logo
Sanseito Rising: How History and Identity Fueled a Political Breakthrough

Sanseito Rising: How History and Identity Fueled a Political Breakthrough

Japan Forward4 days ago
In the Upper House election held on July 20, a newly emerged political party called Sanseito made a significant breakthrough, securing 14 seats.
At the same time, the ruling coalition of the Liberal Democratic Party and Komeito fell short of a combined total of 50 seats, losing their majority in the chamber. It was a setback following their 2024 Lower House election defeat.
Sanseito's success was a key factor behind the loss of the LDP's majority. It fielded candidates in all 45 constituencies. The party's success warrants closer examination.
A fundamental reason for Sanseito's rise, I believe, is rooted in the historical perspective shared by its candidates.
Party leader Shohei Kamiya held left-leaning views until high school. However, his outlook expanded significantly during an eight-month backpacking trip through 18 countries when he took a year off in his junior year in college.
Like many conservative activists, Kamiya was raised in a conservative family and embraced leftist ideology during his school years. His experiences abroad, however, led him to break away from it and rediscover Japanese history.
Kamiya's YouTube channel, CGS (Channel Grand Strategy), has been carrying serious history lessons through courses taught by Mitsuru Kurayama and Takeo Saito.
Building on the momentum of these study sessions, Sanseito, established in 2020, has uniquely emphasized the importance of taking pride in Japanese history. It's an approach no other political party has adopted.
The party's slogan, "Japanese First," was undoubtedly a key factor in their electoral success. During the campaign, treatment targeting foreigners in Japan unexpectedly became a key issue.
For instance, a Chinese national who does not pay resident tax in Japan could start a business in Tokyo and receive an unsecured loan of ¥15 million JPY. They could even be approved for welfare benefits within just three days of arriving in the country. Sohei Kamiya, at the Japan National Press Club. Tokyo, July 2 (©Sankei by Masahiro Sakai).
Some paid health insurance premiums for only a short period, yet still received expensive medical treatment. In scholarship programs, foreign students were often given preference over Japanese students.
Other growing concerns included the purchase of land by foreigners, the Kurdish issue, and the negative effects of overtourism.
Existing political parties were reluctant to address these topics, which led to growing frustration and a sense of helplessness among the Japanese public.
As such, "Japanese First" resonated deeply with the Japanese public. It struck a powerful chord with voters.
Before the campaign began, Sanseito's low approval ratings for candidates in individual districts indicated their chances of winning were slim.
However, once the campaign got underway, their approval ratings surged, with some candidates even becoming strong contenders in their constituencies. This phenomenon was observed across many parts of Japan, clearly demonstrating the impact of the candidates' messages. Sanseito candidates Mizuho Umemura (left) and Saya (from Saya's X account)
What made the candidates of this political party so persuasive? Their boldness in addressing taboo topics set them apart, earning attention and support from voters seeking voices that truly speak to their hopes and concerns.
Overall, the candidates are young, share the struggles of working-age parents raising children, and connect their policies directly to the realities of everyday life. These qualities deeply resonated with the constituents.
But that is not the whole story. The Sanseito has a grassroots community organization, and its study groups for members were far more extensive than those of other parties. With a foundation rooted in a historical perspective that took pride in their country's past, their candidates delivered speeches with genuine conviction and depth, rather than relying on rehearsed talking points.
The party also made education a top policy priority and was steadily addressing the issue of history textbooks. I will introduce its activities based on my involvement. Sanseito leader Sohei Kamiya speaks to the press. July 3, Chuo Ward, Tokyo (©Sankei by Shinpei Okuhara)
In 2024, Japan conducted its once-every-four-years adoption of junior high school textbooks. During this period, Sanseito's Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly members made notable efforts.
In each of their respective districts, they organized numerous study sessions, both large and small, focused on the issues of history textbooks and textbook adoption. I was personally involved in nearly ten of these meetings.
Furthermore, Sanseito's local councilors held a press conference to express their commitment to the textbook adoption process. While some members of other parties cooperated individually, no other party worked with the same level of coordination and dedication as the Sanseito. Tsukuru Kai's inaugural press conference in 1996 at the Akasaka Excel Hotel Tokyu. 78 individuals endorsed the group at the event. (©Tsukuru Kai)
The Japanese Society for History Textbook Reform (Tsukuru-kai) organized a study tour to Hitachiomiya City in Ibaraki Prefecture. Its public school board was the only one in Japan to adopt the Jiyusha textbook. [Editor's note: The Jiyusha textbook is a history and civics textbook published by Tsukuru-kai]
Of the 40 participants on the tour bus, half were local council members, many affiliated with the Sanseito's regional branches. Textbook adoption ultimately hinges on regional government. I envision a future where a young councilor from the Sanseito earns the trust of their community, rises to become chief within five to ten years, and leads the adoption of these textbooks.
Author: Nobukatsu Fujioka
( Read this in Japanese )
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Heres why the EU keeps losing to China
Heres why the EU keeps losing to China

