Supporters say Hunger-Free Campus Act would benefit Ohio students' well-being
Advocates recently spoke out in favor of a bill that would help Ohio college students dealing with food insecurity.
A bill that would require the Chancellor of Higher Education to create the Hunger-Free Campus Grant Program had supporter testimony last week in the Ohio House Workforce and Higher Education Committee meeting.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The program would award hunger-free campus grants which could, for example, create an on-campus food pantry or a partnership with a local bank, provide students information about SNAP, have an emergency assistance grant available to students, or have a student meal plan credit donation program.
Ohio House Reps. Sean Patrick Brennan, D-Parma, and Jim Hoops, R-Napoleon, introduced Ohio House Bill 157, which had 15 people submit supporter testimony. H.B. 157 would appropriate $625,000 for fiscal year 2026 and 2027 for the program.
'The Hunger Free Campus Act would incentivize colleges and universities to establish basic needs programs, like an on-site food pantry or emergency assistance grant program as well as connecting students to resources,' said Sarah Kuhns, external affairs manager of the Ohio Association of Foodbanks.
The Ohio Association of Foodbanks has worked with more than 30 Ohio colleges and universities to create food pantries or distribute food to students struggling with food insecurity, she said.
'Throughout our network's engagement on the issue of college student hunger, it has been clear that the approach has been patchwork, leading institutions to establish basic needs programs only if they have the connections, the will and the funds to do so,' Kuhns said.
Students who are unable to meet their basic needs are more likely to have a hard time in class, take longer to finish their degree or drop out, Kuhns said.
Some food pantries on Ohio's college campuses said they are interested in providing microwaves and stoves near the pantry, so commuter students or those with limited access to a kitchen can cook the items they receive from the pantry, she said.
State Rep. Tom Young, R-Washington Twp., was surprised that food insecurity on college campuses is an issue.
'I don't have anyone coming up and saying, 'We have students starving on campus and things like that.' I just can't get my head around it,' he said. 'Why is this such a big issue that no one knows anything about?'
In response, Kuhns said food insecurity is often an invisible problem.
About 23% of college students experienced food insecurity in 2020 and 59% of food-insecure students potentially eligible for SNAP did not report receiving benefits, according to a report released last summer by the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
State Rep. Tracy Richardson, R-Marysville, asked what population of students are experiencing food insecurity and Kuhns said this affects all demographics of students — commuter, non-traditional, and those living on campus.
Deacon Nick Bates, director of the Hunger Network in Ohio, said he regularly hears from campus ministries about the growing need to help food insecure students across Ohio.
'Students cannot learn hungry,' Bates said. 'Food insecurity on college campuses leads to lower GPA's and lower completion rates.'
Sophie Gephardt, a graduate social work student at Ohio State University, talked to students facing food insecurity last year when she did her undergraduate thesis on food insecurity experiences of Ohio State social worker students.
'Some common themes included poor diet quality impacting energy and health, concerns about rising food costs, and overall constant stress and mental health concerns due to food insecurity,' she said. 'The Enact the Hunger-Free Campus Act would be incredibly beneficial to getting students connected to resources that they so desperately need.'
Meeting students' basic needs leads to higher retention and graduation rates, said Stephanie Dodd, executive director at Community Campus Coalition.
'These outcomes contribute directly to Ohio's workforce development priorities and long-term economic growth,' she said.
