logo
Could Danny Kruger save the Conservatives?

Could Danny Kruger save the Conservatives?

Spectator4 days ago
I've seen signs of life in the Conservative party – unlikely I know, but true. I had thought it a dead thing, dripping its life-blood slowly into Reform. But ten days ago I saw on YouTube a speech that a Tory MP gave in the House of Commons and… I don't know. I felt hope.
The MP was Danny Kruger, member for East Wiltshire, and as it happens he's a friend of mine. I'll say straight away then that this is absolutely not an attempt to promote him as next leader, though the post-Kemi era does seem to be approaching fast.
For one thing, Kruger is a middle-aged white Etonian, cursed by association with the last two Etonian PMs. For another, from what I've seen of it, high office acts like high altitude on humans. The rarified air gets to them in the end. They go crackers for want of normality, and when they descend their brains have changed. Fundamentally decent men become deluded – Rishi. The others – Boris – live as high-functioning addicts, dreaming of the next power-fix.
So it's not that I have ideas about party leadership. It's just that I'd clean forgotten it's even possible for a politician to stick their neck out in public – to state simply what they believe – and how powerful that is.
Kruger's speech, addressed to his fellow MPs, made the point that this country is Christian in its bones and in its beginnings and that, like it or not, through the parish system, we are all members of the Church of England. If there's a crisis in this country, he said, which there indisputably is – an epidemic of anxiety and hopelessness in the young, among adults even talk of civil war – then it's to Christianity that we should turn. I know: sky fairies and invisible friends – perhaps you thought we'd outgrown them.
There are two religions moving into the space from which Christianity has been ejected, said Kruger. One is Islam; the other is wokery, which has become competitive oppression – victim-signalling, you could call it. 'I don't think that 'woke' does justice to its seriousness,' said Kruger. 'It is a combination of ancient paganism, Christian heresies and the cult of modernism all mashed up into a deeply mistaken and deeply dangerous ideology of power that is hostile to the essential objects of our affections and our loyalties: families, communities and nations… It must simply be destroyed at least as a public doctrine. It must be banished from public life from schools and universities and from businesses in public services.'
It was a Thursday afternoon, about 4 p.m. when Kruger addressed the House. Most MPs, having lunched, had drifted back to their constituencies, so you have to picture the MP for East Wiltshire delivering this tub-thumper to an almost entirely empty chamber: row upon row of plump green benches, punctuated with just the odd crumpled suit.
'The fact is that the strong gods are back, and we have to choose which god to worship,' said Kruger, undaunted. 'I suggest we worship the God who came in the weakest form, Jesus Christ.' The room may have been empty but more than three million people have now watched the footage online. The comments keep rolling in, thousands of them: 'Don't worry, we're listening, Danny.' 'We're here even though your colleagues aren't. Bravo!' It's the response, as much as the speech, that has given me hope.
For decades now, the Conservative party has considered Christianity embarrassing. And Danny Kruger's faith has cost him. He converted at a time when the only acceptable form of Christian faith in the Conservative party was the David Cameron sort – a faint and flickering radio signal, low vol. Even the friends we share from university will usually preface talk of meeting with a little verbal dance designed to ward off stigma: 'I'm having dinner with Danny, I mean, I can't stand Christians but…' I've often wondered how they'd react if they heard this in the context of another religion: 'I'm off to meet Sadiq. Yeah, I can't stand Muslims but…'
Three years ago Kruger gave another speech in the Commons, this one about the importance of not importing American culture wars over abortion. In it, he reminded his peers that 'in the case of abortion' a woman's 'absolute right to bodily autonomy… is qualified by the fact that another body is involved'. He wasn't advocating changing the law, just reminding everyone that somewhere along the journey towards birth the baby acquires rights of its own. It was fascinating to me that as a result of this reasonable speech, Danny became unacceptable to whole swaths of his constituents – and how instinctive their reaction was. Asking reasonable, ethical conservatives to engage with his argument was like asking snakes to wrap themselves around a hot pipe. They'd wince and flail, sidle off. Too embarrassing. Not what People Like Us say.
But the point for the party perhaps is that it's People Like Us who are now old hat. The world has changed, young people have changed. It's not the 1990s any more. Look at the growing appetite for Jordan Peterson, who points to the Bible as a store of wisdom. Look at The Spectator's recent 'Recovering the Sacred' event. Damian Thompson, presenter of the Holy Smoke podcast, presided; the editor spoke alongside two priests and a Regius Professor of Divinity. The event was sold out. My Catholic priest friend who has a church in central London says that the size of his congregation has doubled, and it's young people from all over the world filling the pews. Orthodox Christianity is on the rise in America, Catholicism in France.
And Danny's right, the old gods are back, too. In Silicon Valley, among the young tech lords who actually shape our future, the talk is about which of the biblical demons they are summoning as AI evolves. I'm serious about this. It's normal in the valley to discuss Moloch and Ba'al over sushi. There's an opportunity here, but only if the Conservatives have the courage to embrace this country's founding faith.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tommy Sheppard: Why an SNP majority is crucial in 2026
Tommy Sheppard: Why an SNP majority is crucial in 2026

