
California Gas Prices to Go Up July 1: What to Know
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
California drivers will see higher gas prices starting July 1, as two state policies take effect.
First, the state's gas excise tax will increase from 59.6 cents to 61.2 cents per gallon, part of an annual adjustment for inflation.
At the same time, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) is rolling out stricter rules under its Low-Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS), which requires fuel producers to cut the carbon emissions from their products more sharply than before. The 2025 benchmark requires a 22.75 percent cut in carbon intensity from 2010 levels—a sharp increase from the previous goal of 20 percent by 2030.
To meet these targets, companies will need to blend in more expensive clean fuels or buy emissions credits—costs that are expected to be passed on to drivers.
Meanwhile, two major refineries, Phillips 66 in Los Angeles and Valero in Benicia, announced they will close by the end of 2026. The closures will reduce the number of gasoline producers in the state from nine to seven, which could trigger a sharp spike in fuel prices, based on analysis by University of Southern California Professor Michael Mische. His projections indicate gas could hit $6.43 per gallon after the first closure and soar to $8.43 once both refineries are offline, with even higher prices possible under volatile market conditions.
Together, these changes could raise gas prices by as much as 6 to 10 cents per gallon. But some experts warn the increase could be even higher.
Why It Matters
Retail prices for regular grade gasoline in California are already consistently higher than in any other state in the continental United States, often exceeding the national average by more than a dollar per gallon.
Therefore, a dramatic surge in gas prices could deepen California's cost-of-living crisis, strain working families, and reverberate through the broader economy.
Gasoline prices above 6.00 dollars a gallon are shown at a gas station in Los Angeles on Tuesday, June 7, 2022.
Gasoline prices above 6.00 dollars a gallon are shown at a gas station in Los Angeles on Tuesday, June 7, 2022.
Richard Vogel/AP
What To Know
A University of Pennsylvania report projected that changes to California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) could raise gas prices by 65 cents per gallon in the near term and 85 cents by 2030.
In response, Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones launched a Change.org petition urging lawmakers to repeal what he called an "unaffordable 65 cent gas price hike," arguing, "Californians already face the highest gas prices in the country." As of Thursday morning, the petition has more than 29,000 signatures — 21,000 short of its target.
However, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) disputed the 65 cent figure, calling it "misinformation." A spokesperson said prices may rise only 5 to 8 cents and that any increase would come from oil companies deciding how much compliance costs to pass on. Governor Newsom's office echoed that, calling the higher estimate false and emphasizing the LCFS could actually reduce fuel costs per mile by 42 percent by 2045.
Studies back this up. Research from the University of Minnesota and Biofuels Digest found little connection between LCFS credit prices and retail gasoline prices. In fact, California's gas price gap with the national average remained steady before and after the LCFS was introduced.
Jones rejected those claims, calling them "hogwash," telling Newsweek, "I'm really not too concerned about whether it's 10 cents or 65 cents. Basically we're splitting hairs at that point in time. It probably is in between somewhere. The bottom line is, these regulations are going to cause the price of gasoline to increase."
He also accused Newsom's office of trying to walk back an earlier CARB estimate of a 47 cent increase, saying, "They originally came out with 47 cents... and then they had to walk that back."
CARB did initially project a 47 cent increase for 2025, but later clarified that the analysis was not meant as a direct pump price forecast. Meanwhile, Democrats in the state Senate unanimously voted down a bill from Jones to pause the LCFS changes, which he claimed was part of Newsom's broader effort to phase out gas vehicles in favor of EVs.
"I believe Newsom's goal is to push Californians into EVs under the ideological guise that he's saving the planet," Jones said.
Newsom's office defended the policy on environmental grounds, noting that transportation accounts for over half of the state's carbon emissions and nearly all of its toxic diesel pollution. "This is the most impactful step our state can take to fight climate change," Newsom said in 2023, arguing that car emissions worsen asthma, wildfires, and sea-level rise.
