Air Force sees historic recruitment surge with delayed entry program
More potential recruits are making appointments with recruiters to discuss the possibility of joining the Air Force or Space Force, Air Force Recruiting Service commander Brig. Gen. Christopher Amrhein told reporters at the AFA Warfare Symposium in Aurora, Colorado, on Tuesday.
What's more, the Air Force is shipping more new recruits off to basic military training at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland in Texas on a weekly basis than it did even two years ago, Amrhein said. And the service is more than filling its delayed entry program — essentially a waiting list of recruits who have signed up and been approved to join the military, but who have to wait for room at basic training to ship out — which typically doesn't happen in winter, he said.
'We had 3,000 appointments last week alone,' Amrhein said. 'We normally have 1,600.'
Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Allvin announced Sunday on social media platform X that the Air Force had accumulated 13,000 recruits in the delayed entry program, the most in nearly 10 years.
With more recruits joining, the Air Force was sending 750 to 800 airmen to basic military training each week, according to the Amrhein. When he first took over Air Force recruiting in 2023, that number was around 500 to 600 a week.
Amrhein said that the rise in airmen did not appear to be an anomaly either and that he would not be surprised if the trend continued.
'Since my time in the recruiting business ... I haven't seen numbers that high, at least consistently that high,' Amrhein said.
Entire Air Force to miss recruiting goal, the first failure since 1999
Typically, Amrhein said, the Air Force expects the flow of recruits joining the ranks of the delayed entry program to dip in the winter months of December, January and February, but that hasn't been the trend these past few months.
Amrhein credited outreach as an instrumental factor in bringing in a surge of airmen enrolled in the program, the most he'd seen in 15 years. The week before Amrhein spoke, he said the Air Force brought in 921 airmen to the delayed entry program and shipped 709 airmen to basic military training.
The rise in delayed entry numbers comes as the Air Force has seen an increase in recruitment. In September 2024, Amrhein announced the Air Force would meet its fiscal 2024 goal of 27,100 non-prior service enlisted recruits, a rebound after falling short the previous year for the first time in decades.
The service aims to bring in 32,500 new airmen for 2025, marking a 20% increase.
Military recruitment overall is trending upward, according to an October 2024 release from the Defense Department.
The armed services saw a 12.5% increase in fiscal 2024, including a 35% rise in written contracts and a 10% increase in the each service's delayed entry program to start fiscal 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Trump Megabill Tosses $1 Billion At Space Force's Boeing Spaceplane
It's difficult to believe that any legislator read all 940 pages of President Donald Trump's Big, Beautiful Bill before it was passed by Congress earlier this month. I wonder if the Senate was aware that the megabill allocated $1 billion to the U.S. Space Force's Boeing X-37B Orbit Test Vehicle. The American military's newest branch is proud to boast about how maneuverable the uncrewed spaceplane is in orbit. Still, little else is known about what the Boeing spacecraft is actually doing while looping the planet. The budget increase is certainly a statement of intent from the White House, especially when NASA's budget is slated to be slashed by $3.4 billion. The Boeing X-37B has been in service since 2010, back when the Space Force was Air Force Space Command. The spaceplane's familiar white and black thermal clad appearance is reminiscent of NASA's Space Shuttle, and it fulfills a similar role for the Pentagon, based on the publicly available information. Air Force Space Command didn't reveal the X-37B's payload for its first three flights. While the flights are still considered classified, the Space Force will reveal orbital deployment and experiments done in collaboration with other agencies. The seventh X-37B mission ended in March with the spaceflight landing at Vandenberg Space Force Base after 434 days in orbit. The mission conducted experiments with NASA to observe the effects of space radiation on plant seeds. Read more: You'd Only Drive These Cars If They Were Free Military Wants The Highest Ground Possible No, the X-37B's primary reason for spending over a year in orbit wasn't seeing if you could turn a packet of seeds into the Fantastic Four. The Space Force stated it tested the spaceplane's ability to complete maneuvers using atmospheric drag. The branch is gradually getting its feet wet in what space combat could look like with our spacefaring geopolitical rivals, like China and Russia. General Chance Saltzman, Chief of Space Operations, said: "Mission 7 broke new ground by showcasing the X-37B's ability to flexibly accomplish its test and experimentation objectives across orbital regimes. The successful execution of the aerobraking maneuver underscores the U.S. Space Force's commitment to pushing the bounds of novel space operations in a safe and responsible manner." Air Force Space Command's independence from the Air Force in 2019 wasn't just a Trump vanity project, but a push to militarize space. The $1 billion dedicated to the X-35B is part of a $11.3 billion budget increase for Space Force. This is happening amid the White House leaving civilian spaceflight on a shoestring budget and reliant on private companies. NASA's Artemis Program is still scheduled to return astronauts to the Moon, but is unclear how it'll get there. The Trump administration is trying to cancel the Space Launch System, but the agency won't halt the rocket's testing and development efforts. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.
