A new Trader Joe's store is baffling customers...'like a glitch in the matrix'
A new store opened at 14140 Riverside Drive in Sherman Oaks, Los Angeles, on June 6.
However there was already an existing Trader Joe's location only about 100 yards away - at 14119 Riverside Drive.
'Maybe we are living in a simulation, because that seems like a glitch in the matrix,' a TikTok user commented on a video of the two stores posted by ShavsPaper.
One TikToker claimed that the original store is one of the busiest in the state, so the retailer is testing the two spots.
Another claimed the opening of the new store was delayed, so the chain had to re-sign the lease for the old location.
Trader Joe's has not confirmed the reason, but the chain is planning to operate both of them.
'We've had a great relationship with our customers in Sherman Oaks for 52 years, and we plan to keep both stores open,' Trader Joe's spokesperson Nakia Rohde told DailyMail.com.
Many shoppers 'don't see the problem' with two stores and believe multiple locations are a 'win-win' when looking for popular items like its viral mini tote bags.
L.A. in a Minute host Evan Lovett had nothing but good things to say about the new location last week in a TikTok video.
'It's modern, it's spacious, it's got an expanded freezer and refrigerated section. It's a great store,' he said.
Lovett also pointed out that it has a separate parking garage, unlike the other Riverside Drive store.
'The smaller Trader Joe's wasn't crowded and all the stuff was in there. I parked with no issue for the first time ever on a Sunday,' a shopper claimed on TikTok.
A few shoppers insisted the older location is superior even though it makes some customers feel 'claustrophobic.'
'Who wants to park your car in a garage that you need a ticket for?! Then get into a small elevator! Just wait until it gets crowded w/all those new apartments in that complex!,' a person commented.
'H*** no, I won't go. The old one is fantastic: You get in and out in minutes, and the staff is fantastic,' another shopper responded.
Others insisted they would visit the new store when they had a chance but would continue visiting the other one now that it will be 'mostly empty.'
Trader Joe's popularity has skyrocketed in recent years
The grocery store is known for its miniature tote bags which went viral
Founded in 1967, Trader Joe's has become a supermarket empire in the US operating about 600 locations.
The chain made headlines last year after its tote bags became the talk of TikTok.
Shoppers began reselling its Mini Insulated Totes for $100 on eBay, and customers would line up around the block just to get their hands on the $3 bags.
Trader Joe's brings back bags from time to time, and shoppers were in a frenzy last March after its $4 collapsible totes returned to stores.
The chain is in the process of opening nearly two dozen locations across 13 states, the first bunch launching a few months ago.
As of now, the latest Trader Joe's location opened last week in Tracy, Georgia.
The only states that don't house a Trader Joe's are Alaska, Hawaii, Mississippi, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, West Virginia and Wyoming.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
30 minutes ago
- Times
Google has signalled the death of googling. What comes next?
For a quarter of a century, the front page of the internet hasn't changed: a spare, white screen with a rectangular search box beneath a single word: Google. Whether for practical purposes — getting the best price for a flight to Sardinia, finding a new frying pan — or to settle an argument, such as who is the best tennis player of all time — Google is the first port of call. The company that began as a student project by two Stanford computer science students became a pillar of modern life, a utility, like running water. It also turned into perhaps the best business the world has ever seen. Google handles nine of every ten searches on the web and, according to Forbes, its co-founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, are worth $144 billion and $138 billion respectively. Last year Alphabet, Google's parent company, brought in $350 billion in sales — more than the gross domestic product of 140 countries, thanks mostly to cash from advertisers who pay to jam their products high up into the results of the 8.5 billion searches that Google runs every day. It is the most elegant of machines. And yet, last month Google rolled out something that gave a glimpse of a very different Google, a new way to search and, long term, potentially an entirely new internet — AI Mode. This is a quantum leap that threatens to radically upend the landscape of the internet. 'Google is disrupting itself,' said Laurence O'Toole, chief executive of Authoritas, a specialist AI search consultancy. The change, he added, was 'seismic'. It arrived for British users on Wednesday, a form of search that allows people to ask any question to what looks like a chatbot and receive a detailed answer — not just a list of blue hyperlinks. And the more complex or detailed the query, the better. Google said that the new version handles queries that 'would have previously required multiple searches'. In short, it invites you almost to talk to Google. No need to trim or fine-tune your question: just blather on and let Google figure it out. On a desktop, users can press the AI Mode button in the search bar, on a mobile, one can enable AI Mode from the list at the top of the tabs, then tap the microphone button and start talking to get across your query, 'as messy or complicated as it may be', said Google. An example. Why, I ask, has Nigel Farage become so popular? Once I hit 'enter', AI Mode goes into 'thinking' mode. It whirrs into action, scanning through webpages in their hundreds in a fraction of a second, according to its 'sites' counter. Then, it spits out a summary. Farage, the answer read, had, 'tapped into a sense of frustration and disillusionment with the mainstream political establishment in the UK', before offering six bullet points to flesh out its point, from his 'strong stance on immigration' to his 'social media savvy' and shifting demographics. The answers often included small icons, indicating