David Murray says sorry over disaster of Rangers sale
The former owner of Rangers, Sir David Murray, has apologised to fans for his part in the financial calamity that befell the club more than a decade ago.
Sir David, who sold the Ibrox side for £1 to businessman Craig Whyte, presided over Ibrox when the club gave £47m in tax-free loans to players and staff between 2001 and 2010.
Advertisement
Under Mr Whyte's ownership the Rangers business went into liquidation in 2012 - a year after the sale.
In a wide-ranging interview with the BBC to mark the publication of his autobiography, Mettle, Sir David said he regretted his decisions and said sorry to fans and club staff.
"Of course I'd apologise," he said. "I'm not one of these people who run a company and hide.
"It was a terrible moment, and I apologise to all the staff, good people, and I know many of them to this day.
"I'd hope in hindsight, they look at the facts and think I was put in a very difficult position."
What were the facts?
The sale of Rangers and its resulting financial collapse had a huge effect on fans [SNS]
What was known as the 'big tax case' centred on the club's use of Employee Benefit Trusts (EBTs).
Advertisement
EBTs, which were also used by other clubs, enabled Rangers to pay £47m to players, managers and directors between 2001 and 2010 in tax-free loans.
HMRC argued the payments were earnings and should be taxable.
Two tribunals in 2012 and 2014 had previously found in Rangers' favour but the Supreme Court ruled in favour of HMRC after an appeal in 2015.
The case unfolded against a backdrop of financial meltdown for Rangers.
Years later, Mr Whyte was charged and cleared of taking over the club by fraud.
A court heard that his takeover of Rangers was sealed with a pound coin being tossed across a table in Sir David's office.
Advertisement
At the time, Mr Whyte had agreed to take on obligations which included paying an £18m bank debt and £5m for players.
Sir David denied failing to carry out due diligence on Mr Whyte, saying: "I went on the facts in front of me."
Craig Whyte bought the club and its debts for £1 in 2011 [PA Media]
Challenged on whether it was morally acceptable to deprive the NHS and other public services of funds so millionaire footballers could pay less tax, Sir David replied: "They didn't do anything illegal."
"Footballers are getting paid too much. Not just at Rangers, everywhere," he went on, adding: "It's avoidance. People do that."
Advertisement
Sir David denied that the trophies Rangers had won in this period were tainted by the tax arrangements and also denied that the scheme amounted to buying success, or financial doping.
"Not at all," he replied, adding: "It was proven in the end it wasn't an illegal tax scheme."
Sectarianism, steel and Sir Sean Connery
Sir David built his fortune in the metal industry before turning to football [PA Media]
Sir David made his name in the steel industry, forming the company Murray International Metals Limited by the age of 23.
In 1988, he purchased Rangers for £6m and went on to see the club win 15 league championships and 20 domestic Cups.
He and manager Graeme Souness signed the club's first high-profile Catholic player since World War Two - Mo Johnston, who previously played for Celtic - in 1989.
Advertisement
Reflecting on sectarian tensions in Glasgow, which he described in his book as "vitriol", Sir David said the continued singing of sectarian songs at Ibrox was not acceptable.
"There's no place for that in society," he said. "I don't think it's right and I've said that and I lost some of the support of the Rangers fans by saying that."
Sir David's early success as Rangers owner was achieved with manager Graeme Souness [SNS]
The businessman also called for an inquiry into the Scottish government's involvement in the sale of two steel processing plants in Lanarkshire to the tycoon Sanjeev Gupta.
The sale was backed by a £7m support package from the Scottish government.
Advertisement
Sir David claims ministers rejected his rival bid to purchase the business because it was potentially incompatible with state aid rules, and criticised Mr Gupta's management of Liberty Steel in the years since.
The Scottish government it had "acted quickly" to support the transaction, adding: "This intervention sustained over 100 jobs at Dalzell and retained steelmaking capacity in Scotland."
