
A year after Butler: How a near assassination led to an uneven search for accountability in the Secret Service
In interviews with CNN, a dozen current and former federal law enforcement officials and lawmakers describe an overall lack of accountability, especially for top Secret Service officials and those agents in Trump's detail during the rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, last July.
That includes Sean Curran, the top-ranking agent on Trump's detail that day, who has since been promoted to director of the Secret Service.
Several Congressional investigations and federal reports, including the Secret Service's own analysis, found multiple failures, including communication breakdowns with local police who spotted the shooter and confronted him on a nearby roof before he took aim at Trump.
Ten days after the rally, Kimberly Cheatle, the then-director of the Secret Service, resigned amid scrutiny over the security lapses. Since then, only six Secret Service personnel have been disciplined — issued short suspensions without pay — a decision that has felt inconsistent to many at the agency.
'None of those operational people have been held accountable, some were even promoted,' said one former senior agency official, who like others spoke on condition of anonymity to preserve relationships with former Secret Service colleagues.
The majority of those who have faced any kind of discipline are from the agency's Pittsburgh field office, sources said, fueling a sense among some that the office was scapegoated for the failures of higher-ups.
Outside the Pittsburgh field office, just one low-ranking person from Trump's security detail and one counter-sniper deployed that day have been issued suspensions. At least two of the six are appealing the suspensions, and so far, not one Secret Service employee has completed any proposed discipline, according to a source familiar.
Amid the fallout over the Butler rally, the agency has also seen a significant loss of institutional knowledge and expertise as a number of high-ranking officials have left, fueling concerns over a potential brain-drain at the Secret Service, sources said.
Secret Service leadership last week received a subpoena from Sen. Rand Paul, the Republican chairman of the Senate's homeland security committee, asking for records regarding who in the service has been disciplined over Butler, three sources familiar with the subpoena told CNN. One of the sources told CNN that the subpoena was dropped after the Secret Service quickly turned over records Paul was seeking.
Paul's office did not respond to multiple requests for comment. A Secret Service spokesperson did not comment on the subpoena or reply to multiple requests for comment for this story.
In a press release put out by the Secret Service on Thursday, Curran said that his experience from Butler has been top of mind as director and 'the agency has taken many steps to ensure such an event can never be repeated in the future.'
Feelings are still raw among current and former Secret Service agents about what went wrong on July 13, 2024.
Given the failures in communication and coordination that led to the near assassination of Trump and left one person dead and two in critical condition, some sources said any agent involved in security that day should have been immediately placed on leave.
However, the crush of a busy campaign calendar, coupled with the concern Trump would be more comfortable with a detail he knew, pushed the agency to keep those agents working.
Congressional reports as well as internal reports from the Secret Service and Department of Homeland Security all highlighted a breakdown in communication that left Trump's detail in Butler unaware that local officers had spotted the shooter, Thomas Matthew Crooks, and initially confronted him on a roof less than a minute before he got off a clean shot at Trump.
There was also confusion over who was in charge of securing the area where Crooks took aim, and why no visual barriers were installed around the rally to prevent long-distance shooters. The service's anti-drone technology also failed the morning of the rally, and one officer never retrieved a radio that would connect him to locals on the ground.
Communication failures extended to a lack of intelligence sharing — a topic the Government Accountability Office is currently investigating. Just weeks before the Butler rally, the FBI obtained intelligence about a new alleged plot by the Iranian government to kill Trump. The intelligence specified that the Iranians posed a 'long-range' threat to Trump, meaning a potential sniper.
But some senior leaders at Secret Service, including the lead agent in Pittsburgh, were unaware of that intelligence until after Butler, another former senior agency official told CNN.
A Senate report faulted Secret Service for not requesting a countersurveillance unit — a group whose specific job is to find suspicious actors like Crooks. That responsibility fell on the agents assigned to Trump's detail, according to a source, given their knowledge of the Iranian threat.
Another federal source told CNN that the some in the Pittsburgh office were made aware of concerns over 'long-range' threats against Trump, but not the Iranian threat. The source added that because Crooks was a lone-wolf and has no connections to Iran, that information is somewhat irrelevant when it comes to who should take blame for failures that day.
