
Trump budget proposal could tighten access to housing vouchers in Nevada
More than 15,000 households in Nevada rely on federally funded housing vouchers, with thousands more waiting years to access vital rental assistance.
Representatives from the local housing authorities worry many would be locked out of vouchers and other assistance under President Donald Trump's proposed budget, which calls for billions of dollars in cuts to housing programs.
'Based on our current average monthly subsidy in our Housing Choice Voucher Program, we've estimated that for every million-dollar reduction in housing assistance, it would be approximately 93 fewer households that we would be able to serve,' said Dr. Hilary Lopez, the executive director for the Reno Housing Authority.
An estimated 15,300 people in Nevada rely on housing choice vouchers, formerly known as section 8 vouchers, which provide rental assistance subsidies for low-income people, seniors and people with disabilities, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
The number doesn't include other types of specialized vouchers, such as emergency solutions housing vouchers designed to pay rent for people and families at risk or experiencing homelessness.
Another 2,500 people live in public housing throughout the state, according to data from CBPP.
Trump's budget requests, which have been formed into the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' were passed overwhelmingly by House Republicans in late May and are currently being debated in the Senate.
The proposal, which aims to slash Medicaid and food assistance programs, would reduce the Department of Housing and Urban Development's budget by more than 40% amid a national housing and homeless crisis.
The cuts to homeless assistance dollars include a $27 billion reduction in funding to the State Rental Assistance Block Grant, which funds housing vouchers.
The recommendations released by the White House in May said the proposed cuts 'would encourage States to provide funding to share in the responsibility to ensure that similar levels of recipients can benefit from the block grant.'
If these proposed cuts are approved it 'would be staggering in both scale and impact,' Renee Willis, the president of the National Low Income Housing Coalition, said in a press call last week.
'Rather than preserving and strengthening the federal rental assistance program that serves as a lifeline for these communities, the budget proposed consolidating HUD's five largest rental assistance programs into a single state-run block grant,' Willis said. 'It also imposed a two-year time limit on assistance.'
She added that the budget proposal is not only 'misguided but fundamentally unjust' but that it 'abdicates the government's responsibility to address poverty and housing stability.'
While the full scope of these cuts, or the state and local impact of reductions, has yet to be determined, social service providers and local governments fear any cuts to HUD funding would reduce Nevada's already fragile social safety net to tatters.
The Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority declined to answer questions about the proposed budget cuts as well as how it currently used federal funding dollars.
'While federal funding changes are uncertain at this time, we remain laser focused on our mission to provide safe, sanitary and affordable housing to eligible residents within our jurisdictions – housing that will provide an environment that fosters independence, self-sufficiency and community pride,' Lewis Jordan, executive director of the Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority said in a statement.
Bill Brewer, the executive director for the Nevada Rural Housing Authority, said he is still waiting to see what the final budget will look like.
Any amount would mean less people in rural areas being served.
'Worst case scenario, if we took a 40% cut to our vouchers, then we would be looking at cutting about 500 households off of assistance out of our approximately 1,275 voucher holders,' he said. 'If it was just 12% or 10%, then we're still looking at losing 120 to 130 households'
'They'll simply lose their support'
The Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority currently oversees the lion's share of housing assistance, around 12,000 vouchers for low income residents.
Reno Housing Authority, which provides assistance throughout Washoe County, allocated around 2,094 housing choice vouchers last year. Nevada Rural Housing Authority oversaw about 1,100 vouchers, not including specialized housing assistance.
Reno Housing Authority relies on two main federal funding sources: $32 million from the federal government to provide housing vouchers along with $3 million to administer public housing.
'It does fluctuate on an annual basis and really depends upon federal appropriations,' Lopez said.
Of the more than 2,000 households – roughly 3,600 people – that rely on housing choice vouchers in the Reno area, Lopez said close to three-quarters of clients who receive housing choice vouchers are seniors or disabled households. The breakdown is similar for the 600 households living in a public housing unit.
Average income for those relying on housing vouchers is roughly $18,000, according to the authority's 2025 annual report.
Nevada's housing shortage and skyrocketing rent prices have made it difficult for the authority to meet the demand for services, Lopez said.
'Over the last several years, we've seen those rents consistently rise,' Lopez said. 'What that means is that the average rental subsidy that we're providing has also been increasing over time and that also impacts the number of clients that we can assist.'
The rural authority gets about $12 million for its housing choice vouchers, which funds its 1,077 vouchers throughout the rural areas. Additionally it received last year $786,340 for Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing Vouchers, which provides assistance for 76 veterans experiencing homelessness.
Similar to the Reno authority, Brewer said roughly two-thirds of housing voucher recipients are elderly or disabled.
'They're not the kind of folks that can go out and get a job and take care of themselves,' he said. 'They're already living on Social Security or supplemental Social Security, and they simply can't afford a $1,500 a month rent payment. That's all the money they get in most cases.'
Demand for housing assistance is growing.
Reno's authority has about 4,000 people waiting to apply for housing vouchers while the rural authorities have 2,248 applicants waiting.
'What we try to do for households on our wait list, we try to serve them within anywhere from about 18 to 36 months,' Lopez said.