But Jones dismissed such arguments. "California has done a very good job over the last 20 to 30 years cleaning up our air," he said, adding that the state's emissions make up just "about 1 percent of global emissions," and eliminating all internal combustion engines "would have zero impact on the rest of the planet."
Meanwhile, California gas prices remain high. In April, the state's average price per gallon was $4.85—$1.69 higher than the national average. Prices have spiked above $6 twice in the past two years, sparking public backlash and new legislation.
What Happens Next
The updated Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) regulations were resubmitted to the Office of Administrative Law on May 16, after being rejected in February. The office has until June 30 to issue a final decision, and if approved, the changes could take effect as soon as July 1.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
New Bill Would Change Driver's License Renewal Requirement for Some Seniors
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Illinois Governor JB Pritzker has been sent a bill that would change driver's license renewal requirements for senior citizens in the state. Newsweek reached out to Pritzker's office for comment via email. Why It Matters The proposed law would increase the age at which senior drivers must take a behind-the-wheel driving test to retain their license, from 79 to 87. There are more than 1.2 million drivers aged 65 or older in Illinois who the bill would impact if it becomes law, according to the Illinois Department of Transportation. What to Know The bill passed both houses of Illinois' legislature in May, and it was sent to Pritzker's desk for a signature on June 20. The governor has not indicated whether he plans to support the bill. It passed with bipartisan support. The office of Illinois Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias told Newsweek in a statement that the bill would align Illinois' driving standards with those of the rest of the nation. Under the bill, drivers 87 and older would be required to take annual driving tests. Immediate family members would also be able to report concerns about their driving ability, which could potentially result in the loss of driving privileges. Current law allows medical personnel, attorneys and police to file these reports. The name of the individual submitting the report would be kept confidential, according to the bill's text. Stock image of an older man driving a car. Stock image of an older man driving a car. dusanpetkovic/iStock via Getty Images State Representative Jay Hoffman, a Democrat who introduced the bill, told Newsweek that testing seniors at 79 doesn't help improve road safety. "The numbers are clear: testing at that age doesn't create any practical contribution to traffic safety, just unnecessary stress for older Illinoisans," he said. "I was happy to work with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to bring Illinois in-line with neighboring states by making a change we all agreed should be a priority." Giannoulias has supported the bill, which passed the state Senate unanimously. "My top priority as Secretary of State is keeping Illinois roads safe. Allowing immediate relatives to notify my office of concerns about their loved one's driving ability helps make driving safer for everyone," he said in a statement provided to Newsweek. He noted that Illinois statistics show that senior drivers are "the safest of any age category." "This legislation will remove unnecessary burdens placed on them and align our testing standards with the rest of the nation," he said. What People Are Saying State Senator Ram Villivalam, a Democrat, told Capitol News Illinois: "I think about my mom. I don't think my mom would admit she's a senior, but she is someone that is very much a safe driver. I can't think of someone that I know that's a safer legislation is removing this archaic requirement and doing so in a very balanced way." AARP urged lawmakers to support the bill in a press release earlier this year: "AARP members have asked our team for years why Illinois is the ONLY state in the nation that still uses age as a factor to require people to retake their driving test. Our members believe the policy to be discriminatory. The right to drive should be based on ability and not age." What Happens Next If the bill is signed into law, it would take effect on July 1, 2026.