Following his committee's report on Butler in September, then-Homeland Security Committee Chairman, Michigan Democratic Sen. Gary Peters, told CNN that his panel heard 'a lot of finger-pointing' when they pressed Secret Service agents about who was in charge the day of the rally.
'That should be a very clear answer, and the problem is, there is no answer,' said Peters. 'That was astonishing to us. We could not find one point of contact who said, 'This was the person in charge,'' he added.
In April, the agency issued a memo clarifying that the safety of a site is ultimately the responsibility of the agent leading the detail of the protectee, according to sources who read the memo and described the contents.
Under the new policy, Curran — who led Trump's detail at the time — would, in theory, have been responsible for the failure at Butler, according to sources who read the memo.
Another source familiar with the memo questioned whether the policy would truly solve the problem of who was ultimately in charge — since it still allows for significant responsibility to fall on a field office prior to an event, the source noted.
'The Secret Service established a new policy … to clarify the lines of accountability and responsibility for protective operations,' a spokeswoman for the Secret Service told CNN in April. 'The Secret Service continues to evaluate and implement changes based on these reviews' shared findings in order to ensure safe and secure environments for our protectees.'
One former senior agency official told CNN that the failures from Butler 'to appropriately design a security plan for an outdoor event had nothing to do with resources or intelligence.'
Instead, the former official said, 'the team on the ground didn't apply the most basic principles of line of sight, communication, and frankly the subsequent evacuation wasn't executed properly.'
For some, there is not the same level of coordination and communication among senior agency leaders as there had been. 'I would say the Secret Service is in a worse position now than they were before Butler,' the second former senior Secret Service official said, referring to the agency's preparedness for another assassination attempt.
Following the shooting, Secret Service leadership fought with members of Congress over the need for swift discipline, telling lawmakers repeatedly that they wouldn't rush to assign blame and would go by the book.
'The finger pointing piece got in the way of figuring out who did what and what the actual breakdowns were,' Rep. Glenn Ivey, a Maryland Democrat who was on the House panel investigating Butler, told CNN this week.
In the end, just one low-ranking agent on the Trump detail who worked the Butler rally was recommended for a period of suspension. Two Trump detail supervisors have been promoted, most notably Curran, who now runs the agency. Another agent on Trump's detail now oversees internal investigations and compliance.
One supervisor later received a role running Eric Trump's detail, according to one source.
'[Donald Trump Detail Supervisors] reviewed and approved the plans,' for the Butler rally, a current federal law enforcement official told CNN. 'If they felt something was wrong during the walk-through, they fix it then. That is literally their whole job and the point of a final walk through.'
A year later, the Secret Service doesn't face nearly the same level of intense scrutiny as it did in the weeks after the shooting.
'I haven't seen anybody on the Hill actually take a look at where things stand, which is a little ironic because … when you have a switchover from one administration to the next, this would have been an easy time to do it,' Ivey said.
Since Curran became director, the Secret Service has rejected multiple requests from CNN to interview him. It is not clear that Curran has ever testified under oath before members of Congress. He is not listed among the more than 50 transcripts generated during the Congressional reviews.
Neither Ivey nor Rep. David Joyce, an Ohio Republican who also served on the House panel that investigated Butler, could recall if the panel interviewed Curran.
Curran's promised overhaul of the Secret Service got off to a rocky start according to some sources. One of his first visible moves as the agency's leader included a $2 million recruiting ad produced by movie director Michael Bay.
The ad included a photo from moments after Trump was shot, appalling many current and former law enforcement officials who were stunned the agency would try to rebrand their biggest failure in four decades into a celebration of heroism.
Under Curran's leadership, the Secret Service has made a priority of pushing for more recruits. In just the first few months of 2025, the agency saw a 200% increase in applications to join, bringing in 15,000 more applications than the previous year during the same period, according to numbers released by DHS.
Though some agents also quickly soured on two top aides in the beginning months of Curran's directorship, sources familiar told CNN. The aides were brought in as advisors with the intention of taking on other roles later.
According to some sources, both were viewed with skepticism within the Secret Service over their qualifications and whether they'd been tasked with jobs beyond the scope of their experience. One resigned this spring, while another remains in a top job in the agency.
Others CNN spoke to were more optimistic about the service's future and the changes put in place after the Butler rally. That includes a dedicated branch for drone support and establishing more streamlined communication protocols with local officers, initiatives that were set up under Acting Director Ronald Rowe, who stepped aside when Curran was appointed by Trump and has since left the agency.
