
Tariffs: as new regime kicks in, what does it mean for Europe and for Ireland?
Donald Trump
's August 1st
tariff
deadline has been hanging over the global trading system and Europe's transatlantic trade with the US for months.
The deal struck by European Commission President
Ursula von der Leyen
and US President Donald Trump last weekend puts an end to a lot, but unfortunately not all, of the speculation.
Much of the detail has yet to be ironed out and there is still confusion over how certain parts will work in practice. For example, a 'fact sheet' published by the White House seems to suggest the tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors will be paid by the EU when in fact they will be borne by US businesses and consumers.
Is there something in this deal for both sides?
READ MORE
On paper and despite the positive spin coming from Brussels about 'trade certainty', it's a very a one-sided deal in favour of the US.
It imposes, from Friday, a baseline 15 per cent tariff on most EU exports into the US, including approximately €70 billion worth goods exported from Ireland, while committing the bloc to major purchases of US energy and armaments.
The EU, for its part, has reduced its tariffs on most US imports, in some cases to zero, giving US exporters much greater access to Europe's 450 million-strong consumer market. This is far cry from the zero-for-zero deal initially offered by Brussels.
Based on last year's trade figures, the deal might be expected to net the US government roughly $90 billion in tariff revenue.
What will it mean for the Irish economy?
For a small, export-led economy that relies heavily on trade with the US, it's undoubtedly a negative. But Government ministers are playing up the fact that it avoids the 30 per cent tariff rate initially threatened by Mr Trump, keeps the trade doors open and avoids a mutually destructive trade war.
Critics will say the EU gave in too easily and that it failed, as gatekeeper to the most lucrative consumer market in the world, to wield its economic might. According to one estimate, the tariff deal will knock 0.5 per cent off EU GDP (gross domestic product).
What has been the reaction from Irish business?
'Irish exporters and importers will not have to operate under cumbersome and very expensive WTO [World Trade Organisation] rules. However, there will still be changes and increased costs to trade,' the chief executive of the Irish Exporters Association, Simon McKeever, says.
Employers' group
Ibec
says a 15 per cent tariff represents 'a substantial burden for many industries' and has called on Government to consider providing supports to vulnerable businesses similar to those rolled out during Brexit.
Does that mean an economic slowdown here?
On the basis of a 10 per cent tariff on EU goods exports to the US with an exemption for pharmaceuticals, the
Economic and Social Research Institute
(ESRI) had forecast the economy here would grow, in modified domestic demand terms, at a slower rate of 2.3 per cent this year, down from 3 per cent previously.
Now that the actual deal involves pharma and a higher baseline tariff rate, the slowdown in headline growth is expected to be larger though not enough to trigger a recession.
The Government's budgetary numbers, which are also based around a 10 per cent tariff rate, may also have to be scaled back.
Does the different tariff rate in Northern Ireland present a problem?
The divergence in tariff treatment between the EU and the UK (15 per cent versus 10 per cent) will also create cost differentials and other issues on the island of Ireland, between
Northern Ireland
and the Republic, particularly in areas like food and drink which will play out in way we perhaps can't see at this stage.
Will the deal damage inward investment here?
The nightmare scenario for Ireland would be for an Apple or an Intel to up sticks and leave
in the face of Trump's protectionist agenda.
There's no way of telling how these policies are influencing decision-making in the boardrooms of these companies. Like everyone else, they are probably adopting a wait-and-see approach.
The Government will hope that the increased cost of trading with the US (from Ireland) doesn't outweigh the attraction of the Irish economy for US business.
What else?
Of course, the big question surrounding Trump's protectionist trade agenda is how will it impact the US economy. A major slide in performance there – with tariffs expected to lead to higher prices for US consumers – and the global economy (including Irish exports) could suffer.
Trump is already hounding Federal Reserve boss Jay Powell to reduce interest rates to cushion any impact of tariffs but with inflation ticking up, that's unlikely.
