Tetrapodophis: The 120 million-year-old four-footed snake-discovery and controversy
Credit: Instagram/@rodrigo.paleontologist
In 2015, a fossil unearthed in a German museum collection set the world abuzz. The specimen, Tetrapodophis amplectus, Latin for "four-footed snake," was hailed as the first documented four-limbed snake.
If confirmed, it would be a landmark item of evolutionary history, filling in the gap between early lizards and contemporary snakes. Though the find has since been clouded with scientific controversy and legal entanglement, questioning not just evolutionary theory but ethics involved in fossil acquisition as well. (
source: Wikipedia
)
A unique fossil, like no other
Approximately 20 centimeters in length, Tetrapodophis's fossil contains more than 150 vertebrae, a truncated tail, and a snake-like elongated body.
The novel aspects of the fossil were its minute but intact fore- and hindlimbs, both with five digits, coupled with traits such as hooked teeth, a flexible skull, and prey remains in its stomach, indicating a carnivorous diet.
The fossil was published in the journal Science by Dr. David Martill and colleagues, who ruled out the possibility that it came from a marine reptile, concluding instead that it was direct evidence of how snakes evolved from burrowing lizards.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025
Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List
Undo
Tetrapodophis is estimated to have existed between 113 and 120 million years ago during the Early Cretaceous, according to Martill, and was probably suited to living on land.
Scientific evidence suggests
While the early excitement was palpable, however, most within the field of paleontology questioned the fossil's categorization. In 2016 and once more in 2021, paleontologist Dr. Michael Caldwell of the University of Alberta spearheaded the re-examination of the specimen.
His research group contended that Tetrapodophis did not possess several central anatomical features common in true snakes.
Among the features being questioned were the skull's structure, which did not have the movable joints and cranial kinesis characteristic of snakes; the vertebrae, which did not show the articulations characteristic of snakes and fossils; and the limb and rib morphology in general, which was similar to that of aquatic lizards called dolichosaurs.
What humongous secrets science can uncover is truly fascinating.
Caldwell and others suggested that the specimen had been incorrectly identified and was a member of the family Dolichosauridae, an extinct group of marine reptiles more closely related to mosasaurs than to early snakes.
The scientific controversy served to illustrate a long-standing debate in paleontology: did snakes evolve from terrestrial lizards or from marine ancestors? Tetrapodophis became the center of this broader question.
Legal disputes over a fossil? Know why
Complicating matters was the dodgy provenance of the fossil. It was in a German private collection, but it was thought by many to have come from the Crato Formation in northeastern Brazil a place famous for its Early Cretaceous fossils.
Brazil strictly prohibits the unauthorized exportation of fossils as national heritage. The release of the 2015 paper attracted severe criticism from Brazilian paleontologists and authorities, who argued that the fossil was exported illegally from the country.
The controversy triggered further debate concerning the morality of fossil collection and the role of academic journals in ensuring specimens are legal.
In 2024, following years of diplomatic pressure, the owners of the fossil consented to the repatriation of Tetrapodophis to Brazil. It was subsequently moved to the National Museum in Rio de Janeiro, where it will be examined further by Brazilian scientists.
Update?
Up to 2025, there has been no scientific agreement on Tetrapodophis's actual classification.
A 2023 reclassification in the group of stem-snakes—animals that constitute a common ancestor with the contemporary snakes but belong outside the group has yet to convince most scientists, as they argue the necessity of further fossil records and adult specimens.
The case of Tetrapodophis remains unresolved, not only as a paleontological puzzle but also as a case study in ethics, international law, and the evolving nature of science itself.
