
Guru Dutt was more than brooding loneliness. His cinema pulsed with wit and satire
Similarly, auteurs like Andrei Tarkovsky, Ingmar Bergman, and Michelangelo Antonioni explored alienation and melancholy in their work—elements that often mirror personal conflicts but do not define the artist. In Dutt's case, films like Pyaasa and Kaagaz Ke Phool certainly convey the brooding alienation of a misunderstood artist. The latter, semi-autobiographical and a commercial failure at the time, deepened the myth of the tortured filmmaker.
On Guru Dutt's centenary, much of the discourse gravitates toward his mental health and tragic end, often at the cost of overshadowing his towering cinematic legacy. This recurring emphasis on his depression reflects a broader cultural tendency to conflate artistic genius with emotional turmoil—a narrative seen with Tim Burton, Francis Ford Coppola, and Lars von Trier, all of whom have openly discussed their struggles with mental health.
The so-called suicide theory remains contested. While he had earlier incidents involving sleeping pills, there is little definitive evidence that his death was intentional. His onscreen presence in songs like 'Bhanwara Bada Naadan' or 'Aaj Ki Mulaqat' doesn't bear the stamp of a man entirely consumed by despair.
As with Meena Kumari and Madhubala, the mythmaking around Dutt often overshadows the reality: that he was a complex, driven artist who, despite loneliness and internal battles, continued to work, create, and captivate. A hundred years on, it's time to remember Guru Dutt not merely as a tragic figure, but as a visionary who redefined Indian cinema with lyricism, technical innovation, and emotional depth. His work endures—not because of the mystique surrounding his death, but because of the life he poured into every frame.
Also read: Guru Dutt built Bollywood's most unlikely dream team—bus conductor, unknown writer, dancer
Aar Paar showed a different Guru Dutt
The lighter side of Guru Dutt shines through in the genre-bending experimentation of his 1954 film Aar Paar. A blend of noir, romance, musical, and social satire, Aar Paar marks a confident display of Dutt's directorial control. Fresh off the success of Baazi and Jaal, Dutt centres the film on Kaalu, a taxi driver navigating love and crime in Bombay's post-Independence urban landscape. Played by Dutt himself, Kaalu is emblematic of the city's working class, making Aar Paar one of the earliest Indian films to realistically portray the migrant population of Bombay.
Unlike the mythic romanticism of Kaagaz Ke Phool, Aar Paar is embedded in the everyday. Abrar Alvi's dialogue sparkles with authenticity; characters speak in a mix of Hindi, Urdu, and Bombay street slang—a linguistic realism rare for its time. The film avoids 'literary' Hindi and allows each character to speak in their own dialect.
The noir elements—use of shadows, reflective surfaces, and confined spaces—coexist with choreographed musical exuberance. Songs like 'Sun Sun Zalima' (shot in a garage) and 'Ye Lo Main Haari Piya' (set on Bombay's streets) turn real urban spaces into stylised songscapes. The garage scene is particularly notable for its use of space as narrative—a car becomes both a prop and symbolic barrier between the lovers.
The song 'Mohabbat Karlo Ji Bharlo' offers a meta-commentary on love and disillusionment. Dutt's character grunts disapprovingly at young lovers, only to break into a philosophical song that reflects both scepticism and rueful acceptance of love's illusions. Such visual playfulness and choreographed mise-en-scène are rarely seen in Indian cinema of the time.
Dutt and Shyama share palpable on-screen chemistry, anchoring the romantic plot with charm. Shakila, in her noir-inspired club songs like 'Babuji Dheere Chalna,' brings sensual mystique, marking the arrival of the femme fatale in Indian noir. Johnny Walker, as always, injects comedic balance, grounding the film in Dutt's broader humanist vision.
Aar Paar redefined the musical as a narrative driver, not merely an interlude. It also foregrounded Bombay as a character—its taxis, clubs, backstreets, and garages becoming living, breathing backdrops.
The creative team—Abrar Alvi (dialogue), VK Murthy (cinematography), OP Nayyar (music), and Majrooh Sultanpuri (lyrics)—set a high-water mark for collaboration in Hindi cinema. The film laid the groundwork for the noir-romance blend seen in later works like CID (1956), Kala Bazar (1960), and even Teesri Manzil (1966).
Aar Paar is an essential film in Guru Dutt's legacy—not a footnote, but a standalone masterpiece that showcases his wit, range, and control. Its artistic experimentation, urban realism, and unforgettable music testify to Dutt's joy in storytelling. It's time we celebrate Aar Paar not just as a 'lighter' film, but as a work of cinematic intelligence and warmth that rivals any in Dutt's oeuvre.
Rajeev Srivastava is a filmmaker and photographer, who has directed and produced documentaries and reportage for the World Bank, BBC, Reuters, APTN, and France 24. He has also curated international film festivals in Delhi. Views are personal.
