
Sierra Metals Responds to Alpayana's Increased Offer; Makes No Recommendation to Shareholders
The Board of Directors of Sierra Metals (the " Board"), after consultation with its independent legal and financial advisors and based on the unanimous recommendation of the Special Committee of independent directors of the Board (the " Special Committee"), has unanimously determined to make NO RECOMMENDATION as to whether holders of Common Shares (" Shareholders") should accept or reject the Revised Offer (the " Revised Recommendation").
The Board notes that it had hoped to reach agreed terms with Alpayana for a supported transaction. Following the termination of those discussions, the Board makes its Revised Recommendation due to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the continued extensive conditionality and uncertainty attached to the Revised Offer, noting that the Revised Offer continues to contain conditions which Alpayana is aware cannot be satisfied (as described further below).
The Board will provide greater context regarding the Revised Recommendation in a Notice of Change to Directors' Circular (the " Notice of Change") to be filed on SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca) under Sierra's issuer profile. The Notice of Change will also be mailed to all persons required to be sent a copy under applicable securities laws.
The Board encourages Shareholders, including those who may have already accepted the Revised Offer and who may lawfully withdraw their deposited Common Shares, to consider the Revised Offer and the information contained in the Notice of Change carefully and make their own decisions regarding whether or not to accept the Revised Offer. Unless extended, the Revised Offer expires at 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on May 12, 2025.
The Notice of Change will include a letter to shareholders from the Board, which will summarize the principal factors considered by the Board in reaching its recommendation, set out below.
Sierra Metals and BMO Conducted an Exhaustive Strategic Review. Since December 16, 2024, the date that Alpayana announced its intention to make its original offer at an offer price of C$0.85 in cash per Common Share (the " Original Offer"), the Special Committee, with the assistance of the Company's management and BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. (" BMO"), has worked to actively pursue a broad range of strategic alternatives in order to identify other options that may be in the best interests of Sierra Metals and its Shareholders, and that might have resulted in a transaction superior to the Original Offer. The Special Committee considered the outcome of this process, the range of other strategic alternatives available to Sierra Metals and the Revised Offer and concluded that the Revised Offer represented the best alternative available to Sierra Metals and its Shareholders.
Significant Premium to Market Price. The Revised Offer of C$1.15 per Common Share represents a premium of approximately 49% to the closing price of the Common Shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange on December 13, 2024 (the last trading day prior to the public disclosure of the Original Offer). The premium to Sierra Metals' Shareholders is effectively higher when considering that the share price for peers of Sierra Metals has declined 11%, since the Original Offer. The Revised Offer also represents a 35% increase from the Original Offer of C$0.85 per Common Share.
100% Liquidity and Certainty of Value. The Revised Offer provides 100% cash consideration for the Common Shares, giving Shareholders certainty of value and immediate liquidity at an attractive price in the face of volatile markets.
Project Execution and Development Risk. The Board and the Special Committee believe that the Revised Offer provides Shareholders with a fair value for the Company's portfolio of projects, including both the Bolivar and Yauricocha mines, without the long-term risks associated with the development and execution of operational improvements at both Bolivar and Yauricocha.
BMO Fairness Opinion. BMO provided the Special Committee with a written opinion to the effect that, as of the date of such opinion, subject to the assumptions, limitations and qualifications set out therein, the consideration proposed to be received by Shareholders (other than Alpayana) under the Revised Offer is fair, from a financial point of view, to Shareholders.
The Board Believes in the Potential Upside of the Company's Assets. In the event that the Revised Offer is not successful, the Board believes in the potential of the Company to continue on a stand-alone basis. Specifically, the Company's two copper producing assets, the Yauricocha mine in Peru and the Bolivar mine in Mexico, both contain significant near mine, brownfield and greenfield exploration potential that could be leveraged to drive significant long-term value for the Company. At Yauricocha, the Company obtained the permit to mine below level 1120 where 95% of the mine's current mineral reserves sit, allowing the mine to operate at full capacity (currently 3,600 tpd) since Q4 2024. The Company believes there is significant exploration opportunity below level 1120 as the geology appears open in all directions. Sierra Metals is also confident in its exploration efforts at Bolivar and its ability to deliver additional mineral resources to support the Company's plan to increase production capacity from 5,000 tpd to 7,500 tpd in the mid-term.
The Revised Offer Remains Highly Conditional. The Revised Offer contains a significant number of conditions which must be satisfied or waived before Alpayana is obligated to take up and pay for any Common Shares tendered. Many of the conditions are not subject to materiality thresholds or reasonableness standards or any other objective criteria, but rather are in Alpayana's sole discretion. Further, Alpayana is aware that certain conditions of the Revised Offer, as further set out below, cannot be satisfied.
The Revised Offer contains a condition that no shareholder rights plan or similar plan shall have been adopted by the Company. On December 16, 2024, Alpayana announced its intention to make the Original Offer. Following this announcement, on December 30, 2024, Sierra Metals entered into a shareholder rights plan to ensure that all Shareholders are treated fairly in connection with any take-over bid. Later, on December 30, 2024, Alpayana formally commenced the Original Offer, which contained a condition that no shareholder rights plan or similar plan should have been adopted by the Company, despite the fact that such condition could not have been satisfied at the time the Original Offer was formally commenced. This condition remains in the Revised Offer.
