What F-16 Loss Means For Ukraine's Air Power
Lieutenant Colonel Maksym Ustimenko intercepted seven incoming Russian air targets in his F-16 jet before his aircraft was damaged and started to lose altitude, Ukraine's air force said in a statement on Sunday.
He is the third known F-16 pilot to be killed while operating the U.S.-made aircraft, which Ukraine has been using for little under a year.
Kyiv had long clamored for donations of the Lockheed Martin-manufactured F-16s to boost its Soviet-era aircraft while staring down Russia's more advanced - and much more numerous - fleet that has taken far fewer hits in the war than Moscow's land forces.
But Kyiv has not yet received all of the aircraft promised to its military, and fully-trained pilots are in short supply, despite intensive rounds of training abroad.
"With such intense fighting, losses are to be expected," an official with Ukraine's air force, Colonel Yuriy Ignat, said during an interview with the country's Ukrainska Pravda outlet, published in early June.
Losing aircraft is "always part of air warfare, and while individual cases should never be decisive, attrition hurts," said Frederik Mertens, a strategic analyst with Dutch think tank, TNO. Losing pilots is also a painful prospect, he told Newsweek.
In late August, just weeks after Kyiv confirmed it was operating the first of its donated jets, Ukraine said Oleksiy Mes - a famed pilot also known by his call sign, Moonfish - had died while "repelling a massive Russian combined air and missile attack."
A second F-16 was shot down over the northeastern Sumy region in mid-April this year, killing its 26-year-old pilot, Pavlo Ivanov.
The following month, the air force said it had lost communication with an F-16 intercepting Russian attacks, but that the pilot had managed to eject from the aircraft. Search and rescue teams quickly located and evacuated the pilot, the military said.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said on Sunday he had ordered a full investigation into Ustimenko's death. Ustimenko "mastered four types of aircraft, and his record includes truly significant achievements for Ukraine," the Ukrainian leader said in his evening address.
All three Ukrainian F-16 pilots killed while operating the jets were posthumously made Heroes of Ukraine, the country's highest honor.
Kyiv's military reported in the early hours of Sunday that Russia had launched hundreds of drones and decoys at the country overnight, as well as various different types of missiles. Ignat told Newsweek it was the highest number of aerial threats recorded since the start of the full-scale war in February 2022.
Russia's Defense Ministry said in a statement it had launched a "massive strike with high-precision long-range air, sea and land-based weapons," including Kinzhal missiles, targeting Ukraine's military industry and the country's oil refineries. Andriy Yermak, Zelensky's chief of staff, said Moscow had "struck energy facilities, infrastructure, and residential areas."
Ukraine has repeatedly used its F-16 fighter jets, as well French-made Mirage 2000 aircraft Kyiv received in early 2025, to intercept Russian attacks on the country.
"This loss and earlier losses clearly point at the dangers of intercepting low-flying targets at close range with low-flying aircraft," Mertens said, adding the drive to "do the utmost and take serious risks" when in the air can be especially strong when trying to shield civilians and residential buildings.
It's not clear exactly how many of the approximately 85 F-16s committed by Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway and Belgium are now being used by Ukraine.
Rustem Umerov, Ukraine's defense minister, said in February that Denmark had "already delivered most of the promised F-16s, with the remaining ones to arrive soon." Umerov's Danish counterpart, Troels Lund Poulsen, said shortly after that Copenhagen had transferred 12 out of the 19 jets it had promised Ukraine.
It's not immediately apparent whether the remaining seven jets have been delivered. Newsweek has reached out to the Danish Defense Ministry for comment via email.
The Dutch defense ministry said in late May that the last of its 24 pledged F-16s had left the country, bound for Ukraine.
Norwegian Defense Minister Tore Sandvik told the country's state-run NRK broadcaster in mid-May that Oslo would finish transferring F-16s to Ukraine by the end of 2025, but refused to confirm how many jets had already been donated.
Norway has officially confirmed it will send six F-16s by the end of 2025. Newsweek has contacted the Norwegian Defense Ministry for comment via email.
Then-Belgian Foreign Minister Hadja Lahbib told domestic broadcaster RTL in May 2024 that Belgium would deliver 30 F-16s to Ukraine by 2028. Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever said in March this year that the F-16 transfers to Ukraine were on hold until 2026, a delay blamed on hiccups to the delivery of Brussels' replacement F-35 fifth-generation jets. Standing next to Zelensky during a press conference in April in the Ukrainian capital, the Belgian prime minister said Brussels would send two F-16s for spare parts in 2025 and two more aircraft the following year.
Belgium's current defense minister, Theo Francken, said in May Brussels "would try to deliver the aircraft even earlier," according to remarks reported by the Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty outlet. The Belgian Defense Ministry has been approached for comment.
Related Articles
NATO Ally Seeks Women to Fight Russia ThreatUkraine Rebukes NATO Member for Plea To Forgive PutinBetting Market in Disarray Over Zelensky Suit That's Also Maybe Not a SuitUkrainian President Moves to Withdraw From Ottawa Convention: What to Know
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
35 minutes ago
- CNBC
Pentagon halts weapons shipment to Ukraine amid concerns over U.S. stockpile
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered a pause in sending a shipment of missiles and ammunition to Ukraine amid concern about the U.S. military's stockpiles, according to two defense officials, two congressional officials and two sources with knowledge of the decision. Hegseth ordered the delay weeks after he issued a memo ordering a review of the U.S. stockpile of munitions, which has been depleted after years of the United States' sending weapons to Ukraine to defend against the Russia invasion, as well as nearly two years of military operations in the Middle East as the United States fought Houthi rebels in Yemen and defended Israel and allies against Iran, four of the officials said. The munitions and other weapons could be held up until the assessment is complete, the two defense officials and two congressional officials said, and if the munitions are in short supply or needed in other parts of the world, they could be held back even longer. The weapons being delayed include dozens of Patriot interceptors that can defend against incoming Russian missiles, thousands of 155 mm high explosive Howitzer munitions, more than 100 Hellfire missiles, more than 250 precision-guided missile systems known as GMLRS and dozens each of Stinger surface-to-air missiles, AIM air-to-air missiles and grenade launchers, the two defense officials, two congressional officials and two sources with knowledge of the decision said. White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said: "This decision was made to put America's interests first following a DOD review of our nation's military support and assistance to other countries across the globe. The strength of the United States Armed Forces remains unquestioned — just ask Iran." The Defense Department did not respond to a request for comment. At a closing news conference after a NATO meeting at The Hague last week, President Donald Trump said the United States is trying to find Patriot air defense missiles to send to Ukraine. "They do want to have the anti-missile missiles," Trump said of Ukraine. "As they call them the Patriots, and we're going to see if we can make some available." He said that the United States is supplying weapons to Israel and that "you know, they're very hard to get. We need them, too." A senior Ukrainian lawmaker on Wednesday called the Pentagon's decision "painful" for Kyiv's effort to defend itself against Russian air strikes. "This decision is certainly very unpleasant for us," Fedir Venislavskyi, a member of the Ukrainian parliament's defense committee, said in Kyiv, according to Reuters. He added, "it's painful, and against the background of the terrorist attacks which Russia commits against Ukraine ... it's a very unpleasant situation." Ukraine's foreign ministry also met with John Ginkel, a U.S. diplomat based in Kyiv, to discuss military assistance and defense cooperation between with two countries. "It was stressed that any delays or hesitation in supporting Ukraine's defense capacities would only encourage the aggressor to continue the war and terror, rather than seek peace," the ministry said in a statement. Ukraine has repeatedly appealed for additional U.S. and European air defense weaponry as Russia has stepped up its air raids in recent months. Over the weekend, Ukraine's Defense Ministry said Russia had launched the largest aerial attack on the country since Moscow's full-scale invasion in 2022, firing 60 missiles and 477 drones. Trump and his Republican allies in Congress are also working to secure a permanent ceasefire. Though it's common for new administrations to pause weapons transfers to assess stockpiles, there are concerns about the moment in which this is happening, according to an official with knowledge of the situation. The official said Ukraine needs to appear strong to get Russia to the negotiating table. During a visit to Washington on June 5, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's top adviser, Andriy Yermak, told reporters that his country was holding off Russian forces but needed more air defense systems to safeguard its cities from Russian attacks. The munitions were approved as part of Presidential Drawdown Authority and Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative packages during the Biden administration, the defense officials and two sources with knowledge of the decision said. Some of the shipments are already in the region but have been stopped before being turned over to Ukraine, according to a defense official and two sources with knowledge of the decision. Last month, the acting chief of naval operations, Adm. James Kilby, warned during testimony before Congress that while the Navy has enough standard missiles, known as SM-3s, right now, the United States has been using some missiles and munitions "at an alarming rate."
Axios
35 minutes ago
- Axios
The U.S. military can't quit the Middle East
If you're in the defense business, you've seen this meme in one form or another. "Born too late to deploy to the Middle East," it reads. "Born too early to deploy to the Middle East," it continues. "Born just in time to deploy to the Middle East," it concludes. Why it matters: Flippant? Yes. Compelling? Also yes, as the image's virality today reflects just how entangled the U.S. is in the troubled region, even as it promises to pivot more fully to the Chinese and Russian threat. This is geopolitical tug of war, spiked with public cynicism. Driving the news: Surprise strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities using B-2 Spirit bombers and 100-plus other aircraft marked Washington's latest foray into the Middle East, where for decades it's expended taxpayer dollars and lives. (Think Afghanistan, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen.) Meanwhile, the Pentagon frets over Beijing and Moscow and their global ambitions. But the resources needed for that competition — including heavy-duty, traditional military hardware like aircraft carriers — are in high demand elsewhere. Friction point: "There is a disconnect between what we, the United States, say in our national defense strategies and those sorts of products and what actually happens on the ground," Brian Carter, a Middle East expert at the American Enterprise Institute, told Axios. "The problem is: We episodically prioritize the Middle East over China," he said. "Wehaven't been good about ensuring that we put enough effort into the Middle East to make sure that things don't spiral out of control." "When we have to surge all this stuff in, we're always reactive." Between the lines: Pentagon officials and military leaders have been hinting at this dynamic. Elbridge Colby, the undersecretary of defense for policy, has long lobbied for prioritizing China over Europe and the Middle East. During his March confirmation hearing, Colby told senators the U.S. lacks "a multi-war military." Indo-Pacific Command boss Adm. Samuel Paparo in November said support provided to Israel and Ukraine was "eating into" some of the most precious U.S. weapons stockpiles. In April, he revealed it took at least 73 flights to move a Patriot air-defense battalion out of China's backyard and into Central Command. And most recently — just days ago — Acting Chief of Naval Operations Adm. James Kilby told lawmakers the Navy is chewing through Standard Missile-3s at "an alarming rate." The service has used more than $1 billion in munitions fighting Houthi rebels near the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, and the USS Harry S. Truman has lost three Super Hornet aircraft, including one to friendly fire. Zoom out: "The Middle East is the space where four things come together," Daryl Press, the faculty director at the Davidson Institute for Global Security, said in an interview. "It's terrorism and terrorist groups." "It's nuclear weapons and potential for proliferation." "It's the world's most important exportable energy supplies." "And then it's a bunch of countries which have, I would say, somewhat weak control over their borders and airspace."
Axios
35 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump administration shelves Navy's F/A-XX, citing industry strain
The Trump administration is icing the U.S. Navy's F/A-XX futuristic fighter in favor of the Air Force counterpart, the F-47, amid concerns U.S. defense contractors can't handle both. Why it matters: The highly secretive project has for months been in limbo. An F/A-XX contract announcement was supposed to quickly follow F-47 news, according to Reuters, but never materialized. Driving the news: Officials at the Pentagon told reporters the fiscal 2026 budget blueprint includes $74 million to finish design of the Navy warplane. They also said there is debate at the highest levels about its future. "We did make a strategic decision to go all-in on F-47, with a $3.4 billion request for that program, due to our belief that the industrial base can only handle going fast on one program at this time and the presidential priority [is] to go all-in on that F-47 and get that program right," one official said. Catch up quick: Boeing and Northrop Grumman are in the running for F/A-XX. The former bested Lockheed Martin in March for the multibillion-dollar F-47 contract, via the Next Generation Air Dominance effort. Friction point: Boeing executives pushed back on the narrative that it — and others — can't juggle. "From day one, capital investment was for both programs. We've done the same with our technology. We've done the same with our staffing," Steve Parker, the CEO of Boeing's defense business, told reporters at the Paris Air Show. "Absolutely, we can do it. And so can the industrial base. And so can the engine manufacturers. I don't really see that as being an issue." What we're watching: The Navy could end up with a tailored version of the F-47 instead.
