Union's call on controversial tax issue
Speaking to the ABC, the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) secretary said the changes were needed to tackle intergenerational inequity and calm soaring house prices which have locked young people out of the market.
Under the ACTU's proposal, which will be debated at the Jim Chalmers' Economic Reform Roundtable in August, both negative gearing and capital gains tax concessions would be limited to one investment property.
Current conditions would be grandfathered for the next five years for existing homes 'to allow people to adjust'.
The move would also annually add about $1.5bn to the budget, or $6bn over the forward estimates.
'One of the biggest issues in terms of living standards for younger people in Australia is the issue of housing affordability. It's the number one issue. We need to address it,' Ms McManus said on Sunday. ACTU secretary Sally McManus urged Labor to 'bite the bullet' and enact the changes. NewsWire/ Ian Currie Credit: News Corp Australia
'Young people should have the same aspirations as the generations before them, and at the moment, then don't. It's been wiped out by the fact that the housing prices have gone up twice the rate of wages over the last 25 years.'
She said the provisions would target the 'small number of investors' who own '25 per cent of investment properties'.
Ms McManus quoted a study from the NSW Productivity Commission in 2024, which found the state was losing about 7000 people aged between 30 to 40 years old a year - something that could result in Sydney being a city with no grandchildren.
'That has been driving or fuelling the housing prices. I don't think that we ever intended even for this to happen as a result of these tax measures but this is where we're at,' she said.
'Unless we change it, unless we change it, working people can't live where they work. They can't live where they grew up.'
Asked whether Labor had the political will to enact the changes, she urged Labor to 'bite bullet' and be 'brave enough to do something about it'.
It not, they would be at risk of 'abandoning' the younger generations,' she added.
'We're going to go and argue it. We're going to advocate for it. In the end, the Government will make their decisions based on what they think is the national interest. We would say that it is in the national interest,' she said.
Previously, Labor has unsuccessfully taken changes to negative gearing and capital gains concessions to the 2016 and 2019 federal elections under former opposition leader Bill Shorten, before Anthony Albanese ended the policies.
However the government has faced pressure from grassroots advocacy group Labor for Housing to reconsider the concessions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
15 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Historic detail in top cop's shock resignation
Australian Federal Police Commissioner Reece Kershaw will retire in October, ending a near six-year run as the country's top police officer. Anthony Albanese on Monday thanked Mr Kershaw for his long service and named Deputy Commissioner Krissy Barrett as his successor. Mr Barrett will be the first female to lead the AFP. 'Reece, you have achieved an enormous amount for our nation and I hope you feel incredibly proud,' the Prime Minister told reporters at Parliament House, flanked by Mr Kershaw, Ms Barrett and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke. 'We certainly wish you all the best as you get to spend precious time with your family.' He said the outgoing commissioner 'has made an extraordinary contribution to public life, and we are deeply grateful for his service'. Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police, Reece Kershaw, has confirmed his retirement. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia Mr Albanese also said he and Mr Kershaw had developed a strong 'personal relationship' forged by 'events … we would rather not have to deal with'. 'Commissioner Kershaw has been absolutely on call 24 hours a day, seven days a week with his commitment to his fellow Australians,' he said. On Ms Barrett, he called her the 'obvious choice' to fill Mr Kershaw's shoes. Australian Federal Police Deputy Commissioner Krissy Barrett has been named the first female to lead the AFP. NewsWire / Gaye Gerard Credit: News Corp Australia 'Krissy has expertise in community policing and operations, counter-terrorism first response, serious financial crime, and transnational, serious and organised Crime,' Mr Albanese said. 'In her most recent position as a deputy commissioner with the AFP, Ms Barrett has managed the National Security portfolio. 'She is highly renowned for her leadership capability, and I've certainly seen that first-hand in the dealings that I've had with Ms Barrett, as well as the way that she has represented the AFP on matters before the National Security Committee.' More to come.
