logo
‘Dominance, dependency and blackmail': EU and China talks overshadowed by deep divisions

‘Dominance, dependency and blackmail': EU and China talks overshadowed by deep divisions

Irish Timesa day ago
Ursula von der Leyen
and António Costa arrive in Beijing on Thursday for an
EU
-
China
summit that has been cut down, scaled back and relocated halfway around the world.
Xi Jinping
will meet the two European Union presidents before the summit begins but he will leave it to premier Li Qiang to co-chair the meeting.
The summit, which coincides with the 50th anniversary of diplomatic relations between China and the EU, was due to be held in Brussels but the Chinese side insisted on moving it to Beijing. Beijing also reduced the summit to a one-day event, cancelling a planned trip with the European presidents to Anhui province on Friday.
'The China-EU relationship is currently more and more complicated,' said Shi Zhiqin, a professor of international relations at Tsinghua University in Beijing.
The two sides are at odds over everything from trade policy to the war in Ukraine, with climate action almost the only major policy area where they are likely to make progress this week. And
Donald Trump
's return to the White House, instead of bringing China and the EU closer together, appears to be driving them farther apart.
When von der Leyen met Trump and six other world leaders at a Group of Seven (G7) summit last month, she used a prop to make a point. The European Commission president held up a rare earth magnet, a crucial component in electric vehicles and solar panels, which was manufactured in Estonia.
What followed was a broadside against China and its economic model, which von der Leyen said had created a pattern of 'dominance, dependency and blackmail' that was killing key European industries. China controls much of the global supply of rare earth minerals, a fact Europe increasingly views as a concern and von der Leyen pushed for the EU to 'de-risk' and limit its economic dependency on the Asian economic superpower.
The big problem, as many European leaders see it, is not just that China sells much more to Europe than it buys, but that state-subsidised Chinese industries are producing an excess of goods, which then end up flooding the European market.
BYD electric cars waiting to be loaded on a ship are stacked at the international container terminal of Taicang Port at Suzhou Port, in China's eastern Jiangsu Province. Photograph: AFP via Getty Images
The commission last year accused the Chinese state of unfairly subsidising BYD, SAIC and other electric carmakers, allowing them to produce cheaper EVs to undercut competitors made in Europe.
EU officials were worried that the domestic European automotive sector would be muscled off the pitch and China would effectively dominate the EV market, at a time when European policymakers are encouraging a climate-conscious switch away from petrol and diesel engines.
The same thing happened with solar panels several years back, another key industry in the EU's planned move away from fossil fuels. More than 90 per cent of the solar panels Europe buys now come from China.
'I think we still see China as a partner, but also a rival and a competitor,' a diplomat from one EU state said of the changing relationship.
It is official EU policy to view China as a partner for co-operation, an economic competitor and a systemic rival, a description that rankles with Beijing. Shi said that China sees the relationship as essentially interdependent and regards the EU's approach as contradictory.
'If you think we are rivals, how can we co-operate?' he said.
Some Chinese international relations experts expected Trump's return to the White House to bring China and the EU closer together. But others believed that the EU was unlikely to move towards Beijing, partly because many European policymakers are clinging to the transatlantic relationship in the hope that it will return to normal after Trump leaves office.
Some Chinese international relations experts expected Trump's return to the White House to bring China and the EU closer together. Photograph: Alex Brandon/AP
'China was mentally and materially ready for the tariff war,' Shi said.
'China produces or exports almost 90 per cent of the rare earths. The rare earths are very, very important to the USA and very important to the EU. Since the EU are targeting China as its rival, why can't China use its rare earths?'
When China introduced an export licensing system for rare earths last April, it applied to the EU as well as the US. Companies have to apply for a new license every six months and the speed of processing applications appears to vary according to the diplomatic temperature.
The EU's new eyes-wide-open approach has seen it hike up tariffs on imports of Chinese EVs, to protect European producers from being crowded out. China responded with its own tariffs on French cognac and other brandy sold from the EU, with threats more import levies on dairy could follow.
