logo
Priority's Current Plus Ebike Powers You Up the Meanest Hills

Priority's Current Plus Ebike Powers You Up the Meanest Hills

WIRED31-05-2025
I've been an avid biker for as long as I can remember. As a kid, I'd cruise my BMX around town with friends all day during the summer, reveling in the freedom and autonomy that only comes from your own ride. Decades later, my introduction to the ebike scene has provided a renewed sense of that nostalgic joy for the open road.
As a relative newcomer, most of my ebike experience over the past year or so has been with relatively cheap ebikes, like the Propella 9S and Priority's e-Classic Plus. So when Priority offered me a chance to try the much pricier Current Plus, my first question was, 'What do you get from an ebike that costs over three grand?'
In this case, the short answer is range, style, features, and power. Lots of power, which may be the biggest key to the Current's success. As a throttle-equipped Class 2 ebike that converts to Class 3, you can absolutely blaze on this thing at up to 28 mph with pedal assist, and there's virtually no hill that can slow you down.
Most importantly, the bike's punchy motor keeps you safe in sketchy situations. Simply kick up the motor speed to level 5 and let the Current Plus fire you through traffic or cut through busy roads. I rarely pushed the motor above the midpoint, but when I needed the power, it swiftly arrived, affording me the freedom to cruise virtually anywhere on Portland, Oregon's mean streets.
The Current's impressive battery range adds to that go-anywhere feeling, letting me ride worry-free for days without the need to top it off. That kind of freedom and autonomy has brought back that BMX feeling, taking me from ebike tourist to true commuter. Greaseless Lightning
As a direct-to-consumer bike, the Current Plus needs some assembly when it arrives. A local bike shop can do the job for you for around $150-200, which I recommend considering for beginners. If you're more ambitious, you can assemble it yourself, but Priority still recommends having a shop give it a once-over for safety.
Otherwise, the Current Plus is extremely hands-off from a maintenance standpoint. The Gates Carbon Drive belt requires no lube or grease and is claimed to last up to '2-3 times longer' than chains, while Priority tested the 750 Wh battery for up to 90 miles per charge on the lowest pedal-assist speed. Letting the bike loose up and down the hills of southeast Portland for weeks, I squeezed out a still-impressive 60 miles per charge, give or take.
I tested the bike with the five-speed Shimano Nexus gear system, but for $200 more you can swap in the Enviolo CVT (Continuously Variable Transmission). This is a swap that you might consider if you're hauling a lot of gear—it's much safer to be able to make tiny adjustments to the torque if your bike is heavy or off-balance—but if you don't have a kid or two clinging to the back, you probably won't need it.
While the bike's mid-drive motor is much smoother than the front-mounted eClassic, I noticed some pedal buzz when starting the bike in higher gears. Downshifting to lower-tension gears eliminated the buzz, and the simplified belt drive made it brilliantly smooth to shift to any gear at a standstill. After a few rides, I was shifting and swapping through motor speeds without thinking, like driving a car with a manual transmission.
Before long, I was flying across town like a pro, increasingly leaving my car behind as Portland's rainy winter turned to sunlit spring. And man, does this thing fly. When boxed in at 20 mph as a Class 2 bike, I was hitting the top speed in seconds from anything above the second pedal-assist motor speed, so you'll likely want to convert it to Class 3 from the display settings if local laws allow. After converting, I still only hit around 26 mph on flats, but that was fast enough.
I spent the majority of my time between the first and second pedal-assist speeds, but when I got tired (or curious), moving to the fourth or fifth speeds was a blast. It's empowering to know you can make any hill your … subordinate, allowing you to choose virtually any path to your destination. Need to catch up after a late start or get rid of a car on your tail? Punch up the speed and let it rip. It's truly a joyful feeling.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FBI Warning—You Should Never Reply To These Messages
FBI Warning—You Should Never Reply To These Messages

Forbes

time15 minutes ago

  • Forbes

FBI Warning—You Should Never Reply To These Messages

FBI's AI warning is increasingly critical. Republished on July 10 with new report into AI deep fake attacks and advice for smartphone owners on staying safe as threats surge. The news that AI is being used to impersonate Secretary of State Marco Rubio and place calls to foreign ministers may be shocking, but it shouldn't be surprising. The FBI has warned such attacks are now underway and it will only get worse. As first reported by the Washington Post, the State Department has told U.S. diplomats that this latest attack has targeted at least three foreign ministers, a U.S. senator and a governor, using an AI generated voice to impersonate Rubio. A fake Signal account (Signal strikes again) was used to initiate contact through text and voice messages. It's clear that voice messages enable attackers to deploy AI fakes without the inherent risk in attempting to run them in real-time on a live call. The FBI is clear — do not respond to text or voice messages unless you can verify the sender. That means a voice message that sounds familiar cannot be trusted unless you can verify the actual number from which it has been sent. Do not reply until you can. Darktrace's AI and Strategy director Margaret Cunningham told me this is all too 'easy.' The attacks, while 'ultimately unsuccessful,' demonstrate 'just how easily generative AI can be used to launch credible, targeted social engineering attacks.' Alarmingly, Cunningham warns, 'this threat didn't fail because it was poorly crafted — it failed because it missed the right moment of human vulnerability.' People make decisions 'while multitasking, under pressure, and guided by what feels familiar. In those moments, a trusted voice or official-looking message can easily bypass caution.' And while the Rubio scam will generate plenty of headlines, the AI fakes warning has being doing the rounds for some months. It won't make those same headlines, but you're more likely to be targeted in your professional life through social engineering that exploits readily available social media connections and content to trick you. The FBI tells smartphone users: 'Before responding, research the originating number, organization, and/or person purporting to contact you. Then independently identify a phone number for the person and call to verify their authenticity.' This is in addition to the broader advice given the plague of text message attacks now targeting American citizens. Check the details of any message. Delete any that are clear misrepresentations, such as fake tolls or DMV motoring offenses. Do not click any links contained in text messages — ever. And do not be afraid to hang up on the tech or customer support desk or bank or the law enforcement officer contacting you. You can then reach out to the relevant organization using publicly available contact details. ESET's Jake Moore warns 'cloning a voice can now take just minutes and the results are highly convincing when combined with social engineering. As the technology improves, the amount of audio needed to create a realistic clone also continues to shrink.' 'This impersonation is alarming and highlights just how sophisticated generative AI tools have become,' says Black Duck's Thomas Richards. 'It underscores the risk of generative AI tools being used to manipulate and to conduct fraud. The old software world is gone, giving way to a new set of truths defined by AI.' As for the Rubio fakes, 'the State Department is aware of this incident and is currently monitoring and addressing the matter,' a spokesperson told reporters. 'The department takes seriously its responsibility to safeguard its information and continuously take steps to improve the department's cybersecurity posture to prevent future incidents.' 'AI-generated content has advanced to the point that it is often difficult to identify,' the bureau warns. 'When in doubt about the authenticity of someone wishing to communicate with you, contact your relevant security officials or the FBI for help.' With perfect timing, Trend Micro's latest report warns 'criminals can easily generate highly convincing deepfakes with very little budget, effort, and expertise, and deepfake generation tools will only become more affordable and more effective in the future.' The security team says this is being enabled by the same kinds of toolkits driving other types of frauds that have also triggered FBI warnings this year — including a variety of other message attacks. 'tools for creating deepfakes,' Trend Micro says, 'are now more powerful and more accessible by being cheaper and easier to use.' As warned by the FBI earlier in the year and with the latest Rubio impersonations that it has under investigation, deep fake voice technology is now easily deployed. 'The market for AI-generated voice technology is extremely mature,' Trend Micro says, citing several commercial applications, 'with numerous services offering voice cloning and studio-grade voiceovers… While 'these services have many legitimate applications, their potential for misuse cannot be overlooked.' After breaking the Rubio impersonations news, the Washington Post warns that 'In the absent of effective regulation in the United States, the responsibility to protect against voice impostors is mostly on you. The possibility of faked distressed calls is something to discuss with your family — along with whether setting up code words is overkill that will unnecessarily scare younger children in particular. Maybe you'll decide that setting up and practicing a code phrase is worth the peace of mind.' That idea of a secure code word that a friend or relative can use to provide they're real was pushed by the FBI some months ago. 'Create a secret word or phrase with your family to verify their identity,' it suggested in an AI attack advisory. 'Criminals can use AI-generated audio to impersonate well-known, public figures or personal relations to elicit payments,' the bureau warned in December. 'Criminals generate short audio clips containing a loved one's voice to impersonate a close relative in a crisis situation, asking for immediate financial assistance or demanding a ransom.'

