Russia's chilling WW3 warning to Brits as top Putin aide issues ultimatum
Russia has given an ultimatum to Britain that it must halt all military training for Ukrainian troops for the war to end.
Supplies of arms must also be stopped, said Rodion Miroshnik, special envoy to Vladimir Putin 's foreign ministry. The Russian demand came amid signs Donald Trump is ready to impose swingeing sanctions on the Kremlin over its refusal to end the war. The weekend saw the most intense aerial onslaught of the conflict on Ukraine with 537 strikes by Putin's forces, including the downing of an F-16 warplane with the death of pilot F-16 pilot Lt-Col Maksym Ustymenko.
The pilot was posthumously awarded the Hero of Ukraine honour by Volodymyr Zelensky for 'defending our people from yet another massive Russian attack'. He was 'one of our very best' and 'losing people like him is deeply painful'.
Moscow today made clear its aim to kill off Britain's Operation Interflex training for Ukraine, which has drilled tens of thousands of fighters for battle.
'The participation or complicity of other countries is a key issue that must be stopped in all forms — including weapons deliveries and the training of Ukrainian militants,' said Miroshnik. 'All of this amounts to direct complicity in the conflict. Halting these programmes would be a signal of willingness to seek a resolution.'
He was speaking to pro-Putin news outlet Izvestia which reported: 'Currently, two main Western training initiatives are active - the UK's Operation Interflex and the EU's EUMAM mission'. The number trained was put at 130,000.
Last week Zelensky and UK premier Sir Keir Starmer inspected Ukrainian troops undergoing training in Britain. The call was echoed by hardliner Konstantin Kosachev, deputy speaker of the Russian senate, the Federation Council.
'Any aid that helps Ukraine continue fighting or preparing terrorist operations clearly does not promote conflict resolution,' he said. 'It is unequivocally hostile to Russia. That is how we classify it.' London and Brussels are not interested in compromise, he claimed.
'This is a clear campaign against everything Russian — a full display of militarism. I would also add that it shows a desire to shackle the Kyiv government and Ukrainian citizens into tools for achieving British and, in this case, NATO strategic aims.
'Ukrainians no longer have agency. Moscow's dialogue with London and Brussels has been cut off, and the EU and NATO show no intention of resuming it.' Britain was accused of being involved in the deaths of Russian troops.
"In practice, they are participating in the killing of our citizens while simultaneously coordinating terrorist attacks by the Kyiv regime on Russian territory," said Oleg Karpovich, Vice-Rector of the Diplomatic Academy in Moscow. Russia's goal remained to 'demilitarise' Ukraine even though Russia would remain heavily militarised, he made clear.
Moscow spelled out its conditions amid signs that Trump's exasperation with Putin has led to him green lighting legislation from Senator Lindsey Graham to impose tough sanctions on the Kremlin. 'For the first time yesterday the president told me... he says, 'it's time to move your bill'," Graham said in an interview with ABC News.
On whether Graham expected Trump ultimately to sign the bill, the senator responded: "Yes, I think we're in good shape... But he has a waiver. It's up to him how to impose it." Graham said: "So what does this bill do?
'If you're buying products from Russia and you're not helping Ukraine, then there's a 500 percent tariff on your products coming into the United States. India and China buy 70 percent of Putin's oil. They keep his war machine going.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
France must squeeze spending or risk market backlash, says auditor
PARIS, July 2 (Reuters) - France needs to get its public finances back on track this year or risk pressure from unforgiving financial markets to do so in the future, the national public audit office said on Wednesday. Centrist Prime Minister Francois Bayrou is struggling to get public finances back under control after spending spiralled higher last year and tax income fell short of expectations. France saw its budget deficit expand further than any other euro zone country last year as a snap legislative election delivered a hung parliament, making bold decisions to correct the deterioration all but impossible. "We have a choice between making a voluntary effort now or suffering austerity tomorrow," the Cour des Comptes audit office head Pierre Moscovici said, adding markets were watching for missteps. As a first step to getting the budget deficit back to an EU limit of 3% of output by 2029, the government aims to reduce the deficit to 5.4% of GDP from 5.8% last year, a target Moscovici described as "reachable but fragile". Bayrou, a long-time debt hawk, has said he would outline plans in mid-July to cut spending by 40 billion euros next year to reduce the deficit to 4.6%. In France's deeply-divided parliament, opposition parties on the far-right and left are watching closely and could easily topple Bayrou's government as they did with his conservative predecessor, Michel Barnier. With interest payments on France's debt set to become the single biggest expense in the budget by the end of the decade, Moscovici warned that simply meeting the EU deficit target would not be enough to ward off a debt crisis. "To truly guarantee the sovereignty of the French debt, it is essential to return to a primary surplus, which is a prerequisite," Moscovici said.
South Wales Guardian
2 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Trading relationships being lost due to Windsor Framework, MLAs told
The Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) said the results of a UK-wide report showed that one in three firms surveyed had faced 'significant disruptions' due to the post-Brexit trading arrangements. The Windsor Framework was agreed between the UK and the EU in 2023, amending the Northern Ireland Protocol. It governs post-Brexit trading arrangements in the region. Under the framework, Northern Ireland continues to follow some EU laws relating to goods. Roger Pollen, head of the FSB in Northern Ireland, told Stormont's Committee for the Economy they had surveyed 778 businesses across the UK on the impact of the framework on their trade. He said: 'The Windsor Framework is now firmly part of the economic and political landscape of Northern Ireland. 'It has provided a basis for managing trade arrangements between GB, Northern Ireland and the EU following the UK's withdrawal from the European Union. 'While the Windsor Framework aimed to stabilise relations and offer clarity after years of uncertainty, our research suggests that for many small businesses practical uncertainties and barriers remain and in some cases have worsened.' He said while some firms were adjusting and innovating, others, particularly smaller businesses, are being 'left behind'. He said: 'The headline finding is that one in three businesses surveyed have already faced significant disruptions such as supply chain delays, stock shortfalls and lost sales due to the Windsor Framework with 29% anticipating future disruptions. 'A significant number also said it had induced uncertainty into business planning. 'In GB a large proportion of firms told us they had only limited understanding of the Windsor Framework, 75% rated their knowledge as low and many reported they had simply stopped trading with Northern Ireland due to perceived cost complexity or risk. 'This aligns with what our members in Northern Ireland are telling us that longstanding supply chain relationships are being lost because suppliers no longer see Northern Ireland as commercially viable under the current arrangements. 'This is a serious concern for Northern Ireland's internal market connectivity and long-term economic resilience. 'When Northern Ireland businesses struggle to source stock from GB, or when they are told by suppliers that we don't serve Northern Ireland any more, that is not just a logistics issue, it is a competitiveness and investment issue.' Mr Pollen said access for Northern Ireland businesses to both the UK and EU markets had been sold as one of the advantages of the framework. But he added: 'Our finding show this remains largely theoretical for many firms. 'Awareness is low with only a small proportion reporting that they feel that they understand and have been able to take advantage of dual market access whilst 88% report that they didn't think the concept of dual market access is being adequately explained or promoted by the UK Government or the Northern Ireland Executive.' He also said that many businesses which trade between GB and Northern Ireland feel overwhelmed by which rules apply, who they should contact and the number of public bodies involved. He said: 'There is clearly a need for a more co-ordinated plain-English guidance that focuses on communicating answers to real business needs.' He told MLAs that the report contains 12 recommendations, including improving clarity and consistency in official guidance, enhancing the trader support service to be more responsive and user friendly, calling on the UK Government to actively promote dual market access and improving cross-government co-ordination on regulation divergence. He said: 'These are not demands for renegotiation. They are realistic, proportionate measures that reflect what businesses are telling us they now need to trade confidently, plan and grow.' Committee chair Phillip Brett said the report showed that just 14% of businesses in Northern Ireland felt they were benefiting from dual market access. Mr Pollen said: 'I think the problem is that for 30-odd years businesses in Northern Ireland have had dual market access, since the single market came into being that has been the norm. 'So, I don't think there is a clear perception of having this special access, that is what we have always had.' He added: 'What we are finding, the real concern is that actually although everybody, from the First Minister downwards, recognises the benefits and value of dual market access, one of those markets is increasingly closing, that is what the evidence is telling us. 'It is the fact that the UK market, ironically, is the one that is becoming difficult to engage with, as evidenced by the survey.'