China has placed tariffs on French cognac and other brandy sold from the EU, with threats more import levies on dairy could follow. Photograph: Regis Duvignau/Reuters
Abigaël Vasselier, a former official in the EU's diplomatic corps who worked on China policy, said the EU was looking for a 'level playing field', but that was something Beijing could not deliver.
'We are asking the Chinese: 'Yes please could you change your entire economic model',' she said. That was something that was not going to happen, so Europe needed to look after itself as a result, she said.
Ms Vasselier, now head of foreign relations at the Mercator Institute for China Studies think tank, said the EU recognising that areas where it co-operated with China were also simultaneous points of competition, was a bit of a recent 'mini revolution' in thinking.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine has been another flashpoint in EU-China relations, one that may cast a shadow over the upcoming summit. The EU is frustrated about the ongoing support China provides Russia in the war, with the Nato military alliance calling out Beijing as a decisive enabler of Moscow's military campaign.
The EU says China is a key supplier to Russia of 'dual-use' goods that have civilian and military uses. It is also seen as playing an important role in Russia's evasion of economic sanctions aimed at hobbling its war effort.
A staff member prepares for the arrival of officials in advance of a recent China-EU meeting Beijing. Photograph: Wang Zhao/ AFP
One EU source said China's support for Russia was a block to any reset in the relationship. 'If you want to get closer to us ... that is only possible if you don't go through the backdoor continue to harm our security interests,' the official said.
It was worth Europe putting China's support for Russia's war at 'the centre of the agenda' in the upcoming summit, Ms Vasselier said.
'At best the European objective should be that China limits its support to the Russian war economy,' Ms Vasselier said. Chinese entities that help Russia get around sanctions should themselves face EU sanctions, she said.
The delegation from Brussels is expected to press China to stop 'any direct or indirect assistance' it is providing to Russia in its war with Ukraine, one EU official involved in the summit preparations said.
The EU side would also be looking to have a 'frank' discussion about China's unfair trading practices, another EU official said.
'We have reached a point where the situation is becoming unsustainable for the European Union and those imbalances have to be addressed,' the official said.
Beijing's official position on Ukraine is one of neutrality but when foreign minister Wang Yi met EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas this month, he is reported to have told her that China does not want Russia to lose the war. Such an outcome would allow the United States to shift its whole strategic focus towards confronting Beijing, he is reported as saying.
When Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi met EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas this month, he is reported to have told her that China does not want Russia to lose the war. Photograph: EPA
'For a long time, the Soviet Union was a big threat to China. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, we have wanted Russia to keep stable. Because if Russia is not stable, it is threat to its neighbours, it is threat to EU, it is threat to China,' Shi said.
'Why is there a war between Russia and Ukraine? I think there is a quite different understanding between European countries and Chinese people because Russia has its security concern. Its security concern is Nato, Nato's enlargement, Nato's expansion ... China understands Russia's security concern. Chinese policy is to try to keep neutral, although the European Union and the USA do not think so.'
China has condemned the EU's sanctioning of two Chinese banks Brussels believes to have provided cryptocurrency services that were frustrating European sanctions against Russia. Beijing warned that it could take retaliatory action against the measures, insisting that its trade with Russia is legitimate and consistent with World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules.
'Maybe when Wang Yi said that we don't want Russia lose, he means we don't want Russia to collapse. Russia is a very big power with many, many nuclear weapons. So the nuclear weapons could proliferate and that's a very serious threat to European security, to the world's security,' Shi said.
'If Russia collapses, the USA will try to target China as an enemy. That's why we want our world to be balanced, a balance of power.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says he will use import restrictions to reduce drug prices
Trump says he will use import restrictions to reduce drug prices