Sky News AU
15 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
‘Well over a trillion dollars': Nationals leader David Littleproud issues fresh warning on the cost of Labor's renewables revolution
Australian taxpayers may be on the hook for more than a trillion dollars to fund Labor's costly renewables rollout. The government has been told to rapidly boost its public spending to achieve its emissions reductions and renewables goals. Labor's target to reach 82 per cent renewables in the electricity grid by 2030 is set to fail by a 'big margin', according to economist Ross Garnaut who was a principal advisor to former Labor governments on climate change. The grim reality of Labor's lofty targets has triggered the productivity commission to urge the government to expand its direct investment into renewables to cut quickly cut emissions. It warned that the government's plan to cut emissions would 'come with costs', but it failed to specifically outline how much its proposed net-zero push would cost. Nationals leader David Littleproud warned the true cost to achieve the 82 per cent renewables target and the government's emissions reduction goal could top $1 trillion. 'I think we've got well over a trillion dollars that the Australian taxpayers are going to pay and you're going to pay that through your energy bill every quarter and you should see Anthony Albanese and Chris Bowen's face on that bill every quarter,' Mr Littleproud told Sky News Australia on Monday. He argued the government's capacity investment scheme as well as the "underwriting of prices" would see the true cost balloon. The Coalition's pre-election energy plan would have seen renewables contributing about 50 per cent to the electricity grid, with nuclear and gas as the baseload power sources. Modelling by Frontier Economics showed the plan would come in $264 billion cheaper than Labor's all renewables approach. 'You can't do it with renewables and it's madness to try and do it that way and that's where we should have all the energy options on the table including gas and coal with carbon capture storage,' Mr Littleproud said. The Nationals leader said the government had failed to explain how much its integrated system plan would cost Australian taxpayers. He criticised the government's persistent claims that renewables were the cheapest form of power despite plunging billions of taxpayer dollars into green subsidies. 'If they're the cheapest form of energy, why do we need to underwrite the price on which they're getting paid for? And this is where there is no transparency and I think what we'll be very upfront and honest is about having a mix,' Mr Littleproud said. The productivity commission urged Labor to develop an 'enduring, national carbon price', drawing back on the deeply unpopular policies of the Rudd-Gillard governments. Its 83-page report ahead of Treasurer Jim Chalmers' productivity commission also recommended the government give unprecedented powers to Climate Change Authority boss Matt Kean to assess and scrutinise climate change policies. In addition to factoring in the price of carbon while assessing emissions reduction plans, the report also calls for major reforms to the approval process for renewables projects. "We need to build a large amount of clean energy infrastructure to meet climate targets and ensure reliable and affordable energy supply. But our sluggish and uncertain approval processes are not up to the task," Commissioner Martin Stokie said. The Commission argues for substantive changes to the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, including the introduction of national environmental standards, improved regional planning and clear rules about engaging with local communities and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
AU Financial Review
an hour ago
- AU Financial Review
The suffering in Gaza is intolerable
Readers' letters on the Palestine march, workplace mental health, working from home, the need for public servants and home battery subsidies. Thank you to everyone who showed up at the Sydney Harbour Bridge and to the bold organisers who have worked so long and hard to carry reticent Australians towards this moment. It was a privilege to join so many tremendous humans who understood that rain was nothing alongside Palestinian suffering. There were many special moments shared in the middle of the soggy crowd: handing out tiny toy tambourines to fully grown men, joking over spare muesli bars and ponchos, finding out where folk had travelled from. Marg from Grafton (70) doesn't even get internet access, but checked details at the local library and travelled down overnight, (despite flooding on the tracks at Taree) to stay at the Y. Towards the end she borrowed one of my crutches. Mums with babies, families with double strollers, kids on scooters, mum under Disney umbrellas, the halt and lame were all swapping chants, banging pots and smiling widely. Every person seemed clear that the suffering in Gaza is intolerable. Bravo to all who put human rights and common sense ahead of fear, belief, half-truths and self-censorship. Jane Salmon, Killara, NSW I refer to the editorial ' Corporate leaders need to speak up like Ryan Stokes ' and agree that psychological injuries which lead to workers compensation claims need to be addressed. Clearly, for Stokes to raise this issue it's becoming a burden on