logo
Opinion: California stores should ban all plastic bags

Opinion: California stores should ban all plastic bags

In 2016, California voters voted to uphold a ban on thin single-use plastic bags, which were what most stores offered. However, since this ban was passed, stores began passing out thicker plastic bags, which are supposed to be reusable and recyclable.
This change has actually led to a substantial increase in plastic waste. This is because most recycling facilities don't recycle plastic bags, resulting in them being sent to landfills. A recent state study found that Californians' plastic bag waste has gone up from eight pounds per person per year in 2004 to 11 pounds per person per year in 2021 – at least in part due to the thicker plastic bags, which are substantially heavier.
In order to prevent plastic bag waste from continuing to grow in California, we must ensure that all plastic shopping bags are banned in our state.
In the state legislature, Democratic Senator Catherine Blakespear revealed a new bill that aims to ban all plastic shopping bags by 2026. Just as California was the first state to place any type of ban on plastic bags by banning the thin plastic bags, California should follow suit and get rid of plastic bags entirely.
Instead of using plastic bags, people could switch to other reusable bags. While the thicker plastic bags can theoretically be reused, most people throw them away after a single use, as they don't look reusable. People should get bags that they are more likely to reuse, like cotton or canvas tote bags.
In other states, plastic bag bans have worked. In Vermont, after a plastic bag ban, a survey estimated that the ban saves 191 million bags per year. California should use other states as an example and follow their lead in banning plastic bags.
Another reason the new ban against plastic bags should be passed is that the original ban allowed for a loophole . The original law allowed stores to sell bags if they charged 10 cents, and they made the bags thicker and heavier.
One of the reasons plastic bags are so harmful to the environment is that they never biodegrade, and while they can be recycled, they usually are not. Meanwhile, other types of bags, like cotton, could be more easily reused, while other options like paper bags are biodegradable and you can easily compost or recycle them.
However, there are many advantages to plastic bags, which have helped them become so widespread. For example, it takes significantly less energy and solid waste to produce a plastic bag than to produce a paper bag. They are also much more convenient and cheaper, and after you use them, it is easy to just throw them away.
Although plastic bags are cheaper and more convenient, due to their environmental impacts they should not be used. California should pass the bill to finally ban all plastic bags in stores in order to prevent more plastic waste in our world. Related
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AT&T making move designed to outrage older Americans
AT&T making move designed to outrage older Americans

