Metro fare fixation committee report to be made public soon: BMRCL Managing Director Maheshwara Rao
Maheshwara Rao, Managing Director, BMRCL, however, avoided questions over the delay in publishing the report and did not clarify when the report would be published.
The fare fixation committee that hiked Bengaluru metro fares comprised Justice (Retd) R Tharani, former judge of the Madras High Court, along with Satyendra Pal Singh, Additional Secretary, Union Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, and E V Ramana Reddy, retired IAS officer and former additional chief secretary to the Government of Karnataka.
Rao's response came after parliamentarians, including P C Mohan and Tejasvi Surya, repeatedly requested that the report be made public. Earlier, BMRCL had declined to submit the fare fixation report under the Right to Information Act.
Surya sent a second letter to Rao on Thursday on the issue. He had earlier written on the matter on April 28. In the letter, he stated, 'In the wake of the steep hike in the metro fares, public interest demands that the FFC report be made available immediately to ensure transparency and accountability. Despite the passage of considerable time and my formal request almost 10 days ago, the report has neither been published on the BMRCL website nor made accessible through any official channel. This delay stands in sharp contrast to the practices followed by other metro organisations and goes against the interest of openness and informed discourse.'
He added, 'I once again urge you to promptly release the FFC report in full, without further delay. Transparency in public service delivery is essential for building trust and credibility, especially when fare decisions directly impact lakhs of daily commuters.'
The FFC was constituted in 2024 following a request from BMRCL to the Union Government for a fare revision, as metro fares had not been revised since 2017. The Union Government directed the committee to begin functioning on September 16, 2024, with a three-month deadline to submit recommendations.
The committee studied fare revision structures of other metro systems by visiting Singapore and Hong Kong, with FFC and BMRCL officials incurring expenses of approximately Rs 12.97 lakh and Rs 12.88 lakh, respectively, for these foreign tours. The FFC visited the national capital, given Delhi Metro's status as a leading metro system in India. The committee also consulted with Chennai Metro authorities.
The committee recommended an average fare increase of 46 per cent (after a 5 per cent discount for smart card users), though BMRCL had requested a 105.15 per cent hike, equivalent to a 14.02 per cent year-on-year increase. The FFC's recommendation translated to a 6.87 per cent year-on-year increase. As a result, the maximum fare increased from Rs 60 to Rs 90 for distances exceeding 25 km, making it the costliest metro in India.
Following public backlash and a directive from Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on February 13 this year, BMRCL capped the maximum stage-wise fare increase at 71 per cent (down from 105.15 per cent for certain slabs). The revised fares took effect on February 14, addressing anomalies where fares had doubled for short distances.
BMRCL cited a 42 per cent increase in staff salaries, a 366 per cent rise in maintenance and administration costs, and a 34 per cent increase in electricity bills from 2017 to March 2024. Security costs alone amount to Rs 7 crore per month (14 per cent of the Rs 50 crore monthly operational cost). BMRCL also faces significant loan repayment commitments, with Rs 770.60 crore (including Rs 647.66 crore in loans and Rs 122.94 crore in interest) due in 2024-25, projected to rise to Rs 2,776.58 crore by 2029-30.
The fare hike also led to a 4 per cent drop in ridership (from 8.6 lakh to 8.29 lakh on February 10, 2025). By the end of February, BMRCL recorded a ridership of 2.09 crore, a 40 lakh drop from January's 2.49 crore.
