Ecuador approves controversial law on protected areas
The piece of legislation, passed on Thursday by a vote of 80-23 in the 151-seat chamber, permit private entities – including foreign companies – to participate in the management of conservation zones.
Government officials claim the measure will bolster oversight of protect lands, enhance park security, support ecotourism and curb illegal mining, while maintaining a ban on extractive activities.
However, critics warn the law could facilitate land grabs, weaken constitutional safeguards and lead to greater environmental degradation. They also accused lawmakers of pushing the bill through without consulting affected communities.
'This is constitutional vandalism,' said Oscar Soria, co-CEO of the international policy group The Common Initiative. 'Ecuador has shattered its international credibility and invited isolation from the global community.'
Opponents also say the law violates at least 15 international agreements – including the ILO Convention 169 and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
'The legislators of Ecuador reopened a historic wound,' said Justino Piaguaje, leader of the Siekopai peoples and head of the NASIEPAI Indigenous organization.
Piaguaje slammed the law as 'dangerous and unconstitutional" and said it not only reinforces systemic violations of Indigenous rights but 'actively perpetuates a legacy of dispossession and violence that stretches back to the colonial era.'
"It threatens our survival and desecrates the dignity of the Ecuadorian people,' he said.
Valentina Centeno, president of the parliament's Economic Development Commission, insisted the law does not open the door to extractive industries and that here is a provision 'that explicitly prohibits' them.
Still, Indigenous leaders say the process lacked transparency and bypassed meaningful dialogue with their communities. Legal challenges are already underway, with Indigenous organizations vowing to take the case to Ecuador's Constitutional Court and international forums.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
13-07-2025
- Euronews
New Caledonia to become a 'state', but will remain French
France announced a deal with New Caledonia on Saturday, which grants the overseas South Pacific territory more autonomy. The agreement, however, stops short of full independence sought by indigenous inhabitants of the archipelago. The 13-page deal, which French President Emmanuel Macron hailed as "historic", calls for the creation of a "state of Caledonia", which would remain French and inscribed in the French constitution. It will also allow for the creation of a Caledonian nationality alongside French nationality. The accord still needs final approval in New Caledonia, and may face a vote by New Caledonians in February. For decades, the Pacific archipelago east of Australia faced political tensions between those seeking independence and those loyal to France. And in May 2024, mass riots broke out over proposed electoral reforms. The French government debated to give thousands of non-indigenous long term-residents voting rights. Many Kanaks protested against the proposal, claiming changes to the electoral rules would further marginalise Indigenous voters. A difficult path lays ahead for Kanaks and other Caledonians, but the new agreement will get the island "out of the spiral of violence," according to Kanak lawmaker Emmanuel Tjibaou who took part in the 10 days of negotiations. "This text does not mention the word independence. But it opens up a structured, progressive, legally regulated and politically legitimate path," Tjibaou said. Those who were in favour of keeping New Caledonia within the French fold also hailed the accord. Lawmaker Nicolas Metzdorf called it a compromise born of "demanding dialogue,'' and described the Caledonian nationality as a ″real concession.'' A special congress will be held to finalize next steps, which could include more sovereignty for New Caledonia over issues of international affairs, security and justice, according to excerpts published by New Caledonia's public broadcaster. The accord could also eventually allow New Caledonians to change the territory's name, flag and hymn. Participants stressed the importance of rehabilitating and diversifying New Caledonia's indebted economy, which depends heavily on nickel mining, and making it less reliant on the French mainland. France colonised New Caledonia in the 1850s, and it became an overseas territory after World War II. French citizenship was granted to all Kanaks in 1957, but many continue to demand full independence.
