Scottish Open return boosts East Lothian reputation as sports tourism destination
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info
The return of the Scottish Open to East Lothian for a seventh year in a row cements the county's reputation as a leading destination for sport and leisure, its Provost has said.
Speaking as East Lothian councillors agreed to a temporary ban on public access to the course during the summer event, Councillor John McMillan said the continued partnership with organisers was a boost the economy and the county's reputation.
And he said the eyes of the world would be on the Renaissance Club, Dirleton, as global golfing stars arrived for the annual competition.
Councillor McMillan said: "It is a great example of East Lothian being one of the leading, if not the leading, tourist destination for sport and leisure."
Organisers of the event applied to the council for an exemption order to suspend public access rights on the golf course between Tuesday, July 8 until Sunday, July 13, to cover the length of the tournament.
A report to the council's Labour administration cabinet meeting this week, said the order would enable to championship to be held safely.
It said the order would be "in the interests of the safety and security of players and the safety of the public during the championship; and permit an entrance fee to be levied on spectators."
The order was unanimously supported by councillors at the meeting.
The Scottish Open action begins on Wednesday, July 9 with a Pro-Am event with general admission costs starting at £28. The main contest gets underway the next day when daily tickets start at £45 with a five day pass for the event £155.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Starmer's promised ethics commission may repackage existing regulators
Keir Starmer's flagship new ethics and integrity commission may be a rebrand of existing watchdogs brought together under a new 'umbrella' rather than creating an entirely fresh regulator, government sources have said. A year after Labour made its manifesto promise, ministers are mulling the idea of a new oversight structure above current regulators to avoid the need for starting from scratch. They are also considering abolishing some regulators, with one option being to get rid of the lobbying watchdog, the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (Acoba) and splitting its functions between the independent adviser on ministerial standards for former politicians and the civil service commission for former officials. Acoba has widely been criticised for being toothless, so any redistribution of its responsibilities could be an opportunity for new penalties for those flouting lobbying rules. Another possibility is formalising the regular meetings of standards watchdogs, convened by the committee on standards in public life, chaired by former military chief Doug Chalmers. However, asked last week whether he wanted responsibility for a new ethics and integrity watchdog, Chalmers told a panel that he did not want the role. Sources suggested the new commission could have its own website 'signposting' to existing ethics structures and providing an overarching governance. Several Whitehall sources said the process of coming up with a new ethics structure had proved more complex than initially thought and that ministers were increasingly reluctant to add a whole new body at a time when they are trying to shrink the civil service rather than expand it. There are multiple bodies with elements of standards as part of their remit including the independent adviser on ministerial standards, Acoba, the CSPL, the parliamentary standards commissioners, the civil service commission, the independent complaints and grievance service, the House of Lords appointments commission, the electoral commission, the UK parliamentary standards authority (Ipsa), the UK statistics authority and the registrar of consultant lobbyists. Part of the complication is that their responsibilities are fairly distinct and some report to parliament while others are responsible to the government. Tim Durrant, programme director at the Institute for Government (IfG), said: 'Labour committed to creating an ethics and integrity commission in their manifesto but more important than the structure is how the standards system works. If all they do is create a new organisation that doesn't fix the underlying issues.' The government has faced criticism over the length of time it has taken to establish the new commission, which was originally championed by deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner, who no longer has the brief. Earlier this month, parliament's public administration committee launched a new inquiry to examine the seeming lack of progress and to push the government on what has happened to its ethics commitments. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion It was one of Keir Starmer's flagship manifesto pledges that the new Labour government would 'establish a new independent ethics and integrity commission, with its own independent chair, to ensure probity in government'. The party promised to 'restore confidence in government and ensure ministers are held to the highest standards', and to enforce restrictions on ministers lobbying for companies they used to regulate, with meaningful sanctions for those breaching the rules. However, there was no blueprint for a commission ready to go when Starmer formed the government last year. It has barely been mentioned by ministers since last July. The prime minister published a new ministerial code last year, allowing the independent adviser on ministerial standards to start his own investigations into misconduct without requiring permission from the prime minister. It is understood the government is hoping to come forward with proposals soon for a new ethics structure. A government spokesperson said: 'This government is committed to establishing the right structures to uphold the highest standards in public life. We have already taken steps to improve probity and transparency, including through introducing a new ministerial code which emphasises the principles of public life, by strengthening the terms of reference for the independent adviser, and by introducing a new monthly register of gifts and hospitality.'
