Trump And Musk's Public Breakup Is Messy, But It Won't Sink Trump's Tax Bill
Emotional satisfaction, however, might be all Democrats get out of the divorce between Trump and his biggest financial supporter, which gets nastier by the minute. The duo's big, not-so-beautiful breakup is unlikely to significantly harm Trump politically, or meaningfully slow down congressional Republicans' plodding march toward passing the tax-cutting, Medicaid-slashing, deficit-exploding legislation Musk labeled an 'abomination' last week.
Let's start with a basic fact: Musk was very unpopular, and was not doing much to help Trump politically. His favorability stood at just 40%, with 54% of Americans holding an unfavorable opinion, notably worse than Trump's 46% job approval. GOP operatives have long been skeptical the quarter-billion dollars Musk spent on the 2024 election, and which Musk claimed on Thursday were the actual reason Trump won, actually did much to help Republicans reclaim the White House. (In fact, Republicans were ready to scapegoat Musk if Trump lost.)
'Musk did damage to Trump by doing politically unpopular things and by drawing attention off of Trump and making it so when voters think about Trump, they're going to think about Elon,' said Evan Roth Smith, a Democratic pollster at Slingshot Strategies who studied the ways Musk created vulnerabilities for Trump. 'The first few months of an administration can really define how voters feel about it, and Musk was so closely associated with the first weeks and months of this administration.'
So breaking up with Musk is an opportunity for Trump to cast off a toxic political appendage known for unpopular policies like attacking Social Security and enacting indiscriminate federal job cuts. The amputation is unlikely to totally work, but he could make it so both he and other GOP leaders aren't held responsible for Musk's unpopular positions in the future.
'Trump is looking for a really loud breakup,' Roth Smith predicted. 'He's hoping voters will draw some distance between him and Elon. Trump is going to be really dramatic about this.'
At the same time, while Musk's critiques of the bill as a budget-buster ― it would add nearly $3 trillion to the debt over the next decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office ― may give a rhetorical boost to members seeking deeper cuts, like Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah), Republicans seemed mostly inclined to shrug off his critiques.
'Oh, I don't care. He's got an opinion,' Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Ark.), a man generally willing to upset Republican leaders, said of Musk earlier this week.
Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) similarly said lawmakers are reacting to Musk's broadsides against the legislation with shrugs and eye rolls. 'He's an entertaining fellow, I just don't base my policy positions on his tweets,' he told HuffPost.
Musk does not totally lack leverage over House and Senate Republicans. On the social media site he owns, he reminded them Trump's presidency will end in a short 3 1/2 years, while noting he would be around for another 40 (Musk is 53). He's also demonstrated a willingness to spend money on politics, even if the effectiveness of that money ― both in the general election and in a Wisconsin Supreme Court race earlier this year ― is up in the air.
But longtime GOP aides said a contest between Trump and Musk for the hearts and minds of congressional Republicans was no contest at all.
'Let there be no doubt who congressional Rs are going to side with in this skirmish. We don't need to play the 'will Elon sink the bill?' game,' Brendan Buck, a former aide to House Speakers John Boehner and Paul Ryan, wrote on social media.
For all the social media bombast and meme-driven gallows humor of the Musk-Trump split, the story of the South African-born billionaire's apparent ouster is much less novel than it might seem.
'I think Elon Musk is learning a lesson that many people who enter politics as relative novices sometimes take a while to learn,' Roth Smith said. 'Inertia is a powerful force in American politics, and people who seek to upend the normal state of affairs in American politics often find they are the ones who are upended after, as President Trump put it, patience is worn thin.'
Igor Bobic and Arthur Delaney contributed reporting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Investing in Cedar Woods Properties (ASX:CWP) three years ago would have delivered you a 108% gain
By buying an index fund, you can roughly match the market return with ease. But if you choose individual stocks with prowess, you can make superior returns. Just take a look at Cedar Woods Properties Limited (ASX:CWP), which is up 80%, over three years, soundly beating the market return of 22% (not including dividends). On the other hand, the returns haven't been quite so good recently, with shareholders up just 62%, including dividends. Let's take a look at the underlying fundamentals over the longer term, and see if they've been consistent with shareholders returns. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price. Cedar Woods Properties was able to grow its EPS at 29% per year over three years, sending the share price higher. This EPS growth is higher than the 22% average annual increase in the share price. So one could reasonably conclude that the market has cooled on the stock. We'd venture the lowish P/E ratio of 11.71 also reflects the negative sentiment around the stock. You can see below how EPS has changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image). We know that Cedar Woods Properties has improved its bottom line lately, but is it going to grow revenue? You could check out this free report showing analyst revenue forecasts. What About Dividends? When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. We note that for Cedar Woods Properties the TSR over the last 3 years was 108%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. This is largely a result of its dividend payments! A Different Perspective We're pleased to report that Cedar Woods Properties shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 62% over one year. And that does include the dividend. Since the one-year TSR is better than the five-year TSR (the latter coming in at 13% per year), it would seem that the stock's performance has improved in recent times. In the best case scenario, this may hint at some real business momentum, implying that now could be a great time to delve deeper. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Cedar Woods Properties , and understanding them should be part of your investment process. Of course Cedar Woods Properties may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of growth stocks. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Australian exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Fox News
17 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump declaring US must win the AI race is 'one of the most important' statements of this term, says former deputy director of national intelligence
Former deputy director of national intelligence Cliff Sims explains why President Trump's stance on A.I. is so important on 'Sunday Night in America.'