Follow Capital Journal Reporter Megan Henry on Bluesky.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
Gaza aid crisis: Why Gazans are dying of hunger or being killed by Israel on a near daily basis
Twenty-one months into Israel's war in Gaza, the enclave is gripped by escalating scenes of death and hunger, with some killed while trying to reach aid, others dying of starvation and growing condemnation of Israel's conduct even among many of its closest allies. The United Nations says more than a thousand people have been killed by Israeli forces while seeking food since late May, when a controversial new Israel- and US-backed aid group, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, began operating. Of those, hundreds have died near GHF sites, according to the UN. The GHF was created to replace the UN's aid role in Gaza and has been widely criticized for failing to improve conditions. All 2.1 million people in Gaza are now food insecure. On Tuesday, Gaza's health ministry said 900,000 children are going hungry, and 70,000 already show signs of malnutrition. But how did it come to this? Before the war, Gaza was already one of the most isolated and densely populated places on earth, with around two million people packed into an area of 140 square miles. Israel has maintained tight control over the territory through a yearslong land, air and sea blockade, with severe restrictions on the movement of goods and people. More than half of its residents were food insecure and under the poverty line, according to the UN. Between 500 and 600 truckloads of aid entered Gaza daily before the conflict. That number has since plummeted to an average of just 28 trucks per day, a group of humanitarian organizations said Wednesday. It's unclear if the figure includes trucks used in GHF's operations. Following Hamas' October 7, 2023 attack, which left 1,200 people dead and more than 250 taken hostage, Israel ordered a 'complete siege' of Gaza, halting the supply of electricity, food, water and fuel. A humanitarian crisis swiftly unfolded, as trapped residents faced both hunger and a devastating Israeli military campaign in response. Human rights groups have repeatedly criticized Israel's use of food as a 'weapon of war' and accused it of imposing 'collective punishment.' Following international pressure, the first trucks carrying aid entered Gaza in late October. A temporary ceasefire between Israel and Hamas began on November 24, 2023, slightly increasing aid flow. But the truce collapsed a week later. Aid deliveries subsequently dwindled again, and stringent Israeli inspections further delayed shipments. Israeli authorities said screening was necessary to prevent Hamas from diverting supplies but humanitarian officials accused Israel of deliberately throttling aid. Further compounding the crisis was the Israeli campaign against the UN and its aid delivery system, which Israel said was ineffective and allowed aid to fall Hamas' hands. The UN denies this. Among the agencies targeted was the UN's Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA), which Israel accused of having staff involved in the October 7 attack. A UN investigation found that nine of UNWRA's 13,000 Gaza-based employees 'may have' participated and no longer worked at the agency. In January this year, Israel banned UNRWA from operating in Gaza, cutting off viral services like food, health care and education to hundreds of thousands of people. As Israel's campaign leveled much of Gaza, displacing most of its residents and weakening Hamas' grip on the territory, lawlessness began to spread. Looting became a new hurdle for UN trucks, and casualties mounted at aid delivery points. Israel has repeatedly blamed Hamas and armed gangs for the chaos. The UN warned just weeks into the war that civil order was beginning to collapse, with desperate Palestinians taking flour and hygiene supplies from warehouses. By November 2024, the UN again raised the alarm, saying the capacity to deliver aid was 'completely gone.' In 'one of the worst' looting incident, over 100 trucks were lost, it said. Drivers were forced to unload trucks at gunpoint, aid workers were injured, and vehicles were damaged extensively. As Hamas' grip on Gaza waned and the territory's police force was hollowed out, gangs emerged to steal aid and resell it. Israel has also armed local militias to counter Hamas – a controversial move that opposition politicians have warned will endanger Israeli national security. The arming of militias appears to be the closest that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has come to empowering any form of alternate rule in the strip. Since the start of the war, the Israeli leader has refused to lay out a plan for Gaza's governance once the conflict ends. On January 19, another temporary ceasefire was reached. Aid resumed, but remained well short of what was needed. Israel reinstated a total blockade of Gaza on March 2 after the truce expired. Two weeks later, it resumed fighting, with officials saying the goal was to force Hamas to accept new ceasefire terms and release hostages. By July, the World Food Programme (WFP) assessed that a quarter of Gaza's population was facing famine-like conditions. At least 80 children have died of malnutrition since the conflict began, the Palestinian health ministry says. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), most of these occurred after the March blockade. In May, GHF, the controversial new Israeli- and American-backed organization, announced it would begin delivering with Israel's approval. Just days before GHF began operating, its director Jake Wood resigned, saying it was impossible to do his work 'while also strictly adhering to the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence.' The foundation was created to replace the UN's role in Gaza, while complying with Israeli demands that the aid not reach Hamas. The GHF said it would coordinate with the Israeli military, but that security would be provided by private military contractors. The UN has refused to participate, saying the GHF model violates some basic humanitarian principles. Critics have noted that there are only a small number of GHF distribution sites, in southern and central Gaza – far fewer than hundreds under the UN's previous model. This has forced massive crowds to gather at limited locations. The GHF has defended its system, saying it is a 'secure model (that) blocks the looting.' But soon after it began operating on May 27, the plan turned deadly as those seeking aid increasingly came under fire near GHF aid sites. Palestinian officials and witnesses have said Israeli troops are responsible for most of the deaths. The Israeli military acknowledged firing warning shots toward crowds in some instances, but denied responsibility for other incidents. And the deaths aren't limited to the vicinity of GHF aid sites. On Sunday, Israeli forces killed dozens waiting for aid in northern Gaza, according to the Palestinian health ministry. Israel said troops fired warning shots after sensing an 'immediate threat' The ministry of health recorded 10 deaths due to famine and malnutrition in 24 hours from Tuesday, bringing the total of Palestinians who died of starvation to 111. On Wednesday, 111 international humanitarian organizations called on Israel to end its blockade and agree to a ceasefire, warning that supplies in the enclave are now 'totally depleted' and that humanitarian groups are 'witnessing their own colleagues and partners waste away before their eyes.' An Israeli official said at a press briefing on Wednesday that they expect more aid to enter the enclave in the future. 'We would like to see more and more trucks entering Gaza and distributing the aid as long as Hamas is not involved,' the official said. 'As we see for now, Hamas has an interest: First, to put pressure on the State of Israel through the international community in order to (have) an effect in the (ceasefire) negotiation process; and second, to collapse the new mechanism that we have established that is making sure that they are not involved in the aid delivery inside Gaza.' International pressure continues to mount on Israel, including from the United States. And on Monday, the foreign ministers of 25 Western nations slammed Israel for 'drip feeding' aid into the Gaza Strip. Israel's foreign ministry said it 'rejects' the statement, calling it 'disconnected from reality.' CNN's Tim Lister, Mostafa Salem, Catherine Nicholls, Oren Liebermann, Eugenia Yosef, Dana Karni, Mike Schwartz, Mick Krever, Eugenia Yosef and Jeremy Diamond contributed reporting.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
The three types of hunger – and how to stay fuller for longer
For some people, eating a meal keeps them happily satiated until the next one, whereas for others, hunger is a far more complicated business. A couple of hours after eating, they're starving again and trying desperately not to succumb to the lure of the fridge or office vending machine. But is what they're experiencing really physical hunger, also known as homeostatic hunger, or could it be fuelled by one of the other kinds? There is hedonic hunger – the drive to eat for pleasure, rather than out of a physiological need for energy and, one of the most persuasive, emotional hunger, where food serves as a form of self-soothing when negative feelings arise. 'Physical hunger, when your body needs refuelling, is just one type of hunger, but we don't necessarily talk about the other types as much – although we should, because understanding them can be important for our health,' says Dr Emily Leeming, a microbiome scientist at King's College London, dietician and author of Genius Gut. Hedonic and emotional hunger are among the main culprits when it comes to weight gain. In fact, a broad new review of existing research found a significant positive link between hedonic hunger and food addiction, defined as symptoms similar to those in drug addiction, including cravings, tolerance and withdrawal effects – as well as to increased calorie intake and weight gain. So which might you suffer from? Here's a science-backed guide to all three, understanding their triggers and learning how to beat them. Physical hunger That empty-stomach feeling, often accompanied by a growling sound, dip in energy and 'hanger' (hungry anger) – caused by cortisol and adrenaline rising as our blood sugars drop – is our body's way of signalling to the brain that we need food. This drop in blood sugar and insulin levels, a few hours after eating, triggers the stomach to produce ghrelin, the hormone that stimulates appetite. But for some of us, our appetites seem to be in overdrive. The reasons for this can be complex: some people seem to be less sensitive to the suppression of ghrelin that comes when the stomach encounters food, while for others, their brains could be less sensitive to leptin signals, which tell the brain to stop eating when we're full. For most people, however, focusing on what we eat can make a huge difference in managing our hunger. Eating too many refined white carbohydrates is one of the primary reasons many of us find ourselves reaching for sugary snacks between meals. 'With white or refined carbs, such as white bread, pasta and rice, most of their nutrients and fibre have been lost, so our bodies don't have to work hard to break them down,' says Laura Southern, the founder of London Food Therapy. 