Sanath Prasad is a senior sub-editor and reporter with the Bengaluru bureau of Indian Express. He covers education, transport, infrastructure and trends and issues integral to Bengaluru. He holds more than two years of reporting experience in Karnataka. His major works include the impact of Hijab ban on Muslim girls in Karnataka, tracing the lives of the victims of Kerala cannibalism, exploring the trends in dairy market of Karnataka in the aftermath of Amul-Nandini controversy, and Karnataka State Elections among others. If he is not writing, he keeps himself engaged with badminton, swimming, and loves exploring. ... Read More
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
6 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Markets will hope for a 'TACO' trade if better senses prevail: Nilesh Shah of Kotak Mutual Fund
Following U.S. tariffs on Indian exports, experts suggest India should focus on growth-supportive reforms and leverage its GDP size. Markets will hope for a 'TACO' trade if better sense prevails, said Nilesh Shah, Managing Director at Kotak Mahindra AMC, after U.S. President Donald Trump announced new tariffs on Indian exports.'China is defying U.S./UN sanctions on Iran oil, Myanmar and Russia trade, and North Korea support. The size and competitiveness of an economy have their advantages,' Shah added that the unilateral imposition of tariffs should ideally push Indian policymakers toward more growth-supportive reforms. India's best deterrent remains the size and competitiveness of its GDP, he noted. Also Read | MF Tracker: UTI Mid Cap Fund turns Rs 10,000 SIP to nearly Rs 1.62 crore in 2 decades US President Donald Trump announced a 25% tariff on Indian exports starting from August 1. Trump further hinted at unspecified penalties linked to India's continued energy and military purchases from Russia. This follows the earlier 26% reciprocal tariff imposed on India on April 2. Another expert says it is difficult to see how we reached a situation where we have 25% tariff + penalty and he had noted that Trump may be a messiah for Indian trade and investments and it seemed like a great opportunity to win in global markets. 'A 25% rate leaves us higher than Vietnam, Indonesia, and other competitor economies from Asia/EU. India had a potential chance to get a 10% rate from the US.. imagine the positive impact of that to the Indian economy and trade and investments,' said Arvind Chari, Chief Investment Strategist, Q India UK, affiliate of Quantum Advisors should be deeply disappointing for the government and the foreign policy to have ended in this situation and with Trump there are always way outs and hope India can find one to get a better deal, Chari further mentioned. Another expert believes that the current tariff announcement is much beyond trade and has far bigger geopolitical implications on the ongoing bilateral relations between India and US since Operation Sindoor and roots of this aggression lie in - four factors. These factors include, firstly Indian denial of US role in ceasefire with Pakistan. Secondly, sustained buying of Russian crude, followed by continuous status of Russia as a key defence supplier and lastly growing strategic overtures of BRICS and attempts at forging a RIC (Russia, India, China) block which might disturb US geopolitical interests in SE Asia. Also Read | 13 equity mutual funds with over Rs 1,000 NAV offer up to 24% CAGR since their inception 'We don't rule out some counter measures by India on US exports and the path to a trade deal is not easy given sticky issues like agriculture, dairy and defence. We expect an increase in uncertainty and market volatility in the near term. We believe companies which have higher US exports might see increased volatility,' said Amnish Aggarwal, Director - Research, Institutional Research, PL Capital.'Although the current earnings season has not shown any meaningful recovery in domestic demand, hopes of festival season demand revival will increase interest in domestic stories for the time being. Domestic consumption, hospitals, select consumer, Infra, capital Goods, AMC and private banks will act as a defensive hedge during these volatile times,' Aggarwal adds. (Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)
New Indian Express
36 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
ED conducts first-ever raids in Andaman & Nicobar Islands linked to cooperative bank 'fraud'
PORT BLAIR: The Enforcement Directorate on Thursday conducted its first-ever searches in Andaman and Nicobar Islands as part of a money laundering case probe linked to an alleged cooperative bank loan 'fraud' involving a former MP from the Union Territory, official sources said. The case pertains to the Andaman Nicobar State Cooperative Bank (ANSCB) and its vice chairman Kuldeep Rai Sharma. Sharma, a 57-year-old Congress leader, is a former MP of the UT (2019-24). Nine places in and around Port Blair and two in Kolkata were raided by the officials of the central probe agency under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), the sources said. This is the first time that the agency has undertaken searches in the Union Territory located in the Bay of Bengal, they said. Sources said the agency has recovered some documents pointing towards "large-scale" irregularities in the grant of loans and overdraft facilities by ANSC Bank. The role of former Congress MP Sharma is also under the scanner of the ED, according to the sources. They alleged that a group of about 15 entities/companies were created by suspects for the benefit of Sharma and loan facilities of more than Rs 200 crore were fraudulently taken by these entities from the ANSCB. The sources said documents collected indicate that loan facilities were extended to various shell companies/ firms by ignoring the laid down procedures and guidelines of the bank. The money laundering case stems from an FIR of the Crime and Economic Offences Wing of the Andaman Nicobar Police.