'We formed a new division called Mission Assurance Division to come in and have oversight and give recommendations to see how we can fix the things that did happen,' said Derek Mayer, the former deputy special agent in charge for the Secret Service's Chicago Field Office.
'There's a new policy that states who has command authority and it specifically states who is in charge up to what point — whether it's going to be the [Special Agent in Charge] of the district, or the [Special Agent in Charge] of the detail,' said Mayer, who now works for a private security company.
Mayer also highlighted 'policies put in place to ensure clear lines of accountability, also, sharing that with local law enforcement and ensuring that there is one joint command post for us and locals.'
Asked if he thought there had been accountability at the Secret Service for the failures at Butler, Rep. Joyce, the Ohio Republican, said Cheatle's resignation was one means of accountability.
'You have to rely on a change in the culture. And hopefully Director Curran is bringing those type of things,' Joyce told CNN.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
29 minutes ago
- CNBC
New Senate report on Trump assassination attempt calls for more severe disciplinary action
A new Senate report on the attempted assassination of President Donald Trump at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, last summer has revealed "multiple, unacceptable failures" in the U.S. Secret Service's planning and response, and called for more severe disciplinary action. Trump, then a presidential candidate, was grazed by a bullet during the rally as 20-year-old gunman Thomas Crooks fired eight shots. One attendee, Corey Comperatore, was killed, and two others were injured. A sniper subsequently killed the gunman, but the attack prompted questions about how Crooks was able to avoid detection by the country's top protective agency for nearly 45 minutes. "What happened was inexcusable and the consequences imposed for the failures so far do not reflect the severity of the situation," stated the report released Sunday by the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, chaired by Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. Last December, a House task force investigating the incident made nearly a dozen recommendations for the Secret Service in a 180-page report that determined the shooting was "preventable." The latest report details a series of breakdowns that reveal "a disturbing pattern of communication failure and negligence that culminated in a preventable tragedy." It said the USSS became aware of a suspicious individual "nearly 45 minutes before shots were fired, and failed to act." Despite advance knowledge of line-of-sight vulnerabilities at the venue, officials did not address them, the report said, adding the agency assigned an inexperienced operator to oversee counter-unmanned aerial systems and that USSS headquarters "denied or left-unfulfilled at least 10 requests" by the Donald Trump Division for additional resources, including countersniper personnel. Last July, six Secret Service employees were suspended without pay, an agency official told NBC News last week. The suspensions ranged from 10 to 42 days without pay. It is unclear when the agents were formally suspended. Less than two weeks after the incident, Kimberly Cheatle stepped down as director of the Secret Service amid bipartisan calls for her resignation. At the time, she said she took "full responsibility for the security lapse." But the report also criticized the agency for "insufficient accountability" following the attack. "Not a single person has been fired," it said. "The Committee believes more than six individuals should have received disciplinary action as a result of their action (or inaction) on July 13, 2024. Those who were disciplined received penalties far too weak to match the severity of the failures." Investigators also found that the Secret Service "denied or left unfulfilled" multiple requests for additional staff, assets and resources to protect Trump. "This was not a single error. It was a cascade of preventable failures that nearly cost President Trump his life," it said. "The American people deserve better." On Saturday, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, released a separate Government Accountability Office report saying the USSS "failed to implement security measures that could have prevented the assassination attempt." "Prior to the July 13 rally, senior-level Secret Service officials became aware of a threat to then-former President Trump," the GAO report said. "This information was not specific to the July 13 rally or gunman. Nonetheless, due to the Secret Service's siloed practice for sharing classified threat information, Secret Service and local law enforcement personnel central to developing site security plans for the rally were unaware of the threat." In an interview with ABC News before she resigned, Cheatle said there was a "short period" of time between when the gunman was initially flagged as suspicious and when he began shooting. December's House investigation praised the response of the Secret Service to the second assassination attempt on Trump in September in West Palm Beach, Florida, crediting it for demonstrating "how properly executed protective measures can foil an attempted assassination."