Canada News.Net

time37 minutes ago

  • Canada News.Net

Heres why the EU keeps losing to China

The summit Brussels-Beijing economic summit spotlighted the blocs mounting strategic confusion and accelerating drift toward isolation The China-EU summit held in Beijing late last month could have been a celebration of 50 years of diplomatic relations between two of the world's largest economic powers. Instead, it served as a sobering reminder of the EU's growing strategic confusion, and its inability to capitalize on the immense opportunities offered by cooperation with China. The summit came at a sensitive moment in global politics. What was once hailed as a mutually beneficial partnership has now become entangled in geopolitics, internal divisions within the EU, and the enduring shadow of Washington's influence. The global turbulence of recent years - the pandemic, and the war in Ukraine - has not only strained relations but also reinforced the EU's dependence on the United States. Rather than renewing a partnership that once stood as a pillar of global economic integration, the EU leaders arrived in Beijing with a familiar agenda: accusations over trade practices, warnings about "security threats," and renewed calls for China to "rein in" Russia. Predictably, no breakthrough was achieved. The deterioration of China-EU relations cannot be understood without revisiting the European Commission's strategic shift in 2019. Under Ursula von der Leyen, Brussels officially categorized China as not just a partner but also a "systemic rival" - a move that introduced suspicion into virtually every area of engagement. Since then, an ideological lens has increasingly shaped EU policy, replacing the pragmatism that once underpinned economic cooperation. The consequences have been stark. Brussels has launched measures to restrict Chinese investment, imposed high tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, and - most recently - barred Chinese firms from public tenders worth over €5 million. Further escalation came when the EU included two Chinese banks in its latest sanctions package against Russia, signaling that Europe is willing to weaponize economic tools for political purposes. These steps are justified by the EU as "de-risking." By pushing for reduced interdependence in strategic sectors - raw materials, high-tech supply chains, and digital infrastructure - Brussels has aligned itself with Washington's containment playbook, even as European leaders publicly insist on independence. In Beijing, von der Leyen struck a conciliatory tone, declaring the EU's openness to Chinese investment and cooperation. But such statements ring hollow when juxtaposed with her recent warnings at the G7 summit about a looming "China shock" and accusations of Beijing "weaponizing trade." Similarly, the head of EU diplomacy, Kaja Kallas - also present in Beijing - has accused China of fueling the war in Ukraine and waging hybrid operations against Europe. These mixed signals undermine credibility and reinforce perceptions in Beijing that the EU lacks a coherent, autonomous China strategy. More fundamentally, Brussels' approach is internally contradictory. The EU dreams of "strategic autonomy," yet ties its foreign policy to transatlantic priorities. It seeks economic resilience, yet undermines its own competitiveness by disrupting supply chains and limiting market access. It aspires to global leadership, yet isolates itself from the rest of the world by clinging to zero-sum geopolitics. By contrast, China's position at the summit was clear: focus on complementarity, promote free trade, and pursue win-win cooperation in areas that matter for global stability - digital transformation, green development, and infrastructure connectivity. Beijing emphasized its willingness to deepen exchanges in artificial intelligence, clean