Carbon Credit: Graphene May Be the New ‘Super' Concrete
Can you build a house using trash? Periyar University researchers say yes. A team at the university developed a method to convert waste materials such as plastic and agricultural residue into
flash graphene
, one of the strongest materials known, using short bursts of super-heated electricity.
Just a pinch of this graphene, added to concrete, can significantly boost its strength, say the researchers. The patented Pulsed Capacitive Discharge (PCD) instrument they built generates graphene from waste in milliseconds, offering a way to tackle plastic pollution and carbon emissions from cement.
You Can Also Check:
Chennai AQI
|
Weather in Chennai
|
Bank Holidays in Chennai
|
Public Holidays in Chennai
Researchers say the PCD technique uses high-powered electric pulses to heat carbon-rich waste to over 3000 Kelvin, triggering a thermal shock that breaks down plastic and biomass molecules, rearranging their carbon atoms into graphene sheets. Plastic, which contains about 30% carbon, as well as wood chips (80%), agricultural and forest waste, can all be converted into graphene through this process.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Villas Prices In Dubai Might Be More Affordable Than You Think
Villas In Dubai | Search Ads
View Deals
Undo
"Just by adding 0.01% graphene by weight, the strength of concrete increases by 30%. This reduces cement usage, which in turn brings down CO2 emissions," says R. Ramesh, Director of the Centre for New and Renewable Energy Studies at Periyar University.
Graphene, an ultra-thin material, was discovered by Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov, who won the Nobel Prize for it in 2010. For a long time, the material was not used in mainstream applications due to cost and scalability issues. The PCD technique changes that, cutting graphene production costs by 80% to ₹40,000 per kg and consuming just 0.5 units of electricity per gram, making it scalable, energy-efficient, and sustainable.
Why does using graphene as a construction material matter? Because it is a greener alternative in the concrete industry, responsible for nearly 8% of global CO2 emissions. It reduces the need for cement and, consequently, its environmental toll. Trials with fly ash bricks and pavements are showing equally promising results.
But the innovation does not stop at construction. With its superior electrical conductivity and strength, graphene can play a key role in energy storage technologies. Flash graphene made from waste is being used to enhance batteries, including those for electric vehicles and renewable energy systems, and supercapacitors, while even offering a solution for recycling graphite from old batteries, tackling the environmental challenge of battery recycling.
Email your feedback with name and address to southpole.toi@timesofindia.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Tetrapodophis: The 120 million-year-old four-footed snake-discovery and controversy
Credit: Instagram/@ In 2015, a fossil unearthed in a German museum collection set the world abuzz. The specimen, Tetrapodophis amplectus, Latin for "four-footed snake," was hailed as the first documented four-limbed snake. If confirmed, it would be a landmark item of evolutionary history, filling in the gap between early lizards and contemporary snakes. Though the find has since been clouded with scientific controversy and legal entanglement, questioning not just evolutionary theory but ethics involved in fossil acquisition as well. ( source: Wikipedia ) A unique fossil, like no other Approximately 20 centimeters in length, Tetrapodophis's fossil contains more than 150 vertebrae, a truncated tail, and a snake-like elongated body. The novel aspects of the fossil were its minute but intact fore- and hindlimbs, both with five digits, coupled with traits such as hooked teeth, a flexible skull, and prey remains in its stomach, indicating a carnivorous diet. The fossil was published in the journal Science by Dr. David Martill and colleagues, who ruled out the possibility that it came from a marine reptile, concluding instead that it was direct evidence of how snakes evolved from burrowing lizards. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Tetrapodophis is estimated to have existed between 113 and 120 million years ago during the Early Cretaceous, according to Martill, and was probably suited to living on land. Scientific evidence suggests While the early excitement was palpable, however, most within the field of paleontology questioned the fossil's categorization. In 2016 and once more in 2021, paleontologist Dr. Michael Caldwell of the University of Alberta spearheaded the re-examination of the specimen. His research group contended that Tetrapodophis did not possess several central anatomical features common in true snakes. Among the features being questioned were the skull's structure, which did not have the movable joints and cranial kinesis characteristic of snakes; the vertebrae, which did not show the articulations characteristic of snakes and fossils; and the limb and rib morphology in general, which was similar to that of aquatic lizards called dolichosaurs. What humongous secrets science can uncover is truly fascinating. Caldwell and others suggested that the specimen had been incorrectly identified and was a member of the family Dolichosauridae, an extinct group of marine reptiles more closely related to mosasaurs than to early snakes. The scientific controversy served to illustrate a long-standing debate in paleontology: did snakes evolve from terrestrial lizards or from marine ancestors? Tetrapodophis became the center of this broader question. Legal disputes over a fossil? Know why Complicating matters was the dodgy provenance of the fossil. It was in a German private collection, but it was thought by many to have come from the Crato Formation in northeastern Brazil a place famous for its Early Cretaceous fossils. Brazil strictly prohibits the unauthorized exportation of fossils as national heritage. The release of the 2015 paper attracted severe criticism from Brazilian paleontologists and authorities, who argued that the fossil was exported illegally from the country. The controversy triggered further debate concerning the morality of fossil collection and the role of academic journals in ensuring specimens are legal. In 2024, following years of diplomatic pressure, the owners of the fossil consented to the repatriation of Tetrapodophis to Brazil. It was subsequently moved to the National Museum in Rio de Janeiro, where it will be examined further by Brazilian scientists. Update? Up to 2025, there has been no scientific agreement on Tetrapodophis's actual classification. A 2023 reclassification in the group of stem-snakes—animals that constitute a common ancestor with the contemporary snakes but belong outside the group has yet to convince most scientists, as they argue the necessity of further fossil records and adult specimens. The case of Tetrapodophis remains unresolved, not only as a paleontological puzzle but also as a case study in ethics, international law, and the evolving nature of science itself. It reminds us of the dramatic and sometimes contentious interaction between science, law, and heritage. More significantly, it reminds us of how a single fossil can disprove long-held theories, invoke global legal action, and realign the global debate on scientific accountability.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Tata Harrier EV launched with AWD, 622 km range: Prices, details