Sir David was also critical of the industrial policies of both the Scottish and UK governments saying: "It's ridiculous that Britain does not have the capacity to make a steel plate for its defence."
Sir David lost his legs after a car accident at the start of his business career [SNS]
Elsewhere in his book, Sir David describes in detail the car accident in 1976 that led to his legs being amputated at the age of 24, a year after founding his metals business.
Advertisement
On the way home from a game of rugby in his fibreglass Lotus, a tyre blowout sent him off the road and into a tree.
Sir David described how fellow rugby players stopped to help him, using their ties as tourniquets before he was taken to hospital for life-saving surgery.
"None of us know how tough we are until the time we find out how tough we are," he said.
"I had a young son of several months old and a boy of two. I'd a young wife. My father had just passed away. I could only go one way. I couldn't fail. I have a responsibility," he added.
Another chapter in the autobiography is dedicated to Sir Sean Connery, who was a close friend of Sir David's.
Advertisement
The book describes how the pair travelled to Dunblane in the aftermath of the murder of 16 children and their teacher in the Scottish town on 13 March 1996.
"It was after the terrible news up there that Sean wanted to visit it. And I took him up with some flowers, and quietly he stood for a minute and put some flowers at the school gates. A very difficult moment," said Sir David.
"He was such a patriot, Sean. He took an interest in Scotland every day and he just wanted to be there."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Starmer says fixing welfare is a 'moral imperative'
Sir Keir Starmer has said the UK's benefits system is broken and fixing it is a "moral imperative", a day after a backbench Labour revolt saw him forced into a U-turn on welfare cuts. The prime minister told the Welsh Labour Party conference in Llandudno that the government would not take away the welfare "safety net that vulnerable people rely on". But he said he could not let benefits "become a snare for those who can and want to work". Despite the government's concession on its plans to reform welfare, some Labour MPs want further changes, while the Unite union has called for the proposal to be dropped altogether ahead of a vote on Tuesday. PM's benefit cuts U-turn leaves backbenchers feeling bruised We've got the right balance, says PM after benefits U-turn Faisal Islam: How much will U-turn on disability benefits cost? The BBC understands whips and cabinet ministers - including Wes Streeting, Angela Rayner and Rachel Reeves - have been phoning or texting Labour MPs over the weekend, going through the names of the initial rebels in a bid to get an accurate assessment of potential voting. Some MPs are saying they have yet to make their mind up on how to vote and are awaiting a statement on Monday from Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall that will spell out government concessions. Speaking at the conference in north Wales on Saturday, Sir Keir said fixing the "broken" benefits system needed to be done because it was "failing people every day", leaving "a generation of young people written off for good and the cost spiralling out of control". "Fixing it is a moral imperative, but we need to do it in a Labour way," he added. The government's initial plans, aimed at bringing down the welfare bill, would have made it harder for people to claim personal independence payment (Pip), a benefit paid to 3.7 million people with long-term physical or mental health conditions. But following a rebellion among Labour MPs and the likelihood the government would be defeated in the Commons, the government announced the stricter criteria would only apply to new claimants. It reversed its plans to freeze the health-related component of universal credit, and the payment will now rise in line with inflation for existing recipients. Ministers will also carry out a review of the Pip assessment process, with input from disability organisations. A £1bn support package to help people into work, originally scheduled for 2029, will be fast-tracked. A new "reasoned amendment" to the bill will be put down on Monday by rebel MPs, which will reflect government concessions but is expected to be similar to the now-withdrawn earlier amendment that sought to block changes to the benefits system. The BBC understands that around 50 Labour MPs currently back that new amendment. That number is likely to increase but the expectation is it will not reach the 80-plus needed to put the government in danger of defeat. However it would still represent a significant rebellion. Rebel MPs are also expected to hold a briefing on Monday night at Westminster with various disability charities. Labour MP Diane Abbott earlier told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that she thought the result of a vote