
Edward Keegan: NASCAR has embraced the Chicago backdrop, but will it return?
The NASCAR Chicago Street Race.
If it sounds a bit edgy, that's certainly by design.
And the race has had its challenges.
First it was the smoky haze of Canadian wildfires.
Then it was rain.
And finally, it was the darkness of nightfall.
And that was just the inaugural race in 2023.
Oh, and the noise and the street closures that lasted for weeks before and after the race. And most folks who live in the immediate vicinity of the Grant Park racecourse were not NASCAR fans before the race and probably aren't now either.
Like architecture, much of the appeal of motorsports is aesthetic. The cars are sleek, or at least as sleek as purpose-built vehicles molded to resemble Chevrolet Camaros, Ford Mustangs and Toyota Camrys can be. And they are as bright and colorful as each sponsor is willing. And the speed and the sound add to the spectacle.
With each of these elements, the NASCAR Chicago Street Race is an exceptionally well-conceived and packaged design mirror of ourselves.
Chicago's history with auto racing stretches back to the earliest automobile race held in the United States on Thanksgiving Day in 1895. Fun fact: The Jackson Park to Evanston course traversed Michigan Avenue and included two blocks that are part of the NASCAR Chicago Street Race course. Nearby Soldier Field hosted races from 1935 to 1970, including NASCAR in 1956 and 1957. More recently, the now-defunct Chicago Motor Speedway in Cicero fielded IndyCars and some of NASCAR's minor league series from 1999 to 2002, and both major series have raced at Joliet's Chicagoland Speedway, which is now owned by NASCAR.
But what these races lacked was the Chicago backdrop to the racing — something NASCAR has completely embraced during the last three years.
Because what's most important is how it looks on TV.
Almost every sporting event held in the city, whether it's at Soldier Field, Wrigley Field, Rate Field or the United Center, will show Grant Park and the Loop from a helicopter-mounted camera sometime during the event. But holding NASCAR's race in the park allows them to spotlight the city in a very particular way.
Chicago's image is no longer just Willis Tower and the building formerly known as John Hancock Center. Newer tall buildings, including Trump Tower and the St. Regis, are more dominant from NASCAR's Grant Park perch.
The Michigan Avenue street wall, long the classic Chicago skyline scene, has been extended in recent years by new development south of Ida B. Wells Drive including Helmut Jahn's striking 1000M, Krueck + Sexton's folded glass-faced Spertus Institute and Rafael Viñoly's distinctive, if mediocre, NEMA. And there are the older buildings along Michigan Avenue as well: Adler & Sullivan's Auditorium Building, Solon Beman's Fine Arts Building, Burnham and Root's Railway Exchange Building, and John Moutoussamy's Johnson Publishing Co. building, to name just a few.
NASCAR and the Chicago Street Race highlight all of these distinctive — and very Chicago — buildings in a way that will endure.
The best-known street course in the world has been in use for almost a century: the Grand Prix of Monaco in Monte Carlo. That enclave of wealth on the Mediterranean certainly doesn't need the grand prix in much the same way that Chicago doesn't need the NASCAR Chicago Street Race.
But it's interesting to consider them together.
The backdrop in Monaco includes the Belle Epoque Casino, the Mediterranean harbor, small shop fronts for luxury good purveyors and concrete cliffs filled with the pied-à-terre of the uber-rich. The NASCAR Chicago Street Race's background is, let's say, different. But it's just as compelling. And while Formula 1's multimillion-dollar bespoke cars reflect Monaco's place in the world economy, NASCAR's 'stock' cars are probably the best expression of Chicago. A bit brash, a bit ordinary, a lot noisy and prone to wrecks.
Monaco is so good at its build that traffic navigates the racecourse within hours of on-track activity each day of the race weekend. It's too early to expect that here, but the build-out of the track and its support structures has become shorter with each year, reflecting NASCAR's efficiency and learning from experience.