Newsweek
5 hours ago
- Newsweek
Republican Senator Tells House Not To Vote on Bill She Just Voted For
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Republican Arkansas Senator Lisa Murkowski said Tuesday that despite voting in favor of the sweeping tax and spending package, she wants the House to return the "One Big Beautiful Bill" to the Senate for further work. "My hope is that the House is gonna look at this and recognize that we're not there yet," Murkowski told reporters today. Murkowski's vote was pivotal in the Senate's razor-thin 51–50 passage of the bill. The Alaska senator had been the focus of intense lobbying by GOP leaders, including Senate Majority Leader John Thune, to secure her support amid concerns over Medicaid cuts and food assistance reductions. The bill now heads to the House, where its future remains uncertain. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) (L) and Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY) (R) take an elevator just off the Senate floor after the Senate stayed in session throughout the night at the U.S. Capitol Building on July... Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) (L) and Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY) (R) take an elevator just off the Senate floor after the Senate stayed in session throughout the night at the U.S. Capitol Building on July 1, 2025, in Washington, D.C. MoreHow Did Lisa Murkowski Vote? Murkowski's reluctant "yes" vote underlines the fractures within the GOP over the bill's $3.3 trillion price tag and its sweeping policy changes. Her call for the House to send the legislation back signals that even among supporters, there's dissatisfaction with the final product. The passed bill determines the future of era tax cuts, Medicaid funding, and clean energy incentives. The Senate's passage marks a significant win for President Trump, who has pushed for the bill's approval before July 4. However, with House Republicans divided over the Senate's revisions, including deeper Medicaid cuts and a faster rollback of clean energy credits, the bill's path to final passage is far from guaranteed. What to Know Murkowski was one of the final holdouts in the Senate, citing concerns about the bill's impact on Alaska's vulnerable populations. GOP leaders spent hours negotiating with her, offering carve-outs for Alaska on Medicaid and SNAP (food assistance) funding. While some provisions passed parliamentary review, others—like enhanced Medicaid payments—were ruled noncompliant with Senate budget rules. Despite her reservations, Murkowski said voting "no" would have killed the bill entirely. "There is a tax impact coming forward. That's gonna hurt the people in my state," she said, referencing the expiration of Trump's 2017 tax cuts. Her vote allowed the bill to advance, but she made clear she expects further revisions. The Senate stayed in session overnight, voting on dozens of amendments. Murkowski, Thune, and other GOP leaders huddled repeatedly to hash out last-minute changes. The final vote came after 20+ hours of debate. The bill now returns to the House, where Republicans are split. Some hardliners oppose the increased deficit, while moderates are uneasy about Medicaid cuts. If the House rejects the Senate version, a conference committee may be needed to reconcile the differences. Murkowski also pushed to preserve clean energy credits from the Biden-era climate law. While some phaseouts were slowed, most credits will expire by 2026 under the Senate version. The House version is even more aggressive in ending them. List of Senators Who Voted Against the Big, Beautiful Bill Republican Senators Susan Collins (Maine), Rand Paul (Kentucky), and Thom Tillis (North Carolina) joined all 47 Democrats in voting against the legislation, forcing Vice President J.D. Vance to cast the tie-breaking vote. Each senator cited different reasons for their opposition. Collins pointed to deep cuts to Medicaid, warning they would jeopardize health care access for hundreds of thousands of Mainers and threaten rural hospitals. Tillis, who has faced backlash from Trump and announced he won't seek reelection, said the bill would strip Medicaid coverage from over 600,000 North Carolinians. Paul objected to the bill's impact on the national debt, calling for more aggressive fiscal reforms. Despite the defections, the bill now heads to the House, where Republican leaders are racing to finalize it before Trump's self-imposed July 4 deadline. The legislation includes extensions of Trump-era tax cuts, a $5 trillion debt ceiling hike, and major changes to Medicaid, SNAP, and clean energy funding. What People Are Saying Murkowski, when asked why she voted for the bill today, said, "Kill it and it's gone. There is a tax impact coming forward. That's gonna hurt the people in my state." In a separate interview with NBC News Capitol Hill correspondent Ryan Nobles, Murkowski said: "Do I like this bill? No. But I tried to take care of Alaska's interests." Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy on X following the vote: Thank you to @VP and the Senate for passing the One Big Beautiful Bill. Now it's time for the House to fly it home to @POTUS' desk so he can sign it into law!" Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer on the bill: "Republicans are in shambles because they know the bill is so unpopular." He pointed to a report from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), which estimated that 11.8 million more Americans would be uninsured by 2034 if the bill becomes law. The CBO also projected the bill would add nearly $3.3 trillion to the national deficit over the next decade, despite its deep cuts to welfare programs. What Happens Next The Senate-passed version of the bill is expected to be taken up in the House Rules Committee, possibly as soon as Tuesday. If House Republicans demand changes, the bill could head to a conference committee. Lawmakers are racing against the clock to finalize the package by Trump's self-imposed July Fourth deadline.