Gizmodo
33 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Trump Tries to Bury Epstein Scandal, but Elon Musk Won't Let Him
Elon Musk seems convinced he's finally found Donald Trump's Achilles' heel, the one issue that could fracture the unshakable loyalty of the Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement: the infamous Epstein files and their handling by the Trump administration. For years, the unsealing of Jeffrey Epstein's records has been a holy grail for many on the right. The belief, fanned by influencers now in seats of power, was that the files contained a secret 'client list' that would expose widespread corruption and depravity among powerful Democrats and 'deep state' figures. It was seen as the ultimate political weapon. FBI Director Kash Patel, in his former life as a right-wing media personality, told Glenn Beck in 2023 that Trump should 'on Day 1, roll out the 'black book'.' This long-held anticipation is what made the administration's recent announcement so explosive. On July 7, the Department of Justice and the FBI released a joint memo concluding their review found no mythical client list and no new information that could lead to charges. The long-awaited bombshell was a dud, and the fallout has been swift, creating deep fissures within the administration itself. According to multiple reports, a major fracture has emerged between the leadership of the DOJ and the FBI over the handling of the case files. The infighting boiled over when conservative commentator Dan Bongino, now the Deputy Director of the FBI, reportedly criticized Attorney General Pam Bondi's handling of the review in a White House meeting. Reports from Fox News and other outlets suggest Bongino distanced himself from the findings and is considering resigning in protest. Amid the chaos, FBI Director Kash Patel posted a carefully worded statement on X. 'The conspiracy theories just aren't true, never have been,' Patel wrote on July 12, without clarifying if he was denying reports about the feud or a potential Bongino resignation. 'It's an honor to serve the President of the United States @realDonaldTrump — and I'll continue to do so for as long as he calls on me.' The conspiracy theories just aren't true, never have been. It's an honor to serve the President of the United States @realDonaldTrump — and I'll continue to do so for as long as he calls on me. — Kash Patel (@Kash_Patel) July 12, 2025This internal revolt prompted President Trump to intervene. In a lengthy message on Truth Social, he attempted to shut down the controversy by framing the entire Epstein affair as a conspiracy orchestrated by his political enemies. 'They created the Epstein Files, just like they created the FAKE Hillary Clinton/Christopher Steele Dossier,' Trump wrote, urging his allies to stop 'playing right into their hands.' He ordered his team to refocus on his own political grievances and to 'not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about.' 'LET PAM BONDI DO HER JOB — SHE'S GREAT!' the president concluded. But where Trump saw a political inconvenience, Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and founder of SpaceX, saw a profound moral failure. In a direct reply on X, Musk ignored Trump's entire political narrative. Instead, he zeroed in on the core injustice of the scandal, amplifying the outrage that Trump sought to extinguish. 'This is a very big deal,' Musk posted to his hundreds of millions of followers. 'What the hell kind of system are we living in if thousands of kids were abused, the government has videos of the abusers and yet none of the abusers are even facing charges!?' This is a very big deal. What the hell kind of system are we living in if thousands of kids were abused, the government has videos of the abusers and yet none of the abusers are even facing charges!? — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 13, 2025The rebuke was immediate and powerful. While Trump tried to control his political universe, Musk used his immense platform to declare that justice for abused children was more important than political games. The split highlights a fundamental difference between the two men: Trump views the world through the lens of political power, while Musk, in this instance, has positioned himself as a champion for basic justice. This public disagreement marks one of the most significant moments of dissent from within Trump's orbit and appears to be the latest flashpoint in a rapidly escalating political divorce. Their once-tight alliance, which saw Musk lead a government efficiency task force (DOGE), has fractured in recent weeks over fundamental disagreements on policy. The rift burst into public view over Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' a sweeping tax and spending package that Musk lambasted as a 'disgusting abomination.' I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 3, 2025That policy disagreement quickly morphed into a direct political challenge. In early July, Musk announced the formation of 'America Party,' a third-party movement aimed at challenging the political establishment. The move was a clear signal that Musk was no longer content to be a Trump ally. While their previous fights were over fiscal policy and political strategy, this latest clash over Jeffrey Epstein is different. By refusing to let the Epstein story be swept under the rug, Musk is using his platform to force a conversation that Trump desperately wants to end, proving he is one of the few figures on the right willing and able to defy the president so directly.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion: How the Trump tax cut law will hurt the working class
Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska said it was 'agonizing' to vote for the tax cut bill President Trump signed on July 4. As details of the legislation come into focus, it's obvious why it might cause heartburn even for Republicans who passed it, with no Democratic votes. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, as the law is clumsily known, will literally make the rich better off and the poor worse off. Some conservatives who want to pare the 'welfare state' may not care. But imposing austerity on millions of working-class voters is a stunning political risk for a party that is supposedly following President Trump's populist instincts. The law has two main elements. The first is a sweeping series of tax cuts and tax cut extensions that will generally benefit everybody but add trillions of dollars to the national debt. The second is a set of benefit cuts that are meant to reduce the overall cost of the bill. Those will hit working-class Americans and make the net effect of the bill punishing to them. The biggest part of the OBBBA is an extension of the tax cuts Trump signed into law in 2017. Those were due to expire at the end of this year. The OBBBA makes the current individual income tax rates permanent. Those are not 'tax cuts' per se, since tax rates will be the same in future years as they are in 2025. But the law does prevent what would have been a de facto tax hike if the 2017 rates expired and the higher 2016 rates went back into effect. The law also includes some new tax breaks, such as the elimination of tax on income from tips and overtime pay, up to certain limits. There's also a new tax break for some seniors and a much higher cap for deducting state and local taxes, which will mostly benefit wealthy homeowners who itemize deductions on their tax returns. The tax provisions generally benefit everybody, but the wealthy will gain the most. The average savings for all taxpayers will be about $2,900, compared with what the tax bill would have been if current rates expired, according to the Tax Policy Center. Those with incomes above $1 million would save nearly $60,000 on average. But the savings for workers with incomes below $30,000 would be less than $200 per year. Those provisions, at least, do no harm to most taxpayers. But the harm arrives when factoring in cuts to Medicaid, subsidies for people to buy health insurance through the Affordable Care Act, and food aid known as SNAP. The healthcare cutbacks will leave an additional 16 million people without coverage by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Cutbacks to the SNAP program could reduce or eliminate food aid going to 22 million families, according to the Urban Institute. Those changes will leave millions of Americans worse off. When accounting for the tax changes and benefit cuts combined, people in the lowest income quintile, with incomes below $13,500, will lose an average of $600 per year, according to the Yale Budget Lab. The next quintile will lose $65 per year. The healthcare and food aid cuts will have little impact on top earners, for obvious reasons. The top quintile will gain $6,500 in after-tax savings from all of the law's provisions, while the top 1% will net more than $30,000. This is what economists call a 'regressive' policy change because the economic burden falls more heavily on those with lower incomes. 'The bill has four overriding characteristics,' Howard Gleckman of the Tax Policy Center wrote recently. 'It is regressive, expensive, complicated, and it treats people who make roughly the same amount of money in very different ways.'Tax cut defenders often point out that the wealthy typically get the biggest tax cuts because they pay the most taxes in the first place. That's generally true. But the wealthy are a distinct minority, which means a regressive law such as the OBBBA dis-serves millions of voters, and possibly a majority of them. The bottom two income quintiles, for instance, include roughly 92 million taxpaying units, whether singles, married couples, or other designations. There are only 26 million taxpaying units in the top quintile. Maybe that's what Murkowski found so agonizing. 'Do I like this bill? No,' she told a reporter on July 2. 'I know in many parts of the country there are Americans that are not going to be advantaged by this bill.' Trump can point to working-class provisions such as the elimination of taxes on tip income and overtime pay, with limitations based on the type of work and the amount of income. Some workers will in fact benefit from those carve-outs. But tax analysts argue that favoring certain types of work in that manner violates the principle of 'horizontal equity,' the idea that similar incomes should be taxed in similar ways. To use the example of a restaurant, a waiter earning tip income would get a tax break that a cook paid hourly would not. That distorts the tax code, creates incentives to cheat, and generates legitimate grievances among the unlucky workers not gifted a tax break. The OBBBA is already unpopular, with 64% of Americans disapproving and just 35% approving, in one poll. The real vote will come in the 2026 midterm elections, when Americans will express whether they feel better off or worse off under unified Republican control of government. Getting Americans to like this law might be a more agonizing ideal than passing it. Rick Newman is a senior columnist for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Bluesky and X: @rickjnewman. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices.