Out-gunned Europe accepts least-worst U.S. trade deal
As such, Sunday's agreement on a blanket 15% tariff after a monthslong standoff is a reality check on the aspirations of the 27-country European Union to become an economic power able to stand up to the likes of the United States or China.
The cold shower is all the more bracing given that the EU has long portrayed itself as an export superpower and champion of rules-based commerce for the benefit both of its own soft power and the global economy as a whole.
For sure, the new tariff that will now be applied is a lot more digestible than the 30% "reciprocal" tariff that Trump threatened to invoke in a few days.
While it should ensure Europe avoids recession, it will likely keep its economy in the doldrums: it sits somewhere between two tariff scenarios the European Central Bank last month forecast would mean 0.5-0.9% economic growth this year compared with just over 1% in a trade tension-free environment.
But this is nonetheless a landing point that would have been scarcely imaginable only months ago in the pre-Trump 2.0 era, when the EU along with much of the world could count on U.S. tariffs averaging out at around 1.5%.
Even when Britain agreed a baseline tariff of 10% with the United States back in May, EU officials were adamant they could do better and — convinced the bloc had the economic heft to square up to Trump — pushed for a "zero-for-zero" tariff pact.
It took a few weeks of fruitless talks with their U.S. counterparts for the Europeans to accept that 10% was the best they could get and a few weeks more to take the same 15% baseline that the United States agreed with Japan last week.
"The EU does not have more leverage than the U.S., and the Trump administration is not rushing things," said one senior official in a European capital who was being briefed on last week's negotiations as they closed in around the 15% level.
That official and others pointed to the pressure from Europe's export-oriented businesses to clinch a deal and so ease the levels of uncertainty starting to hit businesses from Finland's Nokia to Swedish steelmaker SSAB.
"We were dealt a bad hand. This deal is the best possible play under the circumstances," said one EU diplomat. "Recent months have clearly shown how damaging uncertainty in global trade is for European businesses."
That imbalance — or what the trade negotiators have been calling "asymmetry" — is manifest in the final deal.
Not only is it expected that the EU will now call off any retaliation and remain open to U.S. goods on existing terms, but it has also pledged $600 billion of investment in the United States. The time frame for that remains undefined, as do other details of the accord for now.
As talks unfolded, it became clear that the EU came to the conclusion it had more to lose from all-out confrontation.
The retaliatory measures it threatened totaled some €93 billion ($109 billion) — less than half its U.S. goods trade surplus of nearly €200 billion.
True, a growing number of EU capitals were also ready to envisage wide-ranging anti-coercion measures that would have allowed the bloc to target the services trade in which the United States had a surplus of some $75 billion last year.
But even then, there was no clear majority for targeting the U.S. digital services that European citizens enjoy and for which there are scant homegrown alternatives — from Netflix to Uber to Microsoft cloud services.
It remains to be seen whether this will encourage European leaders to accelerate the economic reforms and diversification of trading allies to which they have long paid lip service but which have been held back by national divisions.
Describing the deal as a painful compromise that was an "existential threat" for many of its members, Germany's BGA wholesale and export association said it was time for Europe to reduce its reliance on its biggest trading partner.
"Let's look on the past months as a wake-up call," said BGA President Dirk Jandura. "Europe must now prepare itself strategically for the future — we need new trade deals with the biggest industrial powers of the world."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
3 hours ago
- Japan Times
The AI race has Big Tech spending $344 billion this year
If there's any lesson to take from the spending plans issued by the world's largest technology companies over the past two weeks, it's to never underestimate the fear of missing out. Microsoft, which set a $24.2 billion capital spending record last quarter, plans to drop upward of $30 billion in the current period. similarly spent $31.4 billion last quarter, almost double what it dropped a year ago, and is maintaining that level of investment. Google owner Alphabet raised its capital expenditures guidance this year to $85 billion. Then there's Meta Platforms: The social networking giant lifted the low end of its forecast for 2025 capital expenditures and projected that costs will continue to grow at an even faster pace next year. Altogether, the four companies are expected to spend more than $344 billion for the year, with much of it going to the data centers necessary to run AI models. "We've basically tripled capex investment in cloud due to AI,' Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Mandeep Singh said. The emphasis from virtually every company executive during this earnings season was on investing as quickly as possible to get ahead. "We need the teams to execute at their very best to get the capacity in place as quickly and effectively as they can,' Microsoft Chief Financial Officer Amy Hood told analysts in a call Wednesday. Susan Li, Meta's CFO, said the goal of its own spending is to secure the advantage "in developing the best AI models.' Wall Street's response has been mixed. Meta was rewarded — in large part because the company posted a strong second-quarter sales beat and issued a rosy revenue forecast, signaling that the billions it's spending on AI are paying off. "On advertising, the strong performance this quarter is largely thanks to AI unlocking greater efficiency and gains across our ad system,' Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg said on an analyst call. Zuckerberg has plans to build several massive data centers and has been luring top AI researchers with compensation packages valued at hundreds of millions of dollars. The company recently restructured its internal AI division, now referred to as Meta Superintelligence Labs, in an effort to build human-level AI capabilities and apply that technology across its products. Shares of the company have gained more than 8% since it reported earnings on Wednesday. Amazon, on the other hand, failed to convince investors that its lavish spending has been worth it. The stock was down as much as 8.1% on Friday after the company reported tepid sales from its cloud division. The results were "especially disappointing' given the strong performance from Google's and Microsoft's own cloud services, according to Bloomberg Intelligence. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg speaks during an event at the company's headquarters in Menlo Park, California, in September 2023. | Reuters And the ongoing capital costs won't help. The operating margin for Amazon's cloud unit will continue to face pressure "through 2026 as capital spending ramps up,' BI analysts Poonam Goyal and Anurag Rana said. Alphabet's shares are essentially unchanged from last week when it reported earnings and issued guidance. The company raised its capital expenditures outlook by $10 billion and expects to ramp up spending even more in 2026. Chief Executive Officer Sundar Pichai explained that the investments are necessary to keep up with customer demand. "Obviously, we are seeing strong momentum across our portfolio, and especially in cloud,' Pichai told analysts in a call on July 23. "It's a tight supply environment, and we are investing more to expand.' Nikhil Lai, an analyst at Forrester, put it another way: If Google wants to keep up with rivals, he said, it has little choice but to follow suit: "Google's hand is forced by OpenAI to spend tremendously on AI's infrastructure and applications.' Microsoft tied its AI investments directly to a 39% jump in sales for its Azure cloud-computing division, which came in ahead of analysts' estimates. "We continue to lead the AI infrastructure wave and took share every quarter this year,' Chief Executive Officer Satya Nadella said in a call with analysts on Wednesday. "In Microsoft's case, the returns are good,' Gil Luria, an analyst with DA Davidson & Co., said in an interview. The only question now is whether Microsoft's customers are in turn seeing a decent return on investment, he said. "That's where the test will be,' he said. "If they don't, they're not going to increase that spend next year.' Apple's capital plans pale in comparison to its Big Tech peers. But the iPhone-maker did raise its spending estimates, tying much of the increase to AI efforts. Apple's property, plant and equipment investments totaled $9.47 billion in the nine months ended June 28, up nearly 45% from a year ago. "You are going to continue to see our capex grow,' Chief Financial Officer Kevan Parekh told analysts on Thursday. "It's not going to be exponential growth, but it is going to grow, substantially. And a lot of that's a function of the investments we're making in AI.'
The Mainichi
4 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Trump injects a new dose of uncertainty in tariffs as he pushes start date back to Aug. 7
WASHINGTON (AP) -- For weeks, President Donald Trump was promising the world economy would change on Friday with his new tariffs in place. It was an ironclad deadline, administration officials assured the public. But when Trump signed the order Thursday night imposing new tariffs, the start date of the punishing import taxes was pushed back seven days so the tariff schedule could be updated. The change in tariffs on 66 countries, the European Union, Taiwan and the Falkland Islands was potentially welcome news to countries that had not yet reached a deal with the U.S. It also injected a new dose of uncertainty for consumers and businesses still wondering what's going to happen and when. Trump told NBC News in a Thursday night interview the tariffs process was going "very well, very smooth." But even as the Republican president insisted these new rates would stay in place, he added: "It doesn't mean that somebody doesn't come along in four weeks and say we can make some kind of a deal." Trump has promised that his tax increases on the nearly $3 trillion in goods imported to the United States will usher in newfound wealth, launch a cavalcade of new factory jobs, reduce the budget deficits and, simply, get other countries to treat America with more respect. The vast tariffs risk jeopardizing America's global standing as allies feel forced into unfriendly deals. As taxes on the raw materials used by U.S. factories and basic goods, the tariffs also threaten to create new inflationary pressures and hamper economic growth -- concerns the Trump White House has dismissed. Questions swirl around the tariffs despite Trump's eagerness As the clock ticked toward Trump's self-imposed deadline, few things seemed to be settled other than the president's determination to levy the taxes he has talked about for decades. The very legality of the tariffs remains an open question as a U.S. appeals court on Thursday heard arguments on whether Trump had exceeded his authority by declaring an "emergency" under a 1977 law to charge the tariffs, allowing him to avoid congressional approval. Trump was ebullient as much of the world awaited what he would do. "Tariffs are making America GREAT & RICH Again," he said Thursday morning on Truth Social. Others saw a policy carelessly constructed by the U.S. president, one that could impose harms gradually over time that would erode America's power and prosperity. "The only things we'll know for sure on Friday morning are that growth-sapping U.S. import taxes will be historically high and complex, and that, because these deals are so vague and unfinished, policy uncertainty will remain very elevated," said Scott Lincicome, a vice president of economics at the Cato Institute. "The rest is very much TBD." The new tariffs build off ones announced in the spring Trump initially imposed the Friday deadline after his previous "Liberation Day" tariffs in April resulted in a stock market panic. His unusually high tariff rates announced then led to recession fears, prompting Trump to impose a 90-day negotiating period. When he was unable to create enough trade deals with other countries, he extended the timeline and sent out letters to world leaders that simply listed rates, prompting a slew of hasty agreements. Swiss imports will now be taxed at a higher rate, 39%, than the 31% Trump threatened in April, while Liechtenstein saw its rate slashed from 37% to 15%. Countries not listed in the Thursday night order would be charged a baseline 10% tariff. Trump negotiated trade frameworks over the past few weeks with the EU, Japan, South Korea, Indonesia and the Philippines -- allowing the president to claim victories as other nations sought to limit his threat of charging even higher tariff rates. He said Thursday there were agreements with other countries, but he declined to name them. Asked on Friday if countries were happy with the rates set by Trump, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said: "A lot of them are." Thursday began with a palpable sense of tension The EU was awaiting a written agreement on its 15% tariff deal. Switzerland and Norway were among the dozens of countries that did not know what their tariff rate would be, while Trump agreed after a Thursday morning phone call to keep Mexico's tariffs at 25% for a 90-day negotiating period. The president separately on Thursday amended an order to raise certain tariffs on Canada to 35%. European leaders face blowback for seeming to cave to Trump, even as they insist that this is merely the start of talks and stress the importance of maintaining America's support of Ukraine's fight against Russia. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has already indicated that his country can no longer rely on the U.S. as an ally, and Trump declined to talk to him on Thursday. India, with its 25% tariff announced Wednesday by Trump, may no longer benefit as much from efforts to pivot manufacturing out of China. While the Trump administration has sought to challenge China's manufacturing dominance, it is separately in extended trade talks with that country, which faces a 30% tariff and is charging a 10% retaliatory rate on the U.S. Major companies came into the week warning that tariffs would begin to squeeze them financially. Ford Motor Co. said it anticipated a net $2 billion hit to earnings this year from tariffs. French skincare company Yon-Ka is warning of job freezes, scaled-back investment and rising prices. It's unclear whether Trump's new tariffs will survive a legal challenge Federal judges sounded skeptical Thursday about Trump's use of a 1977 law to declare the long-standing U.S. trade deficit a national emergency that justifies tariffs on almost every country. "You're asking for an unbounded authority," Judge Todd Hughes of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit told a Justice Department lawyer representing the administration. The judges didn't immediately rule, and the case is expected to reach the Supreme Court eventually. The Trump White House has pointed to the increase in federal revenues as a sign that the tariffs will reduce the budget deficit, with $127 billion in customs and duties collected so far this year -- about $70 billion more than last year. New tariffs threaten to raise inflation rates There are not yet signs that tariffs will lead to more domestic manufacturing jobs, and Friday's employment report showed the U.S. economy now has 37,000 fewer manufacturing jobs than it did in April. On Thursday, one crucial measure of inflation, known as the Personal Consumption Expenditures index, showed that prices have climbed 2.6% over the 12 months that ended in June, a sign that inflation may be accelerating as the tariffs flow through the economy. The prospect of higher inflation from the tariffs has caused the Federal Reserve to hold off on additional cuts to its benchmark rates, a point of frustration for Trump, who on Truth Social, called Fed Chair Jerome Powell a "TOTAL LOSER." But before Trump's tariffs, Powell seemed to suggest that the tariffs had put the U.S. economy and much of the world into a state of unknowns. "There are many uncertainties left to resolve," Powell told reporters Wednesday. "So, yes, we are learning more and more. It doesn't feel like we're very close to the end of that process. And that's not for us to judge, but it does -- it feels like there's much more to come."