Miami Herald

time2 days ago

  • Miami Herald

AT&T making move designed to outrage older Americans

Do you remember life before cellphones? Maybe not, but there are probably many readers who do. As recently as the 1990s, most homes had one or two landlines per household. It was actually a big deal for a home to have two lines, one for the "kids" and a separate one for the adults. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter But in the later 1990s and earliest 2000s, as the price of cellphones came way down, they became ubiquitous. By 2004 there were more cellphones than landlines in the U.S., and by some estimates, around 98 percent of people in the country own cellphones, according to Consumer Affairs data. Now there are even more cellphones than there are people on Earth. Related: Verizon sends bold message to frustrated customers But some people are still committed to their landlines, and a recent Centers for Disease Control study revealed some interesting data around landlines. First, people with a landline are more likely than wireless customers to own a home and are more likely to live in the Northeast. Landline owners are also healthier: they are less likely to smoke or binge drink, and more likely to exercise, wear seat belts, and have health insurance, according to the research. So even though nearly "everyone" in America has a cellphone, some people also like having a landline. Maybe it's because they they can't afford a cellphone, or because they live in rural areas that have poor cell service. AT&T's recent announcement that it wants to withdraw from being the "carrier of last resort," ending its obligation to provide landline service across California, is angering many customers. Millions of people in California still depend on their landlines for phone service, including emergency and "life alert" systems that don't work on cellular networks. So California Public Utilities Commission said "Not so fast," and rejected AT&T's request. Related: Comcast has a gift for AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile customers Now AT&T has taken the fight to the government. More than a third (35%) of California residents still use landlines, and around 5% of Californians reside in rural areas where they depend on landlines. They might also have a cellphone, but they don't want to give up their landline. Many of the residents are elderly and have used landlines for decades. Critics of the plan say AT&T is attempting to push people away from landlines because they are more expensive to maintain, and newer technologies mean higher profits for the company. Before AT&T can stop landline service, they must have alternatives in place. Landlines depend on copper wiring, and copper theft has been a big and expensive problem for the carrier. This is one reason the company wants to end its commitment. "To put things plainly, our current Carrier of Last Resort (COLR) policy no longer reflects the reality of today's competitive communications landscape in California," said AT&T's Terri Nikole Baca to ABC7 Los Angeles. Nonetheless, AT&T is hugely profitable. AT&T's first quarter 2025 earnings, released on April 23, 2025, showed a strong performance with revenue of $30.6 billion, a 2% increase year-over-year. The company also reported an adjusted EPS of $0.51, which aligned with market expectations, and a free cash flow of $3.1 billion. These results were driven by growth in 5G mobility and fiber broadband businesses, according to AT&T's investor relations. AT&T's second quarter 2025 earnings come out later this week (July 23). Related: AT&T customers sound alarm on a frustrating problem The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Opinion: California stores should ban all plastic bags
Opinion: California stores should ban all plastic bags

Los Angeles Times

time6 days ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Opinion: California stores should ban all plastic bags

In 2016, California voters voted to uphold a ban on thin single-use plastic bags, which were what most stores offered. However, since this ban was passed, stores began passing out thicker plastic bags, which are supposed to be reusable and recyclable. This change has actually led to a substantial increase in plastic waste. This is because most recycling facilities don't recycle plastic bags, resulting in them being sent to landfills. A recent state study found that Californians' plastic bag waste has gone up from eight pounds per person per year in 2004 to 11 pounds per person per year in 2021 – at least in part due to the thicker plastic bags, which are substantially heavier. In order to prevent plastic bag waste from continuing to grow in California, we must ensure that all plastic shopping bags are banned in our state. In the state legislature, Democratic Senator Catherine Blakespear revealed a new bill that aims to ban all plastic shopping bags by 2026. Just as California was the first state to place any type of ban on plastic bags by banning the thin plastic bags, California should follow suit and get rid of plastic bags entirely. Instead of using plastic bags, people could switch to other reusable bags. While the thicker plastic bags can theoretically be reused, most people throw them away after a single use, as they don't look reusable. People should get bags that they are more likely to reuse, like cotton or canvas tote bags. In other states, plastic bag bans have worked. In Vermont, after a plastic bag ban, a survey estimated that the ban saves 191 million bags per year. California should use other states as an example and follow their lead in banning plastic bags. Another reason the new ban against plastic bags should be passed is that the original ban allowed for a loophole . The original law allowed stores to sell bags if they charged 10 cents, and they made the bags thicker and heavier. One of the reasons plastic bags are so harmful to the environment is that they never biodegrade, and while they can be recycled, they usually are not. Meanwhile, other types of bags, like cotton, could be more easily reused, while other options like paper bags are biodegradable and you can easily compost or recycle them. However, there are many advantages to plastic bags, which have helped them become so widespread. For example, it takes significantly less energy and solid waste to produce a plastic bag than to produce a paper bag. They are also much more convenient and cheaper, and after you use them, it is easy to just throw them away. Although plastic bags are cheaper and more convenient, due to their environmental impacts they should not be used. California should pass the bill to finally ban all plastic bags in stores in order to prevent more plastic waste in our world. Related

A mother's ‘strength and perseverance paid off'
A mother's ‘strength and perseverance paid off'

Boston Globe

time07-07-2025

  • Boston Globe

A mother's ‘strength and perseverance paid off'