energy, and scientific research, seeing these sectors as essential to both sides' modernization. For China, the EU remains a strategic partner, not an adversary. Beijing has long supported European integration and consistently encourages the EU to play an independent role in global affairs. From China's perspective, a strong, autonomous Europe is a counterweight to unilateralism and an anchor of multipolarity. This vision aligns with Europe's own interests - but diverges sharply from Washington's preference for a subordinate EU within the transatlantic alliance. From Beijing's perspective, the EU's current challenges - economic slowdown, energy insecurity, and geopolitical vulnerability - are not caused by China. Rather, they stem from internal divisions and policy choices that tether Europe to US strategies. China fears that Europe's drift into a hardline camp could destabilize the international order, a scenario contrary to Beijing's vision of stability and connectivity across Eurasia. The single most contentious issue remains the war in Ukraine. Brussels insists that China's ties with Moscow "destabilize" Europe, while Beijing argues that it is maintaining an independent and neutral position aimed at facilitating a peaceful settlement. EU leaders, however, continue to press China to "use its influence" to end Russia's military operations - effectively asking Beijing to abandon a key strategic partnership. This is neither realistic nor conducive to diplomacy. For now, this geopolitical deadlock overshadows other areas of potential cooperation. So long as the EU views the Ukraine conflict through an existential lens - and equates neutrality with complicity - China-EU relations will remain constrained, regardless of shared economic interests. Despite political frictions, economic ties remain robust. The EU is China's largest trading partner, and China ranks second for the EU. Together, they account for over one-third of global GDP and nearly 30% of global trade in goods and services. Chinese investment in Europe has surpassed $100 billion, and annual flows are roughly balanced with EU investment in China. These numbers underscore a basic truth: the China-EU relationship is too significant to be defined by ideological posturing. Global supply chains, green technology cooperation, and digital innovation cannot advance without mutual engagement. The question is whether Brussels will recognize this before further damage is done. The EU portrays its current trajectory as "rebalancing" and "de-risking." In reality, these policies risk strategic isolation. By securitizing economic ties and subordinating its diplomacy to US priorities in relation to China, the EU undermines its own competitiveness and alienates partners across the globe. The result is an inward-looking bloc that struggles to influence global norms as it dreams of geopolitical power. For China, the lesson is clear: The EU is not ready for a genuine reset. Beijing will continue to engage constructively but will not expect rapid progress. In the long run, the revival of a balanced partnership may depend on a political shift within Europe - a leadership willing to replace ideological rigidity with pragmatic cooperation. The Beijing summit, rather than rekindling optimism, has confirmed the structural divergence between China and the EU. However, it also highlighted what remains at stake: two economic giants whose cooperation - or confrontation - will shape global stability for decades to come. China stands ready to pursue a future based on multilateralism, open trade, and shared development. Whether the EU can free itself from delusions and anxieties and rediscover the value of partnership with Beijing remains an open question. Until then, the EU's fixation on "de-risking" may turn into what it fears most: self-inflicted decline.