(Edited by Prashant)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
CBFC cuts ‘Superman' in India: A short history of Hollywood films facing censorship
James Gunn's Superman soared into theatres across the world this weekend, but in India, the Man of Steel's flight was grounded by an indomitable foe: the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). Audiences here were treated to a version of the film that felt conspicuously snipped, with a now-infamous 33-second floating kiss between Clark Kent (David Corenswet) and Lois Lane (Rachel Brosnahan) mysteriously missing. The romantic moment previously teased in trailers was reportedly deemed too 'sensual' by the CBFC, which demanded its removal in exchange for an UA certificate. A swift wave of public outrage has since followed online, with exasperated fans pointing out the absurdity of censoring a kiss in a superhero flick while Indian films continue to get away with far sleazier depictions of women, often under the guise of tradition or mass appeal. But the uproar surrounding Superman is hardly an isolated incident; rather, it's just the latest cape caught in the CBFC's scissors. One needn't look far down the cutting room floor to find Dev Patel's Monkey Man, a politically loaded revenge saga set in a dystopian India, which found itself ghosted by the certification board. Universal Pictures had already pre-emptively cleaned house, swapping saffron banners for red and scrubbing out scenes that drew lines between religion and violence. Yet, despite these concessions, the film still failed to secure a screening date with the CBFC. No official ban was declared, but the film was never certified either. Industry insiders described the move as a covert form of bureaucratic censorship: by not officially rejecting the film, the board avoided controversy while still keeping it out of theatres. For Indian audiences, Monkey Man remains unseen, and, perhaps more tellingly, unspoken. Shortly after, The Apprentice, Ali Abbasi's thorny biopic on Donald Trump, arrived at the CBFC's doorstep, only to be promptly taken apart. The board demanded that nude scenes be axed, a graphic sexual assault between Trump and his then-wife Ivana trimmed by 75%, and the term 'Negro' removed altogether. They also threw in the usual public service announcements about smoking and drinking for good measure. Not mincing words, Abbasi said the world needed a 'vaccine against censorship,' arguing that what was left of his film after CBFC's pruning barely resembled the one he made. Sometimes, films disappear without a trace. Sean Baker's indie drama Anora, widely celebrated on the global awards circuit and eventually crowned Best Picture at the Oscars 2025, was originally slated for a November 2024 release in India. Then it vanished into the limbo known to Indian cinephiles as 'TBA' — the all-too-familiar acknowledgement that the film likely did not clear the CBFC's moral radar. Featuring the story of a Brooklyn-based stripper marrying into a Russian oligarchy, Anora may have been too risqué, too complex, or simply too uncomfortable, for certification. A slightly more local ghosting was with Santosh, a blistering Hindi-language drama made by an Indian cast and crew under a UK production banner. The film stormed Cannes in 2024, winning praise and major award nominations, only to be stonewalled in its own backyard. The CBFC didn't technically ban Santosh, but instead, sent back a laundry list of edits so sweeping and vague, director Sandhya Suri called them 'impossible' to implement. While specifics remain under wraps thanks to legal restrictions, it's speculated what rattled the board was the film's interrogation of India's police force, gendered violence, and systemic rot. But even filmmakers who play by the rules aren't safe. Halina Reijn's Babygirl, an erotic drama starring Nicole Kidman, was officially granted an A (Adults Only) certificate, only to be carved up anyway. Over three minutes of 'problematic' content were snipped, including intimate visuals and spicy language, prompting critics to ask what purpose an adult certification serves if adults still needed babysitting? The paradox of certifying films for adults and then treating those same adults as incapable of processing difficult or sensual material continues to dog the board's credibility. In a similar vein, Brady Corbet's Oscar-winning The Brutalist, starring Adrien Brody and Guy Pearce, was released in India with roughly one minute of nudity and sexual content removed. While the cuts were less dramatic than those faced by other films, Pearce himself commented that such interventions could undermine a film's emotional weight and artistic intent. A minute may be short, but as Pearce noted, 'Sometimes it's the uncomfortable parts that help the story land.' Of course, nothing quite captured the board's deeply confused moral compass like Christopher Nolan's Oppenheimer. The film wad released with its runtime intact, but not its integrity. Sex and nudity were blotted out with the infamous 'CGI black dress,' cigarette smoke disappeared into a puff of denial, and a pivotal scene featuring Florence Pugh and a recitation of the Bhagavad Gita sparked outrage from government officials and Hindu nationalist groups. Never mind that the film is about a man grappling with the morality of creating the atomic bomb, for the real crisis apparently, was quoting scripture during sex. And though the audio remained, the Minister of Information and Broadcasting questioned how the scene made it through in the first place. Other Oscar hopefuls, such as Steven Spielberg's The Fabelmans, also fell prey to Indian censorship. The CBFC muted several anti-Semitic slurs in the film that, in context, reflected the protagonist's experience of hate and bullying. In doing so, the board managed to rob the film of its sting, all in service of a more 'palatable' viewing experience. But perhaps the most glaring episode of the CBFC's vigilance in recent memory came courtesy of Brad Pitt's F1. The board reportedly asked the filmmakers to digitally replace a middle finger emoji with a fist emoji. Yes, it seems we're censoring emojis now. Around the same time, Marvel's Thunderbolts also faced the wrath of the mute button with five expletives — 'a**,' 'a**hole,' 'd**ks,' 'b***h' and 'pr**k' — scrubbed. All this despite the fact that the film was aimed squarely at older teens and young adults. The history of CBFC's edits is long and often baffling. From blurring alcohol bottles in Ford v Ferrari to removing references to Kashmir from Mission: Impossible – Fallout, the board's decisions have consistently reflected a desire to control what audiences watch and how they interpret it. What may have started as a well-meaning attempt to shield innocent eyes has now curdled into a mechanism of cultural and political gatekeeping. In Superman, the missing kiss might seem trivial, but in a film that quite literally flies the flag for truth and justice, it speaks volumes.


