul's favor and found the law unenforceable.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld that ruling, saying that over the last 50 years the law had effectively been replaced by state lawmakers with a series of criminal laws and regulations governing healthcare providers and government funding of abortion services.
In a dissenting opinion, Justice Annette Ziegler accused her colleagues of bending the law to arrive at their preferred result. She said wiping out a law that was never repealed by the state legislature violated the court's constitutional role.
"The majority's smoke-and-mirrors legalese is nothing more than 'painting a mule to resemble a zebra, and then going zebra hunting,'" Ziegler wrote. —Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
an hour ago
- GMA Network
Republicans muscle Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill through Congress
US House Republican Conference Chair Lisa McClain (R-MI) speaks after the US President Donald Trump's sweeping spending and tax bill passes, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., July 3, 2025. REUTERS/Umit Bektas WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump 's tax-cut legislation cleared its final hurdle in the US Congress on Thursday, as the Republican-controlled House of Representatives narrowly approved a massive package that would fund his domestic agenda and push millions of Americans off health insurance. The 218-214 vote amounts to a significant victory for the Republican president that will fund his immigration crackdown, make his 2017 tax cuts permanent and deliver new tax breaks that he promised during his 2024 campaign. It also cuts health and food safety net programs and zeroes out dozens of green energy incentives. It would add $3.4 trillion to the nation's $36.2 trillion debt, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Despite concerns within Trump's party over the 869-page bill's price tag and its hit to healthcare programs, in the end just two of the House's 220 Republicans voting against it, following an overnight standoff. The bill has already cleared the Republican-controlled Senate by the narrowest possible margin. The White House said Trump will sign it into law at 5 p.m. ET (2100 GMT) on Friday, the July 4 Independence Day holiday. Republicans said the legislation will lower taxes for Americans across the income spectrum and spur economic growth. "This is jet fuel for the economy, and all boats are going to rise," House Speaker Mike Johnson said. Every Democrat in Congress voted against it, blasting the bill as a giveaway to the wealthy that would leave millions uninsured. "The focus of this bill, the justification for all of the cuts that will hurt everyday Americans, is to provide massive tax breaks for billionaires," House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said in an eight-hour, 46-minute speech that was the longest in the chamber's history. Trump kept up the pressure throughout, cajoling and threatening lawmakers as he pressed them to finish the job. "FOR REPUBLICANS, THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE. RIDICULOUS!!!" he wrote on social media. Though roughly a dozen House Republicans threatened to vote against the bill, only two ended up doing so: Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, a centrist, and Thomas Massie of Kentucky, a conservative who said it did not cut spending enough. Marathon weekend Republicans raced to meet Trump's July 4 deadline, working through last weekend and holding all-night debates in the House and the Senate. The bill passed the Senate on Tuesday in a 51-50 vote that saw Vice President JD Vance cast the tiebreaking vote. According to the CBO, the bill would lower tax revenues by $4.5 trillion over 10 years and cut spending by $1.1 trillion. Those spending cuts largely come from Medicaid, the health program that covers 71 million low-income Americans. The bill would tighten enrollment standards, institute a work requirement and clamp down on a funding mechanism used by states to boost federal payments - changes that would leave nearly 12 million people uninsured, according to the CBO. Republicans added $50 billion for rural health providers to address concerns that those cutbacks would force them out of business. Nonpartisan analysts have found that the wealthiest Americans would see the biggest benefits from the bill, while lower-income people would effectively see their incomes drop as the safety-net cuts would outweigh their tax cuts. The increased debt load created by the bill would also effectively transfer money from younger to older generations, analysts say. Ratings firm Moody's downgraded US debt in May, citing the mounting debt, and some foreign investors say the bill is making US Treasury bonds less attractive. The bill raises the US debt ceiling by $5 trillion, averting the prospect of a default in the short term. But some investors worry the debt overhang could curtail the economic stimulus in the bill and create a long-term risk of higher borrowing costs. On the other side of the ledger, the bill staves off tax increases that were due to hit most Americans at the end of this year, when Trump's 2017 individual and business tax cuts were due to expire. Those cuts are now made permanent, while tax breaks for parents and businesses are expanded. The bill also sets up new tax breaks for tipped income, overtime pay, seniors and auto