The Revised Offer contains a condition that the Company shall not have adopted or amended, or taken any other action with respect to, any bonus, profit sharing, incentive, salary or other compensation plan, severance, change in control, employment or other employee benefit plan, agreement, fund or arrangement for the benefit of any officer, director or consultant, except for limited exceptions. Following the Original Offer, which the Board determined to be highly opportunistic, well below the fair value of the Company and which BMO had determined to be inadequate, from a financial point of view, to the Shareholders, the Board determined to make amendments to the employment agreements of certain officers of the Company, to provide such officers with adequate protection in the event that such officers are terminated without cause within 12 months of a change of control and to ensure the continued retention of such officers as a result of the turbulence and uncertainty created by the opportunistic offer. The particulars of such change of control provisions were fully described in the Directors' Circular of the Company dated January 13, 2025 under the heading " Arrangements Between Sierra and its Directors and Officers – Compensation Agreements and Arrangements". Such changes are customary in connection with unsolicited takeover bids and were necessary for retention purposes to allow the Company to continue to operate while the Board assessed the Original Offer and potential alternatives. Alpayana was aware of these change of control provisions at the time it made the Revised Offer, however, such condition remains in the Revised Offer.
The Revised Offer contains a condition that the Company shall not have issued, sold, granted or awarded any Common Shares or other equity or voting interests or any options or rights to acquire Common Shares. Following the conclusion of the financial year-ended December 31, 2024, as part of the Company's regular compensation process, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,370,956 restricted share units to senior management as part of their performance bonuses for the year ended December 31, 2024. Such grants were made in the ordinary course, consistent with past practice and properly disclosed via the System for Electronic Disclosure by Insiders (SEDI). Alpayana was aware of these issuances, and the timing thereof, at the time it made the Revised Offer, however, such condition remains in the Revised Offer.
Alpayana was aware that the above noted conditions could not be satisfied at the time it made the Revised Offer. However, it has not elected to waive such conditions in connection with the Revised Offer. As a result, tendering Common Shares to the Revised Offer, in effect, constitutes the grant to Alpayana of a unilateral and discretionary option to acquire all of the Common Shares and there can be no certainty that Alpayana will waive such conditions and take up and pay for the Common Shares.
About Sierra Metals
Sierra Metals is a Canadian mining company focused on copper production with additional base and precious metals by-product credits at its Yauricocha Mine in Peru and Bolivar Mine in Mexico. The Company is intent on safely increasing production volume and growing mineral resources. Sierra Metals has recently had several new key discoveries and still has many more exciting brownfield exploration opportunities in Peru and Mexico that are within close proximity to the existing mines. Additionally, the Company has large land packages at each of its mines with several prospective regional targets providing longer-term exploration upside and mineral resource growth potential.
Forward-Looking Statements
This news release contains forward-looking information within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking information relates to future events or the anticipated performance of Sierra Metals and reflect management's expectations or beliefs regarding such future events and anticipated performance based on an assumed set of economic conditions and courses of action. In certain cases, statements that contain forward-looking information can be identified by the use of words such as "plans", "expects", "is expected", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates", "believes" or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might", or "will be taken", "occur" or "be achieved" or the negative of these words or comparable terminology. By its very nature forward-looking information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual performance of Sierra Metals to be materially different from any anticipated performance expressed or implied by such forward-looking information.
Forward-looking information is subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual events or results to differ from those reflected in the forward-looking information, including, without limitation, the risks described under the heading "Risk Factors" in the Company's annual information form dated March 26, 2025 for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 and other risks identified in the Company's filings with Canadian securities regulators, which are available at www.sedarplus.ca.