Finally, there's the racing itself. I had my doubts about how NASCAR's full body cars would race on this layout. But even with dreadful weather both years, it's proved to be a very entertaining track. The wide straightaways along Columbus and DuSable Lake Shore drives promote good side-by-side action and passing. Although the two one-block-long stretches on Michigan Avenue are good for photography, they are far too narrow to be either challenging or conducive to racing. But while the portion of track between them, the semicircular stretch through Congress Plaza, doesn't promote much passing, it is a great place to see up close how difficult these cars are to drive. The change in elevation — up and then down — while navigating a broad left turn really gets these cars to the edge of control, and it's quite entertaining to watch them skate through this section.
And unlike the open wheel cars of IndyCar and Formula 1, not every contact between cars is likely to slow the race with a full-course yellow flag. Stock cars can often take some bumping and continue on without major incident. And it's proved to be a safe track as well.
It will not be surprising if NASCAR announces in the coming days that it won't be back in Chicago next year. The initial contract runs its course with next week's race, although there are options for two additional years if NASCAR and the city agree to continue. The sanctioning body has let several other nontraditional races lapse after just a few years, and they're reportedly in talks with San Diego about a street race for 2026.
Presumably there would be a lot less grit involved, but probably a lot better weather in store.
Edward Keegan writes, broadcasts and teaches on architectural subjects. Keegan's biweekly architecture column is supported by a grant from former Tribune critic Blair Kamin, as administered by the not-for-profit Journalism Funding Partners. The Tribune maintains editorial control over assignments and content.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
44 minutes ago
- USA Today
Fanatics Sportsbook Promo: Choose up to $300 in Bonus Bets or $1000 in No Sweat Bets
The United States has a golden opportunity to win the CONCACAF Gold Cup for the eighth time since the competition began in 1991. The ride begins tonight in Minneapolis as the USMNT is favored to beat Costa Rica in quarterfinal play. If this match inspires you to play a wager or two today, then it's a great day to learn about the Fanatics Sportsbook promo that plunks a bunch bonus bets, No Sweat Bets or profit-boost tokens into your new account. Here's what we mean: New bettors playing in Michigan, New Jersey and Pennsylvania are guaranteed $300 in bonus bets just for playing $30 in first bets in a three-day span. New bettors in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, North Carolina, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia will clinch $250 in bonus bets by making $50 in first bets over a five-day run. New bettors in every state where Fanatics Sportsbook is a popular thing (except New York) have the chance to opt for the flagship Fanatics Sportsbook welcome offer that leads to as much as $1,000 in No Sweat Bets over a 10-day stretch. Don't worry if you're a new bettor playing in New York because you get rewarded, too. You receive one 100% profit-boost token each day for 10 straight days. The Gold Cup happens every two years, but the United States has established a pattern of winning it every four years — and 2025 is next on the arithmetic progression because the USMNT beat Mexico in the 2021 title game, Jamaica in the 2017 title game and Panama in the 2013 title game. To check the latest odds, download the Fanatics Sportsbook app to your phone — giving yourself access to one of the industry's best sports betting apps — click the Soccer Hub icon, then the Futures tab. You'll notice the United States are a decent favorite to knock off Costa Rica tonight and advance to Wednesday's semifinal in St. Louis. You'll also see Mexico is a slight favorite over the USA to win the whole thing. Ready to play on the Gold Cup, FIFA's Club World Cup, NASCAR, MLB, golf or any of the many other events happening today? It's an extremely quick process to set up your account with the Fanatics Sportsbook promo. Click any BET NEW button you see, answer a few questions and you'll soon see bonus bets, No Sweat Bets or profit-boost tokens flooding into your account. It's the highest-reward, lowest-risk of all sportsbook promos out there. Fanatics Sportsbook Promo: Score Up to $300 Bonus or $1000 in No Sweat Bets It's a good day to spend time checking out the MLB schedule. The Sunday Night Baseball game is particularly intriguing because it's not the same old Yankees/Dodgers/Red Sox/Mets deal. The Detroit Tigers, who boast the best record in the bigs, get to host on Sunday night for the first time in eight years. Better yet, reigning Cy Young Award winner Tarik Skubal will be on the mound. Not only does he has a 9-2 record and 2.29 ERA, the Tigers have won 10 of his last 11 starts. Check out the latest MLB odds to bet either on the game or on Skubal's likely exploits. We're still a couple months away from the start of the NASCAR Cup