logo
Edinburgh school ‘protected' abusers for decades

Edinburgh school ‘protected' abusers for decades

Telegraph5 days ago

Merchiston Castle School, which charges annual fees of up to £50,000, issued an 'unreserved apology', with headmaster Jonathan Anderson and Gareth Baird, chairman of the board of governors, describing Lady Smith's report as 'detailed, fair and, at times, a difficult read'.
They added: 'It uncovers a history of unacceptable abuse suffered by many former pupils and highlights the enduring impact on their lives decades later.
'To all those who suffered abuse while in the care of Merchiston Castle School, we offer our most sincere and unreserved apology. No child should ever suffer harm, especially not in a place that exists to nurture and educate. Those who were abused by their teachers or their fellow pupils deserved better, and we are truly sorry that they were so badly let down.'
The report said indecency occurred from the 1950s to the 2010s, however Lady Smith said that 'by the early 2000s, Merchiston thought itself a leader in the child protection field'.
Abusers protected by 'tradition'
Lady Smith said that 'references were badly handled and child protection concerns ignored', while voyeurism and indecent assaults were common.
She added: 'Abusers, and potential abusers, were sometimes protected by tradition, long service, or governor loyalty.'
The findings, part of the inquiry's overall boarding schools case study, found that 'in common with Loretto School, Morrison's Academy, Gordonstoun, and Queen Victoria School, children who boarded at Merchiston were exposed to risks of suffering sexual, physical and emotional abuse'.
Lady Smith concluded the two main perpetrators at Merchiston were 'virtually untouchable'.
Normalised abusive behaviour
She said: 'From the 1950s to the second decade of the 21st century, there was a more or less continuous line of consistent indecency perpetrated by two prolific abusers, Mervyn Preston and James Rainy Brown.
'The former taught the latter, who then returned to Merchiston as a teacher, after which they worked together.
'They engaged in abusive behaviour which became normalised for generations of boys.
'In the cases of both those men, their longstanding service and positions of power in boarding houses rendered them virtually untouchable.
'In total, eight teachers abused children sexually. Seven were male and one was female.
'Conduct included voyeurism, encouraging nudity, indecent exposure, indecent assaults, and in the case of the female, it included encouraging senior pupils to engage in sexual intercourse with her.'
'Obvious abusive trends'
She said the school's strong culture of rugby and sport left those who did not fit in vulnerable to abuse and bullying.
She said by the millennium, the school was 'content to rely on positive but, in fact, inadequate and insufficiently critical' inspections, while 'obvious abusive trends' were missed – until 2014 when a wider police inquiry revealed many longstanding weaknesses in child protection and pastoral care.
Following a poor inspection report in 2015, Merchiston was made subject to special measures by the Scottish government.
It was obliged to respond, and Lady Smith said it was 'well led by its board of governors', and policies 'were corrected and became meaningful'.
'Deep and lasting harm'
Mr Anderson and Mr Baird added: 'That sexual, physical and emotional abuse of children at our school was allowed to continue for so long is deeply upsetting and we respect and we thank our former pupils who had the courage and bravery to speak about their experiences in evidence to the inquiry.
'Their collective testimonies painted a picture of a school that fostered a culture of fear, bullying and abuse that is hard to fathom, and unrecognisable with the school that exists today.
'We fully accept these criticisms, we acknowledge these failures, and we recognise the deep and lasting harm that was caused. The school is wholeheartedly committed to ensuring the lessons of the past are fully learned.
'Safeguarding is our number one priority and the wellbeing of the young people in our care is of paramount importance to us.
'Following a negative inspection report in 2015, Merchiston was placed under special measures by the Scottish Government. This was a turning point and as Lady Smith recognises in her report, we responded promptly and decisively.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dartmoor dairy farm 10-year ban for chronic neglect of cattle
Dartmoor dairy farm 10-year ban for chronic neglect of cattle

BBC News

time27 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Dartmoor dairy farm 10-year ban for chronic neglect of cattle

A family who ran a Dartmoor dairy farm have been banned from keeping animals for ten years due to chronic neglect of their Dunn, 50, of East Barton Farm, Exbourne, Devon, admitted 22 food hygiene offences and 24 animal welfare charges at Exeter Magistrates' parents Rosamund Dunn, 76, and Edmund Dunn, 79, admitted ten animal welfare judge Stuart Smith said the hygiene concerns at their milk parlour risked the health of the public who bought their milk products. He added that animal carcasses were found around the farms, lame and emaciated cows had to be euthanised by vets, animals were never treated for their ailments and they were living in hazardous conditions on the farm. 'Buried in mud' The judge said animals were surrounded by rubbish, including pipes, gas canisters, cables, metal sheets and old tyres as they tried to get to water and said one carcass was buried in mud and had been there for days or weeks. Another dead cow was lying in a slurry channel risking contamination of the water Herc Ashworth said William Dunn was 'overwhelmed' by the task and despite getting plenty of advice and support, things just got defence lawyer said these were 'distressing and serious offences' and claimed the family were struggling to recover from Covid when staff were laid off and costs increased by £25,000 a month. Three months to sell The lawyer said: "William Dunn was a one man band. It was a large farm operation with one person to manage the whole thing."The Dunns admitted a number of offences in the prosecutions brought by Trading Standards and the Food Standards have been given three months to sell their 170 strong herd owned by the Dunn parents, with William Dunn running the parents were also fined £3,053 each and William Dunn was fined a total of £27,000.