And, as always, there will be continued uncertainty over whether the US president will stick by this accord or decide that other action is needed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Israeli tactics leave dangerous security vacuum in Gaza which Hamas continues to exploit
Hana Salah Palestinian journalist ISRAEL'S CONTINUING ASSAULTS on Gaza cause daily devastations for the people of Palestine. The starvation of children has become the most visible and derided of those consequences. But last month's killing of 18 Palestinian humanitarian workers, allegedly by Hamas affiliates, also points to a less discussed impact: the dangers of escalating internal lawlessness due to Israel's systematic dismantling of the usual governance mechanisms in Gaza. The Independent Commission for Human Rights says Israeli strikes have systematically dismantled these mechanisms – by targeting police stations, courthouses and prisons. That has left a dangerous security vacuum. Hamas, and other gangs, continue to exploit the gap. On 11 June, at least 18 people working for the US-Israel backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) were killed when the bus they were travelling in was ambushed by gunmen. The incident received little media or public attention in June. What exactly happened on 11 June? According to family interviews and statements, the attackers stopped the bus and accused the workers of collaborating with Israel before unleashing a brutal assault that initially left 11 people dead. About another 17 were injured. Bereaved families now say that at least seven of those 17 were later killed later inside Nasser Hospital, where they had initially been taken for treatment, bringing the death toll to 18. No group has officially claimed responsibility but families of the victims say the attackers were members of the armed Sahem unit, which is affiliated with Hamas. The GHF claimed in a public statement that Hamas gunmen were behind the killings and called for an independent investigation. Hamas, which governs Gaza but has seen its authority fray during the war, has not commented publicly on the incident. However, survivors of the attack say they were targeted because the Sahem unit believed they were members of the Israel-backed Abu Shabab gang. Why were they targeting GHF workers? The GHF, which has controversially, ineffectively and dangerously become the sole provider of food aid in parts of Gaza after Israeli authorities restricted UN agency operations, has faced scrutiny from multiple sides. Some local groups accuse it of serving US interests and consider its operations as 'death traps' because of a lack of proper security protocols. The Palestinian workers were erroneously accused by the Hamas unit of being Abu Shabab gang members because of GHF's links to Israel. 'They were beaten, shot, humiliated' 'What happened was not a mistake. It was a crime,' says local journalist Alaa Al-Helou about the bus ambush. 'They were beaten, shot, humiliated — and then denied medical help in the hospital. And all because of a false accusation.' According to the families' statement, armed men stopped the GHF vehicle before beating the driver and passengers with sticks and rifle butts. They then shot some of them in the legs. Survivors say they were stripped of their belongings and dragged onto the street, where bystanders, incited by the attackers, joined in the assault. 'They forced us off the bus and made us lie on the ground. Then they began beating and shooting us, one by one,' said Younis Abu Shaloof, 18, and a survivor of the attack. 'When the armed men left, people thought we were part of Abu Shabab gang and collaborating with Israel and started hitting us too. The ambulance took us to hospital in Khan Younis.' Yousef was lucky as his family moved him from Nasser hospital in Kahn Younis to another field hospital in Deir Al-Balah, so he survived the second attack by the armed men in the hospital which killed at least seven others injured in the same incident. 'They hit me in the knee, and I passed out,'he recalls. 'When I came to, I saw another man next to me, bleeding from a gunshot wound to the head. 'I smeared some of his blood on my own head and rubbed sand over my face, hoping the gunmen would think I was already dead — so they wouldn't shoot me again and finish me off.' Contracting complications One source, who spoke to The Journal on condition of anonymity, said that the GHF had contracted a bus company for transportation and subcontracted Al-Khuzundar Company to supply the labourers. On 26 May 2025, the Al-Khozendar family — to which the head of the subcontractor company working with the GHF belongs — issued a public statement disowning Mohammad Mohsen Al-Khozendar for his alleged collaboration with a US firm involved in Israeli military projects. The statement, rooted in tribal and social norms in Gaza, condemned any logistical or engineering work that supports such initiatives as a betrayal of the Palestinian cause, and stressed that the company bearing the family name does not represent the family or its values. The transportation company, the source added, claimed it had been communicating with Hamas-affiliated internal security forces to coordinate the workers' movement in the designated humanitarian area. They also had an oral coordination with the Israeli army. Advertisement 'The Israeli army contacted the Palestinian coordinator (sub-contractor) through phone to allow or stop the movement but that doesn't guarantee the bus, or any coordinated movement is protected from strikes, shots, bombing,' the source added. Who knew about the bus movement at that hour? A member of another bereaved family said the bus had been waiting for coordination approval when the attack occurred. 