
What medieval skeletons tell us about long-term health and life expectancy
In a new study, my colleagues and I examined over 270 medieval skeletons to investigate how early-life malnutrition affected long-term health and life expectancy.
We focused on people who lived through the devastating period surrounding the Black Death (1348-1350), which included years of famine during the Little Ice Age and the great bovine pestilence (an epidemic that killed two-thirds of cattle in England and Wales). We found that the biological scars of childhood deprivation during this time left lasting marks on the body.
These findings suggest that early nutritional stress, whether in the 14th century or today, can have consequences that endure well beyond childhood.
Children's teeth act like tiny time capsules. The hard layer inside each tooth, called dentine, sits beneath the enamel and forms while we're growing up. Once formed, it stays unchanged for life, creating a permanent record of what we ate and experienced.
As our teeth develop, they absorb different chemical versions (isotopes) of carbon and nitrogen from our food, and these get locked into the tooth structure. This means scientists can read the story of someone's childhood diet by analysing their teeth.
A method of measuring the chemical changes in sequential slices of the teeth is a recent advance used to identify dietary changes in past populations with greater accuracy.
When children are starving, their bodies break down their fat stores and muscle to continue growing. This gives a different signature in the newly formed dentine than the isotopes from food. These signatures make centuries-old famines visible today, showing exactly how childhood trauma affected health in medieval times.
We identified a distinctive pattern that had been seen before in victims of the great Irish famine. Normally, when people eat a typical diet, the levels of carbon and nitrogen in their teeth move in the same direction. For example, both might rise or fall together if someone eats more plants or animals. This is called 'covariance' because the two markers vary together.
But during starvation, nitrogen levels in the teeth rise while carbon levels stay the same or drop. This opposite movement – called 'opposing covariance' – is like a red flag in the teeth that shows when a child was starving. These patterns helped us pinpoint the ages at which people experienced malnutrition.
Lifelong legacy
Children who survived this period reached adulthood during the plague years, and the effect on their growth was recorded in the chemical signals in their teeth. People with famine markers in their dentine had different mortality rates than those who lacked these markers.
Children who are nutritionally deprived have poorer outcomes in later life: studies of modern children have suggested that children of low birth weight or who suffer stresses during the first 1,000 days of life have long-term effects on their health.
For example, babies born small, a possible sign of nutritional stress, seem to be more prone to illnesses such as heart disease and diabetes in adulthood than the population at large. These characteristics can also be passed to future offspring through changes in how genes are switched on or off, known as 'epigenetic effects' – which can endure for three generations.
In medieval England, early nutritional deprivation may have been beneficial during catastrophic times by producing adults of short stature and the capacity to store fat, but these people were much more likely to die after the age of 30 than their peers with healthy childhood dentine patterns.
The patterns for childhood starvation increased in the decades leading up to the Black Death and declined after 1350. This suggests the pandemic may have indirectly improved living conditions by reducing population pressure and increasing access to food.
The medieval teeth tell us something urgent about today. Right now, millions of children worldwide are experiencing the same nutritional crises that scarred those long-dead English villagers – whether from wars in Gaza and Ukraine or poverty in countless countries.
Their bodies are writing the same chemical stories of survival into their growing bones and teeth, creating biological problems that will emerge decades later as heart disease, diabetes and early death.
Our latest findings aren't just historical curiosities; they're an urgent warning that the children we fail to nourish today will carry those failures in their bodies for life and pass them on to their own children. The message from the medieval graves couldn't be clearer: feed the children now or pay the price for generations.
Julia Beaumont is a Researcher in Biological Anthropology at the University of Bradford.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
3 hours ago
- Sky News
Why are child vaccination rates the lowest they have been in more than a decade?
