logo
Why is Morgan McSweeney now a lightning rod for Labour rebels?

Why is Morgan McSweeney now a lightning rod for Labour rebels?

Timesa day ago

Morgan McSweeney's allies are fiercely loyal. This week the prime minister's chief of staff has been the subject of a series of vitriolic attacks from Labour MPs who are blaming him for the debacle surrounding the government's welfare reforms.
Ministers have accused him of presiding over a 'bunker mentality' in No 10 and some rebels have called for him to be removed from office as part of a 'regime change'. The time has come, they argue, for the 'overexcitable boys' to move on.
In the wake of the attacks, one government adviser shared a post on social media suggesting that removing McSweeney could spell the end of Sir Keir Starmer's premiership.
The post said: 'After losing him it will be nothing but legislating on MP pet projects, the civil service running the country … while Starmer is left running around chasing media stories until the [parliamentary Labour Party (PLP)] panics after the 2028 local elections and replaces him.'
McSweeney's influence cannot be overstated. The Irishman played a key role in transforming Starmer from a bastion of the soft left — a former human rights lawyer who backed a second referendum and was an arch-defender of free movement — into the man who took on Jeremy Corbyn and overhauled the Labour Party.
• Profile: Who is Morgan McSweeney?
With McSweeney at his side, Starmer moved firmly to the centre ground, helping Labour to a landslide victory in the election in the process. The Starmer of today has put defence and security and a strong dose of patriotism at the heart of his premiership, while also promulgating fiscal responsibility at every turn and taking a hardline stance on immigration.
Given Starmer's transformation, it is perhaps not surprising that McSweeney has become a lightning rod for criticism over the government's welfare reforms. Labour rebels see the cuts as part of a broader plan to shift the party to the right and appeal to Reform UK voters who want a tougher line on benefits.
• Starmer is dangerously vulnerable over welfare reforms
The cuts, they argue, are being driven by a combination of an 'arbitrary' approach to balancing the books and political opportunism. They are highly critical of the handling of the policy in No 10. MPs say that a rebellion that was eminently avoidable has blown up into a full-blown crisis for Starmer because Downing Street stopped listening.
For some rebels it is deeply personal. 'I wouldn't be f***ing backing down now anyway, not after the 'noises off' comments [from Starmer at a press conference this week] and the briefing that they had 'cleared the self-indulgent rubbish out',' one said.
'Who the eff do they think they are? It's just desperation and it's sickening. Do you remember when Dominic Cummings went to Barnard Castle and the story became about him? When the story becomes about you, it's time to go, so when is Morgan going to go?'
A senior government source said: 'There clearly needs to be a complete reset in how we approach the party. No 10 did not listen and did not engage until it was far too late and now they're in a hole of their own making.'
Where once McSweeney, the mastermind of Labour's landslide, was untouchable, today the briefings abound. 'There's a bit of 'emperor's new clothes' going on,' one government source said. 'When you see him up close, you see he's not what everyone thinks he is. He isn't this brilliant mastermind. He's a man of the moment who's taken advantage of it, but he has manoeuvred himself into these positions.'
Others believe that McSweeney is being used as a proxy for wider unhappiness with Starmer; that, like so many senior No 10 advisers before him — Sue Gray, his predecessor as Starmer's chief of staff, and Cummings, Boris Johnson's senior adviser — he has become an easy target.
Far from being political, they say, the move to curb the benefits bill is born of a moral and economic necessity; that with 1,000 extra people claiming disability benefits every day, the current system is broken and unsustainable. People are being denied the dignity of work — a view shared by both McSweeney and Starmer.
McSweeney clearly divides opinion. Members of the 100-strong Labour Growth group were quick to defend him. 'It's very clear he gets that [the] cost of living is the crucial issue facing people and knows we've got to be on the side of people who are feeling that,' one member said. 'There was clear alignment on how ambitious we need to be in turning around the economy so we can do that.'
• Call for 'regime change' as Keir Starmer aide faces welfare backlash
The trouble for both Starmer and McSweeney is that the Labour Party is becoming ever more recalcitrant as the reality of the party's collapse in the polls sets in.
Lord Blunkett, a former Labour home secretary, said: 'We may have a very large majority, but many backbenchers are looking at the opinion polls and wondering where they will be in three and a half years' time.'
The risk, according to some, is that the Labour Party will become ungovernable. 'Keir has been completely deluged by world affairs,' said one MP close to Starmer. 'He's been told by his massive team that they have this under control when they do not. This is on them.
'No 10 has entered complete bunker mentality. Last week, they were calm. Now, they are irate. They think that if they give in now the PLP will be ungovernable. But we're past that point. Pandora's box has been opened with the backbenchers.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Record numbers expected at Budapest Pride march despite attempts to ban it
Record numbers expected at Budapest Pride march despite attempts to ban it

