logo
US Black Hawk Pilot Says He Has Religious Right to Sell LSD

US Black Hawk Pilot Says He Has Religious Right to Sell LSD

Newsweek25-04-2025
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A helicopter pilot in the U.S. Army has argued that he has the religious right to sell LSD on the dark web.
Black Hawk pilot Kyle Norton Riester claimed in a civil lawsuit that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 allowed him to sell and take the hallucinogenic drug because his "sacramental use" of LSD was part of a communal "religious exercise."
The government is currently investigating Riester for drug trafficking. He denies the charge, saying he was facilitating religious experiences for himself and his community, although he has admitted to selling LSD over the internet and has asked for injunctive relief from those accusing him of drug trafficking.
Riester's religious freedom request for relief and his request to continue taking LSD while proceedings are ongoing were rejected by Judge Anthony J. Trenga this week.
A lawyer for Riester has been contacted via email for further comment.
An illustration shows a hallucinogenic drug.
An illustration shows a hallucinogenic drug.
Peter Hamlin/AP Illustration
Why It Matters
Religious liberty is a fundamental tenet of the U.S. Constitution, however, Trenga has ruled it does not stretch to selling illegal drugs via the dark web.
Any consumption of a hallucinogenic drug is also a disqualifying factor for pilots, per Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations.
What To Know
Riester filed his case against Attorney General Pam Bondi and several other members of the Trump administration on April 3.
The Virginia-based first lieutenant, who is currently serving on active duty with the 12th Aviation Battalion, has argued that he "is a sincere religious practitioner" whose religious practice of sacramental LSD consumption is being impeded by the defendants.
An Army spokesperson told The Washington Post that Riester's discharge is pending and that he had been reassigned to administrative duties.
Riester had his first experience with the Schedule I drug while attending the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University. He says this experience "was deeply religious and mystical in nature—allowing him direct communion with his creator."
According to his court filings, Riester claims that he used to consume LSD with a group of other religious practitioners in person, but that became more difficult during the COVID-19 pandemic.
During that time of "desperate need," he felt "a moral and religious obligation to provide his co-religionists with Sacrament should they be unable to acquire Sacrament-grade LSD safely and securely," which is why he "adapted" to an online marketplace to sell LSD to his community.
He used Bitcoin to facilitate these alleged transactions and has said he also believes Bitcoin to be sacred because of its "ability to facilitate transactions for the exchange of his Holy Sacrament to other co-religionists."
His religion was not named in court documents or at Wednesday's hearing but Riester said his religious beliefs can be corroborated through Substack articles shared by him between 2021 and 2022. Those posts no longer appear to be available on Substack.
His filings state that he sold LSD via the dark web between September 2022 and May 2024.
This illustrative image shows a poster showing the seized website screen dark web site Deep.Dot.Web during a news conference in Pittsburgh on May 8, 2019.
This illustrative image shows a poster showing the seized website screen dark web site Deep.Dot.Web during a news conference in Pittsburgh on May 8, 2019.
Keith Srakocic/AP Photo
His home was raided on August 5, 2024, where FBI agents found no evidence of the drug itself but did seize electronic items and demanded Reister take a urine test.
He spent months collaborating with law enforcement officials after the raid and was given an April 4 deadline to take a plea deal.
Riester argued that any plea that forced him to cease the use of LSD would be an infringement of his religious rights and would cause him to "suffer irreparable harm to his conscience and religious identity."
Riester's lawyers argue that the government "has no compelling interest in enforcing the Controlled Substances Act against the plaintiff" because, according to their filings "LSD has been long-noted to have both a health and safety and abuse profile of a sufficient quality to negate any alleged 'compelling' governmental interest in enforcing the criminal provisions of the Controlled Substances Act."
These arguments have been refuted by U.S. Attorneys who have said that Riester only claimed religious freedom grounds eight months after finding out about his drug trafficking investigation.
They say that: "He did not sell LSD in the context of a religious gathering or ritual, or to people with whom he shared spiritual experiences; he sold LSD on the dark web, a forum designed to ensure the anonymity of its users. These circumstances strongly suggest that Plaintiff's distribution was a 'personal belief' and a 'choice that he made,' rather than a spiritual practice."
The attorneys also dispute the idea that Riester was only selling LSD to religious practitioners. According to their suit, he sold LSD to a 15-year-old and an undercover law enforcement officer. They claim that Riester did not make any effort when selling the drug to ensure that it only went to religious practitioners.
What People Are Saying
Kyle Norton Riester court filings: "Plaintiff has primarily engaged in LSD use as part of a communal and intentional ritual, ceremony, and/or practice aimed at spiritual transformation and religious revelation preferring communal sellings which promote safety, reflection, and shared religious experience."
U.S. attorney's office for the Eastern District of Virginia court filings: "Even if Plaintiff could show a sincerely held religious belief in distribution, courts have long recognized the government's compelling interest in preventing the diversion of controlled substances from religious to recreational users.
"That risk is especially acute here, where Plaintiff solicited customers through the anonymous dark web and shipped at least 1,797 orders of LSD to users across the country. Indeed, the risk of diversion from Plaintiff's sales is more than theoretical—the government can prove that Plaintiff actually sold LSD to a minor as well as an undercover officer. The government can police the diversion of drugs on the dark web only by prosecuting those, like Plaintiff, who engage in it."
What Happens Next
As a result of his motions pleading religious exemptions, Riester missed the April 4 deadline to sign a plea deal drafted by the government, which would have resulted in him pleading guilty to a number of charges. He will now face a trial which is set to begin in July.
Riester is also facing another court case in Texas over alleged money laundering.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What's known and not yet known about the Justice Department's scrutiny of Trump-Russia probe origins
What's known and not yet known about the Justice Department's scrutiny of Trump-Russia probe origins

