Peace offering? Donald Trump's Nobel obsession
Pakistan nominated US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, as did Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
WASHINGTON - A craving for international prestige, a decade-long Obama rivalry and perhaps a dash of provocation: a mercurial melange of factors is at play in US President Donald Trump's obsession with the Nobel Peace Prize.
'It's well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on July 31, prompting reactions of disbelief and sarcasm from the Republican leader's opponents.
Since his Jan 20 return to power, the US president 'has brokered, on average, one peace deal or ceasefire per month,' Ms Leavitt said, citing as examples his mediations between India and Pakistan; Cambodia and Thailand; Egypt and Ethiopia; Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC); Serbia and Kosovo; and others.
His leading spokeswoman also mentioned Iran, where Mr Trump ordered US strikes against the Islamic republic's nuclear facilities, as evidence of decisions Ms Leavitt claims have contributed to world peace.
She made no mention of the conflict in Ukraine, which Mr Trump pledged multiple times to end on 'day one' of his term, or the war in Gaza, which rumbles on and for which the US supplies Israel with weapons.
Pakistan, Israel
For some foreign leaders, mentioning the prestigious award has become a sign of diplomatic goodwill toward an American president who envisions himself as a peacemaker.
Pakistan nominated Mr Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, as did Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Despite bag checks and warnings, young partygoers continue to vape in clubs in Singapore
Singapore Ong Beng Seng to plead guilty on Aug 4, more than 2 years after trip to Qatar with Iswaran
Singapore LTA, Singapore bus operators reviewing Malaysia's request to start services from JB at 4am
Singapore NDP 2025: Veteran Red Lion says each leap 'feels like 5km run'
Business Decoupling to save on tax? You may lose right to property if ties go awry
Singapore Lessons learnt from Singapore's love-hate relationship with e-scooters
Opinion At UN's Wipo, Singaporean Daren Tang strives to create an equal music for haves and have-nots
Asia Mass grave with over 100 skeletons in Sri Lanka brings up old wounds
During an early July meeting at the White House, a journalist asked the presidents of Liberia, Senegal, Mauritania, Guinea-Bissau, and Gabon whether Trump deserved the award.
Basking in the flattering responses from the African leaders, a smiling Mr Trump said: 'We could do this all day long.'
Tens of thousands of people can offer a nomination to the Nobel committee, including lawmakers, ministers, certain university professors, former laureates and members of the committee themselves.
Nominations are due by Jan 31, with the announcement coming in October 2025 on the 10th of the month.
Law professor Anat Alon-Beck, who is an Israeli-American, submitted Mr Trump's name to the committee's five members, who were appointed by the Norwegian Parliament.
The assistant professor at Case Western Reserve University School of Law told AFP she did so because of the 'extraordinary leadership' and 'strategic brilliance' he has shown, in her opinion, in advancing peace and securing the release of hostages held in the Gaza Strip.
'Never' getting the nobel prize
For some, the prospect of handing the prize to someone who has upended the international order is untenable.
'Nominating Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize is like entering a hyena in a dog show,' US history and politics researcher Emma Shortis wrote on news site The Conversation.
'Of course Trump does not deserve it.'
The American president disagrees.
'I deserve it, but they will never give it to me,' Mr Trump told reporters in February as he hosted Mr Netanyahu at the White House, lamenting not ticking the Nobel box in his life.
'No, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do, including Russia/Ukraine, and Israel/Iran, whatever those outcomes may be,' Mr Trump griped on his Truth Social platform in June.
'But the people know, and that's all that matters to me!'
Mr Trump is well-known as someone who is particularly fond of accolades and prizes, Professor Garret Martin, a professor of international relations at American University, told AFP, 'so he would welcome this major international recognition'.
And since the beginning of his presidential ambitions 10 years ago, 'he has put himself in opposition to Barack Obama, who famously won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009,' Prof Martin added.
The prize awarded to the Democratic former president, barely nine months after he took office, sparked heated debate – and continues to do so.
'If I were named Obama I would have had the Nobel Prize given to me in 10 seconds,' Mr Trump bellyached in October 2024, during the final stretch of the presidential campaign.
338 candidates
Three other US presidents have also been so honored: Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and Jimmy Carter.
The prize was also awarded to Dr Henry Kissinger in 1973 for his efforts to help end the war in Vietnam. The choice of the one-time US secretary of state was heavily criticized.
