‘Flushed down the toilet': UC Berkeley student senate rejects Hindu Heritage month; sparks accusations of Hinduphobia, bullying
In a decision that has ignited widespread backlash, the Associated Students of the University of California (ASUC) at UC Berkeley voted against a resolution to recognize October as
Hindu Heritage Month
, prompting outrage from
Hindu students
, advocacy groups, and civil rights observers.
The proposal, Senate Resolution No. 2024/2025-042, was authored by a Caribbean Hindu student and focused solely on celebrating the contributions of Hindus to American society and the UC Berkeley campus. It highlighted Hindu achievements in science, technology, education, and the arts, deliberately avoiding any reference to Indian politics, Hindu nationalism, or current global events.
Yet despite its apolitical tone, the resolution faced vehement opposition.
Several student senators claimed the measure could be 'used to legitimize Hindu nationalist ideology,' even though those words appear nowhere in the text. The resolution failed to pass, with critics citing vague political concerns while allowing similar heritage recognitions for other groups to proceed without resistance.
The Coalition of Hindus of North America (CoHNA) called the vote discriminatory and accused the Senate of engaging in 'Hinduphobia masked as caution.'
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
3 Reasons to Plug This Into Your Home Today
elecTrick - Save upto 80% on Power Bill
Learn More
Undo
The organization condemned what it described as bullying behavior during the March 5 public meeting and singled out Senator Isha Chander for allegedly steering the discussion toward divisive political rhetoric. CoHNA also expressed solidarity with Senator Justin Taylor, who supported the resolution and, according to observers, faced hostility and mockery from colleagues during the debate.
A video of the meeting, now widely shared on social media platform X, shows one student making a choking gesture and dramatically pretending to suffocate while the resolution was being discussed, a moment many interpreted as a disturbing display of disdain for Hindu concerns.
CoHNA demanded a formal investigation, an apology to the Hindu student community, and accountability for what it called "public bullying of a fellow senator.
"
Adding to the controversy, the ASUC temporarily removed the video of the meeting from its Facebook page during student elections. Critics argue this move amounted to political censorship aimed at avoiding scrutiny. 'What are they trying to hide?' CoHNA questioned, calling the deletion 'deeply suspicious' and 'indicative of institutional bias.'
The resolution's defeat has reignited concerns about unequal representation of minority faiths on campus. 'All three Abrahamic religions have formal representation at ASUC,' one student speaker said. 'But when it comes to Hindus, our culture is treated as a political threat. The resolution was flushed down the toilet', a crude phrase actually used by one senator during the session.
While the ASUC defended its decision as a measure to avoid 'unintended political implications,' Hindu students and supporters argue that the episode reflects a deeper problem: the growing tendency to conflate
cultural celebration
with controversial geopolitics—especially when it involves Hindu identity.
'It's exhausting,' said one student. 'We just wanted to celebrate our heritage. Instead, we were told to defend politics we don't even identify with.'
The debate at UC Berkeley is far from over, as Hindu student organizations, alumni, and advocacy groups now call for transparency, reform, and equal respect for all communities on campus—regardless of the geopolitical baggage others may project onto them.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
8 minutes ago
- Business Standard
'Let them sail': Russian lawmaker shrugs off Trump's nuclear sub threat
A senior Russian lawmaker has said that Russia has enough nuclear submarines at sea to handle any potential threat from the two US subs ordered into position by President Donald Trump, news agency PTI reported. Viktor Vodolatsky, a member of the Russian Parliament (Duma), told state news agency TASS that there is no need for a response from Russia to Trump's decision. "The number of Russian nuclear submarines in the world's oceans is significantly higher than the American ones, and the subs that US President Donald Trump ordered to be redirected to the appropriate regions have long been under their control,' he said. 'So no response from the Russian Federation to the American leader's statement about the submarines is required." Vodolatsky also said: 'Let the two US subs sail, they have been in the crosshairs for a long time now.' Trump orders US nuclear submarines on alert On Friday, Trump posted on his social media platform Truth Social that he had ordered the movement of two US nuclear submarines to 'appropriate regions'. He said the decision was in response to what he described as 'extremely provocative statements' made by former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, now the deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council. In his post, Trump wrote: 'Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev... I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that." Russian minister backs peaceful approach, warns against direct conflict Responding to comments made by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in a Fox News interview, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov welcomed the US position that a direct military clash with Russia must be avoided. 'We wholeheartedly concur with this position. Such shared understanding has been facilitated through constructive Russian-American dialogue,' Lavrov said. 'While Europeans are hysterically pushing for Ukraine's integration into NATO... Marco Rubio recently reaffirmed a responsible stance, explicitly stating that a direct military confrontation between the United States and Russia must be avoided," he said. Trump slams Medvedev, India and Russia In another post on Thursday, Trump attacked both India and Russia, calling them 'dead economies' and suggesting they could 'take their dead economies down together'. He also criticised Medvedev. 'Russia and the USA do almost no business together. Let's keep it that way. Tell Medvedev, the failed former President of Russia, who thinks he's still President, to watch his words. He's entering very dangerous territory!' Trump said. In response, Medvedev dismissed Trump's remarks, saying they showed nervousness. 'If some words from the former president of Russia cause such a nervous reaction from the supposedly mighty president of the US, then Russia is doing everything right,' he wrote on Telegram. He also reminded Trump of Russia's Cold War-era nuclear capability, designed to retaliate even if the country's leadership were destroyed in a first strike. Mocking Trump's interest in pop culture, Medvedev added: 'He should remember his favourite films about 'The Walking Dead' and think about how dangerous a 'dead hand' can be, even one that doesn't exist in nature,' ending his post with a laughing emoji. (With agency inputs)
