Wits study reveals gap in Sedibeng's integrated mental health-care system
The study — published in the online journal Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health, and led by Saira Abdulla, a PhD fellow at the Centre for Health Policy at Wits University — evaluated mental health services in nine clinics across Sedibeng in southern Gauteng.
'Sedibeng district has really high levels of unemployment, poverty and violence — all of which really worsen health inequalities,' said Abdulla. 'The district has also implemented mental health screening programmes in primary health care [after] the Life Esidimeni tragedy.'
About 4,500 patients in Sedibeng had accessed these services, though the system had not undergone a formal evaluation.
The research compared two models of integration: physically integrated clinics, where psychiatric and PHC teams share space, records and management structures; and co-located clinics, where psychiatric services operate adjacent to PHC facilities, but function independently.
'In South Africa, we actually don't have any standardised approaches to integrating that care,' said Abdulla. 'In physically integrated clinics, mental health staff are part of the clinic. They share records, space and resources. In co-located clinics, they work in silos.'
While physically integrated models offered better collaboration, both settings were constrained by inadequate space, high caseloads and limited staff. In some clinics, psychiatric consultations were held in shared rooms, with no privacy.
'I just want you to imagine, as you are speaking to the psychiatric doctor, there's another psychiatric doctor in the same room as you seeing another patient,' Abdulla said. 'The patients can listen to each other's consultation.'
I just want you to imagine, as you are speaking to the psychiatric doctor, there's another psychiatric doctor in the same room as you seeing another patient,' Abdulla said. 'The patients can listen to each other's consultation.
The study also uncovered serious staffing challenges. Clinics typically operated with five psychiatric nurses and doctors rotated between sites for adult psychiatric consultations. With monthly caseloads ranging from 580 to 910 patients, the lack of consistent staff meant long queues and rushed consultations.
'You have people waiting outside in long lines for hours without any seating,' said Abdulla. 'Providers [staff] have to decide; see what is more important and then deal with it the next time you come back.'
The research also found that some PHC doctors were reluctant to treat psychiatric patients, especially stable ones who could be managed at PHC level. Instead, they referred all cases to already stretched community psychiatry staff.
'They are already overburdened and might not feel confident enough to treat mental health conditions,' said Abdulla. 'Primary health-care providers should be managing common mental health disorders or stable cases, which is not actually happening.'
Another finding was the importance of leadership.
The physically integrated clinic benefited from stronger management, resulting in better communication and less staff conflict. In contrast, the co-located clinic suffered from a 'vacuum in power and in management', which led to a toxic work environment.
Abdulla is calling for national and district-level reform.
'We need clearer guidance in terms of referrals,' she said. 'We need mental health training for primary health-care staff. We need strong leadership at the clinic level as well as at the district level.'
She added that clinics would also benefit from having dedicated mental health champions to support day-to-day integration efforts.
Though the study focused solely on Sedibeng for Abdulla's doctoral research, she hopes to continue this work beyond her PhD.
Her warning to health policymakers is stark.
'Integration needs to happen, but it can't happen without leadership, without support and without accountability,' she said. 'While we do have really great policies, they need to be backed by action on the ground if you want to prevent tragedies like the Life Esidimeni. We must invest in primary health care and in specific integrated care.'
The tragedy involved the deaths of more than 140 mental health patients who were relocated from the private institution to less expensive
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

TimesLIVE
15-07-2025
- TimesLIVE
Wits study reveals gap in Sedibeng's integrated mental health-care system
A recent study has found that integrating psychiatric services into primary health-care (PHC) clinics in Sedibeng has improved access for people living with serious mental illness. However, progress is being undermined by various challenges, including inadequate infrastructure, high patient volumes, staff shortages and fragmented leadership. The study — published in the online journal Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health, and led by Saira Abdulla, a PhD fellow at the Centre for Health Policy at Wits University — evaluated mental health services in nine clinics across Sedibeng in southern Gauteng. 'Sedibeng district has really high levels of unemployment, poverty and violence — all of which really worsen health inequalities,' said Abdulla. 'The district has also implemented mental health screening programmes in primary health care [after] the Life Esidimeni tragedy.' About 4,500 patients in Sedibeng had accessed these services, though the system had not undergone a formal evaluation. The research compared two models of integration: physically integrated clinics, where psychiatric and PHC teams share space, records and management structures; and co-located clinics, where psychiatric services operate adjacent to PHC facilities, but function independently. 'In South Africa, we actually don't have any standardised approaches to integrating that care,' said Abdulla. 'In physically integrated clinics, mental health staff are part of the clinic. They share records, space and resources. In co-located clinics, they work in silos.' While physically integrated models offered better collaboration, both settings were constrained by inadequate space, high caseloads and limited staff. In some clinics, psychiatric consultations were held in shared rooms, with no privacy. 'I just want you to imagine, as you are speaking to the psychiatric doctor, there's another psychiatric doctor in the same room as you seeing another patient,' Abdulla said. 'The patients can listen to each other's consultation.' I just want you to imagine, as you are speaking to the psychiatric doctor, there's another psychiatric doctor in the same room as you seeing another patient,' Abdulla said. 'The patients can listen to each other's consultation. The study also uncovered serious staffing challenges. Clinics typically operated with five psychiatric nurses and doctors rotated between sites for adult psychiatric consultations. With monthly caseloads ranging from 580 to 910 patients, the lack of consistent staff meant long queues and rushed consultations. 'You have people waiting outside in long lines for hours without any seating,' said Abdulla. 'Providers [staff] have to decide; see what is more important and then deal with it the next time you come back.' The research also found that some PHC doctors were reluctant to treat psychiatric patients, especially stable ones who could be managed at PHC level. Instead, they referred all cases to already stretched community psychiatry staff. 'They are already overburdened and might not feel confident enough to treat mental health conditions,' said Abdulla. 'Primary health-care providers should be managing common mental health disorders or stable cases, which is not actually happening.' Another finding was the importance of leadership. The physically integrated clinic benefited from stronger management, resulting in better communication and less staff conflict. In contrast, the co-located clinic suffered from a 'vacuum in power and in management', which led to a toxic work environment. Abdulla is calling for national and district-level reform. 'We need clearer guidance in terms of referrals,' she said. 'We need mental health training for primary health-care staff. We need strong leadership at the clinic level as well as at the district level.' She added that clinics would also benefit from having dedicated mental health champions to support day-to-day integration efforts. Though the study focused solely on Sedibeng for Abdulla's doctoral research, she hopes to continue this work beyond her PhD. Her warning to health policymakers is stark. 'Integration needs to happen, but it can't happen without leadership, without support and without accountability,' she said. 'While we do have really great policies, they need to be backed by action on the ground if you want to prevent tragedies like the Life Esidimeni. We must invest in primary health care and in specific integrated care.' The tragedy involved the deaths of more than 140 mental health patients who were relocated from the private institution to less expensive


