Ukraine says it hit Russian oil facilities, military airfield
In a statement on Telegram, Ukraine's Unmanned Systems Forces said they had hit the oil refinery in Ryazan, about 180 km southeast of Moscow, causing a fire on its premises.
Also hit, the USF said, was the Annanefteprodukt oil storage facility in the Voronezh region that borders on northeastern Ukraine.
The statement did not specify how the facilities were hit, but the USF specialises in drone warfare, including long-range strikes.
There was no immediate comment from Russia on the reported attacks on its infrastructure sites.
Separately, Ukraine's SBU intelligence agency said its drones had hit Russia's Primorsko-Akhtarsk military airfield, which has been used to launch waves of long-range drones at targets in Ukraine.
The SBU said it also hit a factory in Penza that it said supplies Russia's military-industrial complex with electronics.
At the start of Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022, Ukraine had no response to Moscow's vast long-range strike capacity but it has since built up a fleet of long-range kamikaze drones able to carry explosive warheads for many hundreds of kilometres.
Russia's defence ministry said in its daily report that its defence units had downed a total of 338 Ukrainian drones overnight. Its reports do not say how many Ukrainian drones were launched at any given time.
For its part, Ukraine's air force said it had downed 45 of 53 Russian drones launched towards its territory overnight.
On Ukraine's eastern battlefront, Russia's defence ministry said, Russian forces had captured the village of Oleksandro-Kalynove in the Donetsk region on Saturday.
Reuters could not immediately verify the battlefield report.
Russian forces now control almost 20 per cent of Ukraine in its east and south after three-and-a-half years of grinding war.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sharjah 24
2 hours ago
- Sharjah 24
China and Russia start joint drills in Sea of Japan
Alongside economic and political ties, Moscow and Beijing have strengthened their military cooperation in recent years, and their relations have deepened since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022. The "Joint Sea-2025" exercises kicked off in waters near the Russian port of Vladivostok and would last for three days, China's defence ministry said in a statement on Sunday. The two sides will hold "submarine rescue, joint anti-submarine, air defence and anti-missile operations, and maritime combat". Four Chinese vessels, including guided-missile destroyers Shaoxing and Urumqi, are participating in the exercises alongside Russian ships, the ministry said. After the drills, the two countries will conduct naval patrols in "relevant waters of the Pacific". China and Russia have carried out annual drills for several years, with the "Joint Sea" exercises beginning in 2012.
Arabian Post
6 hours ago
- Arabian Post
U.S. Investigation Targets Jack Smith Amid Trump's Legal Struggles
The U. S. Office of Special Counsel has initiated a formal investigation into Jack Smith, the prosecutor overseeing key legal cases against former U. S. President Donald Trump. This move marks a significant escalation in a series of actions targeting Smith, widely viewed as a central figure in the growing legal battle surrounding Trump. The investigation stems from allegations of misconduct during Smith's tenure as special counsel, and the timing of this inquiry has raised questions about its political motivations. Critics argue that the move is part of a broader effort to undermine legal proceedings against Trump, a claim echoed by several high-profile supporters of the former president. However, others view the investigation as a legitimate step in ensuring transparency and accountability in Smith's conduct, particularly as his role has attracted heightened scrutiny in the wake of several high-profile legal cases. Smith, appointed by U. S. Attorney General Merrick Garland, is responsible for prosecuting Trump in connection with various charges, including obstruction of justice, mishandling classified documents, and efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. His appointment followed the departure of previous special counsel Robert Mueller, who led the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. ADVERTISEMENT Despite Smith's established track record in handling high-stakes cases, questions regarding the impartiality of his actions have arisen from both the political left and right. Some claim that the investigation into Smith represents an effort by Trump and his allies to diminish his credibility and derail the ongoing cases. Others insist that Smith's conduct has been above reproach, and the scrutiny is politically motivated. Smith has faced mounting pressure since his appointment, with critics alleging overreach in his handling of sensitive information. His prosecution of Trump has been framed by some as part of a larger political vendetta. The latest investigation, according to insiders, focuses on whether Smith misused his authority during the prosecution of Trump, particularly in relation to the investigation into the former president's handling of classified documents. These claims are set against the backdrop of an increasingly polarised political climate, where legal actions against prominent figures are often seen through a partisan lens. In contrast, defenders of Smith argue that his efforts have been crucial in holding Trump accountable for alleged crimes committed during his time in office. They point to Smith's legal expertise and his reputation for fairness in the handling of politically sensitive cases. Critics, however, remain unconvinced, alleging that Smith's actions are more aligned with advancing a personal or political agenda than upholding the law impartially. The investigation into Smith's conduct is likely to have wide-ranging consequences for both the legal proceedings against Trump and the broader landscape of U. S. politics. Given the divisiveness of the case, it is expected that both sides will continue to use the investigation to fuel their respective narratives, with each viewing the inquiry as either a necessary check on power or a politically charged attack. The probe into Smith's actions comes amid escalating tensions surrounding the Trump legal battles. Legal experts speculate that the investigation could have a significant impact on Smith's ability to continue his work, depending on its outcome. If allegations are substantiated, Smith could face professional consequences, potentially including a loss of his position or restrictions on his ability to handle sensitive national security cases. On the other hand, if cleared, it could further solidify his standing as a key figure in the U. S. legal system, especially in politically sensitive matters.
