Abu Dhabi Bid for Santos Sparks Energy Sovereignty Debate
The bid, sponsored by ADNOC's investment arm XRG alongside ADQ and Carlyle, offers A$8.89 per share—a 28 per cent premium to Santos's market value—while assuming A$36.4 billion in enterprise debt. It marks the largest all‑cash takeover ever in Australia.
Investors have reacted with caution: Santos shares rallied nearly 11 per cent upon news of the bid but remain significantly below the offer price, reflecting deep concern over regulatory approval. Analysts warn that the deal's fate now hinges on the Foreign Investment Review Board and Treasurer Jim Chalmers, whose approval will weigh economic gain against strategic control of critical energy infrastructure.
ADVERTISEMENT
Proponents emphasise that ADNOC's financial strength can catalyse development of Santos's undeveloped assets—including Narrabri and shale projects like Beetaloo—and help mitigate an anticipated east‑coast gas shortage by 2027. With ADNOC targeting 20–25 million tonnes per annum of LNG capacity by 2035, acquiring Santos's stakes in Gladstone, Darwin and PNG LNG represents a strategic alignment for both parties.
However, a chorus of concern has emerged over the implications for domestic energy sovereignty. The high concentration of export‑oriented gas supply—over 70 per cent in Queensland—raises alarms that ADNOC might prioritise LNG sales over local consumption, deepening east‑coast supply pressures. RenewEconomy warns that 'if ADNOC's focus is primarily on LNG markets, it will likely seek to export as much gas as possible'.
Australian Energy Producers, which counts Santos CEO Kevin Gallagher as a board member, has yet to publicly weigh in, but the Australian Energy Market Operator has flagged potential domestic shortfalls by late decade if projects like Barossa and Narrabri are delayed.
Political figures are sharpening oversight. South Australia's energy minister, Tom Koutsantonis, invoked state power to oversee licence transfers, while Treasurer Chalmers cautioned that the deal 'would be a big decision' and pledged not to pre‑empt FIRB's findings.
Historical precedents include the federal government blocking Shell's bid for Woodside in 2001 and the NSW Ausgrid sale in 2016—illustrating a willingness to restrict foreign control of strategic infrastructure.
From Adelaide to Canberra, voices across politics and industry are watching keenly. South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas stressed that the headquarters and local workforce must be retained; this position is reinforced by new state laws granting oversight over petroleum licence assignments.
On the investor side, divergent assessments persist. UBS analysts see ADNOC's deep pockets as a positive, while others like Evans & Partners downgraded Santos stock, suggesting investors might prefer Woodside, citing superior oil market positioning.
The bid aligns with Australia‑UAE economic ties following a free trade agreement, yet regulatory scrutiny is expected to be heightened due to the sovereign‑state nature of ADNOC.
Approval would mark a milestone in Australia's economic evolution, yet rejection—or imposition of conditions like domestic supply carve‑outs—could serve as a policy catalyst in securing energy infrastructure for public benefit.
This takeover bid places domestic energy security at the centre of policymaking, challenging Australia to find balance between foreign investment and safeguarding its energy future.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Crypto Insight
2 hours ago
- Crypto Insight
GENIUS sets new stablecoin rules but remains vague on foreign issuers
The signing of the GENIUS Act into law established the first comprehensive regulatory framework for US-issued stablecoins. Supporters argue it will enhance trust, drive mainstream adoption and bolster the dollar's status as the global reserve currency. With stablecoins now gaining traction in global finance, the GENIUS Act could also prove a boon for the developing world, attract institutional interest and drive a resurgence in decentralized finance (DeFi). However, concerns remain over unresolved issues, such as the regulation of foreign issuers, doubts about the ban on yield-bearing stablecoins and the potential dominance of corporate and traditional finance players. Industry experts surveyed by Cointelegraph agree that the GENIUS Act is a landmark event for the US blockchain and stablecoin sector, if not the global crypto industry. 'Banks, fintechs and even large retailers — essentially anyone with significant consumer or institutional distribution — will all be considering issuing their own stablecoin,' Christian Catalini, founder of the MIT Cryptoeconomics Lab, told Cointelegraph, adding that a stablecoin strategy will now be an integral part of all payments and financial services companies. GENIUS Act's foreign stablecoin 'loophole' A major weakness of the GENIUS Act is what the Atlantic Council calls the 'Tether loophole.' The US think tank argued in a blog post that the US stablecoin law did not 'adequately' regulate offshore stablecoin issuers. The law aims to bring order to US stablecoins by imposing strict rules on reserves, financial disclosures and sanctions compliance. This could put local issuers at a competitive disadvantage and potentially encourage new issuers to incorporate in less-demanding jurisdictions offshore. 'The foreign issuer loophole was not sufficiently fixed,' Timothy Massad, a research fellow at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University and former chairman of the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission, told Cointelegraph. Massad is a co-author of the Atlantic Council blog. The GENIUS Act requires Tether and other foreign issuers to meet standards 'comparable' to those of US issuers, but what qualifies as 'comparable' isn't clearly defined, Massad added. But Christopher Perkins, president of CoinFund, said that regulated US stablecoins give end users confidence that their holdings are fully backed, paving the way for more companies to set up shop in the US. 