Japan Today
4 hours ago
- Japan Today
Renault profits slump as competition intensifies
Renault has hit a rough patch as it reckons with its stake in trouble partner Nissan and a sluggish European market By Taimaz SZIRNIKS French automaker Renault said Thursday that the tough retail and commercial van market in Europe had squeezed profits although it was able to maintain profitability better than many rivals. Excluding exceptional items, Renault saw its first-half net profit slump 69 percent to 461 million euros ($526 million). However, it suffered 11.6 billion euros in exceptional losses related to its Japanese partner Nissan. That includes 9.3 billion it announced at the beginning of July resulting from a change in the way it handles accounting of its Nissan stake so that it no longer impacts its operating results. Renault rescued Nissan in 1999 and the two automakers have held stakes in one another since, in a rocky partnership that never saw them merge. Heavily indebted Nissan has hit another rough patch, posting a net loss of $4.5 billion for the financial year to March 2025 and announcing plans to cut 15 percent of its workforce. Renault has fared well in recent years, largely thanks to a number of new own-branded models brought to market, as well as its low-cost Dacia range, and by tapping into a consumer shift to hybrid models. However Renault's heavy reliance on Europe, where the market has never fully recovered from pandemic-era drop in sales and contracted by 1.9 percent in the first half of the year, means it faces a difficult road ahead. Moreover, in June, it lost its dynamic CEO, Luca de Meo, to Kering, a French luxury conglomerate that includes Gucci. He was replaced on Wednesday by Francois Provost, a long-time company veteran who has been helping execute its strategic plan. "Our first-half results, in a challenging market, were not aligned with our initial ambitions," Provost, 57, said in a statement, saying actions were already being taken to achieve the company's targets. "Nevertheless, Renault Group's profitability remains a reference in our industry, and we are determined to maintain this standard." Provost said the current trading environment "is difficult in Europe, marked by a drop in the retail market (for private customers) and by a market for commercial vehicles which is experiencing a significant decline". "We know exactly what must be done, particularly having benchmarked our best competitors, especially our Asian competitors," Provost observed. Provost underlined the company's costly commitment to its Alpine team in F1, saying it had ambitions to "achieve success" in 2026 with a new car. There had been speculation over those ambitions given the team's struggles at the tail end of the constructors' championship which some observers had suggested might see Renault sell up. Internationally, Provost said Renault will maintain South America and India among its "priorities," but added there was "no major alliance project" with Chinese partner Geely. Analysts at Oddo BHF said Provost was bringing a much-awaited visibility to Renault and forecast the constructor would be able to "bounce back quickly after this difficult first half". Renault said it's operating margin in the first half was 6.0 percent -- down by 2.1 percentage points -- but said it hopes to raise that to 6.5 percent for the full year. Rival Stellantis -- which includes the French brands Citroen and Peugeot -- saw its margin squeezed to just 0.7 percent in the first half of this year. Volkswagen, Europe's largest carmaker saw its margin slide to 4.7 percent. Both groups are more exposed to U.S. tariffs than Renault, which does not operate in the United States. Renault's revenue rose by 2.5 percent overall, but automotive revenue only edged 0.5 percent higher in the first half of the year. © 2025 AFP