Tata Harrier EV launched with AWD, 622 km range. Tata Motors has launched the all-wheel-drive version of its flagship electric SUV , the Harrier EV, in India. Priced at Rs 28.99 lakh, ex-showroom, this top-spec variant is currently the most premium offering from the homegrown carmaker. The base RWD variant starts from Rs 21.49 lakh, ex-showroom, with introductory prices valid for a limited period. Tata Harrier EV AWD launch: All you need to know Powering the Harrier EV AWD is a 75kWh battery pack , paired with two electric motors, one on each axle. These motors generate a combined output of 313 hp and 504 Nm of torque. As for the range, the company claims up to 622 km on a single charge for the AWD variant. Meanwhile, the RWD variants with the same battery deliver a slightly higher claimed range of 627km. Tata Harrier EV Deep Dive ft. Anand Kulkarni | Battery Tech, AWD & More by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Aparat de sudură cu laser de 9000 W (4 în 1) – o revoluție în sudură! Află mai multe Undo The EV is also offered with a smaller 65kWh battery pack in lower variants, paired with a single rear motor. This version delivers 238hp and 315Nm, with a claimed range of up to 538km on a full charge. In terms of performance and capability, the Harrier EV AWD variant features a Boost Mode, Off-Road Assist, and six terrain modes:Normal, Snow/Grass, Mud-Ruts, Sand, Rock Crawl, and Custom. It also boasts safety and tech features like a 360-degree camera, transparent bonnet view, 7 airbags, Level 2 ADAS with 20+ functions, and a recently bagged 5-star BNCAP crash test rating (32/32 for adult and 45/49 for child safety). Charging options are versatile too. The Harrier EV supports 120kW DC fast charging , adding up to 250 km of range in just 15 minutes. A 20–80% top-up can be achieved in about 25 minutes. For home use, customers can opt for either 3.3 kW or 7.2 kW AC chargers. Stay tuned to TOI Auto for latest updates on the automotive sector and do follow us our social media handles on Facebook, Instagram and X. Discover everything about the automotive world at Times of India .
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Was the colour of the sky blue during the dinosaur era?
When we gaze up at the sky, it's easy to assume it's always looked blue all through the years. After all, the sky's colour is such a consistent backdrop in our daily lives. But Earth's past is full of unimaginable changes, like shifting continents, evolving life, and even an ever-moving position of our galaxy in terms of the shifting universe. But was the colour always the same shade? A NASA research scientist, Jessie Christiansen, explained that the night sky, and possibly even the daytime one, may have looked a little different during the age of dinosaurs. The reason isn't just atmospheric changes but also the solar system's journey through the Milky Way galaxy. Was the sky during the dinosaur era a different colour from today's blue? The sky we see today is blue because of Rayleigh scattering. Sunlight contains all the colours of the spectrum, but shorter wavelengths, like blue and violet, scatter more when they hit air molecules. Our eyes are more sensitive to blue than violet, which is why the sky appears blue. However, during the time of the dinosaurs, which lasted for about 250 to 65 million years ago during the Mesozoic Era, Earth's climate and atmospheric conditions were quite different. Earth was generally warmer during this era, which meant more water vapor in the air. This didn't necessarily mean more clouds, since cloud formation depends on evaporation and saturation levels, but it could have impacted how the sky appeared. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Everybody Is Switching To This Enterprise Accounting Software [Take a Look] Accounting ERP Click Here Undo This means that while the physics of Rayleigh scattering still applies, the exact appearance of the sky may have shifted due to changes in humidity, temperature, and atmospheric particles. Closer to the end of the Mesozoic, it likely resembled the nearly-clear light blue skies we know today. The night also looked different than today! The sky's appearance also changed depending on where Earth was in the Milky Way galaxy. According to NASA scientist Jessie Christiansen, when dinosaurs such as Stegosaurus and Iguanodons roamed Earth during the early Cretaceous period, "our entire solar neighborhood was on the opposite side of the Milky Way galaxy that it is now." Christiansen explained that "the dinosaurs were around for 200 million years, give or take, so the sky might have looked different early on but more like today towards the end, about 65 million years ago," as reported by CNN. It is never possible to reach the same point that the Earth travelled years ago! Apart from that, Christiansen also said that "we're back to where we were between 200 to 250 million years ago" in terms of our position within the galaxy. But because everything in the galaxy, including stars and solar systems, is constantly moving and rotating around a central black hole, she clarified that "we've never really [been] back at the same absolute point in space because it's not possible." So, was the sky a different colour back then? The answer is probably yes, at least for some time. While it may not have been of a starkly different colour but probably of a slightly different shade of blue as per some reports. While the scattering of light works the same, Earth's shifting climate, atmosphere, and cosmic position likely made the sky appear a bit different at various points in dinosaur history. Photo: Canva
