In his words: Trump's rhetoric about Zelenskyy and Putin has evolved
Trump appears to have softened toward Zelenskyy after a February blowout in the Oval Office. And in a reversal, has promised to send badly needed Patriot air defense missiles to Ukraine amid Russia's stepped-up aerial attacks. Russia's bigger army is pressing hard on parts of the 620-mile (1000-kilometer) front line where thousands of soldiers on both sides have died since the Kremlin ordered the full-scale invasion in February 2022. June brought the highest monthly civilian casualties of the past three years, with 232 people killed and 1343 wounded in Ukraine, the UN human rights mission in Ukraine said Thursday. Here's a look at what Trump has said so far during his second term:
Jan. 31: 'We want to end that war. That war would have not started if I was president.' Trump says his new administration has already had very serious discussions with Russia and that he and Putin could soon take significant action toward ending the conflict.
Feb. 19: 'A Dictator without Elections, Zelenskyy better move fast or he is not going to have a Country left.' Trump's harsh words for Zelenskyy on his Truth Social platform drew criticism from Democrats and even some Republicans in the United States, where defending Ukraine from Russian aggression has traditionally had bipartisan support. Zelenskyy said Trump was falling into a Russian disinformation trap – and he was quickly admonished by Vice President JD Vance about the perils of publicly criticizing the new president.
Feb. 28: 'You're gambling with World War III. And what you're doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country that's backed you far more than a lot of people said they should have.' Trump and Vance berated Zelenskyy over the war in Ukraine, accusing him of not showing gratitude after he challenged Vance on the question of diplomacy with Putin. The argument in the Oval Office was broadcast globally. It led to the rest of Zelenskyy's White House visit being canceled and called into question the US support of Ukraine in its defense against Russia's 2022 invasion. A few days after the blowup, Trump temporarily paused military aid to Ukraine to pressure Zelenskyy to seek peace.
March 30: 'I don't think he's going to go back on his word. You're talking about Putin. I don't think he's going to go back on his word. I've known him for a long time. We've always gotten along well.' Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, the US president said he trusts the Russian president to hold up his end of a potential peace deal. The comments were among the last positive remarks Trump made about Putin this year.
April 24: 'I am not happy with the Russian strikes on KYIV. Not necessary and very bad timing. Vladimir STOP! 5000 soldiers a week are dying. Let's get the Peace Deal DONE!' In a Truth Social post, Trump was reacting to Russia attacking Kyiv with an hourslong barrage of missiles and drones. It was the first of his rare criticism of Putin amid increased Russian attacks on Ukraine.
April 29: 'A lot of his people are dying. They're being killed and I feel very badly about it.' Trump addressed the toll on Ukrainians during an interview with ABC News after he met with Zelenskyy on the sidelines of Pope Francis' funeral. It was the first time the two leaders had met since the Oval office spat and signaled a shift in Trump's attitude toward the Ukrainian president.
May 25: 'I've always had a very good relationship with Vladimir Putin of Russia but something has happened to him. He has gone absolutely CRAZY!' Trump's Truth Social post made it clear he was losing patience with Putin as Moscow pounded Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities with drones and missiles in stepped-up aerial attacks.
June 25: 'He was very nice actually. We had a little rough times sometimes. He was ... Couldn't have been nicer. I think he'd like to see an end to this, I do.' Trump had a closed-door meeting with Zelenskyy during a NATO summit in The Hague. Trump's comments to reporters later also opened the possibility of sending Patriot air-defense missiles to Ukraine.
July 8: 'We get a lot of bull---- thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth. He's very nice all the time but it turns out to be meaningless.' Trump also said he's not happy with his Russian counterpart and that Moscow's war in Ukraine is killing a lot of people on both sides. Trump's comments during a Cabinet meeting came a day after he said the United States would send more weapons to Ukraine. It was a dramatic reversal after earlier announcing a pause in the delivery of previously approved firepower to Kyiv, a decision that was made amid concerns that America's military stockpiles had declined too much.