The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
From Jahhvi Kapoor to Urvashi Rautela, all the Indian celebrities spotted at Wimbledon 2025
The 2025 edition of Wimbledon saw a notable turnout of Indian celebrities at the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club, as several public figures from film, fashion, and sport were spotted attending the tournament. Among the first to draw attention were Priyanka Chopra Jonas and Nick Jonas, who were seen in the Royal Box on Centre Court. The couple, regulars at major global events, were captured watching the semi-finals, drawing notice from media and fans alike. Chopra opted for a muted, tailored look in keeping with the tournament's dress code. Anushka Sharma and Virat Kohli were also present at the venue, making a rare public appearance together. The couple kept a low profile, watching the matches quietly from the stands. Their visit came as a surprise to many fans, particularly as Sharma has largely stayed away from the spotlight in recent months. Actor Janhvi Kapoor was spotted alongside her rumoured partner Shikhar Pahariya. Kapoor wore a blue-and-white gingham dress from Miu Miu, a label she has frequently sported since her Cannes appearance earlier this year. Veteran actor Neena Gupta also made headlines for choosing to wear a saree to Wimbledon, breaking with the event's typically western dress code. She shared images from her visit on social media, including one with her daughter Masaba Gupta outside the Centre Court North East Hall. Sachin Tendulkar and Anjali Tendulkar were seen applauding key moments from the Royal Box. Tendulkar, who has often spoken about his interest in tennis, appeared relaxed and engaged during the match. Sonam Kapoor arrived in a white pantsuit, leaning into a business-formal look for the occasion. Preity Zinta, attending with husband Gene Goodenough, opted for a retro polka-dot dress. Also in attendance were Milind Soman and Ankita Konwar, who made a coordinated appearance in neutral-toned outfits. Meanwhile, Urvashi Rautela drew attention with a white lace gown and a set of four Labubu dolls she carried during the match that generated significant buzz online.


Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Prithviraj Sukumaran mourns stuntman SM Raju: 'Your skill and guts made magic possible'- Read below
(Picture Courtesy: Facebook) Actor Prithviraj Sukumaran has joined the Indian film fraternity in mourning the death of SM Raju , a veteran stuntman who lost his life in a devastating on-set accident. Taking to Instagram, Prithviraj penned a heartfelt message, honouring the courage and skill that Raju brought to every frame. 'Rest in peace Raju. So many moments of magic that would have been impossible to film without your skill and guts! You will be missed forever!' A stunt gone horribly wrong Prithviraj Sukumaran in Bengaluru for the promotion of his film Kaduva The accident occurred on Sunday, July 13, during the filming of a high-risk sequence for Tamil actor Arya's upcoming film, reportedly titled Vettuvan, directed by Pa Ranjith. The scene involved a car-toppling stunt using an SUV, which was supposed to launch off a ramp and crash-land in a controlled motion. However, the stunt turned fatal when the car flipped mid-air and crumpled on impact. Disturbing visuals from the shoot, shared by CinemaMadness, show SM Raju behind the wheel, executing the stunt. As the SUV launches, it spirals out of control, flipping and crashing violently, prompting gasps from the crew. Moments later, team members are seen rushing to the wreckage and pulling Raju out. He had sustained critical chest injuries by the time Raju was taken out. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo Rushed to hospital, declared dead on arrival According to The Financial Express, SM Raju was immediately rushed to the Nagapattinam Government Hospital, where doctors declared him dead on arrival. Vishal and Stunt Silva pays tribute - 'I will definitely be there for his family's future' Actor Vishal took Twitter and wrote, "So difficult to digest the fact that stunt artist Raju passed away while doing a car toppling sequence… He was such a brave person. My deepest condolences and may his soul rest in peace. Not just this tweet — I will definitely be there for his family's future… From the bottom of my heart and as my duty, I extend my support for them." Stunt Silva wrote on social media, "One of our great car-jumping stunt artists, S.M. Raju, died today while doing car stunts. Our stunt union and the Indian film industry will be missing him.'