The Hindu
36 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Raichur MP alleges stagnation in Institutions of Eminence scheme
Raichur Lok Sabha member G. Kumar Naik has criticised the Union Government's handling of the Institutions of Eminence (IoE) scheme, saying the Centre has failed to deliver on its core promise of building globally competitive universities even eight years after its launch. On July 28, the MP had raised the issue in the Lok Sabha. Following up, on July 31, Mr. Naik released a statement in which the MP stated: 'Bureaucratic inertia, underfunding, and lack of institutional autonomy' have derailed the Central Government's flagship programme for higher education excellence. 'The state of higher education in India speaks volumes in the silence that has followed. The ambition was to put Indian universities on the global map. But as the numbers show, the reality is far from this goal,' he said. According to the reply by the Union Ministry of Education to his query, only 114 institutions have applied under the IoE scheme since its launch in 2017. Of these, just 11 are greenfield institutions that are yet to commence operations. The MP termed the figures 'abysmally low', noting with concern that prominent institutions such as Jawaharlal Nehru University, known for its work in the social sciences and development studies, are excluded from public funding under the scheme. Mr. Naik pointed out that while 12 universities have been granted the 'eminence' tag, no new Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) has been signed since 2022. 'This is because the Empowered Expert Committee, which was supposed to process new applications, has not been reconstituted after its term expired in 2021,' he said. Highlighting the 2026 QS World University Rankings, Mr. Naik said only six Indian institutions have made it to the top 500 list – five of which have consistently figured in the rankings since 2012. 'The scheme aimed to elevate Indian institutions into the top 500 globally. However, according to the 2026 QS World University Rankings, only six Indian universities have made it to that list so far. Five of these had already entered the top 500 by 2012, during the tenure of the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government. Since then, only one additional institution, the Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, has made it to the list under the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government. Even that has seen a steep fall in its global standing, slipping from 147 in 2016 to 219 in 2026,' he said. Pointing to ₹10,000 crore earmarked for 10 public institutions under this scheme, Mr. Naik claimed that almost 40% of the amount remains unallocated, and even Delhi University had received only ₹481 crore. 'Worse, this year's budget estimates have been slashed by nearly 68% compared to 2023-24, to just ₹475.12 crore,' Mr. Naik said. Mr. Naik flagged a broader decline in public investment in education, pointing out that the share of education in the Union Budget has fallen from over 4% in 2013-14 to 2.5% in 2025-26 whereas the number of students in higher education has grown from 3.2 crore (32 million) in 2013-14 to 4.3 crore (43 million) in 2021-22. He added that one-third of faculty posts in Central universities remain vacant as of March 2023. 'The 2017 policy shift from grants to loans has only added pressure on our universities. It is making higher education more expensive for students, and financially unsustainable for institutions.' he claimed. Quoting a 2023 report by the Ministry of Science & Technology, Mr. Naik noted that India's expenditure on research and development (R&D) had declined to just 0.64% of GDP as of 2020-21, continuing a downward trend since 2009-10. 'Our researcher base is also shrinking, with the number of researchers per capita five times lower than the global average. While China is producing frontier AI models like DeepSeek, we are struggling to fill teaching vacancies,' he said. 'The quest for 'eminence' will no doubt continue, but whether it is driven by meaningful action, or left to wither in quiet neglect is for the Indian political class to decide,' he stated.
