Minnesota gains 10,700 jobs in March, largest gain in a year
The state's unemployment rate was up 0.1 percentage point from last month, and compared with 4.2% nationally, DEED said. The rise in unemployment, even though state added jobs, can be attributed to more people entering the workforce. More than 2,700 Minnesotans joined the labor force last month, bring the labor force participation rate to 68.2%. This measures the percentage of Minnesotans either working or actively seeking work, and is used to calculate the headline unemployment rate.
Minnesota's overall job growth last month rose 0.4%, four times faster than the national rate of 0.1%; Minnesota's private sector grew twice as fast as the U.S. overall.
'Minnesota's job market has shown impressive resilience in the face of unprecedented uncertainty from the federal government,' DEED Commissioner Matt Varilek said in a statement. 'This month we added jobs at a much faster rate than the nation as a whole as employers continue hiring, and more Minnesotans joined the labor force to look for work.'
Eight of 11 state employment supersectors gained jobs in March, with particularly strong growth in construction, up 1,900 jobs, or 1.4%. Government employment was up 1,500 over the month in March, with all growth coming from local and state governments. Federal employment was steady. Recent federal mass layoff announcements are not yet reflected in this data because these estimates are based on employers' reporting of payroll jobs.
Minnesota has gained 37,581 jobs over the past year, faster than the national rate of growth. The private sector gained 29,579 jobs — in line with the national average.
'Minnesota has a diverse economy, allowing us to weather shifts in broader macroeconomic trends,' said Angelina Nguyen, director of DEED's Labor Market Information Office.
Of alternative measures of unemployment, the broadest, called the U-6, increased to 6.9% in March, up from 6.6% in February and 5.4% a year ago, DEED said. This measure factors in people who have voluntarily left the labor force, such as stay-at-home parents, discouraged workers who have stopped seeking jobs, and part-time or otherwise marginally employed workers.
Medical device company to close Maple Grove facility, cut 101 jobs
Business People: Dairy Queen appoints Domino's exec Art D'Elia as COO
Working Strategies: Using AI to organize or even conduct your job search
Mendota Heights med tech company to lay off 124 workers after acquisition
Business People: Andersen CEO Chris Galvin named chairman
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
6 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Private-label brands at Target, other groceries losing stigma as shoppers budget more
Revenue from Target's private labels, from Cat & Jack kidswear to Good & Gather food, has tripled in the past decade to more than $30 billion. The enterprises bundled together would rank fifth among Minnesota's public companies, ahead of U.S. Bancorp and 3M, and 144th on this year's Fortune 500 list. The strength for Target and other retailers, especially in the grocery sphere, is the result of a shift in consumer shopping habits since the pandemic. Think Kirkland at Costco and Trader Joe's. As inflation rose, shoppers turned to private labels, previously known as store brands or generic. Private-label growth is the major reason Target leads the nation in trademark applications. Competitors, with their own private labels, also rank high on the list. "There's been a long-term change in buyer behavior toward greater acceptance of private labels because people were forced to try them and found out it worked really well," said Mark Bergen, a marketing professor at the University of Minnesota who studies pricing strategies and private labels. In 2024, private-label sales increased almost 4%, reaching $271 billion, according to Circana. Retailers are paying attention. Cub Foods recently surveyed customers and found nearly 4 out of 5 Minnesotans - and 87% of Cub shoppers - sometimes prefer private brand over name brand for the taste, the locally based subsidiary of United Natural Foods Inc. said. The grocer's private-label food offerings include Essential Everyday, Wild Harvest and Woodstock. For shoppers raised in the 1980s or earlier, store brands meant budget buys in bland packaging. But many of today's private labels are anything but generic. Even with the inflation rate stabilizing, budget-conscious shopping persists. These behaviors may stick, Bergen said. Retailers say shoppers are now more focused on products that reflect specific values and lifestyles, and that influences the range of private labels from Cub's natural food line to Walmart's Bettergoods line of higher-end foods. "Feedback from our customers has told us they are seeking even more products that feature attributes such as local, gluten-free or plant-based," said Curtis Funk, senior vice president of merchandising for Lunds & Byerlys. But quality can mean different things, said Heidi Teoh, vice president of research and development at SunOpta, a plant-based food and beverage manufacturer in Eden Prairie. "Depending on the retailer, there are some who have store brands that are higher quality than the national brand," Bergen said. Despite lingering perceptions that store brands cut corners, industry experts said private-label products are held to the same food safety regulations as national brands. "If you go by food safety, it's exactly the same thing. I don't care who you are, you have to fall in the same exact regulation," said Petros Levis, vice president of research, design and implementation at TreeHouse Foods. "Flour is flour, it comes out of