Child vaccination uptake is the lowest it has been in more than a decade, with a death from measles in Liverpool reigniting calls for increased awareness of the dangers of not getting jabs. A report from the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) this month reiterated that none of the routine child vaccinations have met the World Health Organisation's recommended target of 95% since 2021. Uptake in some local authorities is as low as 60%, while the England-wide rate for the final quarter of 2024/25 for measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) was 88.8%, down from 92.7% 10 years ago. The latest UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) figures show there were 145 new measles cases in England in July. With outbreaks across Europe and elsewhere, public health officials are concerned families may bring the virus back to the UK when they return to school from the summer holidays. We look at why vaccination rates have declined, and the reasons some parents are still hesitant to get their children immunised. When did uptake start declining - and where is it worst now? Routine childhood vaccinations largely consist of the 6-in-1 vaccine, which covers diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, Hib, and hepatitis B; the MMR vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella; and the MenB vaccine, which covers the meningococcal group B bacterium that can cause meningitis and sepsis. They are all administered free of charge across two or three doses before children are five, with most in the first year. WHO recommends countries set targets of 95% coverage of all three to ensure herd immunity and to protect those who are immunocompromised and cannot have the vaccines themselves. In the UK, MMR rates have consistently been the lowest. The most recent decline began in 2013/14, when uptake at two years peaked at 92.7%. Overall, they have been lower in England than Scotland and Wales, with areas such as London and the North West seeing particularly low levels. In Hackney, east London, only 60% of children had received both their MMR jabs by their fifth birthday in the year 2023/24. The North West, and Liverpool in particular, also had lower uptake, with only 73% vaccinated against MMR by the age of five. Of the 674 measles cases reported in 2025, almost half (48%) have been in London, 16% in the North West, and 10% in the East of England. At local authority level, the most cases were reported in Hackney (12%), Bristol (7%), and Salford (5%), with almost all cases concentrated in either children under 10 or teenagers and young adults. 1:04 Why have rates declined? Although the recent drop began a decade ago, a much sharper decline happened in the 1990s. It saw the two-year MMR uptake in England go from 91.8% in 1995/96 to 79.9% in 2003/04. In 2006, person-to-person measles transmission was re-established in the UK, and a year later, rates exceeded 1,000 for the first time in 10 years. This came after the British doctor Andrew Wakefield published a now-discredited report in the prestigious medical journal The Lancet in 1998, which linked the MMR vaccine to autism. The study was reported by media outlets worldwide and resulted in the safety of the jab being questioned. After it proved baseless, The Lancet retracted the study in 2010. Wakefield was banned from practising medicine after being found guilty of dishonesty and the "abuse" of developmentally delayed children by subjecting them to unnecessary and invasive medical procedures without ethical approval. However, hesitancy around childhood vaccinations persisted. Professor Stephen Griffin, a virologist at the University of Leeds, says: "As widely debunked as it was, it set the cat among the pigeons and poisoned everything." 1:34 What could be behind the latest drop? The increased prevalence of vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic saw a resurgence in "anti-vax" sentiment, with many questioning the quick rollout of the jabs. Others pushed back against mandatory vaccines in certain settings, such as health and social care in the UK, and across most federal government departments in the US, citing a breach of freedom of choice. Hesitancy also proved stronger in some minority communities, which experts have linked to a general mistrust in healthcare services due to the disproportionate outcomes experienced by those groups. "Well-organised and well-funded anti-vaccine movements latched onto mRNA (messenger RNA) vaccines, because while it's not a brand new technology, COVID was the first time they had been used en masse," Professor Griffin says. "There was a lot of disinformation around them, and they just seized on it." However, WHO had already highlighted "vaccine hesitancy" as one of the top 10 global health threats in 2019, before the pandemic began. Some of this was attributed to Wakefield's study. Separately, with the rise of social media and misinformation, unevidenced conspiracy theories around vaccines have circulated, such as them being used by Microsoft founder Bill Gates to track people's movements. More recently, US President Donald Trump has expressed sentiments that nod to views shared by vaccine sceptics. In an interview with Time Magazine in 2024, he was asked if he would consider ending childhood vaccination programmes in the US. He said he would have a "big discussion" with Robert F. Kennedy Jr, who he appointed as his health secretary and who has consistently expressed vaccine sceptic views. Mr Trump said: "The autism rate is at a level that nobody ever believed possible. If you look at things that are happening, there's something causing it." While not directly referencing it, his comments appeared to echo the baseless claims made in Wakefield's study. Professor Griffin says that "reputable" figures, such as politicians and scientists who continue to endorse the view of Wakefield, and other false narratives around vaccine efficacy, have legitimised the anti-vax movement and "normalised" the decision not to immunise children. "They've essentially said 'there's no smoke without fire' and drawn attention to a question that they've created themselves," he says. "It's really upsetting because we've got this brilliant vaccine that people aren't taking because of basic nonsense, and that has serious consequences. A person infected with measles is likely to infect between 15 and 20 others if they are unvaccinated. "But the MMR vaccine is a victim of its own success. Measles was a large cause of infant mortality before we had the vaccine, but now people don't remember why we tried to make vaccines against it in the first place. "So we need to educate people because they aren't aware of how dangerous it is." 1:30 'Lack of access' One children's health expert told Sky News the main issue is a lack of access. Helen Bedford, a professor of children's health at the UCL Great Ormond Street Institute, says everything from knowing how to book an appointment, to having the means to get there can be a barrier to children getting vaccinated. "People may not know when vaccines are due, how to make an appointment, then there's actually getting to the appointment," she says. "For some parents who are suffering the impact of poverty, paying a bus fare to get your child to a GP surgery may be a step too far, even though they understand vaccination is very important." A shortage of health visitors and other staff who can answer questions from vaccine-hesitant parents is also having an impact, she says. "We want parents to ask questions but unfortunately, due to lack of personnel, they can't always get answers or even an opportunity to have a discussion," she said.


Sky News
3 hours ago
- Sky News
90% of young carers could be under the radar - and missing out on vital support
Hundreds of thousands of young carers could be missing out on vital support because they are not registered with their local authority, according to new data seen by Sky News. A Freedom of Information request, carried out by the charity Action for Children and shared with Sky News, has found that 84,256 young carers are known to local authorities in England and Wales. The number is a fraction of the potential 800,000 young carers thought to be helping a loved one in England alone, according to a University of Nottingham study. It means that around 90% of young carers could be missing out on statutory help. "They don't get the time out from being a young carer, they don't get somebody to listen to - and almost, they just get forgotten," says Vicki Phillips from Action for Children. The stark findings come amid concern about extra support for young carers during the summer holidays. The FoI request - which had a response rate of 81.5% - also found that more than a fifth of councils either had no additional provision for young carers during the school break, or that the only extra provision was via services available to other children. Vicki said many young carers, aged under 18, are looking after siblings, parents, grandparents and other relatives while juggling their own lives. "When you think of that young carer is also in school 30 hours a week - is trying to do exams for example - is trying to have a social life and have friends and fit in and just do what everybody else is doing," she adds. "They really can't do that if they have 50/60 hours of caring responsibilities at home as well." Local authorities have a legal duty to assess the impact of caring on a young person, including the impact on education. But many children aren't aware that the help they give to a family member is a formal caring role. Meghan, 16, from Pembrokeshire, has looked after her 12-year-old sister Mia for years. She says: "Over time, as I got older and she got older, I started to notice more about her and how she was different from my friend's siblings and that I was looking after her more than being her sister. "I'm there as a support for her - emotional support - I think I understand her very well and I'm able to communicate with her on a different level." But it was only recently that she was identified as a young carer. "I was recognised as being a young carer for my role by one of the support workers - even before I realised I was doing anything. It was a bit shocking and a bit confusing," she adds. Being assessed and registered as a young carer unlocks a range of statutory and additional support. But that extra help is patchy across the country, with councils often reliant on grants or the charity sector to provide them. In Haverfordwest, Meghan and a dozen other young carers are meeting up at the start of the holidays for a BBQ and chat. It may only be a three-hour break, but it is a chance to get away from their responsibilities for a while. "Being able to come down here and do things like this kind of gives us that chance of a childhood that we may not have at home," said Elle, aged 15. She's here with her 13-year-old brother Charles. "I would say I feel refreshed because it gives me like a sort of restart to doing all the things I have to do at my house." In response to our story, the UK Department for Education said it urges "young carers or their families to contact their local authority for help and support". It added that the government has expanded data collection to better track how young carers are supported. It said it encourages the use of the Young Carer ID card scheme, which helps young carers to be identified, particularly within education.


Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Why thousands of people are missing out on NHS jabs for agonising shingles virus
Widespread confusion over who is eligible for the NHS shingles jab means thousands are going unprotected against the agonising infection, a survey has revealed. The poll found one in five over-65s either did not know what shingles was or were unaware the NHS offered a vaccine to prevent it. Fewer than half said they had been vaccinated, while nearly seven in ten admitted they did not understand who was eligible. More than 50,000 elderly Britons develop shingles every year, and nearly one in four of any age will have it at some point in their lives. The condition is linked to chickenpox – a highly contagious childhood illness that causes itchy, spotty rashes. While chickenpox is usually mild, the virus that causes it – varicella-zoster – lies dormant in the body and can reactivate later in life, especially as the immune system weakens with age. This can cause shingles – a painful, blistering rash that typically appears on one side of the chest or abdomen, but can strike anywhere on the body. Currently, anyone turning 65 is offered a shingles vaccine, and remain eligible until they are 80. But those who turned 65 before September 1, 2023, must wait until they are 70. 'I am not surprised by these findings at all,' said Professor Paul Hunter, an infectious disease expert at the University of East Anglia. 'A combination of confusing eligibility criteria – which even confused me, to be honest – and a lack of promotion of the vaccine campaign means that many people are going unprotected from what can be an extraordinarily painful and debilitating virus.' The jab is available privately at high street pharmacies such as Boots and Superdrug – but the two required doses cost £460 in total. 'I'm part of that group who has to wait until they turn 70 for the vaccine, and I did consider going private because of how painful shingles can be,' Professor Hunter added. 'It is a very effective and safe vaccine, and people should make sure they get it as soon as they're eligible on the NHS.' The study of more than 2,000 over-65s by GSK – the British pharmaceutical firm behind the jab – also found that most respondents wrongly believed they were still eligible for the NHS shingles vaccine after turning 80, when that is the cut-off age. A third of respondents also said they did not trust the Government for information on vaccines. Shingles is often accompanied by headaches, nausea and weeks of severe pain – and in some cases it can prove fatal. Around 50 Britons over 70 die from shingles each year. The vaccine reduces the risk of infection by 90 per cent, yet uptake has historically been low – less than half of all 71-year-olds are vaccinated. The latest figures show fewer than one in five of those who turned 65 this year have received the jab. The current two-dose vaccine, Shingrix, replaced a less effective version in September 2023. But due to high global demand, the Government opted to phase in eligibility. As reported by The Mail on Sunday, campaigners have urged ministers to end what they call 'discrimination' against the three million people aged 66 to 69 who are currently ineligible. Senior citizens group Silver Voices has called on the NHS to scrap the age restriction, warning it puts millions at unnecessary risk. One man who regrets missing out on the jab is 72-year-old Daniel Hill. While on holiday in Majorca he noticed a strange rash of blisters, about four inches wide, on his back. Concerned, but not alarmed, he visited a local clinic, where a doctor diagnosed shingles and prescribed antiviral medication. He was offered painkillers, but he declined them. But he said that moments after leaving, the pain struck 'like someone had taken an axe to my back'. The pensioner spent the rest of the trip in agony, confined to bed. 'You really don't want to get shingles,' he said. 'I wish I'd known the vaccine was available on the NHS – I was eligible but had no idea. 'It's so important to check if you qualify and, if you do, get vaccinated to avoid the terrible impact it can have.'