San Francisco Chronicle​

time6 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

What's known and not yet known about the Justice Department's scrutiny of Trump-Russia probe origins

WASHINGTON (AP) — News that Attorney General Pam Bondi is moving to criminally investigate the Obama-era origins of the Trump-Russia investigation means that one of the most studied, and politically polarizing, chapters of modern American history will be under the microscope yet again. A saga with a long backstory Perhaps no issue continues to aggravate President Donald Trump more than the assessment by intelligence officials that Russia interfered in the 2016 election on his behalf and the investigation by law enforcement into whether his campaign colluded with Moscow to tip the outcome of the contest. Robert Mueller, the former FBI director tapped as special counsel by Trump's first Justice Department to investigate, found that Russia had waged a multi-prong operation in Trump's favor and that the Republican president's campaign welcomed the aid. But Mueller did not find sufficient evidence of a criminal conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign. As president for a second time, Trump has made no secret of his desire to use the Justice Department as a weapon of retribution against perceived political adversaries he sees as having smeared him, including by calling for Obama-era officials to be jailed. And his administration, now more broadly and across multiple agencies, has been engaged in a effort to reopen the long-accepted conclusion — including among prominent Republicans — of Russian interference and to scrutinize the officials involved in reaching that assessment. A Bondi grand jury directive Bondi, a Trump loyalist, has directed Justice Department prosecutors to present evidence related to the Russia inquiry to a grand jury. Grand juries are tools used by prosecutors to issue subpoenas for records and prosecutors and to produce indictments based on the evidence they receive. The bar is low for an indictment given that the presentation of evidence by prosecutors is one-sided, though grand juries do have the option to decline to indict and have done so in the past. A person familiar with the matter confirmed Bondi's directive to The Associated Press but key questions remain. It was not disclosed, for instance, which prosecutors are pursuing the investigation, where the grand jury that might hear evidence is located and whether and when law enforcement officials might seek to bring criminal charges. The Justice Department, in an unusual statement last month, appeared to confirm the existence of an investigation into former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director James Brennan but provided no details or specifics. Potential targets of probe remain unclear It's not clear who might be targeted in the investigation, but the Trump administration has been aggressively challenging intelligence community conclusions about Russia's actions and intentions that had long ago seemed settled. It's been a welcome diversion for the administration as it confronts a wave of criticism from Trump's base and conservative influencers over the handling of records from the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking investigation. In the last month, Trump administration officials and allies have released a series of documents aimed at casting doubt on the extent of interference and at portraying the original Russia investigation as an Obama administration frame-job. The documents have been hailed as incontrovertible proof of a conspiracy, but a close inspection of the records shows they fall well short of that. Among the documents released by Tulsi Gabbard, the administration's director of national intelligence, are emails from 2016 showing that Obama administration officials recognized in 2016 that Russians had not hacked state election systems to manipulate votes in favor of Trump. But the absence of evidence that votes were switched — something the Obama administration never alleged — has no bearing on the ample evidence of other forms of Russia interference, including a hack-and-leak operation involving Democratic emails and a covert social media campaign aimed at sowing discord and spreading disinformation. Last week, Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, released a previously classified annex of a 2023 report by John Durham, the special counsel appointed by the first Trump administration to hunt for government misconduct in the Russia probe. The annex included a series of emails, including one from July 2016 that was purportedly sent by a senior staffer at a philanthropic organization founded by billionaire investor George Soros, that referred to a plan approved by then-Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to falsely link Trump to Russia. But Durham's own report took pain to note that investigators had not corroborated the communications as authentic and said the best assessment was that the message was 'a composites of several emails' the Russians had obtained from hacking — raising the likelihood that it was a product of Russian disinformation. Fresh scrutiny has also centered around the intelligence community assessment on Russian election interference, which was published in January 2017. An annex in a classified version of the assessment contained a summary of the so-called Steele dossier — a compilation of opposition research that included uncorroborated rumors and salacious gossip about Trump and Russia. The latest in a series of investigations Multiple government reports, including not only from Mueller but also a Republican-led Senate intelligence committee that included current Secretary of State Marco Rubio, have documented Russia's activities in sweeping details. To be sure, reports from the Justice Department inspector general and Durham also identified significant flaws in the FBI's Russia investigation, including errors and omissions in applications the Justice Department submitted to a secretive surveillance court to eavesdrop on a national security adviser to the 2016 Trump campaign. But Durham found no criminal wrongdoing among government officials, bringing three criminal cases — two against private citizens that resulted in acquittals at trial and a third against a little-known FBI lawyer who pleaded guilty to doctoring an email. It is unclear if there is any criminal wrongdoing that exists that Durham, who launched his investigation in 2019 and concluded it four years later, somehow missed during his sprawling inquiry.