'The bus was waiting for clearance, and the armed men struck nearly an hour after coordination calls began,' the source said. This could suggest that some security sources were already aware of its coordination request.' Youssef recalls the armed men asking them if they were with the Abu Shabab gang which is backed by the Israeli army. 'They asked us if we were working with Abu Shabab, but we denied,' Youssef said. 'I'm too afraid to leave my home now,' said the survivor Youssef. 'I will never work for the American organisation again. Better to die by an Israeli airstrike than be killed as a 'traitor' by our own people.' In the fragmented landscape of Gaza's ongoing war, the Abu Shabab militia has emerged as a controversial player, reportedly collaborating with Israeli forces while launching attacks on Hamas-linked units such as the Sahem Unit. The group is believed to be operating out of Rafah's eastern border and was formed during the current conflict. Its leader, Yasser Abu Shabab, 34, is now at the centre of fierce accusations from the Joint Operations Room of Palestinian Resistance Factions, which has charged him with treason and leading an illegal armed group. A Revolutionary Court has issued a 10-day deadline for his surrender, warning he will otherwise be tried in absentia. Security body seize bus Formally, no group has claimed responsibility. Hamas has not commented. The day after the incident, Abu Shabab denied the images of the killings showed members of its militia, according to EuroNews . But a month on from the attack, the Hamas Interior Ministry issued a statement banning all forms of collaboration or work with the GHF. The bus involved in the attack was seized by a security body in Gaza, according to sources. Witnesses said no one was allowed to approach the vehicle, and individuals who attempted to do so were reportedly beaten. There have been other killings of suspected Israel collaborators during the lawless chaos of the conflict. However, other innocent civilians have also been mistakenly targeted. On 26 September 2024, Islam Hejazi, Gaza Programme Director at the US-based charity Shifa' Palestine, was shot dead by armed men in Khan Younis, southern Gaza. Gunmen in three vehicles opened fire on the car she was travelling in, firing around 90 bullets. Her family said government officials later told them it was a case of mistaken identity — her vehicle had been wrongly suspected of resembling one linked to a wanted man accused of collaboration. Hejazi, a mother of two, was described by Shifa' Palestine as a dedicated humanitarian 'of the highest integrity and professionalism'. The charity said it remained committed to serving Gaza in her memory. Dismantling of public order In a strongly worded statement, the Independent Commission for Human Rights condemned the Khan Younis attack as an extrajudicial killing and a serious breach of international law. It warned of a disturbing rise in armed groups acting outside any official framework, and called for an urgent, independent investigation to restore public trust and uphold the rule of law. A lawyer associated with a human rights organisation in Gaza talked to The Journal on condition of anonymity due to potential risk to his safety, and said his organisation and others are working to document cases of extrajudicial killings and vigilante violence, but stressed the extreme difficulty of collecting accurate data during an ongoing war. 'It is nearly impossible to provide precise numbers at this stage,' he told The Journal. 'The war has made documentation extremely difficult — especially during the period when Gaza was effectively divided between the north and south.' He added that many killings have not been officially investigated by the Public Prosecution or the Ministry of Health, leaving their motives unclear. 'It is often unknown whether these were revenge attacks, personal disputes, or related to allegations of collaboration with the occupation,' he said. 