EVs have become a litmus test for whether we're still America's buddy — or ready to be a global Canada
EVs have become a litmus test for whether we're still America's buddy — or ready to be a global Canada

Toronto Star

time9 hours ago

  • Toronto Star

EVs have become a litmus test for whether we're still America's buddy — or ready to be a global Canada

By Joanna Kyriazis and Trevor Melanson Contributors Joanna Kyriazis is the director of public affairs and Trevor Melanson is the director of communications at Clean Energy Canada, a think tank at Simon Fraser University. There are few Canadian markets more integrated with the U.S. than vehicles. And not just the cars we build in Ontario, but the ones we drive across this country. We rely on U.S. safety standards that effectively determine which cars end up on dealership lots, align our tailpipe emission standards and when the U.S. under Biden erected a 100 per cent tariff wall on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs), did Canada look to Europe's much lower tariff or the U.K.'s lack of one? No, we put up a 100 per cent tariff wall too. Opinion articles are based on the author's interpretations and judgments of facts, data and events. More details

A First Step to Solve the Abduction Issue
A First Step to Solve the Abduction Issue

Japan Forward

time18 hours ago

  • Japan Forward

A First Step to Solve the Abduction Issue

このページを 日本語 で読む JAPAN Forward has launched "Ignite," a series to share the voices of students in Japan in English. What do they see beyond our obvious differences, disabilities, and insecurities? Individually and collectively, today's students have the power to shape our global future. This seventh essay of the series is by Zui Gu, a student from Tokushima Prefecture, who prods us to think of the first step needed to solve the issue of North Korea's abduction of Japanese citizens. Annually, the Headquarters for the Abduction Issue holds a North Korean Human Rights Violations Awareness Week Essay Contest for junior and senior high school students across the country. (The Government of Japan established the Headquarters, an organization led by the Prime Minister and composed of all the Ministers of State to resolve the abductions issue.) It aims to raise awareness of the abduction issue through viewing films and stage plays, reading books related to the issue, and other opportunities to help the students understand the feelings of abduction victims and their families. These students often use the essay contest as an opportunity to think deeply about what they can and should do to resolve the abduction issue. Some, like Zui Gu, also take on the challenge to directly communicate their thoughts and ideas to others in English. Let's listen. Seventh in the Series, 'Ignite' I can't forgive the abductions by North Korea. If I were a member of the family of Megumi Yokota, I would feel desperate every day of my life. The family lost her, their beloved daughter, unreasonably, by the way of "abduction," and they've never known about her since then. But, they have never given up and have taken many actions to get her back. I didn't know anything about the abduction issue before. This year [2024], I became a participant of the JHS summit, so I learned about it. I could understand the fact and severity of it. How about other junior high school students? When they hear about the abduction issue, what will they think? I think they will not be interested, and say "I see … and what?" Probably they don't know about it, and may think it doesn't matter to them. I think it's a big problem that there are many people who don't know about the abduction issue or think it doesn't matter to them. We should solve this problem first. So, I think it's most important to change people's mind, from "I don't know about it" to "I have heard of it." Zui Gu, a student at Itano Junior High School in Tokushima, receives the Excellence Award for his English essay from Minister for the Abductions Yoshimasa Hayashi at the 2024 North Korean Human Rights Violations Awareness Week seminar on December 14. (Screenshot) To do that, the most effective way is using the internet or SNS to send and receive information about the abduction issue. Recently, smartphones are everywhere, and almost all of my classmates possess them. When we send more messages about the abduction issue using the internet, then more people that we don't know can receive and understand the issue. It's easier to use SNS compared to talking to each person, isn't it? However, sending messages using the internet or SNS may cause insults or misunderstandings. But nevertheless, if we debate about the issues, many people may watch the debates. That will increase the number of people who know the issue. Debating about it will deepen our interests in it. Moreover, we should send this message that "the abduction issue is our own affair." I think this idea is especially important. Someone may think, "Can we solve the issue in such a way?" The answer is maybe "No" but it's enough for us, junior high school students. I read the brochure about the abduction issue published by the government. One question is: What can we Japanese people do to solve the abduction issue? The answer I found is, "When each Japanese person expresses strong determination that we will never forgive abductions and we will definitely get all the abductees back as soon as possible, it will be a strong support to solve this issue." Meumi Yokota's brothers and others from the families of abduction victims call for signatures demanding the swift rescue of the abductees. April 26, in Tokyo (©Sankei by Katsuyuki Seki) The abductions happened in the past, but it is the ongoing problem, and hasn't been resolved yet. I think using internet or SNS is the most effective way to inform the younger generation like us about the issue. We can even convey this information beyond the border. So, I want people all over the world to know the issue, not only Japanese. I'm glad if my idea contributes to resolving the abduction issue. At the time he submitted this essay, Zui Gu was an eighth grade student at Itano Junior High School in Tokushima Prefecture, Japan. He delivered this comment upon receiving the Excellence Award for his English essay by a junior high school student: Comment from the winner: The possibility of an abduction happening in your town is not zero. So surely the first step towards resolving the abduction issue is to recognize it as something that concerns you personally. Author: Zui Gu Student, Itano Junior High School, Tokushima Prefecture このページを 日本語 で読む

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store