North Wales Chronicle
2 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Trading relationships being lost due to Windsor Framework, MLAs told
The Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) said the results of a UK-wide report showed that one in three firms surveyed had faced 'significant disruptions' due to the post-Brexit trading arrangements. The Windsor Framework was agreed between the UK and the EU in 2023, amending the Northern Ireland Protocol. It governs post-Brexit trading arrangements in the region. Under the framework, Northern Ireland continues to follow some EU laws relating to goods. Roger Pollen, head of the FSB in Northern Ireland, told Stormont's Committee for the Economy they had surveyed 778 businesses across the UK on the impact of the framework on their trade. He said: 'The Windsor Framework is now firmly part of the economic and political landscape of Northern Ireland. 'It has provided a basis for managing trade arrangements between GB, Northern Ireland and the EU following the UK's withdrawal from the European Union. 'While the Windsor Framework aimed to stabilise relations and offer clarity after years of uncertainty, our research suggests that for many small businesses practical uncertainties and barriers remain and in some cases have worsened.' He said while some firms were adjusting and innovating, others, particularly smaller businesses, are being 'left behind'. He said: 'The headline finding is that one in three businesses surveyed have already faced significant disruptions such as supply chain delays, stock shortfalls and lost sales due to the Windsor Framework with 29% anticipating future disruptions. 'A significant number also said it had induced uncertainty into business planning. 'In GB a large proportion of firms told us they had only limited understanding of the Windsor Framework, 75% rated their knowledge as low and many reported they had simply stopped trading with Northern Ireland due to perceived cost complexity or risk. 'This aligns with what our members in Northern Ireland are telling us that longstanding supply chain relationships are being lost because suppliers no longer see Northern Ireland as commercially viable under the current arrangements. 'This is a serious concern for Northern Ireland's internal market connectivity and long-term economic resilience. 'When Northern Ireland businesses struggle to source stock from GB, or when they are told by suppliers that we don't serve Northern Ireland any more, that is not just a logistics issue, it is a competitiveness and investment issue.' Mr Pollen said access for Northern Ireland businesses to both the UK and EU markets had been sold as one of the advantages of the framework. But he added: 'Our finding show this remains largely theoretical for many firms. 'Awareness is low with only a small proportion reporting that they feel that they understand and have been able to take advantage of dual market access whilst 88% report that they didn't think the concept of dual market access is being adequately explained or promoted by the UK Government or the Northern Ireland Executive.' He also said that many businesses which trade between GB and Northern Ireland feel overwhelmed by which rules apply, who they should contact and the number of public bodies involved. He said: 'There is clearly a need for a more co-ordinated plain-English guidance that focuses on communicating answers to real business needs.' He told MLAs that the report contains 12 recommendations, including improving clarity and consistency in official guidance, enhancing the trader support service to be more responsive and user friendly, calling on the UK Government to actively promote dual market access and improving cross-government co-ordination on regulation divergence. He said: 'These are not demands for renegotiation. They are realistic, proportionate measures that reflect what businesses are telling us they now need to trade confidently, plan and grow.' Committee chair Phillip Brett said the report showed that just 14% of businesses in Northern Ireland felt they were benefiting from dual market access. Mr Pollen said: 'I think the problem is that for 30-odd years businesses in Northern Ireland have had dual market access, since the single market came into being that has been the norm. 'So, I don't think there is a clear perception of having this special access, that is what we have always had.' He added: 'What we are finding, the real concern is that actually although everybody, from the First Minister downwards, recognises the benefits and value of dual market access, one of those markets is increasingly closing, that is what the evidence is telling us. 'It is the fact that the UK market, ironically, is the one that is becoming difficult to engage with, as evidenced by the survey.'