One Person Murdered Every 30 Minutes in US—FBI
One Person Murdered Every 30 Minutes in US—FBI

Newsweek

time7 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

One Person Murdered Every 30 Minutes in US—FBI

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A person is killed every 30 minutes in the United States, according to the latest crime data report from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The Uniform Crime Reporting Program (UCR) tracked crime throughout the country over 2024 and found that overall gun crimes and homicides had decreased. The data showed that a violent crime occurred, on average, every 25.9 seconds in 2024 in the US, while a murder occurred every 31.1 minutes and a rape occurred every 4.1 minutes. Overall violent crime decreased an estimated 4.5 percent from 2023 to 2024, the report said. Hate crimes were also reported to have decreased by 1.5 percent over the last year. This is a breaking news story. Updates to come.

Death row inmates challenge new Arkansas law allowing executions by nitrogen gas
Death row inmates challenge new Arkansas law allowing executions by nitrogen gas

San Francisco Chronicle​

time36 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Death row inmates challenge new Arkansas law allowing executions by nitrogen gas

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — Several Arkansas death row inmates sued the state Tuesday to block a new law allowing executions by nitrogen gas, saying the measure gives prison officials unconstitutionally broad authority to decide how they should die. Ten inmates filed the lawsuit in state court challenging the law signed this year by Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders. Supporters have promoted the law as a way to carry out executions for the first time in eight years. Arkansas has 23 people on death row. Arkansas hasn't executed an inmate since 2017, when the state put four men to death before a drug used in its lethal injection process expired. The state has been unable to purchase more lethal injection drugs since because of manufacturers' opposition to their use in executions, the attorney general's office has said. Attorneys for the inmates argue the law violates Arkansas' constitution by giving the Division of Correction authority to decide whether to use lethal injection or nitrogen gas for an execution. The law is also unclear on details surrounding the use of nitrogen gas, the suit says. 'This leaves only questions,' including how the gas would be obtained and how it would be administered, the lawsuit said. Attorney General Tim Griffin said in a statement that his office was aware of the lawsuit and was ready to 'vigorously defend' the new law. Under the nitrogen hypoxia execution method, an inmate is forced to breathe the gas and deprived of the oxygen needed to stay alive. Opponents say the method increases suffering, citing accounts from witnesses to Alabama executions who said inmates gasped and shook during executions. State officials say those are involuntary movements associated with oxygen deprivation. Arkansas is the fifth state to approve nitrogen gas executions. Alabama, the first state to use nitrogen gas, has carried out five executions using the method since it began last year. Louisiana staged its first in March, putting to death a man convicted of killing a woman in 1996. Two other states — Mississippi and Oklahoma — have laws allowing the method but have not used it so far. Alabama's law is being challenged in federal court. The Arkansas inmates also argue that the law cannot be applied retroactively to them, since they were sentenced to die by lethal injection. Attorneys for the inmates said the lack of details on how the state would carry out nitrogen executions raises the risk of a "gruesome and torturous execution." 'Arkansas juries explicitly sentenced our clients to execution by lethal injection – not gas – and the General Assembly cannot rewrite those verdicts to impose death by this very different and highly problematic method,' Heather Fraley, an attorney for the inmates, said in a statement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store