'That causes very high blood sugar spikes.' These trigger an immediate release of insulin, causing blood glucose levels of fall, which then signals the release of hunger hormones to replenish them. Research from King's College London has shown that when blood sugar levels dipped below their baseline, people reported a 9 per cent increase in hunger and ate over 300 calories more that day than others whose blood sugar levels did not dip. Tips to stop physical hunger pangs Opting for unrefined carbs, such as oats, barley, rye and quinoa, will help keep blood sugar steady thanks to their higher fibre content. 'Ninety-three per cent of us are not getting the fibre we need, and we have a deficit of 35 to 40 per cent, which is a significant fibre gap,' says Dr Leeming. 'Fibre releases fullness hormones and it's quite bulky, so it gives that sense of fullness and satisfaction. It also feeds our gut microbiome, and there's early evidence that looking after the microbiome could potentially be involved in how tempting we find certain foods.' She recommends starting the day with a protein-rich breakfast, such as yogurt or eggs, which has been proven to reduce food cravings and snacking later in the day, and adding fibre, such as fruit, vegetables or seeds. Hedonic, or taste-hunger pangs It's the smell of the freshly baked croissants we cannot resist on holiday; or that irresistible extra portion of the darkest, ooziest chocolate fondant cake for pudding, followed by the cheese board. Eating for pleasure is one of our biggest drivers to consume more than we need. Food, quite rightly, is a sensory joy – and we all experience a hankering for the fattier, sugary treats, with temptation and advertising bombarding us from all corners. But for some, these cravings can spiral into persistent 'food noise' – intrusive thoughts about eating – or even develop into full-blown addiction. 'When we eat foods we find particularly appealing, our brain releases dopamine in its reward system,' explains Dr Anne-Laure Le Cunff, a neuroscientist at King's College London and founder of Ness Labs. 'This creates a sense of pleasure and reinforces the behaviour.' Unlike homeostatic hunger, which we often mistake it for, hedonic hunger, aptly named after Hedone, the Greek goddess of pleasure, has no mechanism to signal when we should stop eating – hence, it's now seen by scientists as one of the biggest causes of obesity. Tips to stop hedonic hunger pangs But there are measures we can take to combat these cravings, and they aren't as simple as trying to avoid food for which we have a weakness. Dr Leeming says: 'Cutting out the food we crave won't necessarily solve the craving: one study showed that women who cut out chocolate had more food cravings, and when they did eat chocolate, they ate twice as much.'Instead, she suggests eating the food, but with something else. 'If it's chocolate, have it with some fruit and nuts, which combine protein, fibre and healthy fat, so you'll probably eat less chocolate and it's going to satisfy you more,' she says. Dark chocolate is a better choice, with research suggesting it could have a positive impact on blood sugar levels, reducing cravings for less nutritious foods later. Maintaining a consistent eating pattern, including meal-times and portion sizes, is key to managing cravings, as a result of what's called the cold-hot empathy gap. In the cold state (meaning you're not starving hungry, and therefore feeling neutral, or 'cold' towards food) you're less likely to overestimate how hungry you'll be and overindulge – so this is the state to be in when you're planning meals. Getting enough sleep is also vital: research shows that just one night of poor sleep can significantly boost your ghrelin levels, making you snack more the next day. Eating spicy foods can help beat cravings, too. Capsaicin, the compound that makes peppers spicy, can suppress appetite and increase satiety. And don't skip bitter vegetables, such as dark leafy greens, since studies have shown they can trigger the release of appetite-control hormones in the gut and reduce our desire for sweet foods. Emotional hunger Research published last year by scientists at the University of California, Los Angeles in America found that women who perceive themselves to be lonely showed more brain activity in areas associated with food cravings, especially when shown pictures of high-calorie or sugary foods. The dopamine hit we experience when we eat these foods 'essentially teaches our brain that eating makes us feel better,' says Dr Le Cunff. For many people, this link between food and comfort is strong and dates way back to our childhoods. 'Over time, our brains learn to link eating with emotional relief,' says Dr Le Cunff. So when we're struggling emotionally, we're hard-wired to seek this kind of comfort, she explains. 'When we're stressed or feeling low, our brain's emotion centre, the amygdala, becomes more active and interacts with areas that control both hunger and reward-seeking behaviour.'Unfortunately, this can create unhealthy patterns, seeing us reach for food as comfort every time we experience negative emotions, then feeling guilty and ashamed – which can lead to yet more bingeing. Recognising that emotional eating is a normal part of life is important, Dr Leeming advises: 'Don't beat yourself up – think about the bigger picture of what you're eating in a week.' How to stop emotional hunger pangs Taking note of the feelings which lead to unhealthy eating can help identify your triggers, which is the first step in breaking the pattern. Next time you experience one, Dr Le Cunff says: 'Many other activities can activate similar reward pathways, in healthier ways, and these alternatives can help us regulate our emotions without relying on food.'Try contacting a friend – even a text message can provide the social connection that increases bonding hormones such as oxytocin. Or go for a walk or dance around the kitchen to uplifting music. As little as 10 minutes in Zone Two, where your heart rate is around 125-140 BPM and you can talk but not hold a proper conversation, can increase dopamine levels. Yoga, meditation and deep breathing can help us cope with stress, as can creative pursuits such as painting, writing, or gardening – and they can all act as a diversionary tactic to take our mind off the craving until it passes. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Business Upturn
