Tulip Siddiq: Labour MP accuses Bangladesh's leader of 'orchestrated campaign' to damage her reputation
Former minister Tulip Siddiq has accused the leader of Bangladesh of conducting an "orchestrated campaign" to damage her reputation and "interfere with UK politics", according to a new legal letter seen by Sky News.
The Labour MP also said comments made by Professor Muhammad Yunus in a Sky News interview have prejudiced her right to a fair investigation, meaning the ongoing corruption inquiries into her should be dropped.
In March, the chief adviser - who is effectively the country's interim leader - told Sky News that Ms Siddiq "has so many (sic) wealth left behind here" and "should be made responsible".
8:10
Bangladesh's Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) has opened several investigations into Ms Siddiq alleging corruption in connection with the government of her aunt Sheikh Hasina, who was ousted as the country's prime minister last year.
In the new correspondence sent today to Professor Yunus and the ACC, lawyers for the former minister write: "The time has now come for the chief adviser and the ACC to abandon their wholly misconceived and unlawful campaign to smear Ms Siddiq's reputation and interfere with her public service."
Sky News has approached the chief adviser and the ACC for comment.
The Bangladeshi authorities have previously said they have evidence to back up their claims of corruption and will pursue action through the country's courts.
2:35
Speaking to Sky News on Monday, Ms Siddiq said: "I will not be allowing them to drag me into their world of dirty politics and nothing is going to stop me from pursuing the job that I was elected to do with an overwhelming majority, which is representing the people of Hampstead and Highgate.
"So they need to stop this political vendetta, this smear campaign, and this malicious persecution right from the beginning."
The MP had requested a meeting with the Bangladeshi leader during an official visit to the UK earlier this month to "clear up" any misunderstandings.
But this was turned down by the chief adviser, who said he did not want to "interrupt a legal procedure".
0:29
In the new legal letter, lawyers for Ms Siddiq say the interim leader had already unfairly influenced the inquiries through previous comments.
"The copious briefings to the media, the failure to respond to our letters, the failure to even ask to meet with and question Ms Siddiq during their recent visit to the United Kingdom are impossible to justify and completely inconsistent with a fair, lawful and serious investigation," reads the letter.
The correspondence also sets a deadline of 30 June 2025 for the Bangladeshi authorities to reply by, stating that "in the absence of a full and proper response… Ms Siddiq will consider this matter closed".
A former Nobel Prize winning economist, Professor Muhammad Yunus became interim leader of Bangladesh last August after weeks of deadly protests forced Sheikh Hasina from power.
He has pledged to root out corruption and recover alleged stolen wealth before holding votes to elect a permanent administration.
0:47
Last month, Professor Yunus banned the Awami League - the political party still led by Sheikh Hasina - from standing in the coming elections.
That led to criticism from those still loyal to the former prime minister, with protests also sparking in the country over jobs, pay and planned reforms.
Earlier this year, it was revealed that Tulip Siddiq had lived in several London properties that had links back to the Awami League.
She referred herself to the prime minister's standards adviser Sir Laurie Magnus who said he had "not identified evidence of improprieties" but added it was "regrettable" Ms Siddiq had not been more alert to the "potential reputational risks" of the ties to her aunt.
Ms Siddiq said continuing in her role would be "a distraction" for the government but insisted she had done nothing wrong.
Sheikh Hasina is currently standing trial in absentia in Dhaka over alleged killings during last summer's civil unrest.
Asked by Sky News if she had any regrets about links to the Awami league, Ms Siddiq said: "The main thing I would say to you, I'm very proud to be the MP for Hampstead and Highgate. I was born in London, I grew up in London. I went to school here and now I'm an MP here."
In March, Sky News revealed that UK investigators could assist with probes into alleged grand corruption during Hasina's time in power.
Staff from the National Crime Agency visited Bangladesh in October and November as part of initial work to support the interim government in the country.
Last month, the NCA confirmed it had secured a "freezing order" against a property in north London linked to Ms Siddiq's family.
