UH Cancer Center launches endowment to support patients
During her battle with cancer, she had a vision of a program at the University of Hawaii Cancer Center to help patients holistically, with emotional, mental and social support, and not just through the physical and medical aspects of the disease.
It would empower patients while also supporting their families and caregivers throughout their journey.
A new endowment will help ensure the Susan C. Hirano Cancer C.A.R.E. Community will continue the legacy of its namesake, who died April 18.
The UH Cancer Center in Kakaako today announced the endowment, with an initial amount of nearly $250, 000, thanks to contributions from her husband, Peter Hirano, along with Tsuha Hawai 'i Aloha, the Servco Foundation, and family and friends.
'The endowment is really a way to keep this program alive and thriving, ' Peter Hirano said. 'It's there for the community and for the people that need it, and it 's all built on her experience and ultimately, it's her gift to the community.'
He said the launch of the program was a dream come true after more than a year and a half of efforts working with the UH Cancer Center staff and faculty to make it happen. The initials in Cancer C.A.R.E. Community stand for Community, Awareness, Research and Emotional Well-being, and the program's aim is to offer a network, along with quarterly workshops and other resources, to uplift cancer patients, survivors, caregivers and families.
At the April 5 celebration of its launch, UH surprised Susan Hirano by announcing it would be named in her honor as its founder. More than 100 gathered for the celebration, which included a performance by the center's hula halau of cancer survivors, followed by small-group discussions to brainstorm ideas for the program.
She shared her story at the event and was overjoyed to see her mission become a reality that day, her husband said, as she was so determined to see it through.
'I told her on the way home this is a legacy, ' he said. 'This is something your children, our son's children and his grandchildren would be able to look back and say, 'That was my grandmother or great-grandmother that did that.''
Thirteen days later, she died peacefully at home in Honolulu. She was 57 years old.
A real estate agent for most of her adult life with a successful home-staging business, Hirano's cancer diagnosis in October 2021 seemed to surface out of the blue, with no indication it was coming.
'It was really gut-wrenching, ' Peter Hirano said.
She had been healthy before then, exercised often and enjoyed spending time at the beach with their dogs. Once she came to terms with the Stage 4 diagnosis, however, 'she dove in, ' he said.
She retired from real state and began reading up on the latest cancer research, exploring alternative therapies such as acupuncture, meditation, mindfulness and reiki to supplement traditional treatment.
Hirano preferred to call herself a cancer 'thriver ' as opposed to a cancer survivor.
She became a 'hope ambassador ' at the UH Cancer Center providing outreach and education, and a patient advocate for others struggling with cancer as the program became her purpose.
'She saw a vision for how it could help impact people's lives, ' her husband said. 'She had a vision for it while going through it herself, and it was informed by her own journey.'
It's a welcome addition to the UH Cancer Center, according to director Dr. Naoto Ueno, himself is a two-time cancer survivor.
Ueno said the center, which is preparing to welcome patients into its Ho 'ola Early Phase Clinical Research Center next year, embraces social-emotional support as an important component of the journey.
'Social-emotional support can improve quality of life at any stage of cancer, ' Ueno said in a statement. 'It has shown potential for improving health outcomes and survivorship for patients, and enhancing experiences for caregivers as well. So the UH Cancer Center is extremely proud of and excited for the growth of the Susan C. Hirano Cancer C.A.R.E. Community.'
He added, 'Susan was a beloved friend to many at our center, and her legacy will continue to touch many in our community through this program and this endowment.'
Family support is important during this time, he said, recalling his own experiences with cancer that eventually led to a stem cell transplant. Patient empowerment is also essential, as every patient navigates their way through potentially difficult choices.
Every year, an average of 7, 000 Hawaii residents are diagnosed with invasive cancer, according to the UH Cancer Center, and about 2, 400 die from the disease. Hawaii is home to more than 65, 000 cancer survivors.
Though he did not know it at the time, Peter Hirano said his wife upon diagnosis was given six months to a year to live. She survived the late-stage cancer for another 3-1 /2 years, defying expectations. During that time, she embraced her spiritual and holistic self and found a purpose.