'There are certainly killings, but in many cases, the reasons remain undetermined — particularly under the current conditions of war.' Looting During the 11 June, the Hamas unit targeted workers which the group erroneously identified as Israel collaborators. Meanwhile, the United Nations last week said that 766 aid-seeking Palestinians have been killed in the vicinity of GHF sites – mostly by the IDF. UN human rights office spokesman Thameen Al-Kheetan told the AFP news agency that these almost 800 victims were killed by Israeli military actions. That death toll has since increased. The collapse of civil order in Gaza has also been highlighted by the UN Protection Cluster, which warned that humanitarian efforts are being severely disrupted. In a recent update, the group said aid delivery is hindered not only by Israeli restrictions and access barriers, but also by growing lawlessness within Gaza, fuelled in part by Israeli strikes on civilian police infrastructure. It noted that the breakdown in law enforcement has led to increased looting and attacks on humanitarian convoys. The closure of the Rafah crossing since May 2024 — aside from limited evacuations of medical cases — has further compounded the crisis. Israeli military operations and an ongoing siege, particularly in northern Gaza since October, have deepened insecurity and worsened conditions for civilians and aid workers alike. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal


Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
US agency investigates former special counsel Jack Smith over handling of Donald Trump cases
An agency that scrutinises the conduct of US federal employees has opened an investigation into Jack Smith, the former special counsel who investigated Donald Trump before he returned to office, following a request by a Republican senator. The Office of Special Counsel confirmed on Saturday that it had opened an investigation into Mr Smith for a possible violation of the Hatch Act, a law that prohibits federal workers from using their government jobs to engage in political activity. Senator Tom Cotton had asked the agency to investigate on the premise that some of Mr Smith's actions, such as seeking quick trial dates in the two criminal cases against Trump, were designed to influence the 2024 election. The investigation, which was first reported by The New York Post, is unusual in several respects. First, the most severe penalty possible for a Hatch Act violation is dismissal from federal employment, and Smith left the government at the start of the year. Second, the type of prosecutorial decisions criticised by Mr Cotton, Mr Trump and others are far different from the type of cases the office typically handles. It traditionally investigates and addresses violations of federal rules about the civil service. [ Donald Trump indicted over attempt to overturn 2020 election Opens in new window ] [ 'We have one set of laws in this country': Special Counsel in Trump documents case Opens in new window ] The investigation comes at a time when lawyers representing fired or demoted federal employees have complained that under Mr Trump, the office is not fulfilling its traditional role. In February, the US president dismissed the agency's head, Hampton Dellinger, despite a federal law saying that person can only be fired for 'inefficiency, neglect of duty or malfeasance in office'. At the time, Mr Dellinger had been arguing for the reinstatement of thousands of probationary workers who had been fired by the new administration. This article originally appeared in The New York Times 2025 The New York Times Company


The Irish Sun
4 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Russia dismisses Trump's warning of sending nuclear subs closer to country as a ‘temper tantrum'
RUSSIA has dismissed Donald Trump's warning he is sending nuclear submarines closer to Russia as a 'temper tantrum'. While Advertisement 2 The Kremlin has yet to respond to Trump's recent threats, pictured leader Putin Credit: Getty Former major general Leonid Ivlev said it did not pose a new threat as the location of US naval forces is known and the range of submarines can be found online. Another retired lieutenant general called it 'meaningless blather'. And a Russian security expert told one paper: 'I'm sure Trump didn't really give any orders'. Trump had said he was ordering submarines to 'appropriate regions' after ex-Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said they still had Advertisement He said: 'Words are very important and can often lead to unintended consequences.' Trump has said that the US is "totally prepared" for a nuclear war following a slew of threats against America from a Kremlin comrade. He said: "If some words of the former Russian president [Medvedev] cause such a nervous reaction in the entire, formidable US president, then Russia is right in everything and will continue to go its own way. "Let him remember his favorite films about the "walking dead", as well as how dangerous a "dead hand" that does not exist in nature can be." Advertisement Most read in The Sun Medvedev may have been referring to Moscow's "Dead Hand" nuclear weapons system, which is designed to launch a doomsday retaliation attack with full nuclear force - even if the Kremlin leadership is wiped out. He also warned that Russia "isn't Israel or even Iran." "Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences. I hope this will not be one of those instances. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Trump says US is 'fully prepared' for war after moving subs towards Russia 2 Russian officials have dismissed Donald Trump's warning he is sending nuclear submarines closer to Russia Credit: Alamy Advertisement