It reminds us of the dramatic and sometimes contentious interaction between science, law, and heritage. More significantly, it reminds us of how a single fossil can disprove long-held theories, invoke global legal action, and realign the global debate on scientific accountability.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Drinking diet soda? Here's how it sabotages weight loss
A recent study from USC's Keck School of Medicine reveals that diet sodas, particularly those with sucralose, may increase food cravings and appetite, especially in women and obese individuals. Researchers found that artificial sweeteners can trigger brain activity linked to cravings and reduce hormones that signal fullness. People nowadays are obsessed with diet soda, due to its promise of zero sugar and zero calories. It almost looks like a guilt-free beverage, especially for those trying to lose weight. But diet drinks might not be the sweet spot. Switching to diet soda may leave more than just a synthetic aftertaste. A new study found that drinking diet soda may sabotage your weight loss journey. Researchers from the Keck School of Medicine of USC found that diet sodas may increase food cravings and appetite, especially in women and people who are obese. The study is published in JAMA Network Open . The culprit in diet soda The researchers found that drinks that contain the artificial sweetener sucralose are linked to increased food cravings. This was one of the largest studies to examine the effects of an artificial sweetener, also called a nonnutritive sweetener (NNS), on brain activity and appetite responses in different segments of the population. Over 40 percent of adults in the US currently use NNSs to satisfy their sweet tooth. Many consider it a calorie-free way to accomplish weight loss goals. 'There is controversy surrounding the use of artificial sweeteners because a lot of people are using them for weight loss. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Top Public Speaking Course for Children Planet Spark Book Now Undo While some studies suggest they may be helpful, others show they may be contributing to weight gain, type 2 diabetes, and other metabolic disorders. Our study looked at different population groups to tease out some of the reasons behind those conflicting results,' Kathleen Page, MD, corresponding author and an associate professor of medicine at the Keck School of Medicine, said in a statement. The study To understand the effects of artificial sweeteners on health, the researchers studied 74 participants. The participants were divided based on gender and categorized as healthy weight, overweight or obese, over three separate sessions. During each visit, the participants consumed 300 milliliters of either a drink sweetened with table sugar (sucrose), a sucralose-sweetened drink, or water. The researchers used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure three things: activation of regions of the brain responsible for appetite and food cravings in response to pictures of high-calorie foods such as a burger and donut, and glucose (blood sugar), insulin, and other metabolic hormones in the blood. Artificial sweeteners were linked to more cravings The researchers found increased activity in regions of the brain responsible for food cravings and appetite in both women and obese people after they consumed sucralose-containing drinks, when compared to those who drank real sugar drinks. The levels found that after drinking the zero-calorie artificially sweetened drinks, the participants had lower levels of hormones that signal fullness, compared to when they drank the sugar-sweetened drink. This suggests that diet drinks may not really help curb hunger. They also found that female participants who drank artificial sweetener drinks snacked more, whereas snack food intake did not differ for male participants. Shreyas Iyer and Ibrahim Ali Khan's Nutritionist Nicole Kedia Breaks Down Their Diet SECRETS 'Our study starts to provide context for the mixed results from previous studies when it comes to the neural and behavioral effects of artificial sweeteners. By studying different groups, we were able to show that females and people with obesity may be more sensitive to artificial sweeteners. For these groups, drinking artificially sweetened drinks may trick the brain into feeling hungry, which may in turn result in more calories being consumed,' Page said. So, if you enjoy drinking diet sodas, thinking it may help you with weight loss, think again.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Tetrapodophis: The 120 million-year-old four-footed snake-discovery and controversy
Credit: Instagram/@ In 2015, a fossil unearthed in a German museum collection set the world abuzz. The specimen, Tetrapodophis amplectus, Latin for "four-footed snake," was hailed as the first documented four-limbed snake. If confirmed, it would be a landmark item of evolutionary history, filling in the gap between early lizards and contemporary snakes. Though the find has since been clouded with scientific controversy and legal entanglement, questioning not just evolutionary theory but ethics involved in fossil acquisition as well. ( source: Wikipedia ) A unique fossil, like no other Approximately 20 centimeters in length, Tetrapodophis's fossil contains more than 150 vertebrae, a truncated tail, and a snake-like elongated body. The novel aspects of the fossil were its minute but intact fore- and hindlimbs, both with five digits, coupled with traits such as hooked teeth, a flexible skull, and prey remains in its stomach, indicating a carnivorous diet. The fossil was published in the journal Science by Dr. David Martill and colleagues, who ruled out the possibility that it came from a marine reptile, concluding instead that it was direct evidence of how snakes evolved from burrowing lizards. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Tetrapodophis is estimated to have existed between 113 and 120 million years ago during the Early Cretaceous, according to Martill, and was probably suited to living on land. Scientific evidence suggests While the early excitement was palpable, however, most within the field of paleontology questioned the fossil's categorization. In 2016 and once more in 2021, paleontologist Dr. Michael Caldwell of the University of Alberta spearheaded the re-examination of the specimen. His research group contended that Tetrapodophis did not possess several central anatomical features common in true snakes. Among the features being questioned were the skull's structure, which did not have the movable joints and cranial kinesis characteristic of snakes; the vertebrae, which did not show the articulations characteristic of snakes and fossils; and the limb and rib morphology in general, which was similar to that of aquatic lizards called dolichosaurs. What humongous secrets science can uncover is truly fascinating. Caldwell and others suggested that the specimen had been incorrectly identified and was a member of the family Dolichosauridae, an extinct group of marine reptiles more closely related to mosasaurs than to early snakes. The scientific controversy served to illustrate a long-standing debate in paleontology: did snakes evolve from terrestrial lizards or from marine ancestors? Tetrapodophis became the center of this broader question. Legal disputes over a fossil? Know why Complicating matters was the dodgy provenance of the fossil. It was in a German private collection, but it was thought by many to have come from the Crato Formation in northeastern Brazil a place famous for its Early Cretaceous fossils. Brazil strictly prohibits the unauthorized exportation of fossils as national heritage. The release of the 2015 paper attracted severe criticism from Brazilian paleontologists and authorities, who argued that the fossil was exported illegally from the country. The controversy triggered further debate concerning the morality of fossil collection and the role of academic journals in ensuring specimens are legal. In 2024, following years of diplomatic pressure, the owners of the fossil consented to the repatriation of Tetrapodophis to Brazil. It was subsequently moved to the National Museum in Rio de Janeiro, where it will be examined further by Brazilian scientists. Update? Up to 2025, there has been no scientific agreement on Tetrapodophis's actual classification. A 2023 reclassification in the group of stem-snakes—animals that constitute a common ancestor with the contemporary snakes but belong outside the group has yet to convince most scientists, as they argue the necessity of further fossil records and adult specimens. The case of Tetrapodophis remains unresolved, not only as a paleontological puzzle but also as a case study in ethics, international law, and the evolving nature of science itself. It reminds us of the dramatic and sometimes contentious interaction between science, law, and heritage. More significantly, it reminds us of how a single fossil can disprove long-held theories, invoke global legal action, and realign the global debate on scientific accountability.
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Was the colour of the sky blue during the dinosaur era?
When we gaze up at the sky, it's easy to assume it's always looked blue all through the years. After all, the sky's colour is such a consistent backdrop in our daily lives. But Earth's past is full of unimaginable changes, like shifting continents, evolving life, and even an ever-moving position of our galaxy in terms of the shifting universe. But was the colour always the same shade? A NASA research scientist, Jessie Christiansen, explained that the night sky, and possibly even the daytime one, may have looked a little different during the age of dinosaurs. The reason isn't just atmospheric changes but also the solar system's journey through the Milky Way galaxy. Was the sky during the dinosaur era a different colour from today's blue? The sky we see today is blue because of Rayleigh scattering. Sunlight contains all the colours of the spectrum, but shorter wavelengths, like blue and violet, scatter more when they hit air molecules. Our eyes are more sensitive to blue than violet, which is why the sky appears blue. However, during the time of the dinosaurs, which lasted for about 250 to 65 million years ago during the Mesozoic Era, Earth's climate and atmospheric conditions were quite different. Earth was generally warmer during this era, which meant more water vapor in the air. This didn't necessarily mean more clouds, since cloud formation depends on evaporation and saturation levels, but it could have impacted how the sky appeared. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Everybody Is Switching To This Enterprise Accounting Software [Take a Look] Accounting ERP Click Here Undo This means that while the physics of Rayleigh scattering still applies, the exact appearance of the sky may have shifted due to changes in humidity, temperature, and atmospheric particles. Closer to the end of the Mesozoic, it likely resembled the nearly-clear light blue skies we know today. The night also looked different than today! The sky's appearance also changed depending on where Earth was in the Milky Way galaxy. According to NASA scientist Jessie Christiansen, when dinosaurs such as Stegosaurus and Iguanodons roamed Earth during the early Cretaceous period, "our entire solar neighborhood was on the opposite side of the Milky Way galaxy that it is now." Christiansen explained that "the dinosaurs were around for 200 million years, give or take, so the sky might have looked different early on but more like today towards the end, about 65 million years ago," as reported by CNN. It is never possible to reach the same point that the Earth travelled years ago! Apart from that, Christiansen also said that "we're back to where we were between 200 to 250 million years ago" in terms of our position within the galaxy. But because everything in the galaxy, including stars and solar systems, is constantly moving and rotating around a central black hole, she clarified that "we've never really [been] back at the same absolute point in space because it's not possible." So, was the sky a different colour back then? The answer is probably yes, at least for some time. While it may not have been of a starkly different colour but probably of a slightly different shade of blue as per some reports. While the scattering of light works the same, Earth's shifting climate, atmosphere, and cosmic position likely made the sky appear a bit different at various points in dinosaur history. Photo: Canva
