Senate parliamentarian's no-go list: 12 pieces struck from Trump's megabill
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) aims to have the 'big, beautiful bill' on President Trump's desk by July 4. But first, some of the megabill's most controversial aspects must undergo the 'Byrd bath,' a challenge of whether they are eligible to be part of a reconciliation package that can pass with a 51-vote majority.
Republicans can still retool the provisions in an attempt to address the conflicts and resubmit them for review.
Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough has ruled several parts of the tax and spending legislation violate Senate rules and must taken out.
Here's a look at what didn't make the initial cut:
MacDonough ruled against language that proposed increasing the Federal Employees Retirement System contribution rate for new civil servants who refuse to become at-will employees. She argued the provision violates the Byrd Rule, which bars provisions that are considered 'extraneous' to the federal budget.
The megabill originally included language that gave states the authority to conduct border security and immigration enforcement, a responsibility that has traditionally fallen on the federal government. MacDonough rejected this language, ruling it violates the Byrd Rule.
The parliamentarian rejected a measure in the bill that would have made it harder for courts to enforce lawsuits against the Trump administration. The measure targeted preliminary injunctions and temporary restraining orders issued by federal judges against Trump's executive orders and other directives. MacDonough argued that limiting courts' ability to hold Trump in contempt violates Senate rules.
Last week, MacDonough ruled against a measure that prevented immigrants who are not yet citizens or lawful permanent residents from participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
She also rejected another SNAP-related provision that required states to pay a percentage of food assistance under SNAP depending on their individual error rates in delivering food aid. The provision required states to pay between 5 percent and 15 percent of food benefits in 2028, depending on their error rate. Nearly every state has had SNAP error rates of 6 percent or higher.
MacDonough pushed back against a Republican measure that sought to extend the suspension of permanent price authority, which has traditionally been a part of the farm bill.
The original bill had attempted to end a long-held farm bill practice in which farm commodity programs — the network of subsidies for products such as dairy, corn or rice — that underpin large-scale U.S. agriculture expire every few years, effectively forcing congressional Republicans back to the negotiating table annually to participate in the grand bargain of SNAP and conservation funding in return for farm welfare.
The measure knocked down by the parliamentarian would have extended those subsidies past their normal cutoff to expire in 2031 — which advocates of sustainable agriculture and SNAP warn would have removed any need for farm state legislators to pass any farm bill this decade, because they would have gotten what they needed.
While this would be within bounds of a normal farm bill, the Senate parliamentarian ruled that legislators couldn't do it through reconciliation, and would therefore need to come up with 60 votes.
MacDonough has ruled against a provision that would have essentially eliminated the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) by placing a cap on its funding. The provision would have lowered the agency's maximum funding to zero percent of the Federal Reserve's operating expenses.
She also ruled against several other measures that fell under the control of the Senate Banking Committee, Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, and the Senate Armed Services Committee. One would have cut $1.4 billion in federal costs by lowering the Federal Reserve staff pay.
MacDonough also rejected measures that proposed cutting more than $1 billion in costs by slashing the Office of Financial Research funding and getting rid of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.
The Senate's parliamentarian ruled against a provision championed by Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) that would have sold off millions of acres of Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management land in up to 11 states.
Lee, in a post on the social platform X, said he would revamp the plan. The new legislation will still sell off land owned by the Bureau of Land Management — but not that owned by the Forest Service.
He also said he would 'SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE' the amount of land in the bill, limiting it only to lands within 5 miles of a population center.
MacDonough blocked a provision that would deem offshore oil and gas projects as automatically compliant with the National Environmental Policy Act.
She also rejected a measure in the bill that required offshore oil and gas leases to be issued to successful bidders within 90 days after their sale.
She also said Republicans could not include a provision in the bill that requires the Interior secretary to OK the construction of Ambler Road, a more than 200-mile-long access road that would facilitate the development of four large mines and hundreds of smaller mines in northern Alaska.
The bill originally contained language that sought to undo Biden administration rules meant to encourage electric vehicle use. The Senate parliamentarian rejected a provision that would force the General Service Administration, which handles the equipment used by government agencies, to sell all the eclectic vehicles used by the U.S. Postal Service.
However, a policy that would rescind funds passed by Democrats to allow the Postal Service to purchase extra electric vehicles and charges is still in the bill.
The bill targeted several Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations, including one that restricts air pollution emissions from passenger vehicles. MacDonough said late last week that Republicans could not include that measure in the 'big, beautiful bill.'
Republicans also wanted to change the National Environmental Policy Act to allow project developers to fast-track environmental reviews or prevent judicial reviews if they paid a one-time fee, according to Politico. MacDonough ruled against the measure.