The Guardian

time33 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Record numbers expected at Budapest Pride march despite attempts to ban it

Update: Date: 2025-06-28T07:20:58.000Z Title: Budapest Pride expected to be a rallying cry against Orbán's rollback of rights Content: Good morning and welcome to the Europe live blog. My name is Tom Ambrose and I'll be bringing you all the latest news lines. We start with news that record numbers of people are expected to take part in Budapest Pride on Saturday. Hungarians will join forces with campaigners and politicians from across Europe in the march that has become a potent symbol of pushback against the Hungarian government's steady rollback of rights. 'This weekend, all eyes are on Budapest,' Hadja Lahbib, the European commissioner for equality, told reporters in the Hungarian capital on Friday. 'This is bigger than one Pride celebration, one Pride march. It is about the right to be who you are, to love who you want, whether it is in Budapest, in Brussels or anywhere else.' The country's main Pride march was cast into doubt earlier this year after the country's ruling Fidesz party – led by the rightwing populist Viktor Orbán – backed legislation that created a legal basis for Pride to be banned, citing a widely criticised need to protect children. The government also said it would use facial recognition software to identify people attending any banned events, potentially fining them up to €500 (£425). The move caused outrage from within Hungary and beyond, turning Budapest Pride into a rallying cry against a government that has long faced criticism for weakening democratic institutions and gradually undermining the rule of law. Read the full story here: In other developments: Severe weather warnings have been issued across southern Europe, including in Italy, Spain and Portugal, with temperatures expected to get close to or locally even above 40C this weekend, prompting concerns about health hazards and wildfires (14:32). Expected temperatures on early Saturday afternoon: Madrid 38C, Thessaloníki 38C, Florence 38C, Rome 37C, Lisbon 36C, Tirana 36C, Athens 35C. It will be hot in Paris (32C) and still warm in London and Berlin 28C, and in Brussels 27C. European leaders failed to agree on the latest, 18th, package of sanctions at last night's European Council meeting in Brussels, with Hungary and Slovakia holding firm in their opposition to the proposed measures. But it's worth noting that the EU has agreed on rolling over the already existing sanctions against Russia, which were due to expire. In Germany, lawmakers agreed to suspend family reunification rights for refugees without asylum status as conservative chancellor Friedrich Merz's government pursues a crackdown on immigration. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said that Estonia's stated intention to let Nato allies' nuclear-capable aircraft use its territory was a direct threat to Moscow.

The gold-plated pensions costing taxpayers £400m a year
The gold-plated pensions costing taxpayers £400m a year

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

The gold-plated pensions costing taxpayers £400m a year

Taxpayers are spending more than £400m a year on gold-plated pensions for just 10,600 judges, new analysis shows. The average member of the Judicial Pension Scheme now receives £37,000 in pension contributions for each year of work, before being handed almost £40,000 a year in retirement. They have built up £4.5bn in taxpayer-funded pension entitlements, but pay up to 7pc towards the cost of their retirements. The figures come despite major reforms to public sector pensions in 2015 after rising costs pushed the Government to act. The Taxpayers' Alliance said judges should be moved into defined contribution schemes, while the Intergenerational Foundation said the 'profligate pension promises' would be funded by young people. There were 10,578 members of the Judicial Pension Scheme at the end of 2023-24, according to a Freedom of Information request made by The Telegraph. Judicial salaries ranged from £106,563 to £312,510 during the year, according to the Ministry of Justice. As public sector workers, they are entitled to guaranteed, inflation-linked pensions for life. The scheme's 6,162 working judges paid in 4.1pc of their salary on average. As their employer, the Ministry of Justice then added another 51.1pc at a cost of £229m. The required employer contribution increased to 62.6pc from April last year to keep pace with the rising costs of the scheme, but the amount paid in by employees has remained the same. Before 2012, judges did not have to contribute to their personal pensions and only paid towards benefits for their dependants. The scheme's pension payouts are also more generous than other key public sector schemes, with retirees receiving £39,400 on average – costing taxpayers another £180m a year, taking the total bill to £409m. By comparison, the average pension was around £16,600 for teachers and £12,300 for Armed Forces personnel, falling to £11,400 for NHS workers and £9,900 for retired civil servants. Liz Emerson, of the Intergenerational Foundation, said: 'Younger generations can only dream of similar pensions, but they will end up paying for these profligate promises via higher taxation, later retirements and lower pensions themselves. 'At the very least, the Government should levy National Insurance contributions on annual pensions that are higher than the average earnings of working-age adults.' Public sector pensions already cost the UK £54.3bn a year, despite being moved away from final salary schemes in 2015 amid fears they had become unaffordable. Payments are now based on a worker's average earnings, but the final salary entitlement for existing members was extended to 2022 after a legal challenge from members of the judicial and firefighters' pension schemes. Under the new system, judges have 2.5pc of their salary added to their pension each year, which is more than teachers, civil servants, NHS workers and Armed Forces personnel. John O'Connell, of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: ' Public sector pensions are extraordinarily generous with employer contributions, often outstripping those in the private sector. 'But what makes them particularly generous is the fact that they are gold-plated schemes, not based on the value of a pension pot, but on the average earnings of the employee, meaning they get topped up above and beyond what has already been contributed. 'On top of this, they are unfunded, coming not from an investment scheme, but general taxation. At the very least, ministers should be moving all public sector workers onto fully-funded, defined contribution schemes which are based on monies actually paid in.' A report published last year by the University College London Judicial Institute revealed that more than one in three judges planned to quit the profession within five years, citing poor working conditions and a continual loss of net earnings amid a backlog in the country's courts. The Senior Salaries Review body recommended a 4.75pc pay rise for members of the judiciary for 2025-26, but the Lord Chancellor reduced it to 4pc. A Ministry of Justice spokesman said: 'The Judicial Pension Scheme 2022 is designed to encourage top legal professionals to become judges who are vital to keeping the justice system running.'