'As much as I miss her every day, I have this other side of me that says we had some really good times with her and we did a lot, ' he said. 'We created some great memories.'
His hope is that the endowment will grow and the program expand along with it to have a lasting impact for cancer patients in perpetuity. The UH Cancer Center welcomes additional contributions through the University of Hawaii Foundation.
Hirano is also survived by son Trevor, stepson Tyler, mother Jean Stine and brother Dan Stine.
Legacy of caring
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tyra Biosciences Doses First Patient in Phase 2 Study of TYRA-300 in Low-Grade Intermediate Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (SURF302)
-TYRA-300 is the only orally administered investigational agent in clinical development for IR NMIBC- -Initial 3-month complete response (CR) data expected to be reported in 1H 2026- CARLSBAD, Calif., June 30, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Tyra Biosciences, Inc. (Nasdaq: TYRA), a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on developing next-generation precision medicines that target large opportunities in Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR) biology, announced today that the first patient has been dosed in the Phase 2 SURF302 clinical trial of TYRA-300 in low-grade, intermediate risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (IR NMIBC). TYRA-300 is a potential first-in-class, investigational, oral, FGFR3-selective inhibitor designed to minimize the toxicities associated with inhibition of FGFR1, FGFR2 and FGFR4, while being agnostic for FGFR3 gatekeeper mutations. FGFR3 is a frequently altered gene in IR NMIBC, with ~70% of low-grade IR NMIBC showing activating mutations. "Our goal is to develop TYRA-300 as the first once-daily oral treatment designed to reduce disease recurrence, as well as surgical procedural intervention and intravesical therapy, for people living with IR NMIBC," said Dr. Erik Goluboff, SVP of Clinical Development at TYRA. "We believe we are well-positioned to contribute meaningful advancements to the field of bladder cancer with SURF302, and we anticipate that the clinical data will offer valuable insights with the potential to enhance patient outcomes." SURF302 (NCT06995677) is an open-label Phase 2 clinical study evaluating the efficacy and safety of TYRA-300 in participants with FGFR3-altered low-grade, IR NMIBC. The study will enroll up to 90 participants at multiple sites primarily in the United States. Participants will be randomized initially to treatment with TYRA-300 at 50 mg once daily (QD) (Cohort 1) or treatment with TYRA-300 at 60 mg QD (Cohort 2). Following a review of efficacy and safety, an additional dosing cohort may be evaluated. The primary endpoint is complete response (CR) rate at three months. Secondary endpoints include time to recurrence, the median duration of response, recurrence free survival (RFS), progression free survival (PFS), safety and tolerability. "I am excited that the Phase 2 trial evaluating oral TYRA-300 in IR NMIBC is now underway," said Dr. Tom Jayram, Director of the Advanced Therapeutics Center at Urology Associates in Nashville, TN. "IR NMIBC is a challenging disease for urologists and patients alike, with the potential for recurrence, progression, and the morbidity of multiple procedures for disease surveillance. Selective FGFR inhibitors are an exciting new option in this disease space that can allow a personalized approach to bladder cancer. TYRA-300 is an investigational, daily oral tablet that has shown encouraging preliminary safety and efficacy in an early phase trial and has the potential to be a paradigm shift in how urologists can treat bladder cancer." TYRA-300 will also be evaluated in pediatric achondroplasia in the BEACH301 Phase 2 study, which is open for enrollment and for which the Company now expects first child dosing in the second half of the year. About Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer In the United States, it is estimated that there are more than 730,000 people living with bladder cancer. Many of these patients have intermediate risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (IR NMIBC) and experience recurrence episodes throughout the course of their disease. Treatment for IR NMIBC and disease recurrence is a surgical procedure called transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) combined with intravesical-administered chemotherapy. Repeat TURBT procedures and intravesical-administered chemotherapy can impact patients' quality of life and overall health, leading to a significant unmet medical need for better tolerated therapeutic options. TYRA-300 is the only orally administered investigational agent in clinical development for IR NMIBC. About TYRA-300 TYRA-300 is the Company's lead precision medicine program stemming from its in-house SNÅP platform. TYRA-300 is an investigational, oral, FGFR3-selective inhibitor currently in development for the treatment of cancer and skeletal dysplasia that has demonstrated interim clinical proof-of-concept results in metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). TYRA-300's planned clinical development includes three Phase 2 clinical trials: SURF302 for IR NMIBC, BEACH301 for pediatric achondroplasia and SURF301 for mUC. Please visit the Patients page of our website for more information on our clinical trials. About Tyra Biosciences Tyra Biosciences, Inc. (Nasdaq: TYRA) is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on developing next-generation precision medicines that target large opportunities in FGFR biology. The Company's in-house precision medicine platform, SNÅP, enables rapid and precise drug design through iterative molecular SNÅPshots that help predict genetic alterations most likely to cause acquired resistance to existing therapies. TYRA's expertise in FGFR biology has created a differentiated pipeline with three clinical-stage programs in targeted oncology and genetically defined conditions. The Company's lead precision medicine stemming from SNÅP, TYRA-300, is a potential first-in-class selective FGFR3 inhibitor that is designed to avoid the toxicities associated with inhibition of FGFR1, FGFR2 and FGFR4, while being agnostic for FGFR3 gatekeeper mutations. TYRA-300's planned clinical development includes three Phase 2 studies: SURF302 for IR NMIBC, BEACH301 for pediatric achondroplasia and SURF301 for metastatic urothelial cancer. TYRA is also developing TYRA-200, an oral, investigational, FGFR1/2/3 inhibitor, in the SURF201 study for metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and TYRA-430, an oral, investigational FGFR4/3-biased inhibitor for FGF19+/FGFR4-driven cancers. TYRA is based in Carlsbad, CA. For more information about our science, pipeline and people, please visit and engage with us on LinkedIn. Forward-Looking Statements TYRA cautions you that statements contained in this press release regarding matters that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are based on our current beliefs and expectations and include, but are not limited to: expected reporting of data from the SURF302 study and the timing thereof; the design and goals of the SURF302 study; the potential to develop next-generation precision medicines and for TYRA-300 to be a first-in-class, once-daily oral treatment, and the potential safety and therapeutic benefits of TYRA-300; the expected timing and phase of development of TYRA-300, including the expected timing of dosing for the BEACH301 study in pediatric achondroplasia; and the potential for SNÅP to develop therapies. Actual results may differ from those set forth in this press release due to the risks and uncertainties inherent in our business, including, without limitation: potential delays in the commencement, recruitment, enrollment, data readouts and completion of clinical trials and preclinical studies; results from preclinical studies or early clinical trials not necessarily being predictive of future results; interim results of a clinical trial are not necessarily indicative of final results and one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment continues, following more comprehensive reviews of the data, as follow-up on the outcome of any particular patient continues and as more patient or final data becomes available, including the risk that unconfirmed responses may not ultimately result in confirmed responses to treatment after follow-up evaluations; the potential for proof-of-concept results to fail to result in successful subsequent development of TYRA-300; later developments with the FDA may be inconsistent with prior feedback from the FDA; we are early in our development efforts, and the approach we are taking to discover and develop drugs based on our SNÅP platform is novel and unproven and it may never lead to product candidates that are successful in clinical development or approved products of commercial value; our dependence on third parties in connection with manufacturing, research and preclinical testing; acceptance by the FDA of INDs or of similar regulatory submissions by comparable foreign regulatory authorities for the conduct of clinical trials of our product candidates; an accelerated development or approval pathway may not be available for TYRA-300 or other product candidates and any such pathway may not lead to a faster development process; unexpected adverse side effects or inadequate efficacy of our product candidates that may limit their development, regulatory approval, and/or commercialization; the potential for our programs and prospects to be negatively impacted by developments relating to our competitors, including the results of studies or regulatory determinations relating to our competitors; unfavorable results from preclinical studies; regulatory developments in the United States and foreign countries; our ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property protection for our product candidates and proprietary technologies; and other risks described in our prior filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including under the heading "Risk Factors" in our annual report on Form 10-K and any subsequent filings with the SEC. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof, and we undertake no obligation to update such statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date hereof. All forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement, which is made under the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Contact:Amy Conrad aconrad@ View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Tyra Biosciences Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