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

Tommy Sheppard: Why an SNP majority is crucial in 2026

Until just a few months ago, they were accused of not mentioning independence enough. Now they are criticised for talking about it too much. Seems they can't win. John Swinney has had much to say on the topic in recent weeks. In various speeches, he has said independence must be central to the next election, that voting [[SNP]] is the best way to get it and that the party must work with others to achieve its goal. Thoughts on working with others, especially the idea of a new constitutional convention, next week. For now, let's look at Swinney's ambition to win a majority of seats for the SNP in May 2026, and his contention that this is necessary to move forward to independence. READ MORE: SNP members set for second meeting to challenge Scottish independence plan In one sense, a party leader setting out to win a majority of the seats in an election is hardly contentious. That's sort of the point. Smaller parties look daft if they ask you to believe they'll do that from a position of negligible support. But for a party that has done it before and nearly done it several times since, it's not an unreasonable aspiration. It would surely be more remarkable if the leader of the [[SNP]] declared that he didn't intend to win a majority. How tall an order is it, though? Frankly, who knows? The Holyrood voting system was devised to be more proportional than Westminster's. It is a bit. But not completely. And when voting intentions are volatile and opinion is fractured, the capacity for distortion is amplified. The majority of seats up for grabs next May are elected by first past the post. There will be at least six major parties contesting most of them, seven if Jeremy Corbyn's show gets on the road. The traditional Tory and Labour blocs will be divided by serious challengers. In these circumstances, any party that can command north of 30% support has to be a hot favourite to win. So, a party that can get the votes of a third or more of the electorate and whose support is evenly spread could well win 65 constituency seats. They would get none off the lists but that would be a majority. It is very unpredictable, the margins between winning and losing are small, and things could just as easily go the other way. But a majority is possible. It is, after all, just over a year since Labour won a UK General Election landslide on 34% of the vote. More controversial is the SNP leader's claim that only if he gets a majority will this be seen as a legitimate mandate to offer Scots their independence. Other, smaller, pro-independence parties have been outraged by the suggestion, instead advocating that all that is required is a majority of members in the Parliament elected on a commitment to self-government no matter what their party. Actually, both have a point. It is true that if the Parliament has a pro-independence majority and votes to demand that people get a choice on the matter, then that should be respected by the UK Government. But it is undeniably the case that any such demand will be harder to refuse if it is made by a party that has just won a clear majority. Especially if it is then bolstered by representatives from other parties. John Swinney cites historical precedent as evidence. The only time the UK accepted that people should have the right to choose was when the SNP won a majority in 2011. They have denied it ever since, even with a pro-indy majority in the Scottish Parliament. Salmond won a majority for the SNP in 2011 It doesn't, however, follow that they would do so again. A majority of those running the UK think Cameron made a mistake in accepting the outcome of the 2011 election as a trigger for a referendum. They are determined not to repeat it. They are building a barricade against Scottish aspirations for independence, founded on denying the legitimacy of the Scottish Parliament to do anything about it. READ MORE: SNP under fire over public energy firm as Wales launches wind projects And that is where we are. In the middle of a fight for legitimacy, for relevance, for the right to self-determination. That is why we need a strategy that doesn't stop at getting people to vote for an independence party or parties, but which sets out how those elected can mobilise Scotland behind the right to choose their future. That will require cross-party co-operation, civic engagement on a scale not seen since 2014 and stable, determined leadership in government. But there can be no question that the bigger the majority the principal party of independence has, the easier that task will be. And no question also that the converse is true. If the SNP are unable to form a government and a Unionist coalition triumphs, the cause of national autonomy will be gravely set back.

Government pledges extra £100m funding to tackle people smuggling
Government pledges extra £100m funding to tackle people smuggling

BBC News

time3 hours ago

  • BBC News

Government pledges extra £100m funding to tackle people smuggling

The Home Office has announced £100m in extra funding as part of efforts to crack down on illegal people smuggling in the English money will pay for up to 300 additional National Crime Agency (NCA) officers as well as new technology and than 25,000 people made the journey from France to the UK in small boats before the end of July, a record for this point in the Secretary Yvette Cooper said the move would help the UK better "track the [smuggling] gangs and bring them down". The Conservative Party called it a "desperate grab for headlines which will make no real difference". Last month, the government agreed a "one in, one out" pilot scheme with France which aims to deter migrants from crossing the Channel. Under the scheme, some arrivals would be returned to France and in exchange the UK would accept an equivalent number of asylum seekers, subject to security to the Home Office, the new £100m will boost border security and strengthen investigations targeting smuggling kingpins who have operations across Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Cooper said gangs had shown a "a ruthless ability to adapt their tactics and maximise their profits, no matter how many lives they put at risk".The NCA has 91 ongoing investigations into people-smuggling networks affecting the UK, the agency's director general of operations Rob Jones said. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp accused Labour of having "no serious plan" to tackle the issue."The British public deserves real action, not empty slogans and tinkering at the edges," he in the Daily Express, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said it was an effort to "throw taxpayer money at the illegal immigration crisis and hope it will go away"."Another £100 million here or there won't move the needle. It won't stop the boats or the gangs," he and previous Conservative governments have both struggled to reduce the number of people coming to the UK illegally in small Conservatives had proposed sending arrivals to Rwanda, but the scheme was delayed by legal challenges. The general election was called before it could be of Sir Keir Starmer's first acts as prime minister was to scrap the plan, calling it a another measure, which was revealed on Sunday, people advertising illegal Channel crossings online could face up to five years in prison under a new offence the government plans to illegal immigration to the UK is already a crime, but officials believe the new offence would give police and other agencies more power to disrupt criminal would criminalise the creation of material for publication online which promotes or offers services that facilitate a breach of UK immigration would include people using social media to advertise fake passports or visas, or the promise of illegal work opportunities in the UK, and as well as jail time could carry a large fine.

Home Office gives extra £100m for plans to smash people-smuggling gangs
Home Office gives extra £100m for plans to smash people-smuggling gangs

Rhyl Journal

time4 hours ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Home Office gives extra £100m for plans to smash people-smuggling gangs

The cash will also pay for up to 300 more National Crime Agency (NCA) officers and new technology and equipment to step up intelligence-gathering on smuggling gangs. There will be more overtime for immigration compliance and enforcement teams as well as funding for interventions in transit countries across Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia. Labour is seeking to deter smuggling gangs in a bid to bring down small boat crossings, which have topped 25,000 for the year so far – a record for this point in the year. The 'one in, one out' deal agreed last month means the UK will for the first time be able to send migrants back to France in exchange for asylum seekers with links to Britain. Anyone who advertises small boat crossings or fake passports on social media could be face up to five years in prison under a new offence to be introduced under the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said Labour had set the foundations for a 'new and much stronger law enforcement approach' over the last year. She said: 'Now this additional funding will strengthen every aspect of our plan and will turbo-charge the ability of our law enforcement agencies to track the gangs and bring them down, working with our partners overseas, and using state-of-the-art technology and equipment. 'Alongside our new agreements with France, this will help us drive forward our plan for change commitments to protect the UK's border security and restore order to our immigration system.' The NCA has 91 ongoing investigations into people-smuggling networks affecting the UK, the agency's director general of operations Rob Jones said. The Conservatives criticised the funding announcement as a 'desperate grab for headlines which will make no real difference'. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: 'Labour has failed and their laughable claim to smash the gangs lies in tatters. They have no serious plan, just excuses, while ruthless criminal gangs flood our borders with illegal immigrants. 'The British public deserves real action, not empty slogans and tinkering at the edges. The Conservative Deportation Bill is the only real solution. Immediate detention, rapid removal and shutting down these illegal networks for good.' Nigel Farage said it was an effort to 'throw taxpayer money at the illegal immigration crisis and hope it will go away'. 'Another £100 million here or there won't move the needle. It won't stop the boats or the gangs,' the Reform UK leader wrote in The Daily Express. A Reform UK spokesperson said: 'Until the Government gets serious about deporting every migrant that crosses the Channel, nothing will change. Only Reform will ensure the boats stop and every illegal that enters the country is sent home.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store