The full list of Nobel Peace Prize nominees is confidential – except for individual announcements by sponsors – but their number is made public. In 2025, there are 338 nominees.
Some betting sites have Mr Trump in second place to win, behind Ms Yulia Navalnaya, the widow of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny. AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
37 minutes ago
- Straits Times
China and Russia start joint drills in Sea of Japan
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The 'Joint Sea-2025' exercises kicked off in waters near the Russian port of Vladivostok and would last for three days. BEIJING - China and Russia began joint naval drills in the Sea of Japan, also known as East Sea, on Aug 3 as they seek to reinforce their partnership and counterbalance what they see as a US-led global order. Alongside economic and political ties, Moscow and Beijing have strengthened their military cooperation in recent years, and their relations have deepened since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022. The 'Joint Sea-2025' exercises kicked off in waters near the Russian port of Vladivostok and would last for three days, China's defence ministry said in a statement on Aug 3. The two sides will hold 'submarine rescue, joint anti-submarine, air defence and anti-missile operations, and maritime combat'. Four Chinese vessels, including guided-missile destroyers Shaoxing and Urumqi, are participating in the exercises alongside Russian ships, the ministry said. After the drills, the two countries will conduct naval patrols in 'relevant waters of the Pacific'. China and Russia have carried out annual drills for several years, with the 'Joint Sea' exercises beginning in 2012. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore LTA, Singapore bus operators reviewing Malaysia's request to start services from JB at 4am Singapore Despite bag checks and warnings, young partygoers continue to vape in clubs in Singapore Singapore Ong Beng Seng to plead guilty on Aug 4, more than 2 years after trip to Qatar with Iswaran Singapore Now flying solo, Acres CEO Kalaivanan Balakrishnan presses ahead with wildlife rescue efforts Opinion The charm – and drawbacks – of living in a time warp in Singapore Business Decoupling to save on tax? You may lose right to property if ties go awry Singapore NDP 2025: Veteran Red Lion says each leap 'feels like 5km run' Singapore Lessons learnt from Singapore's love-hate relationship with e-scooters 2024's drills were held along China's southern coast. The Chinese defence ministry said on Aug 1 that 2025's exercises were aimed at 'further deepening the comprehensive strategic partnership' of the two countries. China has never denounced Russia's more than three-year war nor called for it to withdraw its troops, and many of Ukraine's allies, including the United States, believe that Beijing has provided support to Moscow. China insists it is a neutral party, regularly calling for an end to the fighting while also accusing Western countries of prolonging the conflict by arming Ukraine. AFP
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Thousands join pro-Palestinian march over Sydney Harbour Bridge
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox SYDNEY - Thousands of demonstrators braved pouring rain to march across Sydney's iconic Harbour Bridge on Sunday calling for peace and aid deliveries in the war-torn Gaza Strip, where a humanitarian crisis has been worsening. Nearly two years into a war that Palestinian authorities say has killed more than 60,000 people in Gaza, governments and humanitarian organisations say a shortage of food is leading to widespread starvation. Some of those attending the march, called by its organisers the 'March for Humanity', carried pots and pans as symbols of the hunger. Among the marchers was Wikileaks founder Julian Assange. New South Wales police and the state's premier last week tried to block the march from taking place on the bridge, a city landmark and transport thoroughfare, saying the route could cause safety hazards and transport disruption. The state's Supreme Court ruled on Saturday that it could go ahead. New South Wales police said they were deploying hundreds of personnel and urged marchers to remain peaceful. Police were also present in Melbourne, where a similar protest march was taking place. Diplomatic pressure ramped up on Israel in recent weeks. France and Canada have said they will recognise a Palestinian state, and Britain says it will follow suit unless Israel addresses the humanitarian crisis and reaches a ceasefire. Israel has condemned these decisions as rewarding Hamas, the group that governs Gaza and whose attack on Israel in October 2023 began an Israeli offensive that has flattened much of the enclave. Australia's centre-left Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said he supports a two-state solution and Israel's denial of aid and killing of civilians "cannot be defended or ignored", but has not recognised Palestine. REUTERS
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
How Trump-vetted scientists are trying to shred the climate consensus