She denies all the allegations - and sources close to the MP say the authorities have been sending correspondence to an address in Dhaka that has no connection with her.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
ALEX BRUMMER: Labour has trapped us all in a doom loop of ever higher taxes and welfare spending. Things are bad now but, with four years to go, this is how much worse they can get
As every football fan knows, the moment the club chairman is forced to quell rumours of the manager's imminent demise by issuing a vote of confidence, the gaffer's days are numbered. And so, as Sir Keir Starmer approaches the end of his first year in power, his Chancellor Rachel Reeves looks like a dead woman walking.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
ANDREW PIERCE: Reeves loses her remaining Whitehall fan
Fighting for her political life after the latest U-turn on disability benefit cuts, Rachel Reeves has now lost her most important Whitehall cheerleader. The Chancellor's high-flying civil servant husband, Nicholas Joicey, was the senior mandarin at the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. But I can reveal he has quietly left his £170,000-a-year post. Joicey has taken a job at Oxford University 's Blavatnik School of Government as Interim Chief Operating Officer. I hear he got out because of a conflict of interest, with deep spending cuts demanded across Whitehall by his wife. Some insist it shows Reeves is at the Treasury for the long haul – greater love hath no mandarin than to lay down a top post for the sake of his wife's career. But that won't be enough to save Reeves' skin. As Joicey is only interim COO at Oxford on a '12-month secondment', he could yet waltz straight back to Whitehall if, as widely expected, his wife is kicked out of the Cabinet within the year. When Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle decides to stand down, a favourite to succeed him is Dame Meg Hillier, chairman of the Commons Treasury select committee. At least that was before she was revealed to be the behind the Labour revolt on disability benefit cuts. Professional dancer- turned- judge Anton Du Beke is asked if he listens to rumours about which celebrities will be taking part in Strictly Come Dancing each year: 'I don't. Once upon a time the lovely Superman actress Teri Hatcher was supposed to be doing Strictly, with me. I ended up with Ann Widdecombe.' 'Everyone is welcome here,' beamed Glasto organiser Emily Eavis, defending her decision to book controversial rap group Kneecap. Everyone? Except the thousands priced out by a £378.50 ticket – and the 7.8km fence that keeps out the great unwashed. Alastair Campbell raged on X after giving an interview for a Nigel Farage documentary: 'Just had an email to say… the sound didn't work!' One viewer replied: 'Good to know they used the correct technical settings for your interview.' It's an own goal for busy Kim Labour's Kim Leadbeater might have hoped for a breather after her Assisted Dying Bill scraped through the Commons. But as Parliamentary Private Secretary to Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy, Leadbeater's office sent an email to Labour MPs suggesting topics to bring up at ministerial questions. They included hard-hitting queries like: 'What steps is her Department taking to support the delivery of major sporting events?' Unfortunately, they were sent to a bunch of Tory MPs, too.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
How Keir Starmer's feeble grip on power got weaker
If love means never having to say you're sorry, then the affair between Keir Starmer and the British voter is, like, so over, as the kids might say. His government sidles towards its first anniversary full of regret for mistakes made, begging for one more chance to get things right, desperate to forestall the dread words already forming on the electorate's lips: 'I really thought we could make it work, but maybe we need a break.' The prime minister's latest apologia comes in newspaper interviews in which he professes that his speech last month launching the government's white paper Restoring control over the immigration system, was a mistake because it contained the assertion that, without strict rules and a fall in the pace and scale of migration, 'we risk becoming an island of strangers, not a nation that walks forward together'. These wholly reasonable remarks were criticised by some, including within his party, as redolent of Enoch Powell's 1968 'rivers of blood' speech, in which the Tory shadow cabinet member asserted that many white Britons 'found themselves strangers in their own country' as a result of rapid Commonwealth immigration. • Keir Starmer on the benefits U-turn and his toughest week yet Until now, Starmer and his ministers have staunchly defended his words. In this latest change of heart, his explanation is that, distracted by other events, he had failed to read his text properly before delivering it. It is true that he had endured a punishing return from Ukraine. And on the morning of the speech, the porch of his former family home, occupied by a relative, had been fire-bombed. It would be churlish to discount the stress