Kansas." Today's private labels are more deliberate, he said. Many private-label manufacturers "strip it down to what is valuable." There can be variation in the ingredients between private labels and national brands. "The really tasty inputs are expensive, so think of it as like a chicken salad. There's less chicken in the lower quality one because it keeps [the manufacturers'] costs down, but they're good enough now at managing the store brands that they can compete on quality," Bergen said. These products are often reverse-engineered to compete with national brands, sometimes faster and leaner, while also creating a relationship with the shopper. "Target is desperately trying to get you to see their store brands as better," Bergen said. "They're trying to build loyalty. [General Mills'] Cheerios doesn't care which store you buy at. They care that you buy Cheerios." Target's owned grocery brand, Good & Gather, launched in 2019 and now has more than 2,500 items developed specifically for the retailer. As retailers move beyond the generic of the past generation, which was more akin to repackaging national brands, they also must put more money and time into developing new products. "We approach research and development in a very similar fashion, so the process is the same regardless of who we are developing products for," Teoh said. SunOpta typically starts with an innovation session - either driven by retailer requests or internal trendspotting. Then comes ideation and refinement. "It's not unlike being in the kitchen," Teoh said. "You might try six recipes and then start changing things until you get to a recipe that makes you go, 'This is the one!'" Formula ownership varies. Sometimes it belongs to the manufacturer, sometimes the customer. SunOpta uses an "identity preserved" program to guarantee each formula is unique. "There would be an extraordinary amount of concern if the thought was that it was being repackaged," Teoh said. Levis attributes some of the confusion to the fact that some manufacturers work with both private and national brands. Lakeville-based Post Consumer Brands is the nation's largest private-label cereal maker, but typically the recipe will differ for the Walmart brand of Honey Bunches of Oats - even if made in the same plant. Nutritional differences between private label and national brands are not typically the result of budget constraints, but product design and customer demand, Teoh said. "Name brands have a lot of bells and whistles that don't add value," said Levis. "It's more marketing value so they can get this added profit." But even when a private-label item is cheaper than the national brand alternative, stores prefer shoppers buy the store brand, Bergen said. Stores often make higher margins on those products. "Private labels do have a price point, but the truth is, when we manufacture for national brands, they also have a price they want to hit," Teoh said. Private-label growth is strongest among Gen Z and younger millennials, with 44% and 39% trying store brands for the first time, according to Circana. Only 18% of older boomers and 16% of seniors say the same. Levis attributes that gap to lingering stigma. "Back then, if you weren't buying the Jolly Green Giant green beans, you were buying poor people green beans," Levis said. His mother-in-law, who grew up in southeastern Iowa, told him she would hide private-label items at the bottom of her cart, stacking the name brand items on top. But that frugality allowed her to feed a family of four. "There's a lot of noise that takes some time in people. If you hear something again and again, you believe it is better," Levis said. Bergen said earlier studies showed people hesitated to serve store brands to guests. "If an item was going to be visible to company, people would buy branded products," Bergen said. "But if it was just an input into a meal, there was more demand for private labels." That stigma has faded, but not entirely, he said. "We tend to buy national brands in places where we're a little more uncertain," Bergen said. "We don't want to be seen as cheap and the butter doesn't taste good. Or my kids are still sick and unhappy at home." Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Miami Herald
5 days ago
- Miami Herald
‘Speech-police regime': Big Tech trade group sues Minnesota over social media transparency law
Social media companies like Meta, Snapchat and X are scheduled to start sharing more information with consumers about usage rates and content practices under a new Minnesota transparency law that took effect Tuesday. A powerful trade association and lobbying firm representing Big Tech wants to block the requirements, arguing in a federal lawsuit that the state's regulations violate free speech rights protected by the First Amendment. The law requires social media companies to publicly disclose user engagement statistics, content assessment, notification practices, interaction rates between user accounts and product experiments. It passed in 2024, as Minnesota and other states have sought to regulate some aspects of online conduct. Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison has released two reports showing the potential harms of artificial intelligence and social media on the mental health of Minnesotans. Children were found to be frequent targets of harassment and online bullying, the latest report found, and other users frequently receive graphic or disturbing content or become targets of unwanted contact and fraud. The lawsuit challenging Minnesota's law mirrors other legal challenges that have come up across the country in recent years as state lawmakers seek to regulate social media and Big Tech, absent broader federal oversight. Similar to lawsuits filed by Big Tech against laws in New York and California, the trade group NetChoice argues in the Minnesota case that the First Amendment's wide protections on free speech shield social media companies from making mandatory disclosures. Many of the arguments draw on court precedents on free speech protections involving news publications. Minnesota's law is unconstitutional because it requires sharing information about "editorial" decisions in order to publish content, the lawsuit contends. NetChoice also argues the state is attempting to dictate which messages are publicized and which are not, a core part of a Supreme Court case last year involving the Big Tech lobby. The lawsuit also cites several provisions of Minnesota's law as being vague and likely unenforceable. NetChoice accuses Ellison of running a "speech-police regime" by requiring the disclosures. In a statement Tuesday, Ellison said the reforms in Minnesota came after residents of all ages expressed the need and he looks forward to defending the law in court. "For too long, social media companies have tested powerful and addictive new algorithms and features on Minnesotans effectively in secret, and with no oversight by their parents or the public," Ellison said, adding that state residents - and especially kids - "deserve better than to be manipulated and exploited for profit by Big Tech." One key difference in Minnesota's law compared with others is a required disclosure of the specific algorithms that social media companies use, said Paul Taske, NetChoice's associate director of litigation. These algorithms dictate how companies disseminate content to users, Taske said, and if made publicly available could enable bad actors or hamper U.S. companies from remaining competitive. The tech trade group has said Minnesota's law would force social media companies to compromise trade secrets. Taske said Minnesota's law puts government pressure on websites with the goal of changing how machine algorithms disseminate posts to social media users. "What the Supreme Court has been very clear on in the past and in recent years is that the government can't do that directly, and it can't do it indirectly either," Taske said. Minnesota's law contains a broad enforcement provision allowing the attorney general to take unspecified actions against companies that fail to comply. Jane Kirtley, a media ethics and law professor at the University of Minnesota, said challenges that say a law is vague or overly broad have been successful in the past, with courts finding that the laws violate the First Amendment. If a person cannot be sure what expressive activities are prohibited under the law, she said, the Supreme Court has concluded that people would be more likely to self-censor or avoid conduct that might run afoul with a law - thereby chilling free speech. Kirtley also said that as states have attempted to regulate social media, judges have ruled that First Amendment protections must remain intact even as new technology changes the way people communicate and find information online. "Just because you're dealing with these new digital platforms doesn't mean that the First Amendment principles go away," she said. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Associated Press
27-06-2025
- Associated Press
Mutual of Omaha Announces Approved Private Plan for Minnesota Paid Family and Medical Leave
OMAHA, Neb.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jun 27, 2025-- Mutual of Omaha is proud to announce the launch of its approved private insurance plan for Paid Family and Medical Leave (PFML) in Minnesota. This plan offers Minnesota employers an alternative to the state-run program, while ensuring that employees receive the same rights, protections and benefits. Mutual of Omaha's PFML private plan has been approved by the Minnesota's Department of Employment and Economic Development and meets all the necessary requirements. This PFML private program is part of Mutual of Omaha's ongoing commitment to providing exceptional insurance solutions tailored to the needs of businesses and their employees. Mutual of Omaha also offers PFML experts that can assist with leave and compliance questions. 'Our newly certified PFML plan reinforces Mutual of Omaha's dedication to supporting Minnesota employers and their workforce,' said Scott Ault, President, Workplace Solutions, at Mutual of Omaha. 'We are pleased to offer a private plan that matches the comprehensive benefits of the state program, while providing the added advantage of tailored coverage options.' In Spring 2025, employers in Minnesota can opt for Mutual of Omaha's PFML private plan, which provides: Mutual of Omaha currently offers PFML private plans in Massachusetts, Colorado, Oregon, Maine, New York and Delaware. For more information on Mutual of Omaha's PFML private plan and to explore coverage options, visit Founded in 1909, Mutual of Omaha is a highly rated, Fortune 500 organization offering a variety of insurance and financial products for individuals, businesses and groups throughout the United States. As a mutual company, Mutual of Omaha is owned by its policyholders and committed to providing outstanding service to its customers. For more information about Mutual of Omaha, visit View source version on CONTACT: Sephera Staley Mutual of Omaha 402-351-3096 [email protected] KEYWORD: UNITED STATES NORTH AMERICA MINNESOTA NEBRASKA INDUSTRY KEYWORD: FINANCE BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSURANCE HUMAN RESOURCES SOURCE: Mutual of Omaha Copyright Business Wire 2025. PUB: 06/27/2025 10:01 AM/DISC: 06/27/2025 10:01 AM