The waitlist in rural Nevada opened last year and 'within a week's time, we had about 5,000 applicants on there,' according to Brewer. 'We had to close the list.'
'It will take us at least two years, if not longer, to work through that list,' he added. 'I think we still have a couple thousand names on there that we will work through.'
Nevadans wait an average of 38 months, more than three years, to receive housing vouchers, according to 2021 data from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
In addition to housing choice vouchers, communities across the country, including those in Nevada, also began receiving funding for emergency housing vouchers through the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 signed by President Joe Biden.
Funding for that is expected to be depleted by the end of 2026.
Willis from the National Low Income Housing Coalition said Trump's current budget request doesn't provide additional funding for these emergency vouchers and could 'put more than 60,000 households at risk of losing their assistance and being pushed into homelessness.'
The rural authority received $455,616 for Emergency Housing Vouchers, which support 36 people. Washoe County previously told the Nevada Current 137 people rely on emergency housing vouchers in the county.
In a 'normal year,' Brewer said the rural authority would just roll people relying on emergency housing voucher holders 'onto a regular Section 8 voucher.'
He doesn't know if that would be possible if the proposed cuts are passed.
'If our voucher program overall is cut, we won't have any room to bring those people on to the (housing choice) vouchers,' he said. 'They'll simply lose their support.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
19 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Kathy Hochul's Chances of Losing New York Governor Election: Polls
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Governor of New York Kathy Hochul is up for reelection in 2026, and a new poll has found that she is leading a hypothetical primary race and hypothetical general elections, despite the majority of voters saying they want a new governor. A poll taken by the Siena College Research Institute of 800 New York State voters between June 23-26 found that 49 percent of Democratic voters would vote for Hochul in a primary between her, Lieutenant Governor Antonio Delgado, and Congressman Ritchie Torres. When asked whether they would want to re-elect Hochul or vote for someone else, 55 percent of people said "someone else." However, when pitted against hypothetical Republican candidates, Hochul polled ahead of her opponents. Governor Hochul has been contacted for comment via email. New York Governor Kathy Hochul speaks during a House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform hearing, Thursday, June 12, 2025, at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. New York Governor Kathy Hochul speaks during a House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform hearing, Thursday, June 12, 2025, at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP Photo Why It Matters Opinions on Hochul largely fall along partisan lines, with 69 percent of Democrats approving of her, but only 18 percent of Republicans sharing the same view. This is likely due to her fighting the Trump administration on New York City's congestion pricing plan and on immigration. Hochul's race comes at a tumultuous time in New York Democratic politics. She is yet to endorse Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, distancing herself from his democratic-socialist stance and his opinions on Israel. What To Know The Sienna poll for a Democratic primary put Hochul against Delgado and Torres. Torres has not officially announced his candidacy for governor yet, and has said he would not run if Mamdani wins the mayoral race. Delgado was appointed by Hochul to his position in 2022, but is now primarying his boss. He did not name Hochul in his announcement, saying: "Listen, the powerful and well-connected have their champions. I'm running for governor to be yours." The Republican race is currently being won, per the same Sienna poll, by Congresswoman Elise Stefanik. Elise Stefanik leaving a House Republican Conference meeting with President Donald Trump on the budget reconciliation bill in the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday, May 20, 2025. Elise Stefanik leaving a House Republican Conference meeting with President Donald Trump on the budget reconciliation bill in the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday, May 20, 2025. Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call via AP Images Stefanik was originally President Donald Trump's pick to be Ambassador to the United Nations, but her nomination was pulled. She has raised millions for a gubernatorial run but has yet to make a formal announcement that she will be joining the race. Per the poll, she leads a Republican primary against Mike Lawler and Bruce Blakeman by 35 percent to Lawler's 18 percent and Blakeman's 7 percent. But, she loses a general election to Hochul by 24 points to Hochul's 47 points. What People Are Saying Elise Stefanik posted on X (formerly Twitter) about a fundraiser in New York: "I ask you all today to join us in this effort to SAVE NEW YORK and fire Kathy Hochul in 2026. This is about the people of New York. And it's going to take fighters all across this state to get this done." Kathy Hochul for Governor site: "As Governor, Kathy has taken decisive action to deliver immediate relief to working and middle class families and small businesses, beat back the pandemic, and accelerate New York's economic recovery. In addition, she has reaffirmed New York's position as a national leader in defending reproductive rights and in combating climate change." What Happens Next The New York gubernatorial race is not until 2026. According to the poll, 43 percent of people do not know, or have no opinion on, Stefanik, meaning that as more people get to know her, the polls will likely move.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Solar Firms Surge as Senate Drops Excise Tax From Trump Bill
(Bloomberg) -- Shares for solar companies rose on Tuesday on the Senate's decision to remove an excise tax on wind and solar projects from President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill. Struggling Downtowns Are Looking to Lure New Crowds Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer Shares in Sunrun Inc. were up about 11%, Enphase Energy Inc. was up about 4% and Solaredge Technologies Inc. were up 9% at around 12:49 p.m. in New York after news reports on the change. The Senate passed the $3.3 trillion bill on Tuesday after making the last-minute change and other modifications meant to mollify some Republicans. The measure spiked a previously proposed excise tax on wind and solar projects that contained a certain threshold of components made in China, Senator James Lankford, a Republican from Oklahoma, told reporters Tuesday. That proposed tax, which had been tucked into the Senate bill unveiled days ago, was supported by some US manufacturers who said the country needs to urgently wean clean energy supply chains off China. But it had sparked alarm from renewable developers who said it could hike costs for wind farms and solar arrays that still rely on some foreign components and supply chains dominated by Beijing. Senator Ed Markey, a Democrat from Massachusetts, hailed the removal of the excise tax in a post on X ahead of passage. The bill would still phase out subsidies for wind and solar projects placed in service after December 31, 2027; some Republicans had made a last-ditch push to ease the credit cutoff. The various iterations of Trump's tax and spending package have whipsawed much of the renewable energy industry — and, with it, shares of developers, installers and manufacturers. The proposed addition over the weekend of the tax on some wind and solar projects stunned the industry, prompting shares to slide Monday. But now, with the excise tax's removal, shares popped on a day that would otherwise have threatened the pace of the growth of renewable energy in the US. Clean energy trade groups had warned that without changes, Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' would have threatened some wind farms and solar arrays already under construction. The changes weren't enough to satisfy renewable developers who on Tuesday said the Senate-passed bill still poses a major threat to the industry. 'Despite limited improvements, this legislation undermines the very foundation of America's manufacturing comeback and global energy leadership. If this bill becomes law, families will face higher electric bills, factories will shut down, Americans will lose their jobs, and our electric grid will grow weaker,' Abigail Ross Hopper, president of the Solar Energy Industries Association, said in a statement. --With assistance from Erik Wasson. America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too China's Homegrown Jewelry Superstar Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Miami Herald
19 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Miami-Dade's immigrant past: from the Mariel tent city to Alligator Alcatraz
With Alligator Alcatraz opening today — complete with a visit from President Donald Trump — some may not recall this isn't the first time undocumented immigrants in Miami-Dade have been housed in makeshift camps under Florida's blazing sun while the government decides what to do with them. We've been here before — but this time, it's about punishment, not trying to help immigrants fleeing oppression. It was 45 years ago this summer that Miami-Dade had another tent city. Dozens of military-style tents were pitched beneath the Interstate 95 overpass near Southwest Eighth Street by the Miami River. The city had allowed the encampment as a last resort for housing hundreds of undocumented Cuban men, women and children who had no relatives in Miami, no jobs, no work permits and nowhere to live after arriving during the chaos of the 1980 Mariel Boatlift. It wasn't ideal, but it reflected a community overwhelmed, not vindictive. A small number of Mariels were said to have been released from Fidel Castro's prisons, but deportation was never considered for the people in this original tent city. And there was no glee from leaders about housing human beings in rough conditions or about using 'natural security' — alligators and pythons — to keep them in line. The 1980s version — where José Martí Park's basketball courts are now — was a necessity. More than 125,000 Cubans had poured into South Florida in just a few months, escaping Castro's communist Cuba. Conditions were rough: tents, minimal sanitation, little privacy. The goal was resettlement and integration. Eventually, the Carter administration responded with the Cuban-Haitian Entrant Program (CHEP), which granted special immigration status to those who had arrived during that time. It allowed Mariel refugees to start a new life. Now compare that to today. The Florida Everglades — an ecologically fragile and nationally protected treasure — is the site of a sprawling pop-up detention center meant to house up to 5,000 undocumented immigrants. Gov. Ron DeSantis, who called for its construction in a matter of days using emergency authority, has proudly dubbed it Alligator Alcatraz, a name now printed on GOP merchandise. This new tent city isn't a response to a humanitarian crisis. It's a message from DeSantis and the Trump administration with one goal in mind: mass deportation. Back in 1980, local leaders worked to help refugees. Today, the city and county have signed agreements to help ICE — U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement — catch and deport immigrants already living here. This time, the optics are deliberate. A detention camp in a swamp sends a clear message: You are not welcome. Alligator Alcatraz evokes isolation and fear. It's political theater. In many ways, these two crises reflect their eras. The 1980s tent city was a Cold War scramble to help refugees fleeing communism. The public was wary but there was a sense of moral obligation. Miami was a city of refugees. Alligator Alcatraz, by contrast, treats undocumented immigrants not as people to help but as threats to contain and deport under an administration that demands it. It's a 'get out' mentality. One constant remains: Miami is still ground zero for America's unresolved immigration crisis. We now have the benefit of hindsight. Many of the Mariel refugees once warehoused under a highway overpass became American citizens, business owners and vital parts of our community. The same could be true for today's undocumented immigrants — if we gave them the chance. Granted, some of those being detained committed crimes. In general, those people should be deported. But the rush to push people out of the country includes lots of immigrants who have not committed offenses. Our response to the immigration crisis must be rooted in dignity: Alligator Alcatraz fails miserable at that goal. Sadly, Trump's visit is meant to turn Florida into an immigration detention poster state for the country. What a difference 45 years can make. Click here to send the letter.