under which any prime minister lives. But I simply do not believe that anyone as diligent and smart as Starmer — who, in opposition, time and again attacked his rival Boris Johnson for 'winging it' — read out words he did not understand or mean to say. Second, the text is not a complicated treatise — it is about the length of this article. A distinguished barrister, a KC, should have been able to spot infelicities in his sleep. For example, one phrase that would instantly have stuck in the craw of an arch Remainer occurs half a dozen times: 'take back control'. Starmer must have used it knowingly and deliberately to emphasise that he would be at least as tough on Channel crossings as Nigel Farage. He knew exactly what he was saying. Third, the claim that neither he nor his speechwriters understood the echo of Powell's polemic is credible only if you think that the dozen or more ministers and aides through whose hands the text passed are all political naifs or illiterates. It is not to No 10's credit that ministers like Yvette Cooper and Seema Malhotra were sent on to the airwaves to defend their boss and have now been casually thrown under the bus. Fourth, the phrase 'an island of strangers' is a rhetorical device that dates back long before Powell. In The Strangers' Case, thought to be written by Shakespeare around 1603, Sir Thomas More enjoins the apprentices of London to refrain from attacking Flemish immigrants. But the most important issue is this: did the prime minister believe the words he read out or not? They are in plain English. I have more than a passing interest in the answer, because perhaps Starmer's writers, being young, drew on a more recent reference. Speaking after the 7/7 suicide bombings in London, which murdered 52 and maimed hundreds almost 20 years ago, the then chair of the Commission for Racial Equality said: 'We are sleepwalking our way to segregation. We are becoming strangers to each other, and we are leaving communities to be marooned outside the mainstream.' Guilty as charged. And I would not change a word of the speech I made that year. What baffles me is why the prime minister feels he needs to apologise so abjectly for making the case for integration. It matters little who used what words when; what matters is what he believes now. Last week's about turn leaves us none the wiser. It is an unusual kind of reverse ferret. For the most part, politicians retreat from unpopular positions. In this case, polling by YouGov the day after Starmer's speech showed that 41 per cent of the nation agreed both with the sentiment and the language of his remarks; 12 per cent felt uncomfortable about the words but backed their meaning. A survey of over 13,000 Britons by More In Common weeks earlier revealed that 44 per cent said they 'sometimes feel like they are strangers in their own country'. It is a sentiment shared equally by white and Asian respondents, suggesting the problem we face is no longer one of straightforward white bigotry but an even more alarming ethnic fragmentation of what was once a united kingdom. There is, of course, a simple explanation for Starmer's mea culpa, what the political strategist Lynton Crosby called a dead cat: toss it on the table and nobody pays attention to anything else — for example the Labour revolt on welfare reform. But I don't think this government is that cynical. Or that clever. • Keir Starmer's plan to win back 'authoritarian-leaning' voters Many wiseacres in political circles blame Starmer's close adviser, Morgan McSweeney, for the government's woes, accusing him of chasing Reform voters, as though this were a slightly seedy, disreputable pursuit. There is no shame in trying to win back Labour voters, unless as some in the Labour hierarchy apparently believe, Farage's double-digit lead consists largely of Tory defectors who were probably racists and have now found their natural home. They are wrong. McSweeney's task is to explain to the Labour hierarchy that if you signal to your own tribe that you find their views on immigration faintly disgusting, they'll get the message. They won't hang around. And if you lecture them that their suspicions around the costs of net zero are evidence of their inability to do sums and that they'll thank you in the long term, don't be surprised if they turn to politicians who offer them a less punishing lesson in climate science. They've read Keynes and they know that in the long run we are all dead. The damaging U-turns on winter fuel, gender identity, welfare and now immigration all point to a single conclusion: this is a government that can be pushed around by the clamour of activist there is no sign that Labour will make popular U-turns — dumping the effort to limit free speech with a fresh definition of Islamophobia, for example, or the continued showering of largesse on wealthy pensioners at the expense of hard-pressed working families. This weekend's retreat on migration is possibly the most alarming signal that this Labour administration remains, at heart, a liberal pressure group, adrift from its roots, ready to be blown hither and thither by the breeze of fashionable opinion, in office but still not in power.