eNCA
31-05-2025
- eNCA
Stage production recounts Life Esidimeni tragedy
JOHANNESBURG - The Life Esidimeni tragedy shook South Africa to its core. 144 mentally ill patients died after government moved them out of private healthcare facilities to state-subsidised ones. READ: SA State Theatre launches streaming platform Isililo recounts the collective traumas of the families who lost their lost their loved ones. Producer, Siyabonga Mdubeki, had a talk with eNCA's Abigail Visagie on his production that will be showcased at SA state theatre in June.


The Citizen
29-05-2025
- The Citizen
Jona Vaughan's closure rumours denied despite hardships
AFTER rumours that the Jona Vaughan Home for the Handicapped in Amanzimtoti might be closed down and its residents transferred to other facilities, the home's parents' association said it fears another Life Esidimeni tragedy might unfold if that is allowed to happen. Also read: Grim festive season for Jona Vaughan staff The Life Esidimeni tragedy involved the deaths of 144 patients at psychiatric facilities in Gauteng from causes including starvation and neglect. The patients died after they were removed from Life Esidimeni, a private healthcare provider, in 2016, and relocated to cheaper care centres. The Jona Vaughan Home for the Handicapped is a non-profit organisation dedicated to providing care and residency to 69 handicapped persons, 40% of whom are abandoned or orphaned. The centre is administered by Durban and Coastal Mental Health (DCMH), which in turn is funded by the Department of Health and the Department of Social Development. The treasurer of the parents' association, Charmaine Lombard, said she heard from two sources that the Department of Health may consider withdrawing all funding from the end of June. 'There is no other facility like Jona Vaughan to cater for such profound disabilities. If Jona Vaughan were to close its doors, the residents would be moved to facilities outside of Durban. This would be detrimental to our residents as the Jona Vaughan Home is the only home that many of the residents know,' said Lombard. The funding that the facility receives from DCMH is never enough to cover all its day-to-day operating costs, which has led the parents' association to spearhead several fundraising initiatives. Lombard said the staff, whom many of the centre's residents regard as their parents, have not been paid in full since April. The water and electricity bill stands at R1.8 million, and the municipality has issued a notice to disconnect the supply on June 2. 'We feel that these issues are serious and critical and require a long-standing resolution, as we are the voices of the very people who deserve to be treated with care, dignity, kindness and respect. Just because the residents are mentally and physically challenged does not exclude them from the basic human rights they are entitled to,' she said. DCMH's CEO, Mbonisi Sibisi, stated that there have been no discussions regarding the closure of Jona Vaughn; however, an agreement between DCMH and DOH is set to expire in March 2026. 'DCMH has consistent meetings with DOH where we discuss the performance of the centre and other related issues. Our organisation is an NPO and largely depends on subsidies and donations. The subsidy only covers a fraction of the centre's costs,' said Sibisi. He also urged the public to keep supporting Jona Vaughan. How to help: A Back-a-buddy campaign to raise funds for Jona Vaughan Home for the Handicapped has been started. Go to to donate. The home is also hosting a work party on June 7, from 08:00, open to the public who may wish to assist. For more South Coast Sun news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. You can also check out our videos on our YouTube channel or follow us on TikTok. Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter and get news delivered straight to your inbox. Do you have more information pertaining to this story? Feel free to let us know by commenting on our Facebook page or you can contact our newsroom on 031 903 2341 and speak to a journalist. At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!