How DeSantis leaned on emergency powers to build ‘Alligator Alcatraz' in days
Nearly three years ago, when Hurricane Ian destroyed a bridge in southwest Florida and left residents on a barrier island with scant access to drinking water and food, Gov. Ron DeSantis leveraged his emergency authority to scramble contractors to reconstruct the bridge. It took less than three days.
Now, the Republican governor is wielding those same powers for something different: building an immigration detention center deep in the Everglades in a week.
Relying on an emergency order issued in January 2023 in response to a flood of Cuban and Haitian migrants arriving by boat in the Florida Keys, DeSantis is seizing county land, mobilizing a team of private companies to build a facility big enough to hold 3,000 detained immigrants and deploying Florida National Guard troops to secure the site. The rush of migrant arrivals ended long ago, but the order, which cites then-President Joe Biden's 'inadequate' response to immigration, has been repeatedly extended.
'This is not our first rodeo,' DeSantis told Fox News on Friday while touring an airfield owned by Miami-Dade County that has quickly been turned into a small grid of heavy-duty tents and trailers.
'The detention of illegal aliens is a little bit different,' the governor acknowledged. 'But logistics, we know how to do that.'
The speed by which the state is building the detention camp — nicknamed Alligator Alcatraz in a nod to the gator-filled wetlands surrounding the site – has unnerved environmentalists as well as local and state elected leaders, some of whom are questioning whether the governor is overstepping his authority.
'What is the emergency in the state of Florida that we need to build this facility under this timeframe?' Sen. Lori Berman, a Boca Raton Democrat, said on Friday. 'We just really can't understand.'
Technically, the governor is following the letter of the law when it comes to exerting his emergency powers, she said, but the question is whether there is an actual emergency.
'Florida is building a prison camp in the Everglades under the false cover of an emergency,' said Sen. Shevrin Jones, a West Park Democrat.
'Turbo-speed'
The idea of Alligator Alcatraz first became known to the public on June 18 — less than two weeks before the detention center's projected opening date. On that day, Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, a DeSantis appointee, appeared on Fox News to talk about plans for the new facility — complete with a helicopter tour on the site.
The news segment piqued the interest of Ra Schooley, a former flight instructor and pilot familiar with the airstrip. Schooley, a Miami resident, dashed off a quick email to environmental leaders — including Eve Samples from Friends of the Everglades.
'Another thing to keep an eye on…' he noted, sharing a link to the clip.
Two days later, Schooley saw an unusual notice from the Federal Aviation Administration to airmen: the tiny airport was set to close for three days, starting that evening. In close to three decades, Schooley had never seen the strip shut down, so he sounded the alarm to other environmentalists.
'No one knew about it,' he said. 'I thought they'd have to go through the community council or something.'
But unlike a typical state construction project, which can be held up in lengthy procurement fights, the state has been able to move at warp speed because of DeSantis' emergency authorization.
On the morning of June 21, Schooley flew over the area for the last time. The FAA that day sent a notice: no landings for the next 99 days. That same day, Uthmeier was in Washington D.C. meeting with Department of Homeland Security officials, setting in motion a massive undertaking to build the facility.
At the time, activists were organizing a protest at the property for Sunday, the same day that a core group of private contractors was planning to hold a meeting on site. By Monday, the federal government had approved the plans to build the project, and soon after trucks were bringing in portable restrooms, tents and industrial generators into the area — laying the groundwork for days of around-the-clock construction.
On that same day that construction started, Collier County officials were learning of the plan for the first time, according to emails obtained by the Miami Herald. Records show Collier officials were unclear on key details, including whether they were supposed to continue responding to emergency calls to the address.
'We have our own onsite ambulance transport, and we are compliant with Florida and national model standards,' wrote Kevin Guthrie, head of Florida's Department of Emergency Management, the agency leading the operation. 'It will undergo a federal inspection before opening.'
Miami-Dade County Mayor Daniella Levine Cava also received notice from Guthrie that day. He told her the property, which is owned by the county, was now under the control of the state and that it would remain so until 'the duration of the state of emergency,' according to records obtained by the Herald.