Apple's AI efforts ‘have struck midnight' and the only way it can stop getting further behind is acquiring Perplexity, analyst Dan Ives says
Apple's AI efforts ‘have struck midnight' and the only way it can stop getting further behind is acquiring Perplexity, analyst Dan Ives says

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Apple's AI efforts ‘have struck midnight' and the only way it can stop getting further behind is acquiring Perplexity, analyst Dan Ives says

Wedbush Securities' Dan Ives said Apple needs to acquire the $14 billion startup Perplexity in order to catch up and ultimately prevail in the AI race. While the company has an advantage because of the popularity of its iPhone and other iOS devices, it ultimately needs to look outside instead of building out an AI product in-house, Ives wrote in a Wednesday note. Apple is falling behind in the AI race, and the only way it can catch up is by buying the AI startup Perplexity, according to a top analyst. Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities said it's clear Apple is incapable of producing its own AI in-house, despite a company culture that strives to build superior products internally. In recent days, some of Apple's top AI talent has also been poached by increasingly aggressive AI talent recruiter Meta, Bloomberg reported. Meanwhile, competitors are increasingly outdoing the company. 'Apple is at a highway rest stop on a bench watching this 4th Industrial Revolution race go by at 100 miles an hour,' wrote Ives in a Wednesday note. Apple did not immediately respond to Fortune's request for comment. Ives was more hopeful about Apple's AI prospects in January, despite writing that the company was facing a 'fork in the road' year on the technology. At the time, he highlighted Apple's clearest advantage in the AI arms race: its existing base of 1.5 billion iPhones and 2.3 billion iOS devices used by people around the world. In his Wednesday note, Ives struck a more apprehensive tone, adding Apple still retained the advantage of its widespread devices and could eventually win the AI race, but that its 'window is narrowing.' Apple's most recent WWDC, its annual event for showcasing new tech, also 'was a snoozer,' Ives wrote, and barely mentioned AI. 'Apple is way too behind and does not have the AI technology to compete. The clock has struck 12, they need to acquire Perplexity or risk getting further behind,' Ives told Fortune in an email. Even if Apple has to pay around double what it is currently worth, it should acquire Perplexity, he wrote. The San Francisco-based startup, reportedly worth $14 billion, has made strides among AI enthusiasts for citing links to articles and other information when its AI responds to queries. Perplexity on Tuesday also launched Comet, an AI-based web browser, for select subscribers, in its latest effort to compete with tech giants Google and Microsoft. Yet, Tomasz Tunguz, the founder of Theory Ventures, which invests in early-stage enterprise AI startups, said acquiring Perplexity would come with myriad privacy considerations for Apple. The company is used to providing end-to-end encryption for products like iMessage and FaceTime, and would need to find a solution for how Perplexity would run, either locally or on a secure cloud architecture. 'They would need to have a lot of confidence they could build an architecture from end to end that had that privacy component,' Tunguz told Fortune. Kevin Novak, founder and managing partner of early-stage AI investment firm Rackhouse Ventures, said it's unclear whether a large acquisition would work for Apple. The company has tried to maintain the pro-building ethos of Steve Jobs for much of its history, and has been shy to acquire. Among its largest acquisitions was its $3 billion purchase of Beats electronics in 2014. 'This would be challenging for any company, but especially given Apple's sort-of corporate ethos around perfectionism, may be especially challenging for Apple,' Novak told Fortune. Still, Ives, for his part, said he believes Perplexity could be a natural fit for Apple and could especially help level up Siri to make it many people's most frequent exposure to AI. 'If Apple acquires Perplexity, the combined forces of Cupertino with Perplexity would be a game changer on the AI front and rival ChatGPT given the scale and scope of Apple's ecosystem,' wrote Ives in the note. This story was originally featured on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store