links to third-party sites that were prime sources of AI Mode's musings. But what it did not do was give that familiar list of links to click on. For two decades now we have been a slave to the search engine algorithm — but potentially no more. This is important because those links are not only the fuel of the Google machine, they are the architecture of the web we have come to know and been conditioned to expect. Companies pay top dollar to show up there, and critically, above their rivals. In America, land of the class-action lawsuit, lawyers want to make sure they are first in line when someone goes googling. One of the most expensive keyword search terms is 'mesothelioma attorney', coming in at $236 per click, according to PPC, an online ad specialist. Lawsuits over mesothelioma, a form of cancer attributed to asbestos exposure, have generated tens of billions of dollars in payouts. The cheapest search terms — those deemed least likely to lead to a purchase, such as 'can dogs smell fear?' — go for as little as five cents. The beauty of the great Google ad machine, however, is that no matter what you look for, clicks turn into cash, and that cash flows into Google's coffers. Which leads to the basic question: why on earth would Google ever want to toy with killing its golden goose? The answer is simply ChatGPT. It was early 2023 when Sundar Pichai, Google's long-serving chief executive, issued a 'code red'. OpenAI had just released ChatGPT, a new chatbot that was wildly powerful, capable of passing standardised tests, telling jokes and answering virtually any question thrown its way. To the internet-using public, it felt like magic. To Google, it felt like a threat. 'Google has been the greatest business in the history of capitalism for 20 years because they owned the consumer. They owned the verb,' said Brad Gerstner, a renowned tech investor, last week. 'The first real threat in 20 years came about in the ChatGPT moment, and it's continued to accelerate.' Put another way, the arrival of ChatGPT, and its many rivals, offer an entirely new way to interact with technology. Ask a question, get an answer, as opposed to a mix of ads and website links that one must then navigate to track down the right product or answer. Critics have long railed against Google, seeing it as little more than a reconstituted, global Yellow Pages with search results shoved beneath a long list of ads. AI bots such as ChatGPT offer a wholly different experience, which for many is simply better. From a standing start less than three years ago, ChatGPT is now used by more than 700 million people every week, and handles a billion searches for them. People — especially younger ones — are striking up relationships with chatbots, sharing their deepest, darkest secrets and seeking advice. It is almost intimate. So, of course, they are also going to their trusted bots for product recommendations and research queries — and it threatens to erode Google's business. Google's AI Mode is the result of necessity and signposts the way the internet is heading. There are still limitations. It can't yet make a dinner reservation or book you a flight. But it can tell you what airlines fly direct to Barcelona, and remember an admonition to never show results with a certain airline — ahem — with which I have had several bad experiences. It will also suggest a weekend itinerary. In response to a request for a weekend in Barcelona 'off the beaten track', it suggested good walking neighbourhoods, such as Gràcia, and olive-oil tasting in Sant Antoni, with links to sites that offer more information or direct booking. That last step in the process — doing things for you — is not far off. Google, OpenAI and the rest of the industry are working feverishly on 'agents', bots that, for example, have your credit card details and will autonomously carry out tasks, from booking travel to taking charge of everyday drudgery, such as ordering toilet paper and toothpaste. In this not-to-distant future, where everyone has a digital butler and their human masters are abstracted away from many purchasing decisions, advertising will probably look very different. The marketing plans and brand strategies businesses tailored to the Google search algorithm? Trashed. There are early signs of the changes afoot. Last year Google rolled out AI Overviews. These are less detailed summaries than those offered by AI Mode, and sit atop the familiar cascade of search results. They are disrupting the industry, with some websites reporting as much as a 50 per cent drop in traffic when Google results include AI overviews. Google disputes this: 'We continue to send billions of clicks to websites every day, and we have not seen dramatic drops in aggregate web traffic as is being suggested.' But Google's changes are, in a way, preparation for a much more profound technological shift: the death of the smartphone. When highly capable bots can understand and respond to spoken queries, is spending hours peering into a little black mirror in one's palm really the pinnacle of technology? Or will we, in the not too distant future, look back on how we use technology today as an almost cro-magnon existence, pecking at a little glass rectangle, grunting, smiling and crying at what it yields? This is the bet of Sir Jony Ive, the celebrated British industrial designer behind the iPhone and iPod. He recently joined forces with OpenAI to design a novel, AI-centred device. Ive has kept schtum as to what it will look like, but there is speculation that it will be a screenless, potentially wearable device (a necklace or lapel pin, perhaps) with a camera and a microphone that can see what we see, hear what we hear, and respond in natural language to anything a wearer might ask. 'Jony recently gave me one of the prototypes of the device for the first time to take home, and I've been able to live with it,' said OpenAI's co-founder Sam Altman. 'And I think it is the coolest piece of technology that the world will have ever seen.' In that context, where screens take a back seat, where ambient AI's become the norm, Google's AI Mode starts to make more sense. A static list of blue links? That is so 2024. AI Mode is just the beginning.