28 minutes ago
Thai, Cambodian leaders to meet for talks to end deadly border dispute
BANGKOK -- Thai and Cambodian leaders will meet in Malaysia for talks to end hostilities, a spokesperson for the Thai prime minister's office said Sunday. This comes following pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump to end a deadly border dispute, now in its fourth day, which has killed at least 35 people and displaced more than 218,000. Jirayu Huangsap said Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai will attend Monday's talks in response to an invitation from Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim 'to discuss peace efforts in the region.' Anwar has been acting in his capacity as this year's chair of the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet late Sunday night on several social media platforms confirmed his participation as well. 'I will lead (the) Cambodian delegation to attend a special meeting in Kuala Lumpur hosted by Malaysia, co-organized by the United States and with participation of China,' he said. China is a close ally of Cambodia, and had early in the fighting urged the two nations to resolve their differences peacefully, but Hun Manet's statement appeared to be the first mentioning a Chinese link to Monday's planned talks. Trump posted on the Truth Social social network Saturday that he spoke to the leaders of Thailand and Cambodia and suggested he would not move forward with trade agreements with either country if the hostilities continued. He later said both sides agreed to meet to negotiate a ceasefire. Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet said earlier Sunday his country agreed to pursue an 'immediate and unconditional ceasefire.' He said Trump told him that Thailand had also agreed to halt attacks following the U.S. president's conversation with Phumtham. Phumtham thanked Trump and qualified Thailand's position, saying it agreed in principle to a ceasefire but stressed the need for 'sincere intention' from Cambodia, the Thai Foreign Ministry said. U.S. State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce on Sunday said Secretary of State Marco Rubio had spoken with the foreign ministers of both Thailand and Cambodia urging them 'to de-escalate tensions immediately and agree to a ceasefire.' Her statement added that the U.S. 'is prepared to facilitate future discussions in order to ensure peace and stability' between the two countries. The fighting flared Thursday after a land mine explosion along the border wounded five Thai soldiers. Both sides blamed each other for starting the clashes. Both countries recalled their ambassadors and Thailand closed its border crossings with Cambodia, with an exception for migrant Cambodian workers returning home. Despite the diplomatic efforts, fighting continued Sunday along parts of the contested border, with both sides refusing to budge and trading blame over renewed shelling and troop movements. Col. Richa Suksowanont, a Thai army deputy spokesperson, said Cambodian forces fired heavy artillery into Surin province, including at civilian homes, early Sunday. He said Cambodia also launched rocket attacks targeting the ancient Ta Muen Thom temple, claimed by both countries, and other areas in a bid to reclaim territory secured by Thai troops. Thai forces responded with long-range artillery to strike Cambodian artillery and rocket launchers. Battlefield operations will continue and a ceasefire can only happen if Cambodia formally initiates negotiations, he added. 'Cambodian attacks remain irregular and may constitute violations of rules of engagement, posing further risk to border communities,' said the Thai military's daily summary of the fighting issued Sunday night. "The situation remains highly tense, and it is anticipated that Cambodia may be preparing for a major military operation prior to entering negotiations," it said. Cambodian Defense Ministry spokesperson Lt. Gen. Maly Socheata accused Thai forces of escalating the violence with bombardment of Cambodian territory early Sunday, followed by a "large-scale incursion" involving tanks and ground troops in multiple areas. 'Such actions undermine all efforts toward peaceful resolution and expose Thailand's clear intent to escalate rather than de-escalate the conflict,' she said. Thailand on Sunday reported a new death of a soldier, bringing its total number of fatalities to 22, mostly civilians. Cambodia said 13 people have been killed, though it was unclear if that included Lt. Gen. Duong Samnieng, whose death in combat was announced Sunday. More than 139,000 people in Thailand have evacuated to safe locations and over 79,000 people fled from three Cambodian provinces. Many border villages are mostly deserted, with many schools and hospitals shut. Pichayut Surasit, an air-conditioning technician in Thailand, said the sudden outbreak of fighting meant leaving his work in Bangkok to return home to protect his family. 'I didn't have the heart to continue with my work when I heard the news. I wanted to come back as soon as possible, but I had to wait until the evening,' he said. Now at a shelter in Surin housing some 6,000 evacuees, Pichayut worries for his wife and twin daughters, hoping the conflict will end soon so they can return to their home in Kap Choeng district, one of the hardest hit by shelling. Bualee Chanduang, a local vendor who moved to the same shelter Thursday with her family and pet rabbit, is counting on swift negotiations to end the violence. 'I pray for God to help so that both sides can agree to talk and end this war,' she said. At the Vatican, Pope Leo XIV said he was praying for all those affected by war in the world, including 'for those affected by the clashes on the border between Thailand and Cambodia, especially the children and displaced families.' The 800-kilometer (500-mile) frontier between Thailand and Cambodia has been disputed for decades, but past confrontations have been limited and brief. The latest tensions erupted in May when a Cambodian soldier was killed in a confrontation that created a diplomatic rift and roiled Thailand's domestic politics.