Guthrie, who is also empowered to wield the state's emergency powers, said the state had begun construction on the site, 'as I now deem it necessary to meet the Division's current operational demands in coping with the emergency.'
'Time is of the essence,' he told Levine Cava. 'We must act swiftly to ensure readiness and continuity in our statewide operations to assist the federal government with immigration enforcement.'
On Tuesday, officials in Collier, which along with Miami-Dade has oversight of the land, still had big questions left unanswered: 'What are the expectations of air medical trauma transport resources? Hurricane, severe weather - evacuation planning. Please forward your refuge plan for severe weather,' Dan Summers, Collier's director of emergency services, wrote in an email to state officials.
In the event of a hurricane, Division of Emergency Management officials told the Herald that detainees and staff would be evacuated from the site. The agency added that it is developing a disaster plan.
Setting precedent in Texas
DeSantis' actions aren't unprecedented.
Early last year, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott used his emergency powers to seize control of a local park in the border city of Eagle Pass, according to reporting from the Texas Tribune.
The park sits off the Rio Grande, which divides Mexico and the United States. According to the city's mayor, Abbott issued an emergency declaration to take control of the park for use as a staging area. The city wanted to fight the takeover, but felt it wasn't in their best interest financially.
Once seized by the state, troopers from Texas and Florida patrolled the premises and didn't let anyone in without permission, including U.S. Border Patrol agents, according to the Biden administration.
Texas' takeover of the park came years into an ongoing disaster proclamation over the border that Abbott first issued in 2021. He renewed the order again this year – but has since returned the park to the public, saying that the Trump administration helped decrease border crossings and that it was no longer necessary.
In Florida's emergency order, the state says that the Biden administration is the reason for the immigration crisis. Even now with the Trump administration in place, the continued order notes that it's necessary because 'the large influx and number of illegal aliens within the State remains.'
Since returning to the White House, President Donald Trump has undone many of the Biden-era immigration policies. On June 17, the White House said U.S. Border Patrol 'didn't release a single illegal into the U.S.' in May.
Uthmeier, during an interview with Fox News last week about the detention center, cited a Pew Research study that found Florida's undocumented population had grown by 400,000 from 2019 to 2022, reaching 1.2 million people. The governor's office did not immediately respond to a request seeking comment on the reasons why he believes the state is still under an immigration-driven emergency.
In Florida, emergency orders expire every 60 days unless the governor chooses to renew them, which they can do an unlimited number of times. An emergency order DeSantis issued in September 2022 ahead of Hurricane Ian is still active today, and an emergency order DeSantis issued when the condo tower in Surfside collapsed lasted for nearly two years.
Florida's Legislature has the ability to stop DeSantis' emergency order or limit its scope by passing a resolution, but it's unclear if that has ever happened.
DeSantis' broader use of emergency power comes as U.S. presidents have also leaned on their emergency authority. Elena Chachko, a law professor at Berkeley Law School, said that both Trump and Biden employed emergency power in broad and ambitious ways.
When it comes to the president's power, Chachko said the court is typically a check on the executive branch.
In Florida, battles over executive orders have played out in the courts as well. In 2021, a group of parents challenged a DeSantis executive order that stopped school mask mandates. On Friday, environmental advocacy groups filed a lawsuit challenging the new detention center for not undergoing procedural review.
Chris Reynolds, an emergency management expert and dean of academic outreach and program development at American Public University, called DeSantis' expanded state of emergency over immigration 'unusual.'
'Two years does seem like an awful stretch,' he said.
Reynolds, of Tampa, said emergency response laws are meant to be broad to give leaders the flexibility to make fast decisions and keep people safe. But in this case, he said some may see DeSantis' moves as an overreach.
'In my opinion as an emergency manager, yes it stretches the emergency management doctrine in terms of a strict emergency management response,' he said. 'Is it against the law? No.'
Without an explicitly declared disaster to prepare for, mitigate, respond to and recover from, there's no hard and fast rule for when a 'state of emergency' over immigration should expire.
However, Reynolds said he doesn't see the immigrant detention camp diverting resources from Floridians when the next hurricane comes.