Newsweek
7 hours ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows States Where Drivers Will Pay Higher Gas Tax
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Millions of motorists across the United States will begin paying a higher gas tax starting on Tuesday as hikes go into effect. Why It Matters Gas prices have dropped over the past year or so, leaving more money in drivers' pockets. But several states will see new tax hikes on Tuesday. Fuel taxes are used to maintain and repair existing roads, as well as construct new infrastructure. What To Know Drivers in at least eight states will see gas tax hikes starting on July 1. Here is an overview of how laws are changing in those states. California California's gas excise tax, already the highest in the nation, will increase 1.6 cents per gallon in July, bringing it to 61.2 cents per gallon from 59.6 cents. Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom's office put out a press release earlier this month refuting claims that the tax would increase by 65 cents. "California's gasoline tax will increase by 1.6 cents per gallon, starting July 1, as required by law. This annual inflation increase was enacted by the Legislature in 2017 to help pay for road repairs—and overwhelmingly approved by voters in 2018 when they rejected a repeal attempt," his office wrote. Illinois Gasoline in Illinois will increase from about 47 cents per gallon to just over 48.3 cents, according to the Illinois Department of Revenue. Diesel fuel will also increase from 54.5 cents per gallon to 55.8 cents. Illinois drivers face other fees and levies that cause it to have among the highest fuel tax rates in the country. Indiana Indiana's gas tax is set to have a minor increase to adjust for inflation—from 35 cents per gallon to 36 cents, according to the Indiana Department of Revenue. Its gas use tax, which fluctuates regularly, also increased to 17.5 cents per gallon. Mississippi In Mississippi, the gas tax is expected to increase from 21 cents per gallon to 24 cents, according to the state's Department of Revenue. A gas pump nozzle at a Valero station in Austin, Texas, on June 30, 2025. A gas pump nozzle at a Valero station in Austin, Texas, on June 30, Missouri drivers will also see a slightly higher gas tax—from 27 cents per gallon to 29.5 cents. Nebraska Nebraska's gas tax will increase from 30.4 cents per gallon to 31.8 cents, according to the state's Department of Revenue. Rhode Island The gas tax in Rhode Island will increase one cent from the last hike in 2023, according to the Rhode Island Department of Revenue. It will increase to 38 cents per gallon from 37 cents. Virginia Virginia's fuel tax will increase from 30.8 cents per gallon to 31.7 cents, according to the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles. The gas sales tax also increased from 9 cents per gallon to 9.3 cents. Washington In Washington, the gas tax increased from 49.4 cents per gallon to 55.4 cents, according to the Washington State Department of Licensing. Where Is the Gas Tax Dropping? A few states will also see their gas taxes drop a bit. In Maryland, it will fall from 47.1 cents per gallon to 47 cents, reported The Herald-Mail, a Hagerstown-based newspaper. Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear, a Democrat, announced in June that the state's tax would drop 1.4 cents per gallon to 26.4 cents, reported WSAZ. What People Are Saying State Senator Marko Liias, a Washington Democrat, told The Washington State Standard: "This will keep projects on track and ensure the promises we've made can be kept. As you drive around and see those orange cones, that's where your money is at work." California Governor Gavin Newsom's office wrote: "There are many disingenuous claims swirling about California gas prices 'set to soar'—the truth is that gas prices won't come anywhere close to increasing by 65 cents, as many would have you believe."