The risk factors referred to above are not an exhaustive list of the factors that may affect any of the Company's forward-looking information. Forward-looking information includes statements about the future and is inherently uncertain, and the Company's actual achievements or other future events or conditions may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking information due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors. The Company's statements containing forward-looking information are based on the beliefs, expectations, and opinions of management on the date the statements are made, and the Company does not assume any obligation to update such forward-looking information if circumstances or management's beliefs, expectations or opinions should change, other than as required by applicable law. For the reasons set forth above, one should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Hargreaves Services (LON:HSP) Will Pay A Dividend Of £0.185
The board of Hargreaves Services Plc (LON:HSP) has announced that it will pay a dividend on the 3rd of November, with investors receiving £0.185 per share. Even though the dividend went up, the yield is still quite low at only 5.0%. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. Hargreaves Services' Future Dividend Projections Appear Well Covered By Earnings It would be nice for the yield to be higher, but we should also check if higher levels of dividend payment would be sustainable. Before this announcement, Hargreaves Services was paying out 83% of earnings, but a comparatively small 47% of free cash flows. Since the dividend is just paying out cash to shareholders, we care more about the cash payout ratio from which we can see plenty is being left over for reinvestment in the business. The next year is set to see EPS grow by 20.6%. If the dividend continues along recent trends, we estimate the payout ratio will be 73%, which would make us comfortable with the sustainability of the dividend, despite the levels currently being quite high. See our latest analysis for Hargreaves Services Dividend Volatility Although the company has a long dividend history, it has been cut at least once in the last 10 years. Since 2015, the dividend has gone from £0.255 total annually to £0.37. This works out to be a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 3.8% a year over that time. The dividend has seen some fluctuations in the past, so even though the dividend was raised this year, we should remember that it has been cut in the past. Hargreaves Services Might Find It Hard To Grow Its Dividend With a relatively unstable dividend, it's even more important to see if earnings per share is growing. We are encouraged to see that Hargreaves Services has grown earnings per share at 27% per year over the past five years. However, Hargreaves Services isn't reinvesting a lot back into the business, so we wonder how quickly it will be able to grow in the future. In Summary In summary, while it's always good to see the dividend being raised, we don't think Hargreaves Services' payments are rock solid. The payments haven't been particularly stable and we don't see huge growth potential, but with the dividend well covered by cash flows it could prove to be reliable over the short term. This company is not in the top tier of income providing stocks. Companies possessing a stable dividend policy will likely enjoy greater investor interest than those suffering from a more inconsistent approach. However, there are other things to consider for investors when analysing stock performance. As an example, we've identified 1 warning sign for Hargreaves Services that you should be aware of before investing. If you are a dividend investor, you might also want to look at our curated list of high yield dividend stocks. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
United Parcel Service (UPS) Releases Q2 2025 Results
United Parcel Service, Inc. (NYSE:UPS) is one of the Best 52-Week Low Blue Chip Stocks to Buy Now. On July 29, the company released its Q2 2025 results, wherein its consolidated revenues came in at $21.2 billion. Despite the worries related to the trade policies, in Q2 2025, the overall US economy exhibited continued resilience, but the US small package market was unfavourably impacted by the consumer sentiment, which was near historic lows. In Q2 2025, United Parcel Service, Inc. (NYSE:UPS)'s overall US average daily volume fell by 7.3%. However, because of its strategic actions, the company saw a positive shift in the mix of business, as revenue declined by only 0.8%. A warehouse filled with boxes of parcels, symbolizing the companies reliable logistics services. For Q2 2025, United Parcel Service, Inc. (NYSE:UPS) stated that its US domestic generated revenue of $14.1 billion, down marginally compared to last year, mainly because of the decline in Amazon revenue, which was partially mitigated by increases in air cargo and revenue per piece. In Q2 2025, revenue per piece rose 5.5% YoY. Breaking down, the net impact of base rates and package characteristics rose revenue per piece growth rate by 250 bps, customer and product mix improvements by 200 bps, while fuel drove a 100-bps increase. For FY 2025, United Parcel Service, Inc. (NYSE:UPS) expects capital expenditures of ~$3.5 billion, while dividend payments are expected to be ~$5.5 billion, subject to Board approval. River Road Asset Management, an investment management company, released its Q4 2024 investor letter. Here is what the fund said: 'As of December 31, the portfolio held 29 positions, up four positions from Q3. During Q4, the largest sector increase was 736 bps within industrials, while the largest decrease was -276 bps within consumer discretionary. We established five new positions and eliminated one position While we acknowledge the potential of UPS as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 13 Cheap AI Stocks to Buy According to Analysts and 11 Unstoppable Growth Stocks to Invest in Now Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bill limiting use of sales tax passes
GUILFORD COUNTY — Voters will be asked again to approve a sales tax increase of 0.25% of a penny for every $1 of sales, but this time legislation dictates how the revenue must be spent if the increase is approved. House Bill 305 was amended by Sen. Phil Berger Sr., R-Rockingham and Senate president pro tem, to set parameters on how the revenue, estimated at $28.7 million a year, would be allocated, with most of it going for teacher pay. The bill passed the General Assembly this week. The Guilford County Board of Commissioners voted unanimously in mid-June to place the sales tax referendum issue on the November 2026 general election ballot. A little more than a week after the commissioners' action, Berger amended House Bill 305 to address the sales tax proposal. Berger, whose legislative district includes Guilford County and some precincts in High Point, has said he placed directives on allocating the tax revenue to assure Guilford County voters on how the money would be spent. Although the county commissioners have pledged that all revenue raised by the proposed sales tax increase would go to teacher pay, there was no provision in state law preventing the money from being directed to other purposes. 'House Bill 305 now provides them with information so they can make an educated decision,' Berger previously said. If the proposed tax increase is approved by voters and raises $28.7 million, this is how the money would have to be allocated, according to the new legislation: • Teacher pay supplements in Guilford County Schools, $19.2 million. • Guilford County Fire and Rescue Council for equipment purposes and capital expenditures, $5.5 million. • Guilford Technical Community College capital projects, $2.7 million. • Allocations for Whitsett, Summerfield, Stokesdale, Pleasant Garden and Oak Ridge, $1.3 million. Berger's allocation approach apparently was the first time that has been applied in North Carolina to a sales tax referendum. Whether it will change how Guilford County voters view the proposal is uncertain. Voters have rejected the same proposed sales tax increase six times in the past 20 years, most recently in the November 2024 general election. Solve the daily Crossword