21 hours ago
- Business Upturn
Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Sacrifices Coal Country for Politics
By GlobeNewswire Published on July 22, 2025, 21:41 IST Washington, D.C., July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — On July 4, President Donald Trump signed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' (OBBBA) into law. This sweeping bill repeals clean energy and manufacturing investments and initiatives, and cuts funding for programs like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP). The bill includes several provisions that will negatively impact coal communities by cutting off access to programs designed to revitalize and diversify the economies of coal-dependent areas while creating good jobs. 'Donald Trump left coal communities out in the cold during his first term and he's doing it again now. He talks a big game about defending coal communities, but his words are empty and his actions tell the real story,' said BlueGreen Alliance Executive Director Jason Walsh. 'Trump isn't interested in policies that will help the workers and communities bearing the brunt of the energy transition. Instead, he's dismantling them and feeding families false hope just to help his rich friends get richer.' Contact If you have any questions, need additional information, or would like to set up an interview with one of our policy experts, please contact our Press Secretary, Justin Jackson at [email protected] or (951) 214-9108. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Background The 'Big Beautiful Bill Act' signed into law by Donald Trump is yet another part of his agenda that serves as a direct attack on coal workers and communities. This bill accelerates the administration's efforts to wipe out critical protections for miners, dismantle job-creating investments, and disrupt the economic future of coal communities across the country. OBBBA is a Direct Attack on Progress in Coal Communities The bill eliminates programs that have created union jobs, driven private investment, and safeguarded public and personal health. It includes deep cuts to the tax credits that support clean energy development and domestic manufacturing nationwide and essentially voids the tax bonus specifically targeted toward fossil fuel communities. In addition, it reverses the major progress already underway from the once-in-a-generation investments delivered through the Inflation Reduction Act—just as coal communities are beginning to feel the impact of those long-overdue benefits. The OBBBA could be devastating to coal communities. The bill: Butchered clean energy tax credits, nullifying the bonus that specifically incentivizes developing clean energy projects in energy communities. Killed remaining funds for the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund putting the Green Bank for Rural America in jeopardy even if the courts unfreeze their illegally withheld funds. Turned the Energy Infrastructure Reinvestment Financing loan program into the 'Energy Dominance' loan program, diverting the attention of the program from reinvesting in long-term clean energy solutions to propping up financially struggling coal and natural gas plants. Expanded the 45X Advanced Manufacturing Tax Credit to subsidize the production of metallurgical coal. Currently, the majority of metallurgical coal mined in the United States is exported. Companies will face no labor standards or requirements for the coal to be sold domestically to claim the full value of the tax credit. Other actions by the administration: Continues to withhold approximately $500 million from the Green Bank for Rural America, a recipient of Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund awards that is dedicated to using its lending power to drive investments into rural communities and coal communities. Withheld grant funding for clean energy projects on mine lands, a program created by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. Select projects have begun to move forward, though some still have not. Those projects face further headwinds due to the budget bill killing clean energy incentives. The BlueGreen Alliance Is Holding Trump and Congress Accountable The Trump administration and Congress don't want to create jobs, lower energy costs, and build a better future. If they did, they would listen to communities, not ignore them. Their actions don't just undercut progress—they undermine decades of work to secure legacy and hard-fought-for investments for coal communities. The BlueGreen Alliance is ringing the alarm. We're tracking every vote, flagging every broken promise, highlighting each investment, and calling out elected officials who put donors over workers. Coal communities deserve better and we're making sure to hold elected officials accountable. Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash GlobeNewswire provides press release distribution services globally, with substantial operations in North America and Europe.