ProKidney Reports Statistically and Clinically Significant Topline Results for the Phase 2 REGEN-007 Trial Evaluating Rilparencel in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Full results from REGEN-007 are being held and will be submitted to the American Society of Nephrology 2025 Kidney Week as a late-breaking clinical trial In Group 1 (n=24), kidney function stabilized in patients randomized to receive two rilparencel injections (one in each kidney). The annual decline in eGFR slope improved by 78% from -5.8 mL/min/1.73m2 in the pre-injection period to -1.3 mL/min/1.73m2 in the period following the last rilparencel injection. This 4.6 mL/min/1.73m2 per year difference was statistically significant (p<0.001) and clinically meaningful In Group 2 (n=25), patients were randomized to receive a single rilparencel injection followed by a second injection only if kidney function worsened and a re-dosing trigger was met. The annual decline in eGFR slope improved by 50% from -3.4 mL/min/1.73m2 in the pre-injection period to -1.7 mL/min/1.73m2 in the period following the last rilparencel injection. This 1.7 mL/min/1.73m2 per year difference was not statistically significant (p=0.085) but suggests evidence of a dose response No rilparencel-related serious adverse events were observed; the safety profile was consistent with previously reported study results and comparable to a kidney biopsy FDA Type B meeting set for this summer to confirm ProKidney's approach to using eGFR slope as the surrogate endpoint in the ongoing Phase 3 PROACT 1 study for accelerated approval WINSTON-SALEM, N.C., July 08, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- ProKidney Corp. (Nasdaq: PROK) ('ProKidney' or the 'Company"), a leading late clinical-stage cellular therapeutics company focused on chronic kidney disease (CKD), today reported statistically significant and clinically meaningful positive topline results from the full Group 1 modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population of the Phase 2 REGEN-007 trial evaluating rilparencel in patients with CKD and diabetes. Rilparencel is an autologous cellular therapy that has received Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (RMAT) designation from the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) and is currently being evaluated in the ongoing Phase 3 REGEN-006 (PROACT 1) trial to demonstrate the therapy's potential to preserve kidney function in patients with advanced CKD and type 2 diabetes. 'We are very encouraged by the REGEN-007 topline results that demonstrated a robust improvement in eGFR slope following treatment with rilparencel in Group 1 as well as evidence of a dose response in Group 2. These data bolster our confidence in the design of our ongoing Phase 3 PROACT 1 study given the similarity between the dosing regimen in REGEN-007 Group 1 and PROACT 1. It is also worth noting that 15 of the 24 patients in Group 1 (63%) met key Phase 3 PROACT 1 inclusion criteria, and similar efficacy results were observed in this subgroup compared to the full Group 1 results. We plan to submit the full results from REGEN-007 to ASN's 2025 Kidney Week as a late-breaking clinical trial and are excited to share more details at that time with investors and the medical community,' said Bruce Culleton, M.D., CEO of ProKidney. 'We also look forward to our upcoming FDA Type B meeting in the coming weeks to confirm our approach to eGFR slope as a surrogate endpoint for accelerated approval. This meeting represents an important step toward our goal of expediting rilparencel's potential path to market in the U.S. where there remains a significant unmet clinical need in patients with advanced CKD and diabetes.' Phase 2 REGEN-007 Overview and Topline ResultsREGEN-007 is a multi-center Phase 2 open-label 1:1 randomized two-arm trial in patients with diabetes, CKD, and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 20-50 mL/min/1.73m². At randomization, patients were assigned to one of two treatment groups using different dosing regimens. Group 1 replicated the dosing schedule of the ongoing Phase 3 PROACT 1 study in which patients received two scheduled rilparencel injections (one in each kidney), approximately three months apart. Group 2 tested an exploratory dosing regimen to investigate whether disease progression triggers, rather than a time-based trigger, could optimize multiple administrations of rilparencel. In Group 2, patients received a single rilparencel injection in one kidney and a second injection in the contralateral kidney only if triggered by a sustained eGFR decline from baseline of ≥ 20%, and/or an increase in the urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline of ≥ 30% and ≥ 30 mg/g. The prespecified primary endpoint for REGEN-007 is the