playoffs, but drivers are starting to sweat because the big names keep hogging all the victories. That could be the case again tonight in Atlanta as Ryan Blaney is the favorite to win the Quaker State 400. It takes just two minutes to launch an account that will enable you to play on any sport you want. Hit a nearby BET NOW button and answer a few questions so you can take advantage of the Fanatics Sportsbook promo. Soon your account will be flooded with bonus bets, No Sweat Bets or profit-boost tokens. How to Unlock the Fanatic Sports Promo Welcome Offers In just a few simple steps you can lock in your Fanatics Sportsbook promo. The Fanatics Sportsbook promo bet-and-get offers require a $10 qualifying bet on odds of -500 or better. In MI, NJ and PA, that qualifying bet returns $100 in bonus bets each day for three days. In AZ, CO, IL, IN, LA, MA, MD, NC, OH, TN, VA and WV, the $10 qualifying wager earns $50 in bonus bets each day for five days. If you choose either of these options, you will be automatically opted-in on Day 1 but you must opt-in manually on the subsequent days. Those in DC, IA, KS, KY, VT and WY, plus those in the above listed states, can get the No Sweat Bets offer instead of the bet-and-get offer can chose any bet at -500 odds or better to be your No Sweat Bet for up to $100 daily over a 10-day period. If that wager settles as a loss, Fanatics will provide a bonus-bet refund. Bettors in New York get a 100% profit boost daily for 10 days. Bonus bets provided by any of the Fanatics Sportsbook promo offers will be deposited within 72 hours of placing your qualifying bet. Divide up your bonus bets however you choose but use them within seven days of being deposited before they expire.

an hour ago
Sabalenka's Wimbledon foe is Carson Branstine, a qualifier from California, Canada and Texas A&M
LONDON -- There are plenty of tennis players who might be daunted by the prospect of making their Grand Slam debut against someone ranked No. 1 and in a big stadium — in this case, Aryna Sabalenka at Wimbledon's No. 1 Court. Carson Branstine, though, is embracing the circumstances she'll find herself in Monday. Branstine, 24, is a dual U.S.-Canadian citizen — she was born in California and represents Canada, where her mother is from — and helped Texas A&M win the 2024 NCAA title. She is ranked just inside the top 200, but made it into the women's bracket at the All England Club by winning three matches in qualifying last week. 'It's not like I'm a beginner. This is my job, too. We're playing the same tournament, right? It's just exciting. It's cool. And I love that for myself,' Branstine said. 'You never know what can happen. And I like it. I wouldn't want it any other way. This is the coolest thing.' Besides, facing, and eliminating, the top seed is becoming routine lately for her: This is the third consecutive event this month where Branstine is going up against a foe seeded No. 1. She beat Liudmila Samsonova at a grass-court tournament in the Netherlands, then started off Wimbledon qualifying by defeating Loïs Boisson, who was coming off a surprising run to the French Open semifinals. 'Well, of course I go out with: Why not? Because there's a lot of factors in tennis, more than just playing. You never know what can be happening on each side, behind closed doors. It's Wimbledon. It's (Sabalenka's) first round; you've seen a lot of players have tight matches in their first rounds against players that you'd never imagine that (it) would be close,' Branstine said. 'That could easily happen on Monday. You never know. With my game, maybe God's going to come down and say, 'You're going to have the best tennis of your life. You're not going to miss a single ball right now.'' Branstine credits her big serve and confidence to match with driving her recent success. When Sabalenka — a three-time Grand Slam champion and the runner-up to Coco Gauff at Roland-Garros three weeks ago — was asked Saturday what she knows about Branstine, her playing style was not what came to mind. 'I know that she's super pretty,' Sabalenka replied with a laugh. 'The other day, I opened social media, and she was giving an interview. ... I was like, 'Oh, my God, this girl is so beautiful.' ... That's all I know so far.' Sabalenka planned to discuss tactics with her team and watch some of Branstine's past matches to familiarize herself with what to expect on court. 'It's not easy to face someone you've never seen before,' said Sabalenka, who missed Wimbledon a year ago because of an injured shoulder. 'I know that I'll be prepared for her game.' This is the sort of stage Branstine thought about getting to when she was a kid attending the tournament in Indian Wells. 'You go and you see those big courts and you imagine, 'What if that was me? That's my dream. I want to do that one day.' And now it's here,' she said. 'So it's a dream I get to check off my list, and no matter what happens, I'm going to have that for the rest of my life: I got to play the No. 1 player at Court 1 at Wimbledon. It's pretty cool. So I just want to embrace it, really. I just want to take in the moment and play every single point. It's still another match. ... And, you know, you never know what can happen.'


Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Sabalenka's Wimbledon foe is Carson Branstine, a qualifier from California, Canada and Texas A&M
LONDON (AP) — There are plenty of tennis players who might be daunted by the prospect of making their Grand Slam debut against someone ranked No. 1 and in a big stadium — in this case, Aryna Sabalenka at Wimbledon's No. 1 Court. Carson Branstine, though, is embracing the circumstances she'll find herself in Monday. Branstine, 24, is a dual U.S.-Canadian citizen — she was born in California and represents Canada, where her mother is from — and helped Texas A&M win the 2024 NCAA title. She is ranked just inside the top 200, but made it into the women's bracket at the All England Club by winning three matches in qualifying last week. 'It's not like I'm a beginner. This is my job, too. We're playing the same tournament, right? It's just exciting. It's cool. And I love that for myself,' Branstine said. 'You never know what can happen. And I like it. I wouldn't want it any other way. This is the coolest thing.' Besides, facing, and eliminating, the top seed is becoming routine lately for her: This is the third consecutive event this month where Branstine is going up against a foe seeded No. 1. She beat Liudmila Samsonova at a grass-court tournament in the Netherlands, then started off Wimbledon qualifying by defeating Loïs Boisson , who was coming off a surprising run to the French Open semifinals. 'Well, of course I go out with: Why not? Because there's a lot of factors in tennis, more than just playing. You never know what can be happening on each side, behind closed doors. It's Wimbledon. It's (Sabalenka's) first round; you've seen a lot of players have tight matches in their first rounds against players that you'd never imagine that (it) would be close,' Branstine said. 'That could easily happen on Monday. You never know. With my game, maybe God's going to come down and say, 'You're going to have the best tennis of your life. You're not going to miss a single ball right now.'' Branstine credits her big serve and confidence to match with driving her recent success. When Sabalenka — a three-time Grand Slam champion and the runner-up to Coco Gauff at Roland-Garros three weeks ago — was asked Saturday what she knows about Branstine, her playing style was not what came to mind. 'I know that she's super pretty,' Sabalenka replied with a laugh. 'The other day, I opened social media, and she was giving an interview. ... I was like, 'Oh, my God, this girl is so beautiful.' ... That's all I know so far.' Sabalenka planned to discuss tactics with her team and watch some of Branstine's past matches to familiarize herself with what to expect on court. 'It's not easy to face someone you've never seen before,' said Sabalenka, who missed Wimbledon a year ago because of an injured shoulder. 'I know that I'll be prepared for her game.' This is the sort of stage Branstine thought about getting to when she was a kid attending the tournament in Indian Wells. 'You go and you see those big courts and you imagine, 'What if that was me? That's my dream. I want to do that one day.' And now it's here,' she said. 'So it's a dream I get to check off my list, and no matter what happens, I'm going to have that for the rest of my life: I got to play the No. 1 player at Court 1 at Wimbledon. It's pretty cool. So I just want to embrace it, really. I just want to take in the moment and play every single point. It's still another match. ... And, you know, you never know what can happen.' ___ Howard Fendrich has been the AP's tennis writer since 2002. Find his stories here: . More AP tennis: