logo
The U.S. military can't quit the Middle East

The U.S. military can't quit the Middle East

Axiosa day ago
If you're in the defense business, you've seen this meme in one form or another.
"Born too late to deploy to the Middle East," it reads.
"Born too early to deploy to the Middle East," it continues.
"Born just in time to deploy to the Middle East," it concludes.
Why it matters: Flippant? Yes. Compelling? Also yes, as the image's virality today reflects just how entangled the U.S. is in the troubled region, even as it promises to pivot more fully to the Chinese and Russian threat.
This is geopolitical tug of war, spiked with public cynicism.
Driving the news: Surprise strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities using B-2 Spirit bombers and 100-plus other aircraft marked Washington's latest foray into the Middle East, where for decades it's expended taxpayer dollars and lives. (Think Afghanistan, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen.)
Meanwhile, the Pentagon frets over Beijing and Moscow and their global ambitions. But the resources needed for that competition — including heavy-duty, traditional military hardware like aircraft carriers — are in high demand elsewhere.
Friction point: "There is a disconnect between what we, the United States, say in our national defense strategies and those sorts of products and what actually happens on the ground," Brian Carter, a Middle East expert at the American Enterprise Institute, told Axios.
"The problem is: We episodically prioritize the Middle East over China," he said. "Wehaven't been good about ensuring that we put enough effort into the Middle East to make sure that things don't spiral out of control."
"When we have to surge all this stuff in, we're always reactive."
Between the lines: Pentagon officials and military leaders have been hinting at this dynamic.
Elbridge Colby, the undersecretary of defense for policy, has long lobbied for prioritizing China over Europe and the Middle East. During his March confirmation hearing, Colby told senators the U.S. lacks "a multi-war military."
Indo-Pacific Command boss Adm. Samuel Paparo in November said support provided to Israel and Ukraine was "eating into" some of the most precious U.S. weapons stockpiles. In April, he revealed it took at least 73 flights to move a Patriot air-defense battalion out of China's backyard and into Central Command.
And most recently — just days ago — Acting Chief of Naval Operations Adm. James Kilby told lawmakers the Navy is chewing through Standard Missile-3s at "an alarming rate." The service has used more than $1 billion in munitions fighting Houthi rebels near the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, and the USS Harry S. Truman has lost three Super Hornet aircraft, including one to friendly fire.
Zoom out: "The Middle East is the space where four things come together," Daryl Press, the faculty director at the Davidson Institute for Global Security, said in an interview.
"It's terrorism and terrorist groups."
"It's nuclear weapons and potential for proliferation."
"It's the world's most important exportable energy supplies."
"And then it's a bunch of countries which have, I would say, somewhat weak control over their borders and airspace."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Inside Hakeem Jeffries' decision to filibuster Trump's big bill
Inside Hakeem Jeffries' decision to filibuster Trump's big bill

Axios

time21 minutes ago

  • Axios

Inside Hakeem Jeffries' decision to filibuster Trump's big bill

The overwhelming consensus on Capitol Hill was that House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) would only delay President Trump's "big, beautiful bill" by about an hour. As noon approached on Thursday, that expectation was shattered. Why it matters: For months, the Democratic base has been demanding their party's leaders " fight harder" and use every tool at their disposal to stymie the GOP agenda. In the eyes of many lawmakers, this is Jeffries delivering. Jeffries blasted the GOP's marquee tax and spending bill as an "immoral document," vowing to "stand up and push back against it with everything we have on behalf of the American people." As of late Thursday morning, Jeffries was on track to surpass then-Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy's (R-Calif.) record-breaking, 8-and-a-half hour speech to delay the Build Back Better vote in 2021. If Jeffries keeps speaking until 1:23pm ET, he will have set a new record. What we're hearing: One of Jeffries' central motivations, numerous Democratic sources told Axios, was to ensure that Republicans were forced to pass the bill during daylight hours and not in the dead of night. Jeffries said in his speech: "I ask the question, if Republicans were so proud of this one big, ugly bill, why did debate begin at 3:28am in the morning?" "This is about fighting for the American people ... forcing it into the daylight and telling some stories about the real impacts," House Democratic caucus chair Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) told Axios. Zoom in: Jeffries spoke with House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) ahead of the speech to warn him about his plans, two sources familiar with the discussion told Axios on the condition of anonymity to share details of a private conversation. The House Democratic leader communicated that he was "just going to do an hour," one of the sources said, but that it "may be longer now." Another source said Jeffries made that decision "when he learned [Johnson] was going to stay all night until he got the votes." What he's saying: "Budgets are moral documents, and in our view ... budgets should be designed to lift people up," Jeffries said in his speech. "This reckless Republican budget that we are debating right now on the floor on the House of Representatives tears people down ... and every should vote 'no' against it," he said. Jeffries was consistently surrounded by dozens of House Democratic colleagues, who raucously applauded him throughout his speech. Yes, but: The Democratic leader did face a bit of frustration from his caucus for leaving even his inner circle in the dark about his plans. "No one is upset Hakeem wanted to do this, but to not tell members, 'be prepared, book multiple flights, be flexible,'" one House Democrat vented, grumbling that it is particularly hard to rebook flights around the July 4 holiday. Another House Democrat fumed that a "heads up would have been nice." Between the lines: Jeffries' marathon speech comes after Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) delivered a 25-hour filibuster in April that earned him plaudits from the Democrats' grassroots as a resistance hero. Later that month, Jeffries and Booker held a day-long sit-in on the Capitol steps in protest of Republicans' fiscal plans. The bottom line:"The base wants to see certain things and we have to show them those things, otherwise they don't believe we're fighting hard enough," another House Democrat told Axios of Jeffries' speech.

Colby's China-focused Pentagon playbook sparks Ukraine arms freeze
Colby's China-focused Pentagon playbook sparks Ukraine arms freeze

Fox News

time28 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Colby's China-focused Pentagon playbook sparks Ukraine arms freeze

A recent pause in the U.S. sending Patriot missiles and ammunition to Ukraine is part of a wider, global review of military aid driven in part by the Pentagon's China-leery policy chief, Elbridge Colby. "A capability review is being conducted to ensure U.S. military aid aligns with our defense priorities," Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell told reporters this week. That review is part of a plan championed by Colby to conserve U.S. resources that may be needed for war in the Indo-Pacific. Upon first news of the pause, Pentagon officials said it was due to concerns about the U.S.' stockpile of munitions, which came after the U.S. and Iran traded strikes on each other in the Middle East. However, Parnell wrote on X that it was "flat out wrong" to suggest Colby caught other administration officials off-guard with the aid pause. Colby "routinely provides policy recommendations to the Secretary of Defense and the President," but they have the ultimate say, he said. A White House official confirmed to Fox News Digital they were "aware of the pause ahead of time." "The President and top officials expect the DOD to regularly review aid allocations to ensure they are in line with the America First agenda," the official said. Colby has long advocated for limiting resources in Europe and the Middle East in case they're needed in a war over Taiwan. "What I have been trying to shoot a signal flare over is that it is vital for us to focus and enable our own forces for an effective and reasonable defense of Taiwan and for the Taiwanese, as well as the Japanese, to do more," Colby said during his confirmation hearing. "A Europe first policy is not what America needs in this exceptionally dangerous time. We need to focus on China and Asia - clearly," he wrote on X. last year. The weapons put on pause, including missile interceptors and 155 mm ammunition shells, were already on their way to Ukraine, U.S. officials told Fox News. Since Russia's 2022 invasion, the U.S. has provided Ukraine with nearly $66 billion in security assistance, the Pentagon noted. "Part of our job is to give the president a framework that he can use to evaluate how many munitions we have and where we're sending them," Parnell added. "We can't give weapons to everybody all around the world." Still, critics like former GOP Rep. Adam Kinzinger claimed Colby had "blood on his hands" over the halt. Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., requested an "emergency briefing" from the White House and the Defense Department to "review our nation's weapons and munitions stockpiles, and ensure the United States remains fully committed to providing Ukraine with the resources it urgently needs." Dan Caldwell, a former Pentagon official who worked with Colby on policy, defended his past colleague on X. "The incentives at DoD favor maintaining the status quo: Keep troops in Syria, keep sending weapons to Ukraine that we need for our defense, etc. That is why when patriots like @ElbridgeColby put the interests of their own country and own troops first, they are viciously smeared." Six months into President Donald Trump's second term, U.S. military prowess has largely focused back on the Middle East: an offensive campaign against the Houthis in Yemen, hitting Iran's nuclear sites and boosting defenses in the region. Air Force Gen. Daniel Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said defending the Al-Udeid base from an Iranian counterattack was the largest Patriot missile salvo in history.

Iran: Still a chance for peace talks with US
Iran: Still a chance for peace talks with US

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Iran: Still a chance for peace talks with US

Iran's foreign ministry has told Sky News there is still a chance for peace talks with the United States. In an interview in Iran's foreign ministry in Tehran, a senior Iranian official said despite the attacks on his country by America and Israel, back-channel efforts are under way to restart the search for a diplomatic solution. The comments will be seen as an olive branch for the administration to seize as it explores a diplomatic way forward. Sky News is one of only a handful of foreign news organisations allowed access to Iran following We also filmed the impact of Israel's attacks on ordinary Iranians in Tehran. In the wake of declared by Donald Trump, Esmaeil Baqaei, the Iranian foreign ministry spokesman, said the US must show it is genuine in its desire for peace. "Diplomacy must not be abused or used as a tool for deception or for simply a sort of psychological warfare against their adversaries." Iran felt diplomacy had been betrayed, he said. US-Iranian talks were on the verge of reconvening when Israel attacked his country. And America had breached international law in its support of what he called "Zionist aggression". But Mr Baqaei said "diplomacy never ends, there are contacts, indirectly. My minister is talking to Oman, Qatar and others". President Trump says he is ready to talk with Iran, but major stumbling blocks need to be overcome. The US wants Iran to give up nuclear enrichment completely. Iran has long insisted it has the right to carry on. Read more from Sky News: Across town, we witnessed the impact of Israel's attacks in Gisha, an upmarket neighbourhood of Tehran. Israel claims its attacks on Iranian figures were precision-targeted. In reality they appear to have been far from surgical. The airstrike came at 10.30 Friday morning two weeks ago. It ripped a hole through four floors of reinforced concrete in the residential apartment block. The target may have been a nuclear scientist living there, but everyone in the building is now without a home. Engineers say it will almost certainly need to be torn down. The mood in the Iranian capital seems subdued and tense. Iranians fear Israelis will renew their air campaign despite the ceasefire. There is widespread resentment of the leadership after nationwide social unrest and massive economic problems. But the Israeli attacks have rallied many Iranians around their government all the same. They had hoped diplomacy with America could deliver a new deal and an end to sanctions, then Israel began its 12-day aerial onslaught Iranians hope somehow talks can be restarted, but they also know the chances of progress are for now at least not great.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store