loans, fulfilling Trump campaign promises. The final version of the bill includes more substantial tax cuts and more aggressive healthcare cuts than an initial version that passed the House in May. During deliberations in the Senate, Republicans also dropped a provision that would have banned state-level regulations on artificial intelligence, and a "retaliatory tax" on foreign investment that had spurred alarm on Wall Street. The bill is likely to feature prominently in the 2026 midterm elections, when Democrats hope to recapture at least one chamber of Congress. Republican leaders contend the bill's tax breaks will goose the economy before then, and many of its benefit cuts are not scheduled to kick in until after that election. Opinion polls show many Americans are concerned about the bill's cost and its effect on lower income people. — Reuters
GMA Network
a day ago
- GMA Network
Wisconsin court says 19th-century abortion ban cannot be enforced
Wisconsin's top state court ruled on Wednesday that an 1849 state law banning abortion in virtually all cases cannot be enforced, rejecting claims it had been revived after a landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling three years ago returned the authority to regulate abortion to individual states. The 4-3 decision by the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which affirms a lower court, leaves in place a 2015 state law that bans abortion after 20 weeks. The majority agreed with Wisconsin's Democratic Attorney General, Josh Kaul, that while the 19th-century law has never been formally repealed, it was effectively nullified by more recent laws and regulations including the 20-week ban. "That comprehensive legislation so thoroughly covers the entire subject of abortion that it was clearly meant as a substitute for the 19th century near-total ban on abortion," Justice Rebecca Dallet wrote for the court. The decision stemmed from a lawsuit Kaul filed in 2022 against Joel Urmanski, the Republican District Attorney of Sheboygan County, Wisconsin, who had argued the 1849 law was back in effect and could be enforced shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, which had recognized a constitutional right to abortion. The court separately on Wednesday said that as a result of its decision, it was dismissing a pending case brought by Planned Parenthood's Wisconsin chapter arguing that the 1849 law violated the state constitution. At a press conference on Wednesday, Kaul said Wednesday's ruling was a major victory for reproductive rights and a first step toward addressing the "devastating impact" of the U.S. Supreme Court decision. Michelle Velasquez, chief strategy officer of Planned Parenthood Wisconsin, said the group was disappointed the court had dismissed its separate case. 'At a time when politicians are doing everything in their power to strip away rights... our state courts must step up to protect fundamental freedoms,' Velasquez said at the press conference with Kaul. Urmanski did not respond to requests for comment. The Wisconsin Supreme Court flipped to a liberal majority in 2023 for the first time in 15 years following an election that focused largely on abortion. The court's 4-3 majority was maintained after an election in April in which the winning candidate, Susan Crawford, campaigned on her support for abortion rights. The contest was the most expensive judicial election in U.S. history, widely seen as an early referendum on President Donald Trump. Billionaire Elon Musk, then a Trump adviser, and groups tied to him spent more than $20 million in an attempt to elect Crawford's conservative opponent. Crawford will join the court next month, replacing Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, who was in the majority in Wednesday's decision. 'ZEBRA HUNTING' The 1849 law makes it a felony to "intentionally destroy" a fetus except to save the mother's life, and violations are punishable by up to 15 years in prison. It was rendered unenforceable in 1973, when the U.S. Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade. The Supreme Court overturned Roe in 2022, with the 6-3 conservative majority ruling it was flawed and that abortion should be left for states to regulate within their borders. Currently, 13 states have near-total abortion bans and 28 others prohibit abortions after certain points during pregnancy, according to the Guttmacher Institute, an abortion rights advocacy group. Providers across Wisconsin stopped performing abortions in 2022 over concerns they could be prosecuted under the 1849 state law. They resumed in 2023 after a state judge ruled in Kaul's favor and found the law unenforceable. The Wisconsin Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld that ruling, saying that over the last 50 years the law had effectively been replaced by state lawmakers with a series of criminal laws and regulations governing healthcare providers and government funding of abortion services. In a dissenting opinion, Justice Annette Ziegler accused her colleagues of bending the law to arrive at their preferred result. She said wiping out a law that was never repealed by the state legislature violated the court's constitutional role. "The majority's smoke-and-mirrors legalese is nothing more than 'painting a mule to resemble a zebra, and then going zebra hunting,'" Ziegler wrote. —Reuters
GMA Network
a day ago
- GMA Network