Two arrested after man found seriously injured in Shirebrook
Two arrested after man found seriously injured in Shirebrook

BBC News

time28 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Two arrested after man found seriously injured in Shirebrook

Two people have been arrested on suspicion of wounding with intent after a man was found with serious injuries in Police said it was made aware a man had been admitted to hospital on Saturday 28 June after an incident in or around The Gate Inn pub on King Edward Street earlier in the force added it is still trying to establish how the man came to be injured and is aware of a video circulating on social media - but urged people not to share the video and send it directly to police. Two men aged 22 and 20-year-old have been arrested on suspicion of wounding with intent. The 22-year old has been released on bail while the 20-year-old remains in custody. Police are appealing for anyone with CCTV or dashcam footage from the Main Street area of Shirebrook to come forward.

British law firm coached universities on how to obtain sweeping protest bans
British law firm coached universities on how to obtain sweeping protest bans

The Guardian

time30 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

British law firm coached universities on how to obtain sweeping protest bans

A law firm that helped a UK university obtain a year-long ban on unauthorised protests, which could lead to students being jailed for up to two years, has quietly coached several others on how to take similar legal action, the Guardian can reveal. Shakespeare Martineau LLP, which represented Cardiff University during proceedings that led to it being granted a sweeping anti-protest injunction this month, promoted the controversial type of court order to universities at a webinar last October, according to documents obtained by the Guardian and Liberty Investigates under the Freedom of Information Act. Cardiff staff and students could now face prison and unlimited fines for holding protests on large stretches of their campus without permission, which must be sought three weeks in advance. It follows conflict between the university and students over a pro-Palestine encampment on campus. Lawyers who argued against the injunction said it was so broad that it potentially covered all unauthorised protest-related activity ranging from industrial action to bake sales – though Cardiff disputes this – while a UN watchdog for protests rights called the move a 'flagrant violation of international human rights law'. When approached for comment, a Shakespeare Martineau spokesperson said this interpretation was 'inaccurate', insisting the injunction related only to 'unlawful encampments'. They reiterated that the order did not not prohibit 'lawful' protest, where the university had given its permission. But two independent legal experts who examined the order's wording agreed that it could apply to other protest activities besides encampments. Other universities that registered for the webinar include Reading, Exeter, Northumbria, Hertfordshire, Birkbeck, Bath Spa and Liverpool John Moores. Spokespeople for these universities variously said their staff commonly attended webinars and attendance did not mean they had adopted or agreed with the measures discussed, while Exeter and Northumbria said their staff had not attended but received slides. Falmouth and Warwick, whose staff were also recorded as having attended, did not respond to requests for comment. Slides from the webinar show Shakespeare Martineau suggested the 'newcomer injunctions' – so called because they can be used 'against persons unknown' and those not involved in protests at the time it was made – like that taken out by Cardiff could represent 'the future' for universities. One attender asked whether the use of injunctions could 'be seen as attempting to curtail [freedom of speech] unlawfully', according to notes provided by a university. The presenter said: 'No I don't see any difficulty in principle with that […] You would of course need to show to the court that the restrictions imposed by an injunction do not interfere with freedom of speech and that you can demonstrate this is a proportionate response.' But the European Legal Support Centre, which has intervened in four university injunction cases, including Cardiff, said the tactic represented a 'chilling precedent for academic institutions', calling the injunctions 'legally complex and financially impractical for affected students to challenge in court'. Gina Romero, the UN special rapporteur for freedom of assembly, said 'profiting from the […] curtailing of human rights is despicable', in comments critical of the law firms' promotion of the tactic to universities. Last week England's Office for Students published guidance due to take effect in August, advising universities against making 'sweeping' protest restrictions. While the move has been welcomed by free speech lawyers, they have cautioned that it will not stop universities applying for injunctions and will need to be tested in court. Twelve-month temporary injunctions were this week month granted to two Cambridge colleges, as well as a temporary injunction at a third. Smita Jamdar, the head of education at Shakespeare Martineau, said it was working with universities to facilitate peaceful protests while dealing with unlawful encampments and trespass. She said: 'Universities are dealing with complex situations on campus every single day. Understandably, many institutions are seeking guidance on how to manage a whole host of situations effectively and safely, while upholding the law and balancing the rights and freedoms of the whole campus community.' A spokesperson for Cardiff University said it remained 'absolutely committed to free speech and to the right to peaceful protest' but had seen 'an escalation in practices that put protesters and the community at risk'. Cardiff's injunction is due to be reviewed in July 2026.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store