If anything, he said, it's a 'superb' example of the kind of logistics and planning prowess Florida is known for.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

an hour ago
Trump's so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill' inches closer to vote
The Senate is working through the weekend as many Republican leaders try to pass President Trump's so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill".


Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Exclusive: Democrat on How Trump's Tariffs Could Reshape Key Iowa Race
Christina Bohannan, an Iowa Democrat making her third go at the battleground congressional seat held by GOP Representative Mariannette Miller-Meeks, told Newsweek in an interview that tariffs have emerged as a major issue for voters in the district. Bohannan came close to flipping Iowa's 1st Congressional District last year—losing by only 799 votes despite President Donald Trump carrying the district by more than eight percentage points against then Vice President Kamala Harris. The Iowa Democrat also ran in 2022. Now, Bohannan is making her third go at the district in the 2026 midterms, when Democrats are hoping a 2018-style blue wave will carry them to victory in key races across the country. Democrats will need to win seats like this to retake control of the House of Representatives next November. Trump's tariffs are likely to loom over key races next year, but the issue could be particularly important in the Hawkeye State. Trump says tariffs are necessary to bring back jobs to the U.S. and close the trade deficit. But exports of agricultural goods are a lifeline for farmers in states like Iowa. On Thursday, the president said he signed a trade deal with China, but the full impact of how that deal may affect farmers remained unclear. Bohannan emphasized tariffs as a key challenge facing Iowa in an interview with Newsweek, in which she discussed her campaign. Bohannan said she views tariffs as a "significant issue" facing Iowa. "I've already talked to some farmers who are very worried about the effect of tariffs and the trade war with China," she said. "What we see is that China in the past has bought a lot of farm products from Iowa, and now China is seeking out other trading partners besides Iowa and besides the U.S., like Brazil for example." The U.S. has landed in a trade war with China, which faced the highest tariffs under Trump's plan. This has affected farmers in the state, as China is the largest importer of soybeans from the U.S., importing more than $12 billion worth of the agricultural product in 2024. China has sought new trading partners, a move that could create economic uncertainty and losses for soybean farmers in states like Iowa. Once the trade relationships with Iowa farmers have been "severed," they will be hard to restore, Bohannan warned. Many residents in the district are also "already struggling to get by" due to the high cost-of-living, she said. Legislation supported by Republicans, such as Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" will only make those challenges worse, Bohannan said. Miller-Meeks told KHQA, a news station based in Quincy, Illinois, that Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" will address concerns, adding that tariffs are used as a "negotiating tactic," and that manufacturers and small business owners have for years raised concerns about China's "egregious trade practices." A poll that was published this week and released by the House Majority PAC showed Bohannan with an early lead over Miller-Meeks in the midterms, with 43 percent of voters supporting the Democrat and 39 percent backing the Republican. The poll surveyed 555 voters in the district from June 18-19, Politico reported. Bohannan outperformed Harris by eight points in Iowa's 1st District—which includes areas like Davenport and Des Moines suburbs, as well as large swaths of rural areas in southeast Iowa. The issue of winning back rural voters has been an existential question for the Democratic Party as they try to stop bleeding in Midwest and Great Lake states where their margins have diminished over the past decade. Iowa, which backed former President Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012 but has also backed Trump, is emblematic of that challenge. Bohannan overperformed last year by cutting into GOP margins in some of the rural counties in the district. She told Newsweek that Democrats can win back rural voters by getting out and talk to them "where they are." "That sounds simple, but the fact is that a lot of times, candidates don't take the time to go out to rural areas and small communities to connect with voters," she said. "They go to the bigger cities and do big events, but they don't take the time to really go to these communities and talk to people and listen to people." She attributed those efforts to her performance in 2024. "I actually spent time in these areas. I met with people to talk about what was happening in their public schools. What was happening with childcare and with water quality, and elder care in their communities," she said. "People got to know me and got to trust me. They understand that I come from a very small rural community just like theirs. My family had to make very hard decisions about filling prescriptions after my dad got sick and lost his