Arabian Post
8 hours ago
- Arabian Post
OPEC+ Set to Approve Oil Output Hike Amid Supply Fears
OPEC+ members are poised to approve a significant increase in oil output at a crucial meeting scheduled for Sunday. Sources indicate that the group will likely raise production, though discussions are still ongoing over the exact size of the hike for September. The decision follows rising concerns about global oil supplies and the potential for further disruptions from Russia. This move comes as the international community grapples with the impacts of sanctions and geopolitical tensions, including the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine. The oil cartel, comprising the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and other non-member allies like Russia, has been accelerating production increases over the past few months. The decision stems from a combination of factors, with an acute focus on the global oil stockpiles, which have remained low despite efforts to stabilize supply. The urgency is compounded by seasonal slowdowns in demand, which have raised questions about balancing supply with market conditions. OPEC+ leaders have also been closely monitoring the evolving situation in Russia, which continues to face economic and energy sanctions from Western nations. These sanctions, aimed at curbing Russia's oil exports, have prompted the Kremlin to seek alternative buyers for its crude oil. At the same time, the United States has renewed its calls for India to reduce its purchases of Russian oil, intensifying diplomatic pressure. Washington's strategy is driven by its broader geopolitical objective of isolating Moscow economically while pushing for a peaceful resolution to the Ukraine conflict. ADVERTISEMENT This dynamic has placed India in a delicate position. As one of the largest consumers of Russian oil, India has maintained its imports despite mounting external pressure. This situation has intensified after the European Union's sanctions on Russia, forcing some Indian state refiners to suspend their purchases of Russian oil. With OPEC+ members aware of the broader geopolitical context, their decisions will be shaped not just by market conditions but also by the complex web of international relations and the shifting allegiances in global energy trade. In recent months, the collective oil production of OPEC+ members has become a focal point in global discussions on energy security. The cartel's decisions carry significant weight in influencing oil prices, particularly as economies emerge from the pandemic and recover from inflationary pressures. The oil market has shown signs of volatility, with fluctuations in prices reflecting both the tightening supply and rising concerns about geopolitical tensions. The meeting scheduled for Sunday will likely be decisive for OPEC+ members, many of whom are keen to boost production to meet global demand. Saudi Arabia, as the group's leading producer, has expressed concerns about the pace of supply increases, but has also indicated its willingness to cooperate on finding a balanced approach. The UAE and other Gulf states have similarly shown a commitment to addressing market imbalances, although there are notable differences in opinion regarding how aggressively the group should ramp up output. A key issue at the heart of the debate is the uncertainty surrounding the Russian supply. Moscow's ability to maintain its oil exports amid sanctions has been questioned by some members, and the broader impact of any further disruptions is a critical point of discussion. Russia's oil output has remained relatively stable despite sanctions, but the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and potential future sanctions may disrupt this trend. Further complicating the situation is the fact that some OPEC+ members, such as Iraq and Algeria, have been more cautious about increasing output due to concerns over market stability. They argue that the global oil market remains fragile, and any major increase in production could lead to oversupply, ultimately lowering prices and undermining efforts to stabilize the market.