The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Big tech has spent $155bn on AI this year. It's about to spend hundreds of billions more
The US's largest companies have spent 2025 locked in a competition to spend more money than one another, lavishing $155bn on the development of artificial intelligence, more than the US government has spent on education, training, employment and social services in the 2025 fiscal year so far. Based on the most recent financial disclosures of Silicon Valley's biggest players, the race is about to accelerate to hundreds of billions in a single year. Over the past two weeks, Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet, Google's parent, have shared their quarterly public financial reports. Each disclosed that their year-to-date capital expenditure, a figure that refers to the money companies spend to acquire or upgrade tangible assets, already totals tens of billions. Capex, as the term is abbreviated, is a proxy for technology companies' spending on AI because the technology requires gargantuan investments in physical infrastructure, namely data centers, which require large amounts of power, water and expensive semiconductor chips. Google said during its most recent earnings call that its capital expenditure 'primarily reflects investments in servers and data centers to support AI'. Meta's year-to-date capital expenditure amounted to $30.7bn, doubling the $15.2bn figure from the same time last year, per its earnings report. For the most recent quarter alone, the company spent $17bn on capital expenditures, also double the same period in 2024, $8.5bn. Alphabet reported nearly $40bn in capex to date for the first two quarters of the current fiscal year, and Amazon reported $55.7bn. Microsoft said it would spend more than $30bn in the current quarter to build out the data centers powering its AI services. Microsoft CFO Amy Hood said the current quarter's capex would be at least 50% more than the outlay during the same period a year earlier and greater than the company's record capital expenditures of $24.2bn in the quarter to June. 'We will continue to invest against the expansive opportunity ahead,' Hood said. For the coming fiscal year, big tech's total capital expenditure is slated to balloon enormously, surpassing the already eye-popping sums of the previous year. Microsoft plans to unload about $100bn on AI in the next fiscal year, CEO Satya Nadella said Wednesday. Meta plans to spend between $66bn and $72bn. Alphabet plans to spend $85bn, significantly higher than its previous estimation of $75bn. Amazon estimated that its 2025 expenditure would come to $100bn as it plows money into Amazon Web Services, which analysts now expect to amount to $118bn. In total, the four tech companies will spend more than $400bn on capex in the coming year, according to the Wall Street Journal. The multibillion-dollar figures represent mammoth investments, which the Journal points out is larger than the European Union's quarterly spending on defense. However, the tech giants can't seem to spend enough for their investors. Microsoft, Google and Meta informed Wall Street analysts last quarter that their total capex would be higher than previously estimated. In the case of all three companies, investors were thrilled, and shares in each company soared after their respective earnings calls. Microsoft's market capitalization hit $4tn the day after its report. Even Apple, the cagiest of the tech giants, signaled that it would boost its spending on AI in the coming year by a major amount, either via internal investments or acquisitions. The company's quarterly capex rose to $3.46bn, up from $2.15bn during the same period last year. The iPhone maker reported blockbuster earnings Thursday, with rebounding iPhone sales and better-than-expected business in China, but it is still seen as lagging farthest behind on development and deployment of AI products among the tech giants. Tim Cook, Apple's CEO, said Thursday that the company was reallocating a 'fair number' of employees to focus on artificial intelligence and that the 'heart of our AI strategy' is to increase investments and 'embed' AI across all of its devices and platforms. Cook refrained from disclosing exactly how much Apple is spending, however. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion 'We are significantly growing our investment, I'm not putting specific numbers behind that,' he said. Smaller players are trying to keep up with the incumbents' massive spending and capitalize on the gold rush. OpenAI announced at the end of the week of earnings that it had raised $8.3bn in investment, part of a planned $40bn round of funding, valuing the startup, whose ChatGPT chatbot kicked in 2022, at $300bn.
Reuters
30 minutes ago
- Reuters
Berkshire takes Kraft Heinz writedown, operating profit falls
Aug 2 (Reuters) - Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (BRKa.N), opens new tab on Saturday wrote down part of its investment in Kraft Heinz (KHC.O), opens new tab, and reported a 4% decline in second-quarter operating profit as premiums from insurance underwriting fell. Berkshire also reported a 59% decline in net income, reflecting lower overall investment gains from its common stock holdings, as well as the Kraft Heinz writedown. Operating income totaled $11.16 billion, or about $7,760 per Class A share, compared with $11.6 billion a year earlier. Net income fell to $12.37 billion from $30.35 billion.
