In a First, Leading Israeli Rights Groups Accuse Israel of Gaza Genocide
The two groups were B'Tselem, a rights monitor that documents the effects of Israeli policies on Palestinians, and Physicians for Human Rights — Israel. Their announcement was the first time major Israeli rights groups have publicly concluded that the Gaza war is a genocide, an assessment previously reached by some organizations like Amnesty International.
In a report titled 'Our Genocide,' B'Tselem cited the devastating effects of Israel's war on ordinary Palestinians to support their claim: the killing of tens of thousands of Palestinians in Gaza; the razing of huge areas of Palestinian cities; the forced displacement of nearly all of Gaza's two million people; the restriction of food and other vital supplies.
All together, the Israeli campaign has amounted to 'coordinated action to intentionally destroy Palestinian society in the Gaza Strip,' the organization wrote. 'In other words: Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.'
The debate over whether the war in Gaza constitutes genocide has also played out at the International Court of Justice, where South Africa has brought a genocide case against Israel. The court has yet to rule on the matter.
The office of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not immediately comment. Speaking at the International Court of Justice in January 2024, Tal Becker, a member of Israel's legal defense, said that Israel was fighting Hamas, not targeting Palestinians wholesale.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
17 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
‘Our Dear Friends in Moscow' Review: Propaganda and the Press
In September 2020 Andrei Soldatov and Irina Borogan, two of Russia's leading investigative journalists, fled to the West. For years they had been watched and harassed by their country's security services, and by that spring Mr. Soldatov's life was in danger. Neither of them could have imagined this would be their fate when they started out as young reporters in 2000. Having come of age in the 1990s, they had believed that they belonged to a new generation of Russians who were committed to democracy and human rights, only to see their friends reject these ideals in favor of authoritarianism and anti-Westernism. 'Our Dear Friends in Moscow' is a searing and sobering book that captures the profound cynicism and xenophobic nationalism that define contemporary Russia. 'Our Dear Friends in Moscow' tells two interconnected stories. One is intensely personal and recounts the relationships among Mr. Soldatov, Ms. Borogan and several fellow journalists: Evgeny Krutikov, the scion of a once-elite Soviet family; Petya Akopov, an intellectual with a fascination for repressive regimes; Zhenya Baranov, a war correspondent; and Olga Lyubimova, a TV host with connections to the reactionary film director Nikita Mikhalkov. In the early days, their differences seemed unimportant. They worked and socialized together. They partied, drank, smoked and debated the 'accursed questions' about Russia's troubled past and murky future. Things changed once Russian president Vladimir Putin began to suffocate the independent media and civil society in the early 2000s. For a while it seemed that the regime would allow liberal journalists some space in which to work. 'Many believed that this coexistence could last for years and that one day Putin would just be gone,' the authors write. Then, they add, 'things would go back to 'normal'—whatever that meant.' But Mr. Putin did not go away, and the repression intensified. Mr. Soldatov, Ms. Borogan and their friends had to decide whether to resist and join the opposition or to surrender and join the Putin propaganda machine.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'I am willing to surrender for the hostages,' Iris Haim, mother of fallen captive, says
Haim wrote that Israel had essentially surrendered to Hamas for years before the October 7 massacre, and therefore, it is right to surrender now for the sake of the hostages. Iris Haim, mother of Yotam Haim, a hostage who was mistakenly killed by the IDF in Gaza, wrote on her Instagram on Saturday evening that in her opinion, Israel should surrender to Hamas in order to secure the release of the remaining hostages. Haim wrote that Israel had essentially surrendered to Hamas for years before the October 7 massacre, and therefore, it is right to surrender now for the sake of the hostages. "We surrendered to Hamas for 20 years – we gave and gave and gave some more. Now we must release those who can still be saved." "For me and my family, it's too late – Yotam won't return." "Surrender? I am willing to surrender – for the hostages. For the last shred of dignity that remains for families like mine, who still have hope." Haim spoke about her hope that the hostages would return. "For 70 days, I chose to believe the state was acting wisely to bring the hostages home. I kept up hope, assuming I didn't have the full picture and that the decision-makers were acting correctly." "And yet, the army harmed my son due to continued flawed assumptions that there were no hostages in that area. Still, I kept supporting and strengthening, so that our precious soldiers wouldn't be hurt." Regarding the stalled hostage negotiations and the state of the current hostages, Haim wrote, "What kind of negotiations are taking place now to release hostages who already look like walking skeletons?" Reaching a decision before it is too late for the hostages "We must make a decision today, before it's too late. I can't bear the thought of these children starving. Absolutely not. They must not be left here. This must happen – even if there is a price to pay afterward. We've already paid the heaviest price. "Rom, Nimrod, Evyatar, Alon, and all the other hostages – soon they won't have a chance. I refuse to let them die in captivity like my son."
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
U.S. and Israeli Officials Float Idea of ‘All or Nothing' Gaza Deal
For months, the Israeli government had focused on negotiating a two-phased deal for a 60-day cease-fire in Gaza and the release of some hostages, leaving discussions about a permanent end to the war for a later stage. With the talks now at an impasse, American and Israeli officials appear to be sharply changing their tone by signaling that they will push for a comprehensive deal. But Israel and Hamas remain far apart, and it was unclear if a new approach would be more likely to secure an agreement. The shift, at least in rhetoric, comes as the Israeli government faces rising domestic pressure to secure the release of hostages still held in Gaza. Israel believes that about 20 are still alive and that the bodies of another 30 remain in the enclave. Videos released over the weekend showed two living captives looking emaciated and frail, shocking many Israelis and sparking fear among the hostages' families. The Israeli government has also come under mounting international criticism over the mass hunger that has spread through Gaza's population of about 2 million people after Israel imposed strict restrictions in recent months on the entry of aid. Steve Witkoff, the Trump administration's special envoy to the Middle East, who is visiting the region, met with families of Israeli hostages on Saturday and told them that President Trump now wants to see all the living hostages released at once. 'No piecemeal deals, that doesn't work,' he said, according to an audio recording of part of the meeting published by the Ynet Hebrew news site. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