on the new plans would be tight, partly because backbenchers are still "upset about the lack of consultation" and because of "the notion of a two-tier benefit system". But former Labour justice secretary Lord Falconer told the programme that "sensible" changes to the welfare reforms were "pretty significant", and that he believed opposition among Labour MPs was "shrinking and shrinking". Debbie Abrahams, the Labour MP who chairs the Work and Pensions Select Committee, told the BBC on Friday: "The concessions are a good start, they are very good concessions and they will protect existing claimants. "However there are still concerns about new claimants. It would not be right for me not to do anything just to spare the prime minister an inconvenience." Ahead of Sir Keir's conference speech, Unite called for the "entire welfare bill to be dropped and for the government to start again", with general secretary Sharon Graham accusing Labour of "attacking the most vulnerable in our society". "The government's latest plans for disabled benefits cuts are divisive and sinister," she said. "Creating a two-tier system where younger disabled people and those who become disabled in the future will be disadvantaged and denied access to work and education, is morally wrong."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Business Secretary meeting Lotus after reports of plans to scrap UK carmaking
The Business Secretary will hold talks with Lotus after the carmaker appeared to shelve plans to shut its UK operations. After reports that Chinese owner Geely was planning to stop manufacturing at the Hethel plant in Norfolk, putting 1,300 jobs at risk, Lotus issued a statement saying it had 'no plans' to close the factory. Jonathan Reynolds will speak to the company on Sunday, the PA news agency understands. The British sportscar brand has been majority-owned by Chinese multinational Geely since 2017. The Financial Times had reported it was considering shutting up shop in the UK and in favour of a new plant in the US. On Saturday, Lotus sought to assuage concerns with a statement that it remains 'committed' to the UK, which it called its largest commercial market in Europe and the 'heart' of the brand. 'Lotus Cars is continuing normal operations, and there are no plans to close the factory,' it said. 'We are actively exploring strategic options to enhance efficiency and ensure global competitiveness in the evolving market. 'We have invested significantly in R&D and operations in the UK, over the past six years. Lotus remains committed to the UK, and its customers, employees, dealers, suppliers, as well as its proud British heritage.' A Government spokesperson said: 'The Government does not comment on speculation or the commercial affairs of private companies.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
PM ‘incapable of sticking to a decision' after welfare U-turn
The Prime Minister is 'incapable of sticking to a decision' after he made a major U-turn on welfare reforms in the face of a backbench rebellion, Kemi Badenoch will say. The reforms would only have made 'modest reductions to the ballooning welfare bill', but Sir Keir Starmer was 'too weak to hold the line', the Conservative Party leader is expected to say. In a speech to the Local Government Association Annual Conference in Liverpool on Wednesday, Ms Badenoch will criticise Sir Keir for creating a 'punishing welfare trap that shuts people out of going back to work'. 'This week, the Prime Minister backed down on limited reforms that would have made modest reductions to the ballooning welfare bill,' she will say. 'He was too weak to hold the line. 'The result? A punishing welfare trap that shuts people out of going back to work. 'Right now, Labour are making everything worse. And Keir Starmer sums up exactly what's wrong with politics today. 'Now that his backbenchers smell blood, there's almost certainly another climb down on the two-child benefit cap in the offing. 'Labour told us 'the adults were back in charge', but this is actually amateur hour. The Prime Minister is incapable of sticking to a decision. 'If he can't make relatively small savings to a benefits bill that is set to exceed £100 billion by 2030, how can we expect him to meet his promised 5% defence spending, or ever take the tough decisions necessary to bring down the national debt?' On Saturday, the Prime Minister told the Welsh Labour conference the 'broken' welfare system must be fixed 'in a Labour way'. In a speech to the Welsh Labour conference, he said: 'We cannot take away the safety net that vulnerable people rely on, and we won't, but we also can't let it become a snare for those who can and want to work,' the Prime Minister said. 'Everyone agrees that our welfare system is broken: failing people every day, a generation of young people written off for good and the cost spiralling out of control. 'Fixing it is a moral imperative, but we need to do it in a Labour way.'