The National
5 hours ago
- The National
Anas Sarwar urged to stand up against Keir Starmer's welfare plans
The call comes from the SNP ahead of a vote on Labour's Disability Cuts Bill on Tuesday at Westminster, with significant opposition against the welfare cuts still intact despite a deal being reached between the Prime Minister and some Labour MPs. In a late-night climbdown on Friday, the UK Government offered Labour rebels a series of concessions in an effort to head off Starmer's first major Commons defeat since coming to power. Some 126 Labour backbenchers had signed an amendment that would halt the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill in its tracks. READ MORE: Angela Rayner called out over 'tone deaf' message about terminal illnesses However, it is believed the concessions on offer, which include protecting personal independence payments (Pip) for all existing claimants, will be enough to win over a majority. Sarwar, who has consistently backed Starmer's disability cuts, is yet to indicate how he will instruct Scottish Labour MPs to vote. SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn (below) said it was already clear that the late-night deal was 'designed to save the skin of the Prime Minister' and that it will end up 'punishing those who are young or newly disabled'. (Image: James Manning/PA Wire) He has now called on Sarwar not to do his 'usual and ride to the rescue of Starmer' but to stand firm against the proposed welfare changes. Flynn said: 'The details of the deal reveal a Labour Party policy that will be blatantly discriminatory, of questionable legality, and will see disabled people with the exact same needs treated differently just because of when they were born or became sick, injured or disabled. 'In the next 48 hours Anas Sarwar has a choice – he can do his usual and ride to the rescue of Keir Starmer or he can change the habit of a lifetime and choose to stand firm against this two-tier disability system.' The UK Government's original package had restricted eligibility for Pip, the main disability payment in England, and cut the health-related element of Universal Credit, saying this would save around £5 billion a year by 2030. Now, the changes to Pip eligibility will be implemented in November 2026 and apply to new claimants only while all existing recipients of the health element of Universal Credit will have their incomes protected in real terms. Flynn said that the vote on the UK Government's welfare reform will come down to a test of fairness and of values as he claimed that if Scottish Labour MPs 'truly care', they would vote against it. He said: 'The choice is his – and people in Scotland will be watching to see how he instructs his Scottish Labour MPs to vote on Tuesday. 'This is a test of fairness and a test of values – how can any MP vote for a system that means if you have an accident that causes a disability, develop a disability over time or if you have a child with a disability, you will receive less support than those who have come before you?" Flynn added: 'If Scottish Labour MPs who last week rebelled against Keir Starmer truly care about the cause in the way that they suggest, then they will join the SNP in voting against this legislation and they will tell the Prime Minister to think again, again.' The SNP MP for Aberdeen South's comments come after Disability Rights UK warned the newly proposed cuts to disability and sickness benefits will create 'a two-tiered" system. Speaking on Times Radio earlier this week, campaigner at Disability Rights UK Mikey Erhardt said: 'The idea that you will be less in need, or less deserving of support, depending on the when of the condition that necessitates that support, is something you just have to reject out and out.' Meanwhile, Ian Greaves, who edits the Disability Rights Handbook containing in-depth information on the social security system across the UK, said Labour's 'very small' concessions on welfare reforms will still leave the system 'woefully inadequate'. Greaves told The National he was expecting much more significant changes to be proposed and was surprised MPs like Meg Hillier – whose amendment against the cuts was signed by almost 130 Labour MPs – are now suggesting the changes are a 'real breakthrough' and a 'good step forward'. He added: 'These are not concessions of any significance. 'Fundamentally it is not fair and it is immoral to reduce the health-related support in Universal Credit by 50%. Already people with disabilities on Universal Credit are struggling to pay for their basic needs.' The Scottish Government confirmed that it will not follow Starmer's two-tier system, with the Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice Shirley-Anne Somerville saying: 'A two-tier system cannot be a fair system. 'That's what disabled people would have told the Labour Government if they had actually asked them rather than making a backroom late-night deal with their own MPs. 'And this half U-turn still does not scrap the 4+ points rule which will prevent support for hundreds of thousands with diffuse disabilities in the future. The Scottish Government will not follow Labour's lead on any of these changes.' A Scottish Labour spokesperson said: 'With 240,000 children in Scotland living in poverty, record numbers of homeless young people, rising sexual crime and the NHS on its knees, Stephen Flynn should hang his head in shame over what the SNP have done to Scotland. 'With the SNP now reviewing the application of their own Adult Disability Payment benefit, the hypocrisy that they have displayed over the current welfare bill has been exposed for all to see. 'Stephen Flynn should get his own house in order and apologise to the Scots being failed every day by his knackered and incompetent party.'
The Herald Scotland
5 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
This is the row that could derail the UK-wide 5G rollout
A long-running dispute between landowners, telecommunication companies and government appears to be here to stay. The UK Government, then run by the Conservatives, updated the Electronic Communications Code (ECC) in 2017 in an attempt to accelerate action on 5G. But the government has acknowledged these changes were controversial. Rent dispute The ECC simplifies the process for network operators to access land and install infrastructure like phone masts and cables, while also balancing the rights of landowners. It allowed many telecoms companies to vastly reduce the rents they paid to landowners. Some landowners have reported rent reductions of up to 90%, which has led to many considering whether to continue as a hosting site. Read more: The proposals were described as "well intentioned" but in some areas have had the opposite impact, with landowners refusing to host the infrastructure. There has also been an explosion in legal disputes, with cases reaching over 1,000 since 2017, compared with just three in the previous three decades, from 1984. New changes? The row has escalated as the Labour-led government launched a consultation in May, which looks to extend the changes in the valuation mechanism to rental agreements entered into before 2017 as they come up for renewal. That would mean around 15,000 existing telecoms sites would be added, with landowner representatives arguing it would exacerbate the problem they face. Industry experts want the UK Government to pause the implementation to consider the consequences for landowners. Interestingly, Labour in opposition approved the changes, which would be made by amending the Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure (PTSI) Act, which then updates the ECC. In 2022, shadow digital secretary Lucy Powell warned that the PSTI changes would "slow down, rather than speed up, the broadband and 5G rollout". But now, telecoms minister Chris Bryant confirmed the government wants to implement the provisions "as soon as possible". Connectivity stalled Broadband and 5G accessibility remains poor in many parts of the UK. In Scotland, Argyll and Bute and the Highlands and Islands are amongst he worst. However, in Scotland's largest urban hub - Glasgow - fibre coverage is now amongst the five worst cities in the UK. Just 57.8% of premises have access to full fibre broadband. The UK is also now ranked 30th out of 39 countries in terms of availability of 5G.