RTÉ News​

time2 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

Trump says he will use import restrictions to reduce drug prices

US President Donald Trump said he would use import restrictions to force foreign suppliers to cut drug prices and that pharmaceutical companies would have a lot of problems if they did not agree to bring prices down. Speaking at the White House at an event with Republican politicians, Mr Trump pledged to reduce what consumers must pay for prescription drugs. The US is the biggest market by sales for big pharma companies, and Europe and the US have interconnected supply chains for medicines with the pharmaceutical sector employing around 45,000 people in Ireland. Total Irish exports were valued at €223.8 billion last year, with roughly one third going to the US. Of the €72.6 billion in US imports from Ireland, approximately €58 billion relates to pharmaceuticals and chemicals leaving Ireland. Pharmaceutical companies have previously expressed concern about the threat of tariffs and what they would mean for investment in Europe. In April, a number of pharmaceutical companies sent a letter to EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, warning that the EU could lose €100bn in new investment unless there is a rethinking on regulation and pricing. The letter was sent by around 30 CEOs of some of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world.

Ireland's latest investment plan: A sceptic's guide
Ireland's latest investment plan: A sceptic's guide

Irish Times

time7 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Ireland's latest investment plan: A sceptic's guide

How do we make sense of all the billions announced in new State investment spending ? The key message is that the Government is going for it in terms of the sums it is committing – and this has big consequences. By doing so it is responding to economic growth and population increases, which have been well in advance of expectations. Here is how the numbers add up and the questions they raise. Where the money comes from : The State has allocated an additional €34 billion to its investment plans over the five years from 2026 to 2030. This is a big increase, with the overall total coming to just over €102 billion. About €20 billion of the extra cash is due to come from what might be called cash reserves – the €14 billion from the Apple tax payment, €2.5 billion from the sale of AIB shares and the Infrastructure, Climate and Nature Fund established by the Government. This still leaves a gap to be paid for, however, and this will be met by running down budget surpluses in the years ahead. There is also a commitment to tighter control of day-to-day spending to leave more cash for investment, though an increase of 6.4 per cent is pencilled in again here next year. Tariffs: Why has Donald Trump threatened the EU again? Listen | 47:35 The State will run down a lot of its financial leeway. Already the Department of Finance is facing a smaller budget surplus year than forecast in springtime. The budget sums will come under further pressure if economic growth slows sharply. Where the money will be spent : The Government announced the overall spending allocations, but not the list of projects involved, though some of the big ones, including the Dublin MetroLink , are known. As ESRI professor Alan Barrett said on RTÉ radio, the normal approach in a National Development Plan (NDP) is to start with population and growth projections and then develop a list of projects that are based on this and outline how they relate to each other. Instead, departments are now to come up with their own priorities. The list should be published around budget time, we are told, but with the review well flagged for months, it seems a lot of last-minute haggling means it has not yet happened. As Taoiseach Micheál Martin said, previous NDPs might have been too long. But this one, right now, looks a bit flimsy. Surviving a downturn : Taoiseach Micheál Martin said at the press conference launching the strategy that the goal is to keep investing, even if the economy slows or hits difficulties. Slashing investment spending after the financial crash has had a big economic cost for the Republic. But with no details of the expected budget position next year – never mind in subsequent years – published in the summer economic statement, the other key document published on Tuesday, we have no feeling for how the Department of Finance sees all the numbers adding up. Budget surpluses will be smaller, it says, but we do not know by how much. We are not clear on the appetite to borrow to fund investment in the years ahead if the corporate tax take takes a heavy hit. In fairness, the Government will want to see the outcome of the EU-US tariff talks, which have big implications. If there is a bad outcome, we are told the €9.4 billion budget will be pulled back. That would be the acid test of where priorities lie. Delivering the projects : Senior Ministers spoke at length at the NDP launch about the barriers to delivery from planning and bureaucracy. This raises the obvious question of why they did not do much about them when they were in government last time around, including the multiphase approval processes for local authority housing, for example. A new Planning Act was passed, but only in the dying days of the last coalition. The fiscal council has noted that the State has consistently struggled to meet investment spending targets in recent years. And, as the document states, finding construction workers is a challenge. Now Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers is examining recommendations from an expert group on the delivery issue, and some important moves are on the table. Succeeding here is central to its plans and rebuilding credibility on project delivery.

Budget plan for €9.4bn public spending boost will be reconsidered if tariffs hit
Budget plan for €9.4bn public spending boost will be reconsidered if tariffs hit

Irish Times

time7 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Budget plan for €9.4bn public spending boost will be reconsidered if tariffs hit

Plans to spend an extra €9.4 billion on public services , tax cuts and building projects next year will be reconsidered if the US imposes tariffs on EU imports, Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe and Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers said on Tuesday. But they, along with Taoiseach Micheál Martin and Tánaiste Simon Harris , pledged that if there is pressure on spending plans, they would protect infrastructure budgets and cut growth in current spending on public services, welfare and tax cuts to realise the necessary savings. The Coalition leaders launched a review of the National Development Plan (NDP), promising to spend €100 billion between now and 2030 – a €30 billion increase over what was planned – to improve water, energy, transport and housing infrastructure. [ National Development Plan shows the Government is about to bet big on capital expenditure Opens in new window ] The ambitious plans were overshadowed by the threat of a trade war between the European Union and United States, which Mr Donohoe and Mr Chambers admitted could compel them to revise plans published on Tuesday for a budget day package of €9.4 billion in October. READ MORE In the event of high tariffs, the Government would 'recalibrate its fiscal strategy' and reduce the budget package to keep public finances stable, said Mr Donohoe. Already, the plans for October's Budget 2026 envisage growth in public spending being trimmed from 8-9 per cent of recent years to 6.4 per cent next year. Mr Donohoe said there would be a package of tax cuts of some €1.5 billion. But he added that the cost of cutting VAT on hospitality – a Fine Gael election promise included in the programme for government – would amount to nearly €1 billion in a full year, meaning the scope for any tax adjustments to rates and bands would be reduced significantly. Tariffs: Why has Donald Trump threatened the EU again? Listen | 47:35 'It would not be right to grow the scale of our tax package,' said Mr Donohoe. The Coalition published the amended NDP and summer economic statement at Government Buildings on Tuesday. The NDP promises expenditure of €25 billion on capital projects in 2026, with the amount increasing every year and peaking at €28 billion in 2029. The total is set to reach more than €100 billion by 2030. The plan was immediately criticised for not identifying individual projects, though the Government did point to a small number of 'megaprojects', including the Dublin Metro and two big water schemes: the Shannon to Dublin water supply project and Greater Dublin Area drainage initiative. Social Democrats spokesman on public expenditure Cian O'Callaghan said the plan is 'so vague it doesn't even rise to the level of wish list'. Sinn Féin 's health spokesman David Cullinane said the allocation for health falls 'far short of what is needed' over the next five years. Labour 's Marie Sherlock, meanwhile, has said the €2 billion allocated for the MetroLink is 'hardly a vote of confidence that the project will be substantively progressed in this decade'. The summer economic statement, normally a key document in the preparation of the October budget, was considerably shorter and less detailed than usual. It contained several warnings, however, about threats to the State's public finances from several sources. [ NDP shows Government about to bet big on capital expenditure Opens in new window ] 'Even before the full impact of tariffs takes hold, it is increasingly evident that heightened levels of uncertainty have prompted firms to delay investment plans and households to step up precautionary savings. These headwinds are set to slow the pace of economic expansion,' it said. The document also warned that the 'headline surplus is now likely to be considerably lower than set out in the spring'. It flagged that spending pressures in several Government departments will require additional funding above their agreed allocations, prompting Mr Chambers to warn of the need for spending discipline and an end to bailouts in the second half of the year – a now familiar necessity in some departments.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store