Obama attorney general endorses candidate in Wisconsin Supreme Court race
Holder is among the first major national leaders to campaign in support of Crawford.
"The fight for our democracy is unfolding at the ballot box in Wisconsin. This race is a choice between a court majority that is fair, balanced, and pro-democracy, and one that is anti-democracy, acting as another arm of an extreme right-wing agenda," Holder said in a statement to ABC News.
"Judge Susan Crawford is the commonsense candidate Wisconsinites want and deserve on their state's highest court -- somone who will follow the facts and the law as she evaluates the cases before her," he added.
While the race is technically nonpartisan, Crawford is running with the support of Democrats, while her opponent, Brad Schimel, has the support of Republicans.
Redistricting, or the redrawing of congressional and legislative district maps based on population data, is one of the issues that has come up in the closely watched race because the court has previously dealt with redistricting cases.
In 2024, the court ruled in favor of keeping Wisconsin's current congressional district map in place after previously rejecting legislative district maps.
Holder will be campaigning in support of Crawford on Monday in Madison, Wisconsin, and on Tuesday in Milwaukee.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court election is on April 1, and the contest for the seat of retiring Justice Ann Walsh Bradley is technically a nonpartisan race, though whoever wins the seat will help determine the ideological bent of the court -- which currently leans liberal.
Obama attorney general endorses candidate in Wisconsin Supreme Court race originally appeared on abcnews.go.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
25 minutes ago
- New York Post
Sen. Rick Scott to fly banner urging New Yorkers who ‘hate socialism' to move to Florida
Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) is taking aim at socialist Big Apple mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani – with aerial ads urging fed-up New Yorkers to flee to Florida. 'Hate Socialism? Us too! Move 2 FL,' read the banners the Sunshine State senator will fly over New York beaches this weekend. In a Florida flex, the ad continues: 'WE HAVE BETTER BEACHES.' 3 The aerial ads will be flown over New York beaches this weekend. miami2you – In a statement, Scott described the ad campaign as a 'friendly reminder' to New Yorkers that 'in addition to our world class beaches, Florida is the state where you can escape socialism.' The senator also slammed the cost of living in the Big Apple, antisemitism on college campuses and the rise of Mamdani. 'New York City once represented the American Dream – a city where anything was possible. Today, it has now become the city where only billionaires can prosper, Jewish students are attacked on campus, capitalism is shunned and radical socialists like Zohran Mamdani are celebrated,' Scott said. 'New York City has benefitted from the best system in the world – Capitalism – yet it is now being villainized by the Democrats all across this country.' 'Democrats are working around the clock to discredit President Trump and tear down our country and rebuild it in their woke, radical image through socialist policies.' Scott decried socialism as 'an old, barbaric, discredited idea that's failed every time it's been tried' and noted that Florida has become a place of refuge for families that have fled 'brutal regimes' in Cuba and Venezuela. 3 The ads target New Yorkers disillusioned with the rise of Mamdani. Andrew Schwartz / 3 Scott noted that many families from Cuba and Venezuela have sought refuge from socialism in Florida. Getty Images 'As Governor and now US Senator, I have constantly worked to make sure every family can get a great job, their kids can get a world class education and they can live in safe communities,' he added. 'That is the American Dream and it is deeply unfortunate that it is completely slipping away in New York.' 'New York families deserve better.'
San Francisco Chronicle
25 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Democrats and advocates criticize Trump's executive order on homelessness
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Leading Democrats and advocates for homeless people are criticizing an executive order President Donald Trump signed this week aimed at removing people from the streets, possibly by committing them for mental health or drug treatment without their consent. Trump directed some of his Cabinet heads to prioritize funding to cities that crack down on open drug use and street camping, with the goal of making people feel safer. It's not compassionate to do nothing, the order states. 'Shifting these individuals into long-term institutional settings for humane treatment is the most proven way to restore public order,' the order reads. Homelessness has become a bigger problem in recent years as the cost of housing increased, especially in states such as California where there aren't enough homes to meet demand. At the same time, drug addiction and overdoses have soared with the availability of cheap and potent fentanyl. The president's order might be aimed at liberal cities such as San Francisco, Los Angeles and New York, which Trump views as too lax about conditions on their streets. But many of the concepts have already been proposed or tested in California, where Gov. Gavin Newsom and Democratic mayors have worked for years to get people off the streets and into treatment. Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court made it easier for cities to clear encampments even if the people living in them have nowhere else to go. Still, advocates say Trump's new order is vague, punitive and won't effectively end homelessness. His office said Friday that Trump's order relies on harmful stereotypes and focuses more on "creating distracting headlines and settling old scores." "But, his imitation (even poorly executed) is the highest form of flattery,' spokesperson Tara Gallegos said in a statement, referring to the president calling for strategies already in use in California. San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie has also emphasized the importance of clean and orderly streets in banning homeless people from living in RVs and urging people to accept the city's offers of shelter. In Silicon Valley, San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan recently pushed a policy change that makes a person eligible for jail if they reject three offers of shelter. Trump's executive order tasks Attorney General Pam Bondi and the secretaries for health, housing and transportation to prioritize grants to states and local governments that enforce bans on open drug use and street camping. Devon Kurtz, the public safety policy director at the Cicero Institute, a conservative policy group that has advocated for several of the provisions of the executive order, said the organization is 'delighted' by the order. He acknowledged that California has already been moving to ban encampments since the Supreme Court's decision. But he said Trump's order adds teeth to that shift, Kurtz said. 'It's a clear message to these communities that were still sort of uncomfortable because it was such a big change in policy,' Kurtz said. But Steve Berg, chief policy officer at the National Alliance to End Homelessness, called parts of the order vague. He said the U.S. abandoned forced institutionalization decades ago because it was too expensive and raised moral and legal concerns. 'What is problematic about this executive order is not so much that law enforcement is involved — it's what it calls on law enforcement to do, which is to forcibly lock people up,' Berg said. 'That's not the right approach to dealing with homelessness.' The mayor of California's most populous city, Los Angeles, is at odds with the Newsom and Trump administrations on homelessness. Mayor Karen Bass, a Democrat, opposes punishing sweeps and says the city has reduced street homelessness by working with homeless people to get them into shelter or housing. ___
Boston Globe
25 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
US and Mexico sign deal to stop sewage release into Tijuana River
Lee Zeldin, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, who traveled to Mexico to sign the memorandum of understanding with Alicia Bárcena Ibarra, Mexico's environment secretary, wrote in a statement that the countries are aiming for a 'permanent, 100% solution.' Under the deal, Mexico agreed to complete an allocation of $93 million toward sanitation infrastructure, and complete all projects by Dec. 31, 2027, the EPA said. The United States, which had withheld funds for water infrastructure improvements on the border, will release money to complete the rehabilitation of a pump station and other projects. Advertisement 'The Trump administration is proud to deliver this massive environmental and national security win for Americans in the San Diego area who have been living with this disgusting raw sewage flowing into their communities for far too long,' Zeldin said in a statement. Advertisement Bárcena Ibarra said in a statement the agreement 'strengthens collaboration to address environmental and health challenges along the northern border.' San Diego County residents have suffered acutely. The Office of the Naval Inspector General this year found that more than 1,100 Navy recruits contracted gastrointestinal illnesses after training in southern San Diego waters. And nearly half of the 40,900 households in the region have experienced health problems, including rashes and shortness of breath, that were most likely attributable to the sewage, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The agreement comes three months after Zeldin visited San Diego to begin negotiations with Mexico. It drew praise from local officials, including from Democrats, but some environmental advocates said more needs to be done. Jim Desmond, a Republican supervisor of the San Diego County Board of Supervisors, wrote on the social platform X that the announcement 'marks a significant step forward.' He said the federal government had previously failed to hold Mexico accountable for the sewage flowing into California. 'Our beaches must be clean, safe, and open year-round — anything less is unacceptable,' he wrote. Todd Gloria, the mayor of San Diego and a Democrat, thanked Zeldin on X and called the deal 'a huge step toward ending this crisis.' Matthew Tejada, senior vice president of environmental health for the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental group, called the agreement a good start. 'It's great that we're starting to roll up our sleeves' on this issue, he said. But he added that the waste-water improvements are enormous and complicated infrastructure projects that are likely going to be hit with unexpected problems, including worsening levels of runoff and sewage exacerbated by climate-fueled storms. 'These are really tough projects to implement, with really elusive outcomes,' he said. Advertisement This article originally appeared in