big business and a headache for insurers. However, Westpac CEO Anthony Miller said ' more could be done ' before legislation is changed. Think about small business, who employ 900,000 people and struggle every day just to pay the bills. One psychological claim because an employee was told to improve his manner could be the first step to bankruptcy. In fact, it's not the size of the claim that destroys small business, but the significant increase in the yearly workers compensation bill. In its current form it's a sleeping cost time bomb. David Button, Breakfast Point, NSW WFH law will make Victoria even less appealing The news item about the Victorian Labor government's plan to legislate to ensure that WFH is a worker's legal right is a classic example of governmental overreach (' Vic government to enshrine WFH two days a week in law '). Premier Jacinta Allan is quoted as saying that 'it's good for the economy'. That viewpoint would be disputed by many and it will no doubt make heavily taxed Victoria an even more unattractive place for some companies and businesses to operate from within. It is disappointing that Allan is not instead focused upon working tirelessly to reduce her spendthrift government's mammoth amount of state debt. Dennis Walker, North Melbourne, Vic Remote-working themselves out of a job Now that working-from-home rosters are being institutionalised in the public sector, you must question if the same jobs could be just as effectively done in Mumbai or Manila. With the rise and rise of AI, mass redundancies are inevitable. This will do wonders for Australia's productivity as the only people left in the workforce force will be those creating and adding value. David Hurburgh, Opossum Bay, Tas Are all these public servants strictly necessary? Rather than arguing about where public servants work, we should be asking why we need them at all. Take aged care and health departments, where over 7000 employees work in non-patient-facing roles. With artificial intelligence and automation revolutionising administrative processes globally, this represents a massive productivity opportunity. Every dollar spent on bureaucratic overhead is a dollar not invested in frontline care, infrastructure, or innovation. While other nations streamline their public sectors using technology, Australia maintains bloated administrative layers that serve the bureaucracy rather than the public. The real issue isn't remote work flexibility – it's relevance. Modern AI systems can process applications, manage compliance and coordinate services faster and more accurately than human administrators. Robotic process automation can handle routine tasks 24/7 without sick leave, superannuation, or office space. Countries like Estonia have demonstrated how digital transformation can deliver better citizen services with dramatically fewer public servants. Their e-governance model processes 99% of public services online, eliminating countless administrative positions while improving service delivery. If Australia seriously wants to lift living standards and national productivity, we need a public service focused on essential functions, not job creation. This means embracing technology to eliminate redundant roles and redirecting resources toward genuine public value – teachers, nurses, police, and infrastructure. The question isn't where public servants should work, but whether many of these positions should exist at all. Peter Worn, Melbourne, Vic Home batteries are good business, too Yes, the battery subsidy really is the easy option (' Labor's home battery subsidy low hanging-fruit in energy transition '). Obviously cheaper than taxpayers footing the whole bill for the energy storage we so badly need, to carry the cheap daytime excess through to the evening. It will not only save for those who invest, it could also drive down the cost of power to all consumers. But these new batteries need to be managed wisely if they are to have the same effect as community batteries or the commercial 'big' batteries. Having played the wholesale electricity market ourselves, with Amber managing our home batteries for the last two years, it has become bleedingly obvious why the overall cost of power has gotten so high. Several times a year, the wholesale spot price for electricity goes through the roof, reaching prices more than 100 times the normal. Those who can sell energy into the market at such times are able to make a small fortune. The wholesale feed-in tariff can get to $15 or more per kilowatt hour. Our two home batteries have earned us as much as $380 in just one day. But our batteries are tiny compared to say the Tallawarra gas-fired 'peaker' across the lake from our home. A quick calculation suggests they could be earning several million dollars an hour in such circumstances. It is an expensive exercise to keep the grid working when the prices get so high, but they do it. To my knowledge, the grid hasn't suffered any blackouts due to power shortages, so we can only assume they have always had enough in reserve to keep the lights on. Clearly our privatised electricity grid can only turn on the last of the big players in the spot market by sending the price through the roof occasionally. And consumers will keep picking up that tab until there are enough suppliers in the market to take away that monopoly. Roll on Snowy 2.0, and more batteries.