Write to us at . To subscribe, . TODAY'S STARTING POINT People have been depicting mother and child in art and imagery for almost as long as art and imagery have existed. Carved figurines of women nursing babies in their arms The mother-child pairing often evokes themes of love, protection, and connection. Last month, the Globe Advertisement You can see the image, which Globe photographer Craig Walker captured, above. It shows Jen Fowler pressing her face against that of her 12-year-old son Dante at their home in Wakefield, Mass. If Fowler looks tired and worn, it's for good reason. Dante, who has severe autism, is midway through a 40-minute emotional outburst. And because of those outbursts, the local school had told Jen in late 2023 that it could no longer teach Dante. Advertisement As Jen searched for a school that would, she quit her job and became her son's full-time teacher, planning lessons and buying educational equipment with her own money. Dante, isolated from his former classmates, became less affectionate toward her, more apathetic about learning, and more distressed. To calm him, Jen sometimes had to lie on top of Dante as he flailed his limbs and cried, as in Craig's photo. But as Craig puts it, 'Ultimately, Jen's love, strength, and perseverance paid off.' Earlier this year, Jen and Dante learned that a school in Franklin, Mass., that specializes in teaching children with autism and other disabilities had an opening. Dante's first day there was in April. 'I'd like to think that any mother or parent, for that matter, could relate to this photograph,' Craig says. Craig's photo is one of the best that the Globe published last month, as chosen by editors. 🧩 1 Down: 93° POINTS OF INTEREST Change in Chinatown: Global restaurant chains have been arriving in the ethnic enclave, bearing bubble tea and hot pot and Mass. echoes: Zohran Mamdani won NYC's Democratic mayoral primary with ideas like free buses, rent control, and a tax on millionaires. Advertisement Cautionary tale: Columbia tried to negotiate with the Trump administration. Here's Measles surge: The year is only half over, and already there have been Hunger in America: In May, 15.6 percent of US adults surveyed by Morning Consult said they sometimes or often didn't have enough to eat, a shocking statistic for the wealthiest country in the world. ( Deadline governance: From tariffs to TikTok, Trump's governing style Not exactly: An email sent by the Trump Administration claimed that the new spending bill eliminates taxes on Social Security benefits for most recipients. Turns out that's not quite true. ( Gaza negotiations: When Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visits the White House today, Trump will be eager to advance a cease-fire deal with Hamas. ( Taking her cut: When Homeland Secretary Kristi Noem was governor of South Dakota, she secretly accepted some of the money she raised for a nonprofit that promotes her political career, tax records show. ( Globe event: Our colleague Cristina Silva, one of the paper's managing editors, will host a panel July 15 about the impact Latinos are having in Massachusetts and the challenges they face. Advertisement BESIDE THE POINT By Teresa Hanafin 🤷‍♀️ The WDNC Club: Arm fat. Chin hairs. Laundry. Your opinion. Perimenopausal and menopausal women say: We do not care. ( 🎨 Free events: Art classes, reading clubs, early Bastille Day celebrations, and 📺 This week's TV: Lena Dunham's 'Too Much,' Bono and Sting look back at Live Aid, another cold-case drama, and 🍵 The next thing: A Chicagoland food column says the hōjicha latte is an underhyped drink with the potential to dethrone matcha as the drink of choice among pilates princesses and GenZers. ( 🚉 Hit the ... track? Here are 📚 The most scathing book reviews of 2024: Including a look at Melania Trump's cliché-riddled memoir and Malcolm Gladwell's hollow brand extension. ( 🥪 Food scene: Mike & Patty's & its fabulous egg sandwiches opens in Lexington, Salsa Shack popped up in Brighton, and Thanks for reading Starting Point. This newsletter was edited by ❓ Have a question for the team? Email us at ✍🏼 If someone sent you this newsletter, you can 📬 Delivered Monday through Friday. Ian Prasad Philbrick can be reached at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store