July 13: 'I am very disappointed with President Putin, I thought he was somebody that meant what he said. He'll talk so beautifully and then he'll bomb people at night. We don't like that.' Trump's remarks to reporters came as Russia has intensified its aerial attacks against Ukraine.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Time to put principles above profit
Francesca Albanese is such a threat to world peace and security, according to the US, that she joins four International Criminal Court judges and the court's chief prosecutor on its sanctions list. She is the first UN expert in history to be the subject of sanctions. The US has also written to the UN secretary-general to demand she is sacked. Albanese has not killed anyone. She has not stolen anything. She has not committed any crime. Her mortal sin is to stand up for international law and human rights, and demand that this applies to Israel. Albanese will not be deterred. She has been labeled a terrorist, a Marxist and an antisemite by those wishing to smear her and get her fired. She has not blinked. What is the report she has published that the US dislikes? It is entitled 'From Economy of Occupation to Economy of Genocide,' an examination of the economic underpinnings of Israel's genocide. Much of the media and political focus of those determined to ensure accountability for Israel's crimes has understandably focused on states. The campaign for an arms trade ban has been supercharged in major weapons-exporting states, with some results. Others want states to rip up free trade agreements with Israel. But one of the core foundations of Israel's occupation and genocide has been corporate complicity. This underpins the scaffolding of the regime of occupation and apartheid. For years, this has been a central feature of global civil society's efforts to hold Israel to account. This is what Albanese examines in this groundbreaking report. To what extent have major corporate actors become sponsors of these crimes? To what extent can they do what states, for legal or public relations reasons, cannot? She cites more than 60 international companies involved in 'the transformation of Israel's economy of occupation to an economy of genocide.' She called on the International Criminal Court to look to prosecute the chief executives of these companies. One of the most incredible aspects of Israel's 58-year-old occupation is how profitable it is. These companies are not generally motivated by ideology, but by good old-fashioned corporate greed. They make money. Given that, as the report points out, the Israeli defense budget has doubled since October 2023, they make considerable quantities of money. Albanese is clear that the report is not a mere list of such companies but an attempt to expose the system and how it enables genocide. The UN already has a database of companies that trade and do business in settlements, though many member states oppose or ignore this. This should change. This corporate network is vital for Israel not just to maintain its occupation, but to expand it. The arms companies are well known, but less so is the fact the Occupied Territories are a testing ground for weapons and artificial intelligence systems. But there are also civilian businesses, banks, insurance companies and major tourism companies that, for example, rent properties in illegal Israeli settlements. One 2025 survey found 760 rooms in illegal settlements were available for rent on just two platforms. When you examine the entries for these properties, the unknowing tourist would have no idea they would be holidaying in occupied territory. Banks and financial institutions are also in Albanese's crosshairs. The report points out that 'major global banks have underwritten Israeli treasury bonds, which have bankrolled the devastation, and the largest sovereign wealth and pension funds invested public and private savings in the genocidal economy, all the while claiming to respect ethical guidelines.' Major tech firms also stand accused. Many have offered their cloud services for use by the Israeli authorities, including the country's military. Israel's genocide in Gaza has seen the military deploy facial recognition software, target-selection algorithms and automated targeting systems such as Lavender, all provided and tested by tech giants. One of the core foundations of Israel's occupation and genocide has been corporate complicity. Chris Doyle Heavy machinery firms have provided bulldozers and other equipment that have destroyed huge parts of Gaza and the West Bank. Israeli authorities are recruiting drivers for such bulldozers, reportedly paying them per property destroyed. They get about 2,500 Israeli shekels ($744) for demolishing a small building and 5,000 shekels for a large one. How will this corporate complicity end? Consumer pressure will matter, as it did with the anti-South African apartheid campaign. Already, consumer pressure has hit businesses and pension funds. Options for strategic litigation for those who are seriously complicit are being examined. Ultimately, however, states need to do more. Trade with settlements should have been terminated decades ago. And why are states selling arms to Israel? Given their role in the global system, private corporations need to be held to account just as much as political leaders. It is a legal duty for states, under the UN's Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, to ensure businesses in their territory and jurisdiction adhere to international law and punish such abuses. It is time to put principles above profit.