'I think many investors will choose the onshore regulated version of stablecoins because of the incremental confidence they deliver.' In a recent media interview, Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino said that the company's 'foreign stablecoin' USDt will comply with the GENIUS Act. It is also planning to launch a domestic stablecoin under the new law. Stablecoin issuance goes mainstream with GENIUS The GENIUS Act opens doors for giant US commercial banks like Bank of America to issue their own stablecoins, while mega retailers like Walmart and Amazon are also reportedly exploring stablecoin issuance. The prospect of regulated corporate stablecoin issuers raises questions about how crypto-native stablecoins like Tether and USDC will be affected. 'Tether less so, as its lead offshore is substantial,' Catalini said. He added that most of the new competition will focus on the US market, which presents 'a more significant challenge for USDC.' Meanwhile, Keith Vander Leest, US general manager at London-based stablecoin infrastructure startup BVNK, said that new players won't necessarily flood the market. Non-crypto native firms launching stablecoins will probably move cautiously, beginning with small-scale pilot programs to build comfort and competency. 'It is more likely for banks to move quicker into issuing than corporates,' Vander Leest told Cointelegraph. Many will be 'use-case specific' stablecoins. The number of new stablecoins that 'reach scale' will be limited, he said. GENIUS and stablecoins increase US debt demand The White House claims that the GENIUS Act will increase demand for US debt and cement the dollar's status as the world's reserve currency. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that dollar-linked stablecoins could eventually reach at least $2 trillion in market capitalization, up from today's market cap of about $267 billion. Markus Hammer, a consultant and principal at HammerBlocks, said that because US-issued stablecoins must be 100% backed by US dollars or their equivalents, they will naturally drive up demand for US debt. 'Emerging markets, in particular, may become significant users of US dollar stablecoins, as these offer more stability and efficiency compared to their often fragile local financial systems,' he told Cointelegraph. But Hammer disagreed on the dollar's renewed dominance, claiming that trust in US-based currencies is gradually eroding. According to Massad, the act's impact will depend on whether stablecoins become an important means of payment or remain a niche use case. Business-to-business payments make up the bulk of international payments, and it's not clear whether there will be significant growth in the use of stablecoins for that purpose, he said. GENIUS reshapes stablecoin utility The GENIUS Act prohibits stablecoin issuers from paying 'interest or yield' to individuals holding stablecoins. Could that put US-issued stablecoins at a competitive disadvantage? 'Without yield, stablecoins are a depreciating asset,' Perkins said. 'And while many believe that payments are the killer use case for stablecoins, they also serve as an important store of value in the developing world. Holders will turn to DeFi to reconstitute yield.' In time, it is possible that yield-bearing securities or tokens will become more accessible, continued Perkins. Until then, institutional investors, who have a fiduciary duty to earn interest on their holdings, may need to explore other ways to earn interest. They could offer compliant revenue-sharing agreements with issuers to gain yield exposure, for instance. It almost seems counterintuitive, but the removal of yield on stablecoins could actually be good news for Ethereum-based DeFi as the main alternative for passive income generation. Overall, 'the signing of the Act is a significant milestone,' Massad said. 'Stablecoins are the most useful application of blockchain technology to date, and even if they don't become a major means of payment, they will generate useful competition into payments — we may see tokenized bank deposits soon.' Catalini of MIT Cryptoeconomics Lab called stablecoins 'the first tokenized assets to start its journey towards mainstream adoption.' He added that assets such as bonds and securities will soon follow. The GENIUS Act sets a regulatory foundation for stablecoin issuance in the US and signals mainstream adoption is underway. Despite concerns over unresolved issues such as the vague language around foreign issuers, industry leaders view the law as a critical step for regulated dollar-backed tokens. Source:
Khaleej Times
5 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
US President Trump orders firing of labour official over 'rigged' jobs data
President Donald Trump said Friday (August 1) he has ordered the firing of a key economic official, accusing her of manipulating employment data for political reasons after a new report showed cracks in the US jobs market. US job growth missed expectations in July, Labor Department data showed, and revisions to hiring figures in recent months brought them to the weakest levels since the Covid-19 pandemic. Without providing evidence, Trump lashed out at the department's commissioner of labor statistics, writing on social media that the jobs numbers "were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad." In a separate post on his Truth Social platform, he charged that Commissioner Erika McEntarfer had "faked" jobs data to boost Democrats' chances of victory in the recent presidential election. "McEntarfer said there were only 73,000 Jobs added (a shock!) but, more importantly, that a major mistake was made by them, 258,000 Jobs downward, in the prior two months," Trump said, referring to latest data for July. "Similar things happened in the first part of the year, always to the negative," Trump said, insisting that the world's biggest economy was "booming" under his leadership. He later told reporters "we need people that we can trust," accusing the economic official of inflating hiring figures under former president Joe Biden's administration. 