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Climate experts say it will hobble the country's efforts to rein in rising temperatures. NEW YORK – A new report from the US Department of Energy says projections of future global warming are exaggerated, while benefits from higher levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) such as more productive farms are overlooked. It concludes, at odds with the scientific mainstream, that policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions risk doing more harm than good. Released on July 28, the report is part of an effort by the Trump administration to try to end the US government's authority to regulate greenhouse gases. It's the output of scientists known for contradicting the consensus embodied in volumes of research by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), whose work is approved by virtually every nation. Publishing an alternate approach to the science of global warming on the same day that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said it plans to revoke the endangerment finding – a determination that greenhouse gases harm public health and welfare – marks a step up in the administration's war on regulations. Since its adoption in 2009, the endangerment finding has become the bedrock of many US environmental rules. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said repealing the finding would 'end US$1 trillion or more in hidden taxes on American businesses and families.' Climate experts say it will hobble the country's efforts to rein in rising temperatures and lessen the impacts, such as more intense storms, droughts and wildfires. The federal government's own research shows climate-fuelled extreme weather is already causing US$150 billion (S$193.2 billion) in losses a year in the US. In its proposed rule to nix the finding, the EPA references the Energy Department's report more than two dozen times. Energy Secretary Chris Wright wrote in the report's foreword that he had commissioned it and selected the authors to form a working group. The agency's support for the contrarian research stands in contrast to the broad rollback of other climate work under President Donald Trump. Since his inauguration in January 2025, hundreds of scientists have been dismissed from agencies , including some who had focused on climate change. The EPA recently moved to shutter its main scientific research arm, which has been a crucial tool for policymaking. The US cancelled a landmark climate change report , the sixth National Climate Assessment, and has taken down numerous webpages on climate science. Some of those were related to previous National Climate Assessments – studies that hundreds of researchers spent years painstakingly compiling. The new report's authors include Steven Koonin, a fellow at Stanford's Hoover Institution who wrote a 2021 booking arguing that climate science is 'unsettled'; Roy Spencer, a University of Alabama in Huntsville scientist and senior fellow at the climate-denying group Cornwall Alliance; and Judith Curry, a climatologist formerly of Georgia Tech who testified to a Senate committee in 2023 that climate change has been mischaracterised as a crisis. An Energy Department spokesman said the report's authors 'represent diverse viewpoints and political backgrounds and are all well-respected and highly credentialed individuals.' The spokesman added that the report 'was reviewed internally by a group of DOE scientific researchers and policy experts from the Office of Science and National Labs,' and that there will be a 30-day comment period for the public to weigh in. Ann Carlson, an environmental law professor at the University of California at Los Angeles, said the report presents a series of arguments the administration can draw on to contend 'public health and welfare is not endangered by emissions that come from the auto sector, from the trucking sector, from the electricity sector.' Rather than denying climate change is occurring, Prof Carlson said, 'What they're trying to say instead is, 'Well, it's not so bad. It's really expensive to mitigate. And that expense actually harms people more than anything we could do' to slow it down. That's in keeping with past comments by members of Trump's cabinet that have downplayed global warming or public concern about it. Prof Carlson said the report is 'a wholesale assault' on climate science and previous policy. Zeke Hausfather, the climate lead at Stripe Inc and a research scientist at nonprofit Berkeley Earth, has contributed to major US and international climate reports. He described the Energy Department publication as 'scattershot' and said it 'would not pass muster in any traditional scientific peer review process'. That the administration released it after taking down webpages hosting 'the actual, congressionally mandated National Climate Assessments,' he said, is 'a farce'. The report is a 'package of punches' against the scientific consensus that previously grounded US climate policy, and against that policy itself, said Jennifer Jacquet, a professor of environmental science and policy at the University of Miami. 'It's really surreal to think that's where we are in 2025.' The EPA will have to go through the lengthy federal rulemaking process to try to abolish the endangerment finding. If the proposed rule is finalised, legal challenges are inevitable. The issue could end up before the Supreme Court, which ruled in 2007's Massachusetts v EPA that greenhouse gases were pollutants the EPA could regulate under the Clean Air Act. Getting the court, which now has a conservative supermajority, to overturn the 2007 decision may be the endgame, said Prof Carlson. The effort would be risky but could succeed, she said. 'I think on every front, the arguments that the [EPA] administrator is going to make – based on the DOE report – are extremely weak,' said Prof Carlson. 'But we also have a court that's very hostile to environmental regulation.' BLOOMBERG