New York Times
2 days ago
- New York Times
New Judge Assigned to 9/11 Case Ahead of 24th Anniversary of Attacks
An Air Force judge who was in college at the time of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks has been named as the new judge in the long-running terrorism case at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. Lt. Col. Michael Schrama is the fifth judge in the case against five men who are accused of conspiring in the attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people. The case has been stuck in pretrial hearings since 2012. Prosecutors made a deal last summer with three of the defendants, including the man accused of being the mastermind of the plot, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, to plead guilty in exchange for life sentences. That would have averted their death-penalty the agreement has been revoked twice, including this month by an appeals court in Washington, potentially returning the case to the question of whether the defendants' torture from 2002 to 2006 while they were in C.I.A. detention has rendered their confessions inadmissible. Colonel Schrama was assigned to the case on Wednesday. Prosecutors have indicated that they would like to see him on the bench the week of Sept. 1 for an examination of his qualifications. If no disqualifying conflicts emerge, it will be Colonel Schrama's job to manage the pretrial proceedings at a time when the case has splintered into three parts. Mr. Mohammed and two other defendants who had the plea deal are in one camp. The previous judge, Col. Matthew N. McCall, had ruled that their pretrial agreements were valid contracts before he retired in May. Their lawyers are preparing an appeal to seek the deals' reinstatement, and have shunned any case-moving litigation at the Guantánamo court as a potential breach of the contract. Another defendant, Ramzi bin al-Shibh, was found mentally incompetent to go to trial and his case was severed. Prosecutors have asked the court to revisit that fifth defendant, Ammar al Baluchi, was litigating on a separate track. The last judge wrapped up his four years on the case by suppressing Mr. Baluchi's interrogations by the F.B.I. at Guantánamo in 2007 as having been obtained through his C.I.A. torture. Prosecutors are seeking to reinstate his confessions. Colonel Schrama, who is in his 40s, graduated from Roger Williams University School of Law in 2008, around the time the defendants were first brought to court. He then joined in the Air Force and has served as a military prosecutor and defense counsel on appeal cases. This is his second stint as a military judge. He handled court-martial cases at Joint Base Langley-Eustis in Virginia from 2021 to 2023, and returned to the bench last month. Colonel Schrama was an English student at Georgetown University and a starting defensive end on the school's football team at the time of the attacks. Before he went to law school, he taught high school English in New online personal and professional biography said he suffered a 'season-ending injury' in his third year at Georgetown. According to his Air Force biography, he has specialized in environmental law while serving in the military. He also earned a Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal, possibly from a nine-month stint as the staff attorney for an air wing in Kuwait in 2019.