FACTBOX-Trump's immigration enforcement record so far, by the numbers
WASHINGTON —US President Donald Trump has stepped up arrests of immigrants in the U.S. illegally, cracked down on unlawful border crossings and stripped legal status from hundreds of thousands of migrants since January 20. Arrests Trump won back the White House promising record numbers of deportations. A Trump administration budget document published in June said U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement aimed to deport 1 million immigrants per year. ICE has cast a wider net than under former President Joe Biden's Democratic administration, picking up more non-criminals and people with final deportation orders, including those coming to ICE offices for routine check-ins. ICE arrested more than 100,000 people suspected of violating immigration law from January 20 to the first week of June, according to the White House. The figure amounts to an average of 750 arrests per day - double the average over the past decade. Still, the pace of arrests remains far short of what Trump would need to deport millions of people. Top White House official Stephen Miller, the architect of Trump's immigration agenda, pressed ICE to escalate operations in late May. Miller set a quota for at least 3,000 arrests per day and told ICE leadership they should target anyone without legal status. The increased enforcement led to protests in Los Angeles and other cities. ICE in June ordered officers to generally refrain from immigration sweeps at farms, hotels, restaurants and meatpacking plants, but the Trump administration then rescinded the guidance. Detention ICE statistics show the number of people arrested by ICE with no other criminal charges or convictions and then detained rose from about 860 in January to 11,800 as of June 15 - an increase of nearly 1,300%. Those arrested and detained with criminal charges or convictions also rose, but at a lower rate of 101%. ICE had more than 56,000 immigrants in custody as of June 15, well beyond its funded capacity of 41,500. A sweeping tax and spending bill that Republicans aim to bring to final passage in the U.S. House of Representatives this week would devote an estimated $170 billion to immigration enforcement. The massive funding boost would cover a White House request for 100,000 detention beds, according to an analysis of the legislation by the pro-immigration American Immigration Council. Deportations The Trump administration has struggled to increase deportation levels even as it has opened new pathways to send migrants to countries other than their home country, such as sending Venezuelans to Mexico, El Salvador or Panama. Trump's border czar, Tom Homan, said in late May that the administration had deported around 200,000 people over four months. The total appeared to lag deportations during a similar period under Biden, whose administration had 257,000 deportations from February-May 2024, according to Department of Homeland Security statistics. Biden's administration faced much higher levels of illegal immigration and quickly deported many of those crossing illegally, boosting deportation totals. DHS stopped issuing detailed statistical reports on immigration enforcement after Trump took office, which makes it harder to gauge the scope of the crackdown. Stripping legal status The Supreme Court in May allowed the Trump administration to proceed with terminating Temporary Protected Status for about 350,000 Venezuelans, paving the way for Trump to terminate it for other nations. TPS provides deportation relief and work permits to people already in the U.S. if their home countries experience a natural disaster, armed conflict or other extraordinary event. The Trump administration rolled back a Biden-era extension of TPS for 521,000 Haitians, but that move was blocked by a federal judge on Tuesday, pushing the termination at least to February 2026. The administration also ended the status for thousands of people from Afghanistan and Cameroon, moves that take effect in the coming days and weeks. The Supreme Court in June let the Trump administration proceed with stripping legal status from half a million Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans who entered under a Biden-era "parole" program. Trump said in March that he was weighing a similar move to revoke parole for Ukrainians. The administration in April began notifying people who entered legally under Biden using an app known as CBP One that their status had been revoked. Border security Trump issued a series of executive orders when he returned to the White House, implementing a broad ban on asylum for migrants encountered at the southern border and sending in troops to assist border security efforts. His measures built on some initiatives already under way by the end of Biden's tenure, including a similar asylum ban and a push to increase Mexican enforcement. The policies appear to have successfully reduced traffic. U.S. Border Patrol arrested 6,070 migrants at the southern border in June, according to preliminary figures released by the Trump administration, a new monthly low that fell beyond the previous low in March. Monthly figures are not available prior to 2000. Migrant arrests are often used as a proxy to estimate illegal crossings although some migrants enter undetected. The arrest totals since Trump took office have been far below those under Biden, which peaked at 250,000 in December 2023. —Reuters