difference in annual eGFR slope (calculated using a linear mixed effects model) in the pre-injection period versus the period following the last rilparencel injection. The pre-injection period included all historical eGFR values collected up to 24 months before the screening visit as well as the on-study central laboratory eGFR results prior to first rilparencel injection. The period following the last injection included eGFR values from the last rilparencel injection to the end of study (EOS) visit. Median follow-up after the last injection was approximately 18 months in both Group 1 and Group 2. Fifty-three patients were randomized in the study, of whom 49 patients (mITT population) received at least one rilparencel injection. Four patients did not receive any rilparencel injections. The majority of patients were male (69%), and the mean age was 60 years. At baseline, 38 of 49 patients (78%) had type 2 diabetes mellitus and 11 (22%) had type 1 diabetes. Thirty-nine (80%) patients were receiving an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), and 18 (37%) were receiving a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i). At baseline, the mean (SD) eGFR was 33±10 mL/min/1.73m2. Notably, the median UACR was higher in Group 1 (792 mg/g) compared to Group 2 (229 mg/g). Annual eGFR Slope (mL/min/1.73m2) Group N (mITT) Pre inj Post last inj Absolute benefit Relative benefit 1 24 -5.8 -1.3 4.6 78% 2 25 -3.4 -1.7 1.7 50% In Group 1 (n=24), kidney function stabilized after receiving rilparencel. The annual decline in eGFR slope improved by 78% from -5.8 mL/min/1.73m2 in the pre-injection period to -1.3 mL/min/1.73m2 in the period following the last rilparencel injection. This 4.6 mL/min/1.73m2 per year difference1 was statistically significant (p<0.001) and clinically meaningful. Of the 24 patients in Group 1, 15 (63%) met key Phase 3 PROACT 1 inclusion criteria, and similar efficacy results were observed in this subgroup compared to the full Group 1 results. As a reminder, the Phase 3 PROACT 1 protocol was amended in 1H 2024 after a similar eGFR efficacy signal was observed in the Phase 2 RMCL-002 study subgroup analysis (n=23) of high-UACR, Stage 4 CKD patients with type 2 diabetes. In Group 2 (n=25), the annual change in kidney function as measured by eGFR slope was -3.4 mL/min/1.73m2 in the pre-injection period versus -1.7 mL/min/1.73m2 in the period following the last rilparencel injection, resulting in an improvement of 50%, or 1.7 mL/min/1.73m2 per year. This difference was not statistically significant (p=0.085) but suggests evidence of a dose response. Out of the 25 patients in Group 2, 15 (60%) met the re-dosing trigger and received a second rilparencel injection. The median time between the first and second injections in these 15 patients was approximately 11 months. No rilparencel-related serious adverse events were observed across all patients in the study who received at least one rilparencel injection (n=49). The safety profile was consistent with previously reported study results and comparable to a kidney biopsy. Full results from REGEN-007 are being held and will be submitted to the American Society of Nephrology (ASN) 2025 Kidney Week as a late-breaking clinical trial. Phase 3 PROACT 1 Regulatory ProgressAs previously communicated, the FDA confirmed during a Type B meeting in Q4 2024 that the accelerated approval pathway is available for rilparencel if an acceptable surrogate endpoint, such as eGFR slope, is used. ProKidney has an upcoming FDA Type B meeting this summer to confirm the approach to using eGFR slope as the surrogate endpoint for accelerated approval. Additional details are expected in mid-2025. About Chronic Kidney DiseaseCKD is a progressive condition characterized by the gradual decline of kidney function, which can ultimately lead to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) requiring dialysis or transplantation. An estimated 37 million adults in the U.S. have CKD, though many remain undiagnosed in the early stages. Diabetes is the leading cause of CKD, and individuals with both conditions face significantly elevated risks of cardiovascular events, hospitalization, and mortality. ProKidney is developing rilparencel for patients with Stage 3b/4 CKD and diabetes, a population that includes 1 to 2 million people in the U.S. While current treatment options aim to slow disease progression, there remains a substantial unmet need for therapies that can stabilize kidney function and delay or prevent the need for dialysis in patients with advanced CKD. About the Phase 3 REGEN-006 (PROACT 1) Clinical TrialREGEN-006 is an ongoing Phase 3, randomized, blinded, sham controlled safety and efficacy study of rilparencel in subjects with advanced CKD and type 2 diabetes. The study protocol was amended in 1H 2024 to focus on a subset of patients with Stage 4 CKD (eGFR 20-30 mL/min/1.73m²) and late Stage 3b CKD (eGFR 30-35 mL/min/1.73m²) with accompanying albuminuria (UACR less than 5,000 mg/g for patients with eGFR 20-30 mL/min/1.73m² and 300-5,000 mg/g for patients with eGFR 30-35 mL/min/1.73m²). The total planned enrollment is approximately 685 subjects. Subjects are randomized (1:1) to the treatment group and the sham control group prior to kidney biopsy or a sham biopsy procedure, respectively. The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of up to two rilparencel injections (one in each kidney) using a minimally invasive percutaneous approach. The primary composite endpoint is the time from first injection to the earliest of: at least 40% reduction in eGFR; eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73m², and/or chronic dialysis, and/or renal transplant; or renal or cardiovascular death. About ProKidney a pioneer in the treatment of chronic kidney disease through innovations in cellular therapy, was founded in 2015 after a decade of research. ProKidney's lead product candidate, rilparencel (also known as REACT®), is a first-in-class, patented, proprietary autologous cellular therapy being evaluated for its potential to preserve kidney function in diabetic patients at high risk of kidney failure. Rilparencel has received RMAT designation from the FDA. For more information, please visit Forward-Looking StatementsThis press release includes 'forward-looking statements' within the meaning of the 'safe harbor' provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. ProKidney's actual results may differ from its expectations, estimates and projections and consequently, you should not rely on these forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Words such as 'expect,' 'estimate,' 'project,' 'budget,' 'forecast,' 'anticipate,' 'intend,' 'plan,' 'may,' 'will,' 'could,' 'should,' 'believes,' 'predicts,' 'potential,' 'continue,' and similar expressions (or the negative versions of such words or expressions) are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, the Company's beliefs that the FDA agrees that the Company's Phase 3 REGEN-006 (PROACT 1) trial could be sufficient to support a potential BLA submission and full regulatory approval and that the Company could consider using eGFR slope as a surrogate endpoint on an accelerated approval pathway for rilparencel, expectations with respect to financial results and expected cash runway, including the Company's expectation that current cash will support operating plans into 2027, future performance, development and commercialization of products, if approved, the potential benefits and impact of the Company's products, if approved, potential regulatory approvals, the size and potential growth of current or future markets for the Company's products, if approved, the advancement of the Company's development programs into and through the clinic and the expected timing for reporting data, the making of regulatory filings or achieving other milestones related to the Company's product candidates, and the advancement and funding of the Company's developmental programs, generally. Most of these factors are outside of the Company's control and are difficult to predict. Factors that may cause such differences include, but are not limited to: disruptions to our business or that may otherwise materially harm our results of operations or financial condition as a result of our recent domestication to the United States; the inability to maintain the listing of the Company's Class A common stock on Nasdaq; the inability of the Company's Class A common stock to remain included in various indices and the potential negative impact on the trading price of the Class A common stock if excluded from such indices; the inability to implement business plans, forecasts, and other expectations or identify and realize additional opportunities, which may be affected by, among other things, competition and the ability of the Company to grow and manage growth profitably and retain its key employees; the risk of downturns and a changing regulatory landscape in the highly competitive biotechnology industry; the risk that results of the Company's clinical trials may not support approval; the risk that the FDA could require additional studies before approving the Company's drug candidates; the inability of the Company to raise financing in the future; the inability of the Company to obtain and maintain regulatory clearance or approval for its products, and any related restrictions and limitations of any cleared or approved product; the inability of the Company to identify, in-license or acquire additional technology; the inability of Company to compete with other companies currently marketing or engaged in the biologics market and in the area of treatment of kidney diseases; the size and growth potential of the markets for the Company's products, if approved, and its ability to serve those markets, either alone or in partnership with others; the Company's estimates regarding expenses, future revenue, capital requirements and needs for additional financing; the Company's financial performance; the Company's intellectual property rights; uncertainties inherent in cell therapy research and development, including the actual time it takes to initiate and complete clinical studies and the timing and content of decisions made by regulatory authorities; the fact that interim results from our clinical programs may not be indicative of future results; the impact of geo-political conflict on the Company's business; and other risks and uncertainties included under the heading 'Risk Factors' in the Company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company cautions readers that the foregoing list of factors is not exclusive and cautions readers not to place undue reliance upon any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. The Company does not undertake or accept any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect any change in its expectations or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. Investor Contacts: ProKidneyEthan Advisors, LLCDaniel Ferry Daniel@ 1 Difference in values is due to in to access your portfolio