Euronews
11-07-2025
- Euronews
Ecuador approves controversial law on protected areas
Ecuador's government passed a new law governing protected areas, triggering strong criticism from indigenous leaders, legal experts and environmental advocates who argue it violates national and international protection. The piece of legislation, passed on Thursday by a vote of 80-23 in the 151-seat chamber, permit private entities – including foreign companies – to participate in the management of conservation zones. Government officials claim the measure will bolster oversight of protect lands, enhance park security, support ecotourism and curb illegal mining, while maintaining a ban on extractive activities. However, critics warn the law could facilitate land grabs, weaken constitutional safeguards and lead to greater environmental degradation. They also accused lawmakers of pushing the bill through without consulting affected communities. 'This is constitutional vandalism,' said Oscar Soria, co-CEO of the international policy group The Common Initiative. 'Ecuador has shattered its international credibility and invited isolation from the global community.' Opponents also say the law violates at least 15 international agreements – including the ILO Convention 169 and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. 'The legislators of Ecuador reopened a historic wound,' said Justino Piaguaje, leader of the Siekopai peoples and head of the NASIEPAI Indigenous organization. Piaguaje slammed the law as 'dangerous and unconstitutional" and said it not only reinforces systemic violations of Indigenous rights but 'actively perpetuates a legacy of dispossession and violence that stretches back to the colonial era.' "It threatens our survival and desecrates the dignity of the Ecuadorian people,' he said. Valentina Centeno, president of the parliament's Economic Development Commission, insisted the law does not open the door to extractive industries and that here is a provision 'that explicitly prohibits' them. Still, Indigenous leaders say the process lacked transparency and bypassed meaningful dialogue with their communities. Legal challenges are already underway, with Indigenous organizations vowing to take the case to Ecuador's Constitutional Court and international forums.
Euronews
04-07-2025
- Euronews
Countries must protect human right to a stable climate, top court says
The Inter-American Court of Human Rights on Thursday issued a landmark advisory opinion linking governments' human rights obligations to their responsibility to address the threat of climate change. It is a move expected to shape policy and litigation across Latin America and the Caribbean. The opinion is the first of its kind from the region's top human rights tribunal and responds to a 2023 request from Colombia and Chile. It says states have a duty under international law to prevent, mitigate and remedy environmental harm that threatens human rights, including through laws, policies and actions aimed at curbing climate change. 'We are in a climate emergency' The court outlined a series of legal standards, including the recognition of a human right to a healthy climate, the obligation to prevent massive and irreversible environmental harm, as well as the duty to protect the rights of current and future generations. 'The Court has declared that we are in a climate emergency that is undermining the human rights of present and future generations and that human rights must be at the centre of any effective response," Nikki Reisch, program director at the Centre for International Environmental Law Climate and Energy, told The Associated Press. The opinion states that countries have a legal duty not only to avoid environmental harm but also to protect and restore ecosystems, guided by science and Indigenous knowledge. 'This is a historic opinion,' said Reisch. 'It's not just a legal milestone - it's a blueprint for action. This opinion will guide climate litigation at the local, regional, and national courts, and provide a foundation for climate policymaking, grounding local legislation and global negotiations in legal obligation, not just in the Americas but around the world.' Court findings could bolster climate lawsuits Though not binding, the court's opinions carry legal weight in many member countries of the Organization of American States and often influence domestic legislation, judicial rulings and international advocacy. The court's findings are expected to bolster climate-related lawsuits and human rights claims in the region, and to influence negotiations ahead of COP30 - the next major United Nations climate summit, set to take place in November in Belem, Brazil. 'States must not only refrain from causing significant environmental damage but have the positive obligation to take measures to guarantee the protection, restoration, and regeneration of ecosystems,' said Court President Judge Nancy Hernández López. 'Causing massive and irreversible environmental the conditions for a healthy life on Earth to such an extent that it creates consequences of existential proportions. Therefore, it demands universal and effective legal responses,' López said. Growing Indigenous momentum for climate justice The opinion comes amid growing Indigenous momentum in the region, including a summit in Ecuador's Amazon last month where hundreds of Indigenous leaders gathered to demand enforcement of court victories recognising their land and environmental rights. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights, based in San Jose, Costa Rica, is the region's top tribunal for interpreting and enforcing the American Convention on Human Rights. Its rulings, though often challenged by weak enforcement, have played a key role in advancing Indigenous rights and environmental protections across Latin America. In recent years, the court has condemned governments for allowing mining projects on Indigenous land without proper consultation, and advocates have increasingly turned to it as a forum for climate-related accountability. The advisory builds on the Court's 2017 advisory ruling that recognised the right to a healthy environment as a standalone human right, deepening its application in the context of climate breakdown.
