
Why India's drone industry hasn't taken off
The Indian government has responded with emergency drone procurements, changes in defense policies and increased incentives to boost domestic production of UAVs. On July 4, the government unveiled a US$234 million incentive for domestic drone manufacturing.
India's UAV journey dates back to 1993 with the Defense Research and Development Organisation's (DRDO) Kapothaka project .
It entered the civilian sector only in 2021 when the government removed several licensing requirements and launched the Digital Sky Platform, an online portal developed by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) to manage and regulate civil drone operations.
Since then, India's drone industry has made significant progress, with numerous startups focusing on developing fully indigenous drones. Funding for drones has soared from $3-4 million in 2015-16 to $108 million in 2024.
India now aims to have at least 40% of key drone components manufactured domestically by the end of fiscal year 2028, according to a Reuters report quoting government sources.
The question today is thus no longer whether India can build drones. Rather, the question is: Can India build an ecosystem resilient enough to make drones fast, cheap, secure and entirely indigenously?
Today, more than 50 Indian drone companies are engaged specifically in manufacturing batteries, propellers, flight controllers and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) parts used in drones. Overall, around 500 Indian startups are currently involved in the drone industry.
However, many of these startups are merely assembling drones, rather than manufacturing them from start to finish. Local companies such as IG Drones and Optemius Unmanned Systems, which claim to have 75-80% of their drone parts made in-house, are still importing their high-value components, most of which come from China.
Despite the government's ban on fully built Chinese drones, they can still be procured via e-marketplace portals.
Critical components imported from the Chinese supply chain are vulnerable to jamming, cyberattacks or remote hijacking. Meanwhile, China's 2017 intelligence law mandated local businesses to hand over data to the government on demand, thus creating a backdoor for unauthorized access to critical information.
Besides cyber risk, geopolitical tensions can also impact drone supply chains. For instance, in 2023, China restricted the export of important drone components to stop their use in the Russia-Ukraine war.
The US has also imposed similar restrictions to ensure that its drone parts aren't used for military purposes without approval. India has procured drones from Israel and also imports drone components from Taiwan. Both countries, prone to geopolitical tensions, have the potential to suddenly disrupt India's drone industry.
However, the problem isn't just what India imports; rather, it's why it has to do so. First of all, it is not feasible for a drone company to manufacture every component of a drone. Many components are not required on a large scale, but still are critical in drone manufacturing.
These include lithium-polymer cells and materials such as titanium and Inconel, which are essential for durability and heat resistance, and require advanced manufacturing technology that China possesses but is still in its early stages of domestic development in India.
Furthermore, there are component-only startups that develop only parts, but have fallen short of developing anything unique because they are capital-strapped and therefore reluctant to invest in research and development (R&D).
For decades, India's R&D has remained stagnant at around .64% of GDP, far behind countries like China, the US or Israel. The seed capital provided by Innovation for Defence Excellence (iDEX) for the development of military grade products remains inadequate to scale up production.
The struggle of Indian startups is not just technological but also structural. One major issue lies in the fragmented and uncertain demand for drones. In the commercial sector, demand is seasonal and tied to government procurement cycles. In the defense sector, demand is predictable but fiercely competitive.
The Indian armed forces often demand advanced UAV capabilities at disproportionately low costs, making it nearly impossible for startups to scale sustainably. In some cases, private firms have offered prototypes for free or at loss-making prices, hoping for future government orders — a strategy that raises the risk of hidden downstream costs being passed on to end-users.
The booming market of gray drones also presents a challenge to these startups. In cities like Chennai and Delhi, drone parts are sold openly without Goods and Services Tax, at a significantly lower price. This puts startups at a disadvantage, as they must bear the burden of a 28% GST on manufacturing and selling their products.
To be sure, India has the capacity to lead in drone technology. However, intent without infrastructure and policy without an ecosystem will only take the country so far. What India needs to build is a clustered ecosystem, a 'Drone Valley' where startups can share R&D infrastructure, machine tools and component designs, allowing them to specialize rather than duplicate efforts.
Unified digital portals, simplified drone certification sandboxes and state-level, single-window clearances can go a long way in making India's drone ecosystem more agile and competitive.
India can adopt global norms like those promoted by the American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) and introduce a 'Drone Mark' certification that enhances the global trustworthiness of Indian-made UAVs.
To transform its drone industry into a strategic asset, India must shift from reactive procurement to proactive innovation. It must build not just drones, but an entire industrial and digital architecture that supports them. And as the recent clashes with Pakistan showed, time is of the strategic essence.
Prisie L Patnayak is a PhD candidate at the Centre for Indo-Pacific Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Meta's Zuckerberg settles Facebook lawsuit over Cambridge Analytica scandal
Advertisement A trial over the long-running case had just begun on Wednesday, with defendants accused of overpaying the US government in 2019 when they engineered a US$5 billion settlement for alleged privacy violations in the scandal. Sources familiar with the matter confirmed the settlement without providing details. The settlement comes the same day that Marc Andreessen, one of Silicon Valley's most influential venture capitalists and a board member of the company now known as Meta, was to take the stand. Zuckerberg himself was expected in the Wilmington, Delaware courtroom on Monday. Advertisement Silicon Valley investor Peter Thiel and former Meta top executive Sheryl Sandberg were also expected to face questioning in the court.


South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Will US-built naval facilities in Philippines strengthen Manila's hand in South China Sea?
The US plan to build new naval facilities in the western Philippines could strengthen Manila's ability to 'confront' Chinese vessels in the South China Sea and even pave the way for shared use between the two allies in the event of future conflict, according to one observer. Earlier this week, the United States said its navy would construct two maintenance facilities for smaller vessels at Oyster Bay and Quezon on Palawan , which is less than 260km (160 miles) from the Second Thomas Shoal, a major flashpoint between Manila and Beijing. The US embassy in Manila said the Oyster Bay facility would 'provide repair and maintenance capabilities for several small Philippine military watercraft' and include 'two multipurpose interior rooms for equipment storage or conference use', according to The Philippine Star. The embassy said the facility was 'not a military base', adding that US military activities in the Philippines were conducted 'in full coordination' with its ally. Bao Yinan, an associate research fellow at the Huayang Centre for Maritime Cooperation and Ocean Governance in Hainan, said: 'From the most superficial 'technical' perspective, it is primarily aimed at ensuring and enhancing the combat capabilities of the Philippine Navy, thereby directly strengthening the ability of Philippine naval vessels to 'confront' or even 'counter' China.' The US may also have the 'potential intention' of smoothing the way for the shared use of Philippine naval facilities.


South China Morning Post
7 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Chipmaking giant TSMC raises 2025 sales forecast amid AI optimism
The world's biggest contract chipmaker on Thursday forecast sales growth of about 30 per cent in US dollar terms this year, up from mid-20 per cent previously. That reinforced expectations that tech firms from Meta Platforms to Google will keep spending to build the data centres essential to AI development. Nasdaq stock index futures swung to gains. TSMC's move underscores resilient demand for high-end chips from the likes of Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices, which is outpacing its production capacity. CEO C.C. Wei affirmed during a shareholder meeting in June that AI orders continued to run hot, seeking to dispel persistent speculation that tech firms may curtail spending. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang leaves the China International Supply Chain Expo in Beijing on Thursday. Photo: AFP This was 'supporting the AI value chain, and AI optimism still holds,' said Billy Leung, investment strategist at Global X ETFs in Sydney.