MacDonough also said Republicans could not include a modified version of the REINS Act in the bill. The measure would have increased congressional power over big regulations, according to Axios.
Saul Elbein contributed.
Originally published at 6:05 p.m. on June 23
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
14 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Federal judge postpones termination of TPS for Nicaragua, Honduras and Nepal
A California federal judge has ruled to postpone the termination of Temporary Protected Status for approximately 61,000 immigrants from Nicaragua, Honduras and Nepal, many of whom have been living in the United States for decades. The Trump administration in June had terminated the TPS status for Nepal and in July for Honduras and Nicaragua, saying the conditions in those countries no longer support the designation for deportation protection. The administration, in its efforts to revamp the program and align it with its mass deportation policy, had terminated the status for countries like Cameroon, Afghanistan and Venezuela, emphasizing TPS was meant to be temporary, not long-term. The National TPS Alliance and seven TPS holders challenged the decision in a lawsuit in July, arguing that the administration failed to conduct a full review of current conditions in those countries and that the 60-day timeline provided for the termination is unlawful. With the termination dates fast approaching, they had requested that the judge postpone the effective dates until the court makes a final judgment on whether the administration's decisions to terminate were lawful. U.S. District Judge Trini L. Thompson's ruling on Thursday means the temporary protection status for Nepal, which was set to end on Aug. 5, and for Honduras and Nicaragua on Sept. 6, will remain in place and be extended to Nov. 18, the next scheduled hearing on the case. 'The freedom to live fearlessly, the opportunity of liberty, and the American dream. That is all Plaintiffs seek. Instead, they are told to atone for their race, leave because of their names, and purify their blood. The Court disagrees,' Thompson said in her ruling. TPS grants humanitarian relief, such as deportation protection and work permits, to people from countries experiencing political turmoil or natural disasters. Nicaragua and Honduras were given the status in 1999 after Hurricane Mitch caused extensive destruction in the countries. The designation had continually been extended until the first Trump administration decided to terminate it. That decision was also challenged in a lawsuit, and the first Trump administration chose not to enforce the termination. The extension continued until the decision by the second Trump administration to terminate the status. Nepal, the other country in the lawsuit, was designated for TPS status in 2015 after a 7.8 magnitude earthquake caused massive destruction and displaced millions. In its response to the lawsuit, the Trump administration argued the court did not have jurisdiction in reviewing Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's determination to terminate TPS for the three countries. The administration also cited national security concerns. The judge asked the administration to clarify why those covered under TPS would be national security concerns when they had been living in the U.S. for a significant period. The administration emphasized it had reviewed the conditions of those countries and it was safe for TPS recipients to return. And it argued that the influx of migrants coming through the southern border over the past four years had strained resources that would have been used for proper vetting of those coming into the country. The administration, in its response, did not clarify how that risk related to those who had already been the U.S. for decades. 'Indeed, not all TPS beneficiaries are security concerns. However, aliens can be a security concern and be present in the United States,' the administration stated its responses to Thompson's question. In her decision, the judge also pointed out that the Department of Homeland Security was not responsive to the argument presented by the National TPS Alliance that barring court reviews of TPS decisions would allow the Trump administration to use TPS as a lever for negotiations with other countries. 'The Court shares this concern and does not forget that this country has bartered with human lives. Nor does the Court shut its eyes to the country's shifting attitudes towards immigrants,' the ruling said, agreeing with the National TPS Alliance that the decision to terminate the TPS designation was not entirely based on the respective country's conditions. Harold Rocha, president of the Nicaraguan American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, had been optimistically awaiting the judge's decision. His organization had printed our summaries of the case in Spanish and English and distributed them to its members earlier this week in anticipation of the decision. 'Judge Thompson's order to postpone provides temporary relief for the close to 60,000 beneficiaries from Nepal, Honduras, and Nicaragua. Legal reasoning suggests there's a likelihood plaintiffs will succeed on the merits, and that is also a source of encouragement for a vulnerable group,' Rocha said. The ruling by Thomson to postpone the TPS termination date comes almost a month after a federal judge in New York ruled in favor of Haitians with temporary status, finding that Noem exceeded her authority when she shortened the 18-month extension granted under the Biden administration. In that case, the administration had made similar arguments that conditions in Haiti had improved, and terminating that status was in the national interest of the United States. The Trump administration could appeal Thursday's decision. It does, however, bring some solace for many Nicaraguans in South Florida, many of whom live in Sweetwater in Miami-Dade County and is sometimes referred to as 'Little Managua.'
San Francisco Chronicle
14 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump injects new dose of uncertainty in tariffs as he pushes start date back to Aug. 7
WASHINGTON (AP) — For weeks, President Donald Trump was promising the world economy would change on Friday with his new tariffs in place. It was an ironclad deadline, administration officials assured the public. But when Trump signed the order Thursday night imposing new tariffs on 68 countries and the European Union, the start date of the punishing import taxes was pushed back seven days so that the tariff schedule could be updated. The change — while potentially welcome news to countries that had not yet reached a deal with the U.S. — injected a new dose of uncertainty for consumers and businesses still wondering what's going to happen and when. Trump has promised that his tax hikes on the nearly $3 trillion in goods imported to the United States will usher in newfound wealth, launch a cavalcade of new factory jobs, reduce the budget deficits and, simply, get other countries to treat America with more respect. The vast tariffs risk jeopardizing America's global standing as allies feel forced into unfriendly deals. As taxes on the raw materials used by U.S. factories and basic goods, the tariffs also threaten to create new inflationary pressures and hamper economic growth — concerns the Trump White House has dismissed. Questions swirl around the tariffs despite Trump's eagerness As the clock ticked toward Trump's self-imposed deadline, few things seemed to be settled other than the president's determination to levy the taxes he has talked about for decades. The very legality of the tariffs remains an open question as a U.S. appeals court on Thursday heard arguments on whether Trump had exceeded his authority by declaring an 'emergency' under a 1977 law to charge the tariffs, allowing him to avoid congressional approval. Trump was ebullient as much of the world awaited what he would do. Others saw a policy carelessly constructed by the U.S. president, one that could impose harms gradually over time that would erode America's power and prosperity. 'The only things we'll know for sure on Friday morning are that growth-sapping U.S. import taxes will be historically high and complex, and that, because these deals are so vague and unfinished, policy uncertainty will remain very elevated,' said Scott Lincicome, a vice president of economics at the Cato Institute. 'The rest is very much TBD.' The new tariffs build off ones announced in the spring Trump initially imposed the Friday deadline after his previous 'Liberation Day' tariffs in April resulted in a stock market panic. His unusually high tariff rates unveiled then led to recession fears, prompting Trump to impose a 90-day negotiating period. When he was unable to create enough trade deals with other countries, he extended the timeline and sent out letters to world leaders that simply listed rates, prompting a slew of hasty agreements. Swiss imports will now be taxed at a higher rate — 39% — than the 31% Trump threatened in April, while Liechtenstein saw its rate slashed from 37% to 15%. Countries not listed in the Thursday night order would be charged a baseline 10% tariff. Trump negotiated trade frameworks over the past few weeks with the EU, Japan, South Korea, Indonesia and the Philippines — allowing the president to claim victories as other nations sought to limit his threat of charging even higher tariff rates. He said on Thursday there were agreements with other countries, but he declined to name them. Thursday began with a palpable sense of tension The EU was awaiting a written agreement on its 15% tariff deal. Switzerland and Norway were among the dozens of countries that did not know what their tariff rate would be, while Trump agreed after a Thursday morning phone call to keep Mexico's tariffs at 25% for a 90-day negotiating period. European leaders face blowback for seeming to cave to Trump, even as they insist that this is merely the start of talks and stress the importance of maintaining America's support of Ukraine's fight against Russia. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has already indicated that his country can no longer rely on the U.S. as an ally, and Trump declined to talk to him on Thursday. India, with its 25% tariff announced Wednesday by Trump, may no longer benefit as much from efforts to pivot manufacturing out of China. While the Trump administration has sought to challenge China's manufacturing dominance, it is separately in extended trade talks with that country, which faces a 30% tariff and is charging a 10% retaliatory rate on the U.S. Major companies came into the week warning that tariffs would begin to squeeze them financially. Ford Motor Co. said it anticipated a net $2 billion hit to earnings this year from tariffs. French skincare company Yon-Ka is warning of job freezes, scaled-back investment and rising prices. It's unclear whether Trump's new tariffs will survive a legal challenge Federal judges sounded skeptical Thursday about Trump's use of a 1977 law to declare the long-standing U.S. trade deficit a national emergency that justifies tariffs on almost every country on Earth. 'You're asking for an unbounded authority,' Judge Todd Hughes of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit told a Justice Department lawyer representing the administration. The judges didn't immediately rule, and the case is expected to eventually reach the Supreme Court. The Trump White House has pointed to the increase in federal revenues as a sign that the tariffs will reduce the budget deficit, with $127 billion in customs and duties collected so far this year — about $70 billion more than last year. New tariffs threaten to raise inflation rates There are not yet signs that tariffs will lead to more domestic manufacturing jobs, and the U.S. economy now has 14,000 fewer manufacturing jobs than it did in April. On Thursday, one crucial measure of inflation, known as the Personal Consumption Expenditures index, showed that prices have climbed 2.6% over the 12 months that ended in June, a sign that inflation may be accelerating as the tariffs flow through the economy. The prospect of higher inflation from the tariffs has caused the Federal Reserve to hold off on additional cuts to its benchmark rates, a point of frustration for Trump, who on Truth Social, called Fed Chair Jerome Powell a 'TOTAL LOSER.' But ahead of Trump's tariffs, Powell seemed to suggest that the tariffs had put the U.S. economy and much of the world into a state of unknowns. 'There are many uncertainties left to resolve,' Powell told reporters Wednesday. 'So, yes, we are learning more and more. It doesn't feel like we're very close to the end of that process. And that's not for us to judge, but it does — it feels like there's much more to come.'
Hamilton Spectator
14 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Judge blocks Trump administration from ending protections for 60,000 from Central America and Nepal
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A federal judge ruled on Thursday against the Trump administration's plans and extended Temporary Protected Status for 60,000 people from Central America and Asia, including people from Nepal, Honduras and Nicaragua. Temporary Protected Status is a protection that can be granted by the Homeland Security secretary to people of various nationalities who are in the United States, preventing from being deported and allowing them to work. The Trump administration has aggressively been seeking to remove the protection , thus making more people eligible for removal. It's part of a wider effort by the administration to carry out mass deportations of immigrants. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem can extend Temporary Protected Status to immigrants in the U.S. if conditions in their homelands are deemed unsafe to return due to a natural disaster, political instability or other dangerous conditions. Noem had ruled to end protections for tens of thousands of Hondurans and Nicaraguans after determining that conditions in their homelands no longer warranted them. The secretary said the two countries had made 'significant progress' in recovering from 1998's Hurricane Mitch, one of the deadliest Atlantic storms in history. The designation for an estimated 7,000 from Nepal was scheduled to end Aug. 5 while protections allowing 51,000 Hondurans and nearly 3,000 Nicaraguans who have been in the U.S. for more than 25 years were set to expire Sept. 8. U.S. District Judge Trina L. Thompson in San Francisco did not set an expiration date but rather ruled to keep the protections in place while the case proceeds. The next hearing is Nov. 18. In a sharply written order, Thompson said the administration ended the migrant status protections without an 'objective review of the country conditions' such as political violence in Honduras and the impact of recent hurricanes and storms in Nicaragua. If the protections were not extended, immigrants could suffer from loss of employment, health insurance, be separated from their families, and risk being deported to other countries where they have no ties, she wrote, adding that the termination of Temporary Protection Status for people from Nepal, Honduras, and Nicaragua would result in a $1.4 billion loss to the economy. 'The freedom to live fearlessly, the opportunity of liberty, and the American dream. That is all Plaintiffs seek. Instead, they are told to atone for their race, leave because of their names, and purify their blood,' Thompson said. Lawyers for the National TPS Alliance argued that Noem's decisions were predetermined by President Donald Trump's campaign promises and motivated by racial animus. Thompson agreed, saying that statements Noem and Trump have made perpetuated the 'discriminatory belief that certain immigrant populations will replace the white population.' 'Color is neither a poison nor a crime,' she wrote. The advocacy group that filed the lawsuit said designees usually have a year to leave the country, but in this case, they got far less. 'They gave them two months to leave the country. It's awful,' said Ahilan Arulanantham, an attorney for plaintiffs at a hearing Tuesday. Honduras Foreign Minister Javier Bu Soto said via the social platform X that the ruling was 'good news.' 'The decision recognizes that the petitioners are looking to exercise their right to live in freedom and without fear while the litigation plays out,' the country's top diplomat wrote. He said the government would continue supporting Hondurans in the United States through its consular network. Meanwhile in Nicaragua, hundreds of thousands have fled into exile as the government shuttered thousands of nongovernmental organizations and imprisoned political opponents. Nicaragua President Daniel Ortega and his wife and co-President Rosario Murillo have consolidated complete control in Nicaragua since Ortega returned to power two decades ago. In February, a panel of U.N. experts warned the Nicaraguan government had dismantled the last remaining checks and balances and was 'systematically executing a strategy to cement total control of the country through severe human rights violations.' The broad effort by the Republican administration 's crackdown on immigration has been going after people who are in the country illegally but also by removing protections that have allowed people to live and work in the U.S. on a temporary basis. The Trump administration has already terminated protections for about 350,000 Venezuelans , 500,000 Haitians, more than 160,000 Ukrainians and thousands of people from Afghanistan and Cameroon. Some have pending lawsuits at federal courts. The government argued that Noem has clear authority over the program and that her decisions reflect the administration's objectives in the areas of immigration and foreign policy. 'It is not meant to be permanent,' Justice Department attorney William Weiland said. ___ Ding reported from Los Angeles. Marlon González contributed from Tegucigalpa, Honduras. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