CNN
32 minutes ago
- CNN
State inspection before floods found Camp Mystic had emergency plan in place
Two days before deadly Central Texas floods killed at least 27 people at Camp Mystic, a state inspector visited the youth camp and certified that it had an emergency plan in place and that its cabins and other buildings were safe, records obtained by CNN show. The inspector with the Texas Department of State Health Services confirmed on July 2 that the Christian camp on the banks of the Guadalupe River had a state-mandated plan 'for emergency shelter and for evacuation' in case of a disaster. In the wake of the devastation at the nearly 100-year-old summer camp, the state inspection report raises new questions about whether that emergency plan was adequate and how closely it was followed. The state health department does not maintain copies of youth camp emergency plans, but they are reviewed during each annual inspection, said Lara Anton, a spokesperson for the agency. Plans for disasters 'would include flooding,' she noted. Leaders at Camp Mystic did not respond to phone calls and an email from CNN about the disaster plan. 'Our hearts are broken alongside our families that are enduring this unimaginable tragedy,' a statement on the camp website read. 'We have been in communication with local and state authorities who are tirelessly deploying extensive resources to search for our missing girls.' Through a public records request, CNN obtained the most recent four years of annual inspections, which were first reported by KSAT. The inspections evaluated Camp Mystic on dozens of different safety and compliance rules on topics from water supply to bunk bed guardrails. Those also included state regulations requiring youth camps to formulate a written emergency plan 'in case of a disaster, serious accident, epidemic, or fatality,' and post it at a camp's office and 'in each permanent and semi-permanent occupied building.' Staff and volunteers must be made aware of the plan during trainings, and campers should be instructed about what to do in the event of a disaster or 'the need to evacuate.' The state inspector who visited Camp Mystic last week reported that it was complying with those requirements, confirming that a written emergency plan had been posted at the camp and staff and volunteers were made aware of it. The inspector also found that none of the camp's buildings or structures presented a safety hazard, all buildings complied with applicable building and safety codes, and all permanent structures were in 'good repair.' The camp passed the inspection with 'no deficiency/violation,' according to the records. The previous annual inspections over the last four years also found that Camp Mystic was following the rules on emergency planning. The camp had been hit with a few violations in recent years related to food preparation and insufficient documentation of experience or training for riflery and equine instructors, the records show. There were 386 campers and 64 staff members staying at the camp's Guadalupe River section, where the worst of the flooding happened, as well as 171 campers and 44 staff at the nearby Cypress Lake section of the camp, according to the July 2 inspection. When the floodwaters hit the camp in the early hours of July 4, counselors and staff helped young campers climb a hill to evacuate to higher ground, according to witness accounts. But waters rose so quickly that some campers and counselors, especially those in cabins on lower ground closest to the river, weren't able to make it out in time. Caroline Cutrona, a Camp Mystic counselor, told CNN that a power outage around 4 a.m. that morning meant that the camp's loudspeaker public address system wasn't working, and that she never received cell phone alerts about the flash flooding because counselors and campers weren't allowed to keep their phones with them. It's unclear whether the camp's emergency plan accounted for the communication breakdowns. Some of the cabins campers were staying in are located in the Guadalupe River's 'regulatory floodways' – the areas that flood first and are most dangerous – according to federal flood maps. Other cabins are located in an area that the federal government has determined has a 1% chance of flooding each year. But the Texas regulations for youth camps don't say anything about flood zones, and the state records don't show the annual inspections of Camp Mystic taking that into account.
