Around 3,000 farmers can apply for closed nature farming scheme after ‘error'
The Government caused uproar when it announced on March 11 that the sustainable farming incentive (SFI), which pays farmers in England for 'public goods' such as insecticide-free farming, wildflower strips and managing ponds and hedgerows, was fully allocated for this year.
At the time it said it had stopped accepting new applications for the incentive – the largest part of the new environmental land management (Elms) programme which has replaced EU-era farming subsidies – with immediate effect.
But ministers have apologised for confusion caused by a message 'shown in error' when people started an application and saved it, which told them they would receive six weeks' notice if the Government needed to close applications.
The message, which was shown alongside one correctly telling farmers their application would be available for two months before being deleted if not submitted, 'should not have been included and I apologise for the confusion it caused', food security and rural affairs minister Daniel Zeichner said.
Around 3,000 farmers who started applications after January 12 but had not submitted them when the scheme was halted will now be able to apply for funding up to £9,300 a year – the average value for existing agreements for this year – with restrictions.
Mr Zeichner acknowledged the restrictions were not in the original scheme but said they had been put in place to be fair and reasonable to affected applicants while also 'ensuring the prudent use of public money'.
In a written ministerial statement Mr Zeichner said the budget for this year's scheme had already been fully allocated and the extra applications would have to be funded from other areas of the Environment Department (Defra's) budget.
He also said that 'every penny' committed through more than 37,000 live SFI agreements that were in place before March 11 would continue to be paid to farmers over the coming years, and all eligible applications submitted before applications closed had been taken forward.
The Government is planning to reform the SFI scheme and has promised to provide more details about the new programme later in the summer.
The announcement comes after the National Farmers' Union (NFU) co-ordinated threatened legal action over Defra's failure to give the proper notice period for the closure of the scheme, claiming more than 6,000 farmers had started applications when the scheme was suddenly scrapped.
NFU president Tom Bradshaw said: 'We said from day one that this sudden closure, with just minutes' notice, was wholly unacceptable and always wrong.
'The NFU was determined to use its expertise to challenge this devastating decision, and I would like to thank those members and staff who led this work.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Finextra
an hour ago
- Finextra
Growing pains: Evolving core banking for an age of AI
What are the main barriers preventing European banks from fully modernising core systems? What lessons can they learn from digital-native and AI-infused platforms about agility and data strategy? As regulatory complexity increases, how are financial institutions balancing transformation speed with compliance? In Western Europe's mature banking environment, is modernisation more about cost efficiency or growth through innovation? And what are the key perceived risks for not modernising in the next 24 months? How are European banks prioritising ESG, AI, and cloud strategy across their digital roadmaps? What success measures or KPIs define a successful digital transformation? Every day, banks are increasingly feeling the modernisation imperative. Market demands, technology innovations, and consumer expectations are changing at a pace that many core systems are no longer capable of matching. In fact, Temenos research finds that 81% of banks believe that not implementing artificial intelligence (AI) will cause them to will fall behind competitors. Yet no bank can leverage the opportunities of AI and other innovative tech solutions without first modernising their core systems. So what is the latest state of play of technology modernisation among European banks? Artificial intelligence (AI) and agentic banking transform fraud prevention, personalisation and automation, but as the core continues to be modernised, data will be key to gain insights into what customers want and expect. As regulatory pressure increases, European banks need to balance agile product innovation with compliance needs, ensuring requirements for DORA and PSD3, among others, are met without stifling modernisation budgets. How are banks balancing innovation and compliance? Crucially, how can the C-suite determine what constitutes a successful transformation? Modernisation strategies need to ensure realistic, precise KPIs to ensure progress and effectiveness of the transformation can be measured. Register for this Finextra webinar, hosted in association with Temenos, to join our panel of industry experts who will discuss the state of play for modernisation in Europe and how banks are approaching product innovation under regulatory pressures.