insurance or putting food on the table." National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) spokeswoman Emily Tuttle, in a statement after Bohannan announced her campaign: "When will Christina learn? Iowans have rejected her twice already, and now she has to run to the left to beat radical Bob Kraus and Bernie-bro Travis Terrell in the primary. There's no doubt whoever comes out of this liberal rat race will be sent packing when Iowans re-elect America First fighter Mariannette Miller-Meeks next fall." Christina Bohannan told Newsweek: "One thing that's so interesting about Iowans is that we are fair minded, and we are willing to give people a chance regardless of political party if we believe that you're authentic, and you're willing to put Iowa first. So, in 2024, 33,000 people who voted for Donald Trump in this district also voted for me. I won two counties here that Trump won handily. What we see here is that Iowans really want somebody who is going to put Iowa first." The race is expected to be one of the most competitive of the 2026 midterms. Both the Cook Political Report and Sabato's Crystal Ball, two of the leading election forecasters, classify the race as a pure toss-up. Bohannan and Miller-Meeks are also set to face off against other candidates in primaries scheduled to be held on June 2, 2026. The general election is set for November 3, 2026. Related Articles Republicans' Chances of Flipping New Hampshire's Democratic Senate SeatClarence Thomas Wants Supreme Court to Reassess Landmark Voting LawFull List of Democrats Voting to Condemn Los Angeles Anti-Trump RiotsNew 2028 Democratic Front-Runner Surges Ahead of Kamala Harris-Poll 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.


Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Donald Trump Suffers Legal Blow: ‘Grave Constitutional Violations'
On Friday, a federal judge blocked President Donald Trump's executive order targeting legal firm Susman Godfrey, ruling it was "unconstitutional from beginning to end." This is the fourth defeat in court Trump has suffered since imposing punitive measures on a number of law firms that either were involved in legal cases against him or represented his political rivals. Newsweek contacted the White House and Susman Godfrey for comment on Saturday outside of regular office hours via email and telephone respectively. In March, Trump issued a slew of executive orders targeting law firms resulting in a number taking legal action, though others struck deals with the White House which saw them agree to do unpaid work on behalf of causes the president supports. Critics argued Trump's move was unconstitutional and an assault on free expression, whilst the White House said it was needed to combat what it termed "dishonest" activity. The executive orders Trump imposed on various law firms, including Susman Godfrey, featured a number of punitive measures such as blocking their employees access to government buildings, terminating government contracts and suspending security clearance. Friday saw District Judge Loren AliKhan conclude that in the case of Susman Godfrey, Trump's order was "unconstitutional from beginning to end." She said: "Every court to have considered a challenge to one of these orders has found grave constitutional violations and permanently enjoined enforcement of the order in full. "Today, this court follows suit, concluding that the order targeting Susman violates the U.S. Constitution and must be permanently enjoined." Trump's executive order targeting Susman Godfrey was already the subject of a temporary restraining order issued by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on April 15. Susman Godfrey is the fourth law firm targeted by Trump's executive orders that has successfully fought to get them blocked in court, following Perkins Coie, Jenner & Block and WilmerHale. The rulings were issued by judges appointed by both Democratic and Republican presidents. In a statement, Susman Godfrey said: "The Court's ruling is a resounding victory for the rule of law and the right of every American to be represented by legal counsel without fear of retaliation. "We applaud the Court for declaring the administration's order unconstitutional. Our firm is committed to the rule of law and to protecting the rights of our clients without regard to their political or other beliefs. Susman Godfrey's lawyers and staff live these values every day." In his ruling on WilmerHale's case, Judge Richard Leon, a George W. Bush appointee, said: "The cornerstone of the American system of justice is an independent judiciary and an independent bar willing to tackle unpopular cases, however daunting. "The Founding Fathers knew this! Accordingly, they took pains to enshrine in the Constitution certain rights that would serve as the foundation for that independence." Friday's judgement means the executive order targeting Susman Godfrey will not go into effect. The Trump administration has not said whether it plans to appeal. Related Articles Exclusive: Democrat on How Trump's Tariffs Could Reshape Key Iowa RaceRepublican to Retire as Democrats Eye Potential House Seat: ReportsElon Musk Staffer 'Big Balls' Joining Social Security AdministrationHarvard Finds International Student Lifeline Amid Trump Visa Showdown 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.