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Can Netanyahu deliver a ceasefire Gaza can trust?
With news swirling of a potential ceasefire agreement in Gaza, brokered during a high-profile meeting between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump at the White House last week, Palestinians — particularly those in Gaza — find themselves once again suspended between cautious hope and deep skepticism. The promise of peace may be inching closer, but the lingering question remains: can the world really trust Netanyahu to honor such an agreement? And more fundamentally, can a permanent ceasefire hold in the face of Israel's historical record of violating its own commitments? The Gaza Strip, shattered by relentless airstrikes and years of blockade, is yearning for a pause, for a reprieve. Entire neighborhoods have been reduced to rubble, families torn apart and basic services like food, water and electricity remain scarce. In this humanitarian wasteland, any talk of a ceasefire sparks a flicker of hope — but that hope is deeply guarded. Both Netanyahu and Trump have much to gain politically from a ceasefire. Netanyahu is mired in domestic turmoil, battling corruption charges, protests and an increasingly fractured coalition. Trump is keen to present himself once again as a global statesman capable of forging historic deals. The stakes are high — but so too is the distrust. Palestinians have seen this story play out before. Ceasefire after ceasefire — brokered by Egypt, Qatar or the UN — has collapsed due to Israeli violations, continued settlement expansion or renewed military operations. Despite declarations and photo-ops, Israel has consistently returned to tactics that violate Palestinian sovereignty and humanitarian norms. The Netanyahu government, heavily influenced by its far-right members, has shown little willingness to seriously engage with the Palestinian cause beyond security concerns. And yet, Palestinians are not rejecting the idea of peace — they are rejecting hypocrisy. A genuine and lasting ceasefire must be more than a tactical maneuver or an electoral prop. It must include an unequivocal end to Israeli military operations in Gaza, the lifting of the suffocating blockade and a credible international mechanism to monitor compliance on both sides. Any agreement must address not only the symptoms of war, but also the root causes: occupation, displacement and political disenfranchisement. While the US continues to play the role of chief negotiator, the international community cannot remain a bystander. It must step forward — not just to endorse any agreement, but to provide binding guarantees that Palestinians' rights will be protected and upheld. The Arab world, the EU and the UN should demand oversight mechanisms that ensure Israel complies with its commitments and that the Palestinian people are not once again left to suffer the consequences of broken promises. International actors must insist on a framework that goes beyond ceasefire management and toward a sustainable political solution. The people of Gaza cannot endure another 'pause' that merely resets the countdown to the next war. Hani Hazaimeh The people of Gaza cannot endure another 'pause' that merely resets the countdown to the next war. They need assurance, accountability and, above all, dignity. The ceasefire must not be a reward for violence nor a temporary de-escalation until the next round of bloodshed. It must be the beginning of a broader peace process that affirms the right of Palestinians to live freely in their homeland, with access to food, water, safety and a future. Netanyahu and Trump may seek to shape the headlines in Washington, but history will judge them by what follows on the ground in Gaza. If the proposed ceasefire does not include real protections, real oversight and real political engagement, it will join the long list of failed truces that have left Palestinian civilians to bury their dead in silence. A meaningful ceasefire must be built on trust — but trust is earned, not imposed. And until Israel demonstrates a consistent commitment to peace and until the world holds it accountable for its actions, Palestinians will remain wary of agreements signed with smiles abroad and broken with bombs at home. The people of Gaza are watching. The world must do more than just watch with them — it must stand with them.
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
New York governor wants Trump to take action on drone attack risks
New York Governor Kathy Hochul called on the White House to take action to address risks of drone attacks on the United States, citing a series of incidents last year and their use in international military operations. 'An attack against strategic military and critical infrastructure in New York poses an urgent danger to the United States,' Hochul said in a letter to President Donald Trump made public Monday. 'The reality is that the federal government is unprepared and poorly postured to detect and mitigate (drone) threats and states are hamstrung by a lack of legislative authority and action by the Federal Aviation Administration.'