The Hindu
8 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Malegaon blast case: Forced to name Yogi Adityanath, says witness; court scraps his statement to ATS
A witness in his testimony to the special court in the 2008 Malegaon blast case had alleged that he was tortured and forced by the officers of the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) to name Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath in the case. Special Judge A.K. Lahoti, who on Thursday (July 31, 2025) acquitted all seven accused in the case, said he could not rely on the witness's statement to the ATS, as he submitted to the court that it was given involuntarily. 2008 Malegaon blast: Who were the accused? A brief timeline of the case In its more than 1,000-page judgment, made available on Friday (August 1, 2025), the court said the ATS had questioned prosecution witness Milind Joshirao in October 2008 about the functioning of the right-wing group Abhinav Bharat. He was asked about a meeting at the Raigad fort, where the accused had allegedly taken an oath to create a separate Hindu Rashtra. Joshirao, during his testimony to the court, claimed that the ATS had treated him like an accused. 'They (ATS officers) were telling him to take the names of Yogi Adityanath, Asimanand Indresh Kumar, Devdhar, Pragya and Kakaji in his statement,' the court said. 'The ATS officers assured him that if he took their names, they would let him go free,' it added. Controversy breaks out in Maharashtra after ex-policeman claims he was asked to pick up Mohan Bhagwat over 2008 Malegaon blast case The court noted that the witness had refused to do so and hence, the then Deputy Commissioner of Police Shrirao and Assistant Commissioner of Police Param Bir Singh had shown the fear of torture to him and extended threats. 'It further held that the witness had never stated the things mentioned in the statement and it was written by the ATS officers,' it said. 'Considering his testimony, it clearly indicates that the statement was involuntary,' the court said. 'The statement raises doubts regarding its admissibility and authenticity as it was involuntary,' the court said. Malegaon blast acquittals destroyed Congress 'conspiracy' to manufacture false narrative of Hindu terror: BJP 'When a statement is given involuntarily without actual knowledge of the facts mentioned in the same, nothing survives in it,' the court held, terming it as unreliable. Former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt. Col. Prasad Purohit were among the seven to be acquitted by the court, which noted that the prosecution had failed to adduce cogent and reliable evidence to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. Six people were killed and 101 were injured after a blast at Malegaon in Nashik district in September 2008.
Hans India
8 minutes ago
- Hans India
Originators of saffron terrorism jibe Cong, disgraced: Sadhvi Pragya after acquittal in Malegaon blast case
In her first reaction following the acquittal of all seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon Blast case in which 6 people were killed and over a 100 injured, BJP MP Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, one of the accused, stated that Congress, along with all other non-believers who were the originators of the 'saffron terrorism' tag, have been disgraced. Taking to social media platform X, she wrote: "The Congress, along with all other non-believers, who are the originators of 'saffron terrorism' and 'Hindu terrorism', have been disgraced.. The victory of saffron, Hindutva, and Sanatan has led to the triumph of all Sanatanis and patriots, heartfelt congratulations.... Jai Hindu Rashtra, Jai Shri Ram..." Nearly 17 years after a deadly blast rocked Malegaon in Maharashtra, a special NIA court in Mumbai on Thursday acquitted all seven accused, citing lack of evidence. The verdict marks the closure of a high-profile case that had long been a flashpoint in debates over so-called "saffron terror." The powerful explosion occurred on the night of September 29, 2008, near Bhikku Chowk in Malegaon, a communally-sensitive town approximately 200 kilometres from Mumbai. The blast, which took place during the holy month of Ramzan, killed 6 people and injured more than a 100 others. The court, presided over by Special Judge A.K. Lahoti, stated in its ruling that while the prosecution was able to establish that the bomb blast had occurred, it failed to prove that the explosive device was fitted on the motorcycle allegedly owned by Sadhvi Pragya. The judge specifically noted that the engine number was illegible, and the chassis number had been wiped off, weakening the prosecution's case substantially. The seven accused, including Sadhvi Pragya, were charged under various provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and the Indian Penal Code (IPC), including charges of criminal conspiracy, murder, attempt to murder, promoting enmity between groups, and voluntarily causing hurt. The case was originally investigated by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS), before being handed over to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in 2011. Over the years, the investigation and prosecution became mired in controversy, with allegations of political interference and changing narratives. Sadhvi Pragya was arrested in 2008 and later granted bail in 2017. She has consistently maintained her innocence, claiming that she was falsely implicated due to political motives.