EXCLUSIVE Holly Valance, 42, SPLITS from billionaire property tycoon husband Nick Candy, 52, after years of living separate lives
EXCLUSIVE Holly Valance, 42, SPLITS from billionaire property tycoon husband Nick Candy, 52, after years of living separate lives

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Holly Valance, 42, SPLITS from billionaire property tycoon husband Nick Candy, 52, after years of living separate lives

Holly Valance has split from billionaire property tycoon husband Nick Candy after 13 years of marriage and a long time living separate lives MailOnline can reveal. The ex Neighbours actress, 42, who has reinvented herself as a conservative firebrand, is said to have been left lonely while the Reform Party treasurer, 52, tends to his business ventures around the world. A source told MailOnline: 'They have been living separate lives for a long time, he's travelling a lot and it's been a lonely life for Holly. 'Nick has businesses in Dubai and London, The Reform Party.' The couple are parents to daughters Luka, 11, and Nova, seven, and tied the knot back in September 2012 in Beverly Hills. A spokesman for the couple said: 'This is a private matter and we will not be making any further comment.' The estranged couple were last pictured together in March, with Holly dressed in £10K of designer clothing as they enjoyed a swanky lunch together in London. They wed in 2012 a lavish £3million ceremony with guests including Elton John, Simon Cowell as well as Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie. Together they have enjoyed a lavish lifestyle and previously lived in a two-storey Hyde Park penthouse worth £175million, making it Britain's most expensive flat. Nick and Holly have since downsized to a £10million countryside mansion in the Cotswolds, which they have been renovating. In 2020, Nick gifted Holly with a £26million superyacht, despite the mother-of-two famously suffering from sea sickness. The businessman who previously poured millions into Conservative coffers, became Farage's party treasurer earlier this year. Both he and his former singer and actress wife have made little secret of their support for Farage. As far ago as 2022 they joined him and then incoming US president Donald Trump for dinner at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. A source told MailOnline: 'They have been living separate lives for a long time, he's travelling a lot and it's been a lonely life for Holly' As far ago as 2022 the former couple joined Farage and then incoming US president Donald Trump for dinner at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florid Holly also hosted fundraisers for Reform and they were in the audience when Farage returned as Party leader last year. The former soap star has spent the last decade focusing on her personal life and political interests. She launched her acting career in 1999 after winning the role of Felicity Scully in Neighbours, which she played until 2002. The Melbourne-born actress later moved to America and starred in several popular US movies and TV shows, including Taken, Entourage and Prison Break. She semi-retired from the industry in 2015, although she made a brief cameo on Neighbours in 2022. She raised eyebrows last year after slamming Greta Thunberg as a 'demonic little gremlin' and claiming Australia has become 'too woke' in a TV interview. Holly criticised climate activist Thunberg to podcast host Christopher Hope. 'I don't understand why you have this, like, demonic little gremlin high priestess of climatism as the goddess in classrooms, Greta [Thunberg],' she said. 'All the kids are all coming home with depression and anxiety. She Valance also told LBC radio she had donated around £100,000 to Reform. She and Candy were both seen at the Reform conference at Birmingham's National Exhibition Centre. There have previously been signs of a political split in their household, with the billionaire businessman a former Tory donor who backed Labour at the general election, before jumping ship join his wife and Reform.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store