Finextra
an hour ago
- Finextra
What's next in wealth? Exploring European trends & priorities
What's driving the shift toward hybrid advisory models in European wealth management? Are organisations moving fast enough to keep pace with the tech-driven innovation in the financial sector and the opportunities it offers? What operating model changes are required to modernise legacy private banking infrastructure? How can firms deliver differentiated experiences to digital-native HNW clients without losing personal touch? What is the real ROI of AI in portfolio management? How are European wealth managers navigating ESG complexity when building advisory offerings across jurisdictions? Over are the days of homogeneity in wealth management, today's investors expect the same personalised, digital convenience in wealth that they get with fintechs and big tech. In fact, PwC finds that 72% of asset and wealth managers expect disruptive tech to shift consumer preference toward tech-enabled solutions. So how are European asset and wealth managers keeping pace with the digital revolution taking place in the space? And are they moving fast enough to garner favourability with the new generation of investors, which are expected to inherit an estimated at US$68 trillion over the next decade? Increased competition through fintechs as well as growing regulatory complexity (e.g., through MiFID III and ESG mandates) add further pressure on organisations. So, what are the digital priorities for European wealth managers in 2025 and beyond? How can organisations create scalable, digital, compliant platform strategies to cater to a growing audience of digital-natives? And what is the real ROI of AI in portfolio management? Register for this Finextra webinar, hosted in association with Temenos, to join our panel of industry experts who will discuss the key trends and priorities of European wealth managers, and how organisations can create scalable, digital wealth journeys to serve the next generation of investors.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Radical legal case could let players terminate their own contracts for free
New legal action that could lead to law changes allowing players to terminate their contracts with clubs without paying huge compensation has been launched across Europe. A class action by a group called Justice For Players is seeking compensation potentially totalling billions of pounds for alleged loss of income due to restrictive transfer rules. The action has been launched against Fifa and the FAs of France, Germany, Belgium, Denmark and the Netherlands. But the Dutch-based group said any of the estimated 100,000 male or female players who have played for a club in the EU or the UK since 2002 are eligible to join the claim. The English FA is not facing a legal claim at present but has been sent a copy of the legal action by the group. It follows a Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) ruling in October 2024 in a case brought by the former Chelsea, Arsenal and Real Madrid midfielder Lassana Diarra, who was ordered to pay €10million (£8.7million) by Fifa for leaving the Russian club Lokomotiv Moscow one year into a four-year deal. The CJEU said some of Fifa's rules on player transfers went against EU laws and freedom of movement principles, which led to Fifa adopting an 'interim framework' on transfer rules while it looked at the legal implications of the ruling. Under Fifa's rules, players have in effect been prevented from leaving their clubs unilaterally in the middle of their contract and agreeing a free transfer elsewhere due to the threat of being forced to pay huge compensation. The CJEU ruling means any transfer fee paid for the player cannot form part of the compensation, and the new legal action claims that people in any other profession are allowed to leave their jobs in the middle of a contract. The argument in favour of the existing transfer system is that it benefits smaller clubs who earn income from selling players, and that complete freedom of movement would lead to the richest clubs paying enormous salaries to sign the best players without compensating the clubs who developed them. Franco Baldini, the England assistant manager under Fabio Capello, is one of the board members of Justice For Players. He said: 'As a former professional footballer, agent and someone who has worked in football in various managerial capacities, I have had first-hand experience of how much control and power Fifa has over the players. 'So I am very proud to be part of Justice For Players and to be part of something that could help change the existing system and make football more inclusive and more sustainable.' Justice For Players said it would be advised by the law firm Dupont-Hissel, founded by Jean-Louis Dupont, the Belgian lawyer who won the Bosman ruling in 1995 that cleared the way for players in the EU to move to other clubs at the end of contracts without a transfer fee being paid. The players' union Fifpro Europe said the action was an 'anticipated practical response to the CJEU's Diarra judgment, effectively centralising advocacy for affected players' interests that have broad implications for the football industry'. Justice For Players said its consultancy firm Compass Lexecon had estimated that damages could run into billions of euros.