'Dangerous precedent' The US added 73,000 jobs last month, while the unemployment rate rose to 4.2 percent from 4.1 per cent, said the Department of Labour earlier Friday. Hiring numbers for May were revised down from 144,000 to 19,000. The figure for June was shifted from 147,000 to 14,000. This was notably lower than job creation levels in recent years. During the pandemic, the economy lost jobs. The employment data points to challenges in the key labor market as companies took a cautious approach in hiring and investment while grappling with Trump's sweeping — and rapidly changing — tariffs this year. The numbers also pile pressure on the central bank as it mulls the best time to cut interest rates. With tariff levels climbing since the start of the year, both on imports from various countries and on sector-specific products such as steel, aluminum and autos, many firms have faced higher business costs. Some are now passing them along to consumers. William Beach, who previously held McEntarfer post at the Bureau of Labor Statistics, warned that her firing "sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau." The National Association for Business Economics (NABE) condemned her dismissal, saying large revisions in jobs numbers "reflect not manipulation, but rather the dwindling resources afforded to statistical agencies." "Firing the head of a key government agency because you don't like the numbers they report, which come from surveys using long established procedures, is what happens in authoritarian countries, not democratic ones," slammed Larry Summers, former US Treasury secretary under Democratic president Bill Clinton. 'Gamechanger' Heather Long, chief economist at the Navy Federal Credit Union, said Friday's jobs report was a "gamechanger." "The labor market is deteriorating quickly," said Long, noting that of the growth in July, "75 per cent of those jobs were in one sector: health care." "The economy needs certainty soon on tariffs," Long said. "The longer this tariff whiplash lasts, the more likely this weak hiring environment turns into layoffs." It remains unclear when the dust will settle, with Trump ordering the reimposition of steeper tariffs on scores of economies late Thursday, which are set to take effect in a week. A sharp weakening in the labor market could push the Federal Reserve toward slashing interest rates sooner to shore up the economy. On Friday, the two Fed officials who voted this week against the central bank's decision to keep rates unchanged warned that standing pat risks further damaging the economy. Both Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman and Governor Christopher Waller argued that the inflationary effects of tariffs were temporary. They added in separate statements that the bank should focus on fortifying the economy to avert further weakening in the labor market. Putting off an interest rate cut "could result in a deterioration in the labor market and a further slowing in economic growth," Bowman said.
Zawya
18 hours ago
- Zawya
Apple's tariff-fueled iPhone sales surge raises doubts about sustainability
Apple's best revenue growth in three years failed to impress, with shares down about 1% in volatile trading on Friday, as investors questioned whether a tariff-driven surge in iPhone sales would last. A rush to buy iPhones ahead of potential U.S. tariff-driven price increases, along with China subsidies and upbeat demand for the budget 16e model launched in February, fueled a 13.5% jump in the quarterly sales of the device, crushing expectations. That pushed up total revenue by a better-than-expected 10% in the April-June period, and Apple issued an above-estimate sales forecast for the current quarter ending in September. The results came at a precarious time for the company long seen as Big Tech's safest bet. Beyond the tariff threats facing its manufacturing hubs China and India, Apple has been slow to move on artificial intelligence technology that its software and devices rivals have embraced as their next big growth driver. Analysts said the sales rebound in China, where local rivals have moved faster than Apple on AI features, was a positive. The company benefited in the world's largest smartphone market from a state subsidy program meant to prop up device sales. But they also warned the "pull-in" boost was expected to be temporary, raising doubts about demand for the rest of the year. "Pull-forward, remember, is not a U.S. issue. It's also a China issue. There, Apple's Pro model iPhones were too expensive to qualify for Chinese government subsidies that were being offered … so they cut prices to qualify, leaning into the volume opportunity. It worked," MoffettNathanson analysts said. "But as with the U.S., what does that mean for the rest of the year?" So far this year, Apple stock has underperformed all its "Magnificent Seven" peers barring Tesla, with a decline of more than 17%. The S&P has risen 7.8% in the period. Many of Apple's products are currently exempt from tariffs, and the company has also been rebalancing its supply chain to shield itself from the duties, sourcing iPhones from India and other products such as Macs and Apple Watches from Vietnam. The U.S. is currently negotiating trade deals with both China and India, with U.S. President Donald Trump saying India could face 25% tariffs as early as Friday. Apple said tariffs would raise costs by $1.1 billion in the current quarter after the company said it took an $800 million hit from tariffs in the third quarter. Its AI strategy also remains a concern after Apple delayed the release of an AI-enhanced version of Siri virtual assistant and was slow to launch Apple Intelligence. CEO Tim Cook said on Thursday the company was making good progress on Siri and that Apple is "significantly growing" its investments in AI. "Brand loyalty gives Apple time to get the AI transition right, but it needs to start delivering," said Matt Britzman, senior equity analyst, Hargreaves Lansdown.
