Wexford County Council rejects call to sever ties with companies ‘involved in breaching human rights'
However, Cllr Forde's motion was rejected out of hand with the council executive stating it 'operates its procurement activities in line with all relevant legislation, regulations, guidelines and its own public procurement policy and procedures'.
'WCC is committed to the promotion of the use of environmental and social considerations in public procurement, this is further strengthened in WCC's corporate procurement plan,' it added. 'Any proposed ethical procurement policy would have to align with the EU treaty principles of transparency, equal treatment, mutual recognition, proportionality, and non-discrimination.'
After the meeting, Cllr Forde expressed his disappointment that his motion was rejected, noting that the same motion had been passed in 13 other councils across the country.
"The purpose of this initiative is to ethically advance how councils across Ireland tender and who they are affiliated to in accordance with international law obligations," he said. "This motion has already been passed by 13 councils. It is something that could have been easily achieved here in Wexford. We should be no different in this sense and we should be pushing for more.
"Efforts to introduce such a policy have been quickly dismissed as being controlled by Europe and government and because of the potential to bring legal challenges, but I don't believe that is the case."
Asking that his motion be reconsidered, Cllr Forde said the adoption of an EPP would ensure the council does not 'financially aid businesses and companies investing, practicing or complicit in human rights abuses when tendering."
"We are living in an ever-changing world and we should be holding ourselves and human rights violators to the highest ethical standards," he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
24 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
New veterinary medicines rules will put small independent traders out of business, minister warned
A range of veterinary medicines, currently available over the counter, will become prescription only from September 1. But agriculture minister Martin Heydon has been urged to postpone the implementation of the new regulations. Senator P J Murphy called on him in the Upper House to conduct a full and independent review of the economic and social impact before the sector is regrettably and permanently damaged. He said the move under the new Veterinary Medicinal Products, Medicated Feed and Fertilisers Regulation Act 2023 would deem all antiparasitic veterinary drugs to be prescription only. These remedies are used on farms on a day-to-day basis to treat cattle for conditions such as worms, fluke and lice. Mr Murphy said the products were on the market under tight Department of Agriculture control, with experienced well-trained staff providing advice to farmers at the point of sale. According to new EU harmonised legislation, prescribing must be undertaken by veterinary practitioners, who are also permitted to sell and dispense these products. Most importantly, there is no requirement for vets to keep prescribing and dispensing separate from one another, creating a concerning conflict of interest. 'This shift is not just a regulatory update. It is an economic and structural seismic shift to the many small independent licensed traders across this country. 'According to the Central Statistics Office, Ireland's veterinary medicines market is worth approximately €400m annually. 'While €300m of this already ends up with veterinary practitioners, the remaining €100m goes to a network of small, independent merchants and co-ops found in towns and villages across rural Ireland,' he said. Mr Murphy said the Independent Licensed Merchants Association, which represents 350 of these smaller merchants countrywide, warns only 38 of its members can remain in business under these new rules. 'That is a potential loss of nearly 90% of this industry. This is a choice that is anti-competitive,' he said. He said the justification given for this change was the need to combat antimicrobial resistance and improve traceability and oversight via the national veterinary prescription system, which requires all prescriptions to be on a central controlled database. 'However, as a person who has worked my whole life in the cattle farming sector and administered these medications on thousands of occasions, I assure this House that we as farmers are not in the habit of overusing these expensive medications and do not use them when they are not necessary. Indeed, it quite on the contrary. I fear the inevitable price rise, which will result from the gifting of a monopoly on the sale of these crucial antiparasitic products, could result in their under-use, leading to severe animal welfare concerns. 'I have great fear that it could also lead to an increase in the purchasing of these medicines through black market sources,' he said. Mr Murphy said while the goals of health and EU compliance were important, implementation must reflect Irish rural reality. Without safeguards for independent merchants, this regulation risks creating a dangerous monopoly in the veterinary medicine distribution sector, he said. Fine Gael senator Mark Duffy said from discussions he had with the farming community in Co Mayo, there were serious concerns about the upcoming proposals and changes and how these threatened to monopolise the market. 'We need to have a discussion before these changes are brought into effect because it could have serious ramifications and increases in cost for farmers,' he said. Senator Sean Kyne, leader of the House, said the Veterinary Medicinal Products, Medicated Feed and Fertilisers Regulation Act was passed in the Houses of the Oireachtas in the summer of 2023. 'That is the law we are working with. There may be some sections that are now being commenced, but the law has been agreed and passed. There were debates on those matters at the time. 'I will raise this matter again with the minister for agriculture, Deputy Heydon. Perhaps there are issues with the commencement of some of these regulations,' he said.
Irish Examiner
24 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Oireachtas committee calls for rules to allow Central Banks to refuse Israeli war bond sales
The Central Bank should review the process for approving the prospectus of the sale of Israeli bonds, an Oireachtas committee has found. The Joint Committee on Finance on Tuesday published its Report on the Israeli Bonds Programme and says the Central Bank here and other EU Central Banks should develop a mechanism whereby an individual Central Bank can refuse to process any new prospectus certification requests. Under the EU Prospectus Regulation, a prospectus must be drawn up, approved and published when securities are to be offered to the public or admitted to trading on a regulated market in the EU. Third Country issuers must choose one of the EU competent authorities in the EU as their Home Member State, subject to certain criteria set out in the EU Prospectus Regulation. The Central Bank last month came under mounting pressure to reject the prospectuses of Israeli bonds, which are largely being used to fund the country's war efforts in Gaza, though it has argued because Ireland's central bank is designated as the competent authority to approve prospectuses for Israeli bonds sold in the EU, it has no legal authority to do so. Third Country issuers of bonds must choose the central bank of a country within the EU as their home member state, a choice which is up to that country and not the chosen home member state. In his appearance at the committee, Central Bank governor Gabriel Makhlouf said the bank is required to approve a prospectus where it meets the standards of completeness, consistency, and comprehensibility under the legislation. File photo: Paulo Nunes dos Santos/Bloomberg Before 2021, Britain was the EU home member state for Israel, but following its exit from the bloc, Ireland was chosen by Israel as the new home member state. The Central Bank of Ireland approved the first prospectuses for the bond issuance programme in 2021, with the currently approved prospectus due to expire on September 1, 2025. Committee Cathaoirleach Mairéad Farrell said: 'The facilitation by the Central Bank of Ireland of the Israeli Bond prospectus arose as a matter of concern for the Joint Committee in the previous Dáil, during which the committee initiated contact with the Central Bank to ascertain more detail around the process of prospectus approval. "In line with these engagements, the committee understands that the Central Bank may only refuse the approval of a prospectus where the Central Bank has legal basis to do so. 'Ireland has been to the forefront and steadfast in its position of support and solidarity with the people of Palestine, but we must ask ourselves are we doing everything we can. The issuing of bonds by the State of Israel is seen to assist in the financing of Israel's continued violations of human rights." The Joint Committee makes 15 recommendations in its report, including: The Government engage at EU level with a view to amending the EU Prospectus regulations to permit each individual European Central Bank to refuse to act as a Competent Authority; The Central Bank as the competent authority conduct an immediate internal review in advance of any renewal in September of the Israeli bond prospectus; The Central Bank should seek legal advice and make information available which clarifies that their decision in approving a prospectus is not in breach of international law. In his appearance at the committee, Central Bank governor Gabriel Makhlouf said the bank is required to approve a prospectus where it meets the standards of completeness, consistency, and comprehensibility under the legislation. "Our legal obligations are clear and we do not need guidance to follow them," he is due to tell the Oireachtas Finance Committee on Wednesday. "The law is also clear that, by approving a prospectus, the Central Bank does not endorse the issuer and does not endorse the securities."
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Central Bank should review Israeli war bonds sale
The Central Bank should conduct an internal review into whether it can turn down a request from Israel to continue to facilitate the sale of its war bonds, an Oireachtas committee has said. The cross-party Oireachtas Finance Committee has made the recommendation in a report published today, saying the potential review should take place "in advance of any renewal [of the bonds] in September". While the Central Bank is independent of the Oireachtas, its facilitation of Israeli war bonds has been the subject of significant public and political debate in recent months due to the violence in Gaza. In a number of committee hearings in early summer, Central Bank governor Gabriel Makhlouf and other senior officials argued that the Central Bank must accept a request to facilitate the sale of the war bonds unless there is a breach of prospectus rules. Among these rules are those in relation to transparency, accuracy and humanitarian matters. The Oireachtas Finance Committee has been meeting privately in recent days to conclude its report on the issue. While it is a cross-party committee and includes both Opposition and Government TDs and senators, it has made 15 unanimous recommendations, including: The Central Bank "shall conduct an immediate internal review in advance of any renewal in September of the Israeli bond prospectus" to determine if "it is in compliance with the prospectus regulation"; The Central Bank "engage with other EU central banks to develop a mechanism whereby an individual Central Bank can refuse to process any new prospectus request"; Government "engage at EU level with a view to amending the EU prospectus regulations to permit each individual European Central Bank to refuse to act as a competent authority"; And that "as part of a review seek supplementary information from the issuer and include an examination with regard to" the recent International Court of Justice case by South Africa and "any other pertinent matters in respect of international law". The report is non-binding, meaning it can only include recommendations. It will now be sent to the Department of Finance for further examination.