The Hill
3 days ago
- The Hill
Democrats: Don't retreat from the flag, march with it
Over the Fourth of July holiday weekend, I was pleased to see homes and businesses unfurl their American flags. The sight of those flags reminded me of something that caught my eye when I first started working at the Pentagon — the American flag patch on an Air Force officer's flight suit looked 'backward.' The stars appeared on the right side of the flag, with the horizontal stripes on the left. After spotting this same orientation on other military uniforms, I asked her about it. Without missing a beat, she explained, 'It's because in battle, the standard bearer led the formation holding the flag flying, always moving forward. The flag is supposed to fly in the direction we're heading. America leads.' America leads. Within that simple explanation lay a deeper truth: For the men and women who wear the uniform, the American flag is directional, not decorative. It represents motion, purpose and conviction. And for them, and for our nation, that direction is forward. As someone who never served but spent the Biden administration trying to improve the quality of service and quality of life for those who do, I came to understand that for members of the military, the flag stands for the Constitution and the oath they take to defend it — not an individual president, and certainly not a political movement. As I traveled to military installations around the world, I saw in action the powerful symbolism of the American flag. It means something when people see it on the shoulders of U.S. troops in conflict zones and to allies who fight alongside them. It means something when it arrives with humanitarian aid. And it means everything to those men and women in uniform who proudly display it — not because they agree with every administration or policy, but because they believe in the enduring promise of this country. That's why it pains me to see some Democrats, progressives and young Americans who oppose President Trump's authoritarianism turn away from the flag. At protests opposing the militarization of our cities, some burn it in anger or let other nations' flags stand in for our own. The impulse is understandable — especially for those who feel marginalized, betrayed or worse, targeted, by his dark vision. However, Democrats cannot let frustration with what he's doing to the country drive them to disown its foundational symbols. The Trump era will end, and when it does, the party needs a positive agenda to build back from the charred, hollow husk of a democracy Trump and henchmen intend to leave us. That's why Democrats can't abandon the flag. Instead, the party has to reclaim it. The American flag doesn't belong to Trump. His appointees use it as a prop, his fans desecrate it as a costume, and, when his followers are unhappy with the direction of the country, as a warning: flying it upside down or swapping it out entirely for symbols of defeat and division. When Trump supporters stormed the Capitol, they did it wrapped in the Confederate flag, the Gadsden 'Don't Tread on Me' flag, even Trump's campaign flag. These are not expressions of patriotism; they're declarations of resentment, conspiracy and insurrection. Meanwhile, progressives have always fought for what the flag is supposed to mean: equal justice under law, the dignity of all people and opportunity regardless of background. Members of the Democratic Party have led the battles for civil rights, voting rights, reproductive freedom, worker protections and gay and transgender equality. These are not fringe causes; they are deeply American causes. And that's why Democrats and progressives should fly the flag. They should be proud to carry the American flag at every march, every campaign rally, every protest for justice and equality. I still have the American flags I and other progressives waved in Chicago's Grant Park on election night 2008. We should make it clear that this flag represents our values: the belief that our democracy must be defended against all threats foreign and domestic, and that the Constitution means what it says — all of it, not just the parts that are politically convenient. Let Trump wrap himself in symbols of grievance. Let his allies turn upside-down flags into a twisted badge of resistance. For too long, Democrats and progressives have allowed ourselves to be painted as somehow less patriotic because we dare to criticize America's shortcomings. We should be the ones raising the flag upright and forward, just as that Air Force officer explained to me years ago — because we still believe in leading, in progressing, in moving forward. It's time to remind Americans that the flag belongs not to those trying to dismantle our democracy, but to those determined to protect it. This first year of Trump's nightmarish sequel, next year during America's 250th birthday celebration, and then into the midterm elections, Democrats, regardless of whether they are veterans, should raise it proudly. They should not do this as a symbol of blind nationalism, but as a declaration of fidelity to democratic principles and as a symbol of our commitment to make the values that underpin it real once again. Alex Wagner is an adjunct professor at the Maxwell School, Syracuse University and was the assistant secretary